{"id":242642,"date":"2008-03-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008"},"modified":"2016-05-11T14:46:37","modified_gmt":"2016-05-11T09:16:37","slug":"the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Mahaffozur Rahaman on 13 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Mahaffozur Rahaman on 13 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n
BETWEEE\n\nTH\n\n=--.A..'r.A.zr...,A\n\num uorrnnn MR. auasmcn:  mm:   .\n\nnu-.5. no. 503669\n\n\ufb02lilf\n\nM,__..._-F-'--L4\u00a72ta2_<;Ia.._N..._7%1_#i22m% \n\nE MANAg:::4:::\u00a7I_)11'\u00e9Ec1'0ia \n\nHEAD O_Fi'~"IC3Ei1,(3ENTRAL,0Fi-'RUE. .\nHRH RDA , 3\u00a5"1NG\u00a3!.OR.E.1" " '- \n\nmm? BY.  \n\nCa.) \n\nV(')FEivQEE\u00a7\n\n i<'ESFON'DENT\n(IN MI'-'A.CROB 81\/06)\n\n  T*.flAHFu'\ufb01F(}ZUR RAHAMAN\nS\ufb010LATE A.S. MOI-IAMMED YOUSUFF\n 'S-TYEARS, R] 0 SUBHASHWAGAR,\n}_BlLAGOLE, MUDIGERE\n\nH RAH.A_M__'I'H KUBRA DEAD\nFARZA A MUSHTAR\nD10 MAHAFFOZUR RAHAMAN\nAGED ABGUT -'23 YEARS\nRIO SUBHASHNAGAR, A\nBILAGOLA, MUWGERE, \n\n   \n\n\n\nta}\n\n4 FARIDA NAUSHEER\nD [O MAHAFFGZUR RAHAMEN\nAGED ABOUT '26 YEARS   A\n12\/0 SUBHASHNAGAR,\nBILAGOLA, MUDIGERE\n\n(II\n\n'J'AlA',<'.'.'[-II-i",Xa",\n\nFAKE .,,.........,...  \nS10 MAHAFFOZUR RAHAMAN\nAGED ABOUT E5 ':'EARS.   \nRIO suEHAsE1~mGA.R,  I  ~  \nBILAGOLA,      _\n\n' A   '   .  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
_  _ -..;_C\u00a7ROSS-OBJECFORS
\n    v   MF’A.CROB81_I06)
\n(RESPONI3ENT’S,.3 ‘ro;5k_ AREEROSS
\naw v  ‘PD-4  IE5′)<\/p>\n
(By     E1 65 3-5 1<\/p>\n
W313 MEE’jDAFIELEDE~EEiIis 173(1) OF’ MW ACT’ AGAINST’
\nTHE au–DEME’Ej_r AND AWARD DATED: 5.3.2005 PASSED IN
\nMVC NC)’;347[  on THE FILE 01? THE CIVIL JUDGE
\n{s;{E;DN,)   CHIKMAGALUR, AWARDING<\/p>\n
 -t.::D1\u00bb:EENsATIoN——~EE Rs.2,72,ooo\/- WITH INTEREST AT 6%
\n, =._P.A. ‘ ,AED\u00ab.._ DIRECTEE-3-. THE APPELLANT  To
\n TDEPQSITTHE SAME.\n<\/p>\n
T.i7Ii_$7’IIdFA.CROB IN MFA 5030\/05 FILED UIORDER<\/p>\n
4.1 FIULE’ 22 OF’ CFC, AGAIN’3’I’ ‘T’I-IE JUDGMENT’ AND<\/p>\n
AWARD DATED 513\/2005 PASSED IN MVC NO.347I 1999<\/p>\n
_ [ON ‘THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) & MEMBER,
\n* V , CHIKMAGALUR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
\n‘ = –PE.”I’I’I’lON FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING<\/p>\n
} ENHAN{‘.-EI’v’IEN’P F COMPF-.NSAT.ON.<\/p>\n
‘THIS APPEAL ALONG WITH CRGSS G%EwIGN,
\nCOMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THE CROUIRT
\nDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:\n<\/p>\n
aunensnr<\/p>\n
The Managm g Director of \u00bbi\u00ab:sR’rc;,J ” ‘se\u00e9z;-ggz\u00e9ta .13;  _ <\/p>\n
judgment and award dated 5-3-\u00a7\u20ac)0″$’_A_’h1’tvM’.V. <\/p>\n
of the Motor Accident Clannsfzjbunsl :(1ex_shc19t1._fiu1A(Ii”), dues’<\/p>\n
pmferred this appeal,  _*Re’spcmdcntsV_ 1} to 5, the
\n before  **:e,e’:z:=.-3. cm-ss c_.j-..1.i\u00a2;m_.,<\/p>\n
for enhancement of campensstien.<\/p>\n
No.KA-1&?.]’M-S4~14′._succumbed to fatal “-“jtn-“‘s. The<\/p>\n
 it ‘ci”-.._t.l_1e deceased namely the parents, two<\/p>\n
‘  sisters and a brother in his teens claimed<\/p>\n
”   of Rs. 18,00.000\/- by invoking Section 166 of<\/p>\n
the  Vehicles Act, 1988, arraigning the appellant as<\/p>\n
n ‘ L-puartj?–Respondent No.2 who entered appearance. and<\/p>\n
 resisted the claim by \ufb01ling statement of objections. The<\/p>\n
l’.”.AL ‘1’, in the 3,21!-,z.===.ise …f the ple.sdi_ngs of parties, framed<\/p>\n
issues, ieccf\ufb01ed the iie;’n”\u00bbsi’\u00aer. cf E I.-.’it.=1.esses \u00a39. <\/p>\n
(<\/p>\n
cxainiunus, marked \ufb01ve dwuzz-..en*.e as uxhzhzte .?-..1~- tn P-A,
\nwhile for the Iespondents. the depositicne   ckij.-“er.<\/p>\n
The mar, having regard to the ‘ gm. : the *<\/p>\n
evidence both oral and dccun1ent:’aL1jV_3’r’,” _ <\/p>\n
negligence to the driver of bne  to tlzge appellant
\nand awarded Rs.2,7ft2!_;t3!)0  atvt3′}’tt- per annum
\nas compensation by  and award.\n<\/p>\n
   h-“wing re”ard .. t..e Wylie-e<\/p>\n
mote. ‘cement. Exhibit P-1, the police notice<\/p>\n
EVxl;u1″bitt’P-2′  the oral testimony of the eye<\/p>\n
 nnxne-hiubarak examined as PW-2, an occupant<\/p>\n
V  cfeA;Eat.the time of accident, whose cross examination<\/p>\n
.’ A V  any incriminating statement so as to disbelieve .<\/p>\n
the Veafictence, while not accepting the oral testimony of RW1<\/p>\n
AA ‘tin-;:.2r.>111.e1.i. a \u00a3n1_-_i_ng of ne\ufb01ence on the part of the driver of<\/p>\n
th” has belcn\ufb01g m the apm!1…..-i Ne e.–_.pi_;i_n  -be<\/p>\n
4. Learned counsel for the appellant   ”<\/p>\n
MACT was not just1\ufb01ed’ in reckoning  ‘ f <\/p>\n
as the income of the deceased <\/p>\n
income towards persona1″e\u00a7cpenses,’-   ios of<\/p>\n
dependency.\n<\/p>\n
5. Per contra,   cross-objectors
\ncontends   in reckoning
\nRs.3,000;r;   dncome but ought to have
\n the light of the evidence<\/p>\n
of the emp1\u00a2)\u00a7rei\u20ac”‘!flnssain_ exn..__min..ed as PW-3 an.<\/p>\n
 and  counsel hastens to add that the award<\/p>\n
 ~_  of Rs.3,000\/– towaxds loss of love and<\/p>\n
ahffectiondnlder the conventional head is mise\ufb02y, while not<\/p>\n
 A.  compensation for loss to estate amounts to denial<\/p>\n
A’ neendddrjdsdee. Lastly it is contended that the deduction of yard<\/p>\n
 of the income towards yersonal expenses was justi\ufb01ed since<\/p>\n
the deceased left behind 1.a__ ag__ fat…..r, a methe. who dim.<\/p>\n
C3′:\n<\/p>\n
fact that Mudigele Town, not   ”<\/p>\n
facilities there was no    <\/p>\n
huge amounts towards his  expe <\/p>\n
u*.x ‘___.:l<\/p>\n
6. It is no donbte’tr’uef’;’t’i\u00e9t1at”‘? so cianueu to ‘o<\/p>\n
e the
\nowner-cumfd_i:’iver ofi   that the deceased
\nearned   _–J.   as a driver of the
\n    say of PW-3, no
\n the income of the deceased was
\n  to establish that PW3 was the<\/p>\n
Vofkneir of a  tiiax when entrusted to the deceased to be<\/p>\n
A \u00bb_used on “hire es-….ed. Rs;-300 — t- Rs,4(_)0[- per day is not<\/p>\n
In u: t ‘vie”‘ ‘1’ ll: us… .he e’..’i..er-.w of PW3<\/p>\n
‘is not” eeiiable, is not ieliabie as it is not in the direction of<\/p>\n
 _ _estabi’ishing the income of Rs.7,000\/- per month the<\/p>\n
‘  In my opinion, the MACI’ was fully justified in<\/p>\n
reckoning Rs.3,000\/- per month as the income of the<\/p>\n
deceased. This Court; in BMT. GULLAHMA 6 AND’?-{ER<\/p>\n
WK<\/p>\n
-z<\/p>\n
v-‘ .w.-“‘.’ W cII-Ii’I’ . CCTQC .  ” V ”\n<\/p>\n
-4 r—- A ____ _ _-_…. _-…:_ –…………. :_; v. ….Q …..;….
\nif” ” 111 the ‘ st: of uummimd pcztsuun-*’1__ ~,1 ‘ rs,<\/p>\n
instead of 50%. This Court held:;that..infjv1espeet~oi’Baeheloirs ‘<\/p>\n
living in cities where thereeaafe many diversiysiis.  s\ufb01endiligs,<\/p>\n
money but not so in a  tshexe the
\nopportunity of spendiiig. mo_;iie$r  ‘be  much less,
\nconsidered deduc\ufb01onnfv expenses as
\nappmpxriate;   w.te_\u00a3ia1i)ply the very same
\nM ii i 1 V i  _e ___s_ sopriately in the
\n‘l”‘ow1i3nti1eI*e  iiaciiiizies are not  to ‘ ose
\nin huge {ri\ufb02es  Admittedly, the deceased left<\/p>\n
   vtsther and two unmarried sisters and being<\/p>\n
i  the ‘e.1d’cs’t.  in the family, shouldered the burden of not<\/p>\n
i’ . hdnly  the family but also to ensure the marriage<\/p>\n
  iyeunge-r sisters. In the that situation, there was<\/p>\n
it jziustjiication for the MAC!’ to have deducted 1\/3″‘ of the<\/p>\n
inc-“cine of the dz-,…..aw.. t.t:n.=-.rs.:rd.s persnn..1 exnmsex instead<\/p>\n
..—-.–. _r_*—- —-; -_..—<\/p>\n
23 Ni\n<\/p>\n
– H—–~——1-~~ –~\u00bb\u00ab—— , J) \\<\/p>\n
‘”1L1i2ooc1<AR:1\u00a7a<\/p>\n
material to establish the ag* 'f th" father.a:–o \u00aeV'…'..1e date <\/p>\n
of accident and death. NeifeIti,jue'1ejoo;–t_  15..-15,___+I"i_y '<\/p>\n
guesswork, assumed the age of the"father of  as<\/p>\n
55 to apply multiplier 1 1.   not<\/p>\n
call for interference.'   .,<\/p>\n
3. ‘l’he_MA_Cl’,  towards loss of
\nlove .  This Court
\nhas_    that awald under the
\noonventiuitallltkteiad\ufb01bld\ufb02lli\ufb01og pot be a taken but Ietlect time,<\/p>\n
space,  cost of living, etc. In my opinion<\/p>\n
 in  and circumstances of this case, award of<\/p>\n
‘A ‘ . 3 to-.-.r……s 1.5-. ,f __\\.re and affection cannot but be<\/p>\n
 io._’ne.ju.-at “*6 reasombk ….””d is uwwm’-zdingly at.n.n.=-_n_1.ed.<\/p>\n
it ..   ‘The MACT did not award compensation towards loss<\/p>\n
it ll 1;.’ eatate, a permissible head of damage. The appellants are<\/p>\n
ammm,\u00bb a=.-am.-:4. 1o,ooo:- under the said head of<\/p>\n
‘ff<\/p>\n
datnage. ‘ MK<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
10. In the result; the appeal \ufb01led  <\/p>\n
dismiaaed -.-.’._….’~”- the \u00a333-\u20ac.i1.|}31.’At’|’.l:.i1.1!’_l am   <\/p>\n
the ilnpugiied j”d–*”1*:t —-.1 a-.1-1331*. is  the 5<\/p>\n
claimant–dependants to     ii\u00bbf<\/p>\n
Rs.27.000\/ — with interest at’   sdate bi”\n<\/p>\n
petition and in all amr    The
\nRegistry is directed   the statutory
\ndeposit in LCRS to the MAC!’<\/p>\n
ooncern\u00e9d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Mahaffozur Rahaman on 13 March, 2008 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy BETWEEE TH =–.A..’r.A.zr…,A um uorrnnn MR. auasmcn: mm: . nu-.5. no. 503669 \ufb02lilf M,__…_-F-‘–L4\u00a72ta2_<;Ia.._N…_7%1_#i22m% E MANAg:::4:::\u00a7I_)11'\u00e9Ec1'0ia HEAD O_Fi'~"IC3Ei1,(3ENTRAL,0Fi-'RUE. . HRH RDA , 3\u00a5"1NG\u00a3!.OR.E.1" " '- mm? BY. Ca.) V(')FEivQEE\u00a7 i<'ESFON'DENT (IN MI'-'A.CROB 81\/06) T*.flAHFu'\ufb01F(}ZUR RAHAMAN S\ufb010LATE A.S. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-242642","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Managing Director Ksrtc vs Mahaffozur Rahaman on 13 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Mahaffozur Rahaman on 13 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-11T09:16:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Mahaffozur Rahaman on 13 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-11T09:16:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1154,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008\",\"name\":\"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Mahaffozur Rahaman on 13 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-11T09:16:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Mahaffozur Rahaman on 13 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Mahaffozur Rahaman on 13 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Mahaffozur Rahaman on 13 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-11T09:16:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Mahaffozur Rahaman on 13 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-11T09:16:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008"},"wordCount":1154,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008","name":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Mahaffozur Rahaman on 13 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-11T09:16:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-ksrtc-vs-mahaffozur-rahaman-on-13-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Managing Director Ksrtc vs Mahaffozur Rahaman on 13 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242642","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242642"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242642\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242642"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242642"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242642"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}