{"id":242696,"date":"2010-11-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010"},"modified":"2017-12-16T12:36:34","modified_gmt":"2017-12-16T07:06:34","slug":"the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"The Karantaka Jain Association … vs Sri Naveen Kumar on 11 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Karantaka Jain Association … vs Sri Naveen Kumar on 11 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
W 1 W\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 1 1\"' DAY OF NOVEMBER. 2010\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.-JUSTICE 13.5. 1=A.'\ufb02L 4.11:':  \u00b0\" A\n\nWP Nos.24686-687\/20,09.[GM+OI5'C}*:'.';\u00bb   \n\nBETWEEN :\n\n1.\n\nThe Karnataka Jain Ass0cia'\ufb01_0i*:._[Regd~;],\nNo.81, K.R.Road. Shankarap1ira,\"A\u00bb \nBar1ga10re--56O O04.   A\nRepresented by its Se\u00e9r'etary\u00ab;'A O'  ;\n\n[Sri T.G.D0ddan1ani]. \n\nMothikhane Thimmappaiahi; ' _\n\nJain Vidi'1yari1':'%.._Ni\u00a7ay2:_,       _\nReplay E11e_P1jesif_dent.0f\u00abthe_ Karimtaka \nJain AsscJ{?iaLiCr1;\"'N'0.8Ig[jK.R..RQad_.  A\nShanka1*aI3'111*21.1'V,;.   \u00ab.  5.\n\nBang.a:o're\u00bb5\u00a75;o oii\u00a74A;- \" PETITIONERS\n\n(By Sri     \n\nAND:\n\nS_1\"i '3.\\IaVee.;'1 Kurflar, ____ H x\n\n'Aged  years.\n\n' _R'esiid--1'nVg~Az'rt_N0._.353wA.\n\n1&1 c;.o'ss,. \"l?=i'e~S1}.age, 2nd Phase,\n\n'--Gc-kul E;:{E'.eriSi011,\n\nB:.mga;3.u:~g~v;4j56o 054.\n\nSri I~\u00a7.vSJ.O:i\\\/1ada11akesari.\n\n \"Aged about 70 years.\n\" _ 'Residing 211. No.23.\n \"Raitnaix-aya\" Model House,\n\n4\" Street. Basavanagudi,\n\n\"OB;-mga10re--56O O54.\n\n\n\n3. Dr.M.S.A.nantharaju,\nAged about 71 years.\nResiding at No.29?\/A,\n15? Main Road, 8%\" Block,\nJayanagzti', BangaIore~560 082.\n\n4. Sri T.S.Azianthapadmanabaiah,\nAged about 73 years.\nResiding at No.l033, 27$ Main,\n71\" Block. Jayanaggar, '   \nB2mgalore--560 069.\n\n5. Sri H.S.Sampath Kumar,\nAged about 54 years,\nResiding at No.301(2l},\n3\"\" Cross. N.R.Colony,A_..  _   \nBa1'igalo1'e-560 019. '  ._ f   ;RESPONI)ENTS\n\n(By Sri R.S.Ravi. Adv.)\n\nThese writ.\"'-petitions=afe filed uhder Articles 226 and 227\nof the Cor1s\"\u00a3ii:.-utioii at ind'iaA\"prayi\ufb01g\"to set aside the order dated\n12.3.2009 ;)assedsob_y\"'wthetV I-Io_n--'b1e Prl.City Civil and Sessions\nCourt. ir1\"Q.E},_No.703l3t\u00ab,\/07_.o11ll.A.No.Il at AnI1exure--A and etc.\n\n'l'hesel'petition-s 0c.\u00a7ln1..u7jg on for Preliminary Hearing-'B'\n\nGroup this day, the Court made the following-\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
1. 0 A .._4’l(C)rde:tlt*l’a,te.cl 12.03.2009 passed by the Principal City Civil<\/p>\n
 “and sess;__\u00a2m5 Judge, Bangalore, allowing I.A.No.XI filed by the<\/p>\n
 seeking amendment of the plaint is challenged in this<\/p>\n
  petition. By the amendment ordered, the Court below has<\/p>\n
_. 3 _.\n<\/p>\n
permitted the plaintiffs to add paragraph–22(a) to the plaint<\/p>\n
and also to make certain amendments to the prayer column.<\/p>\n
2. The main contention of the counsel for the p_etit1’oner’sis<\/p>\n
that by amending the plaint the plaintiff is   <\/p>\n
prayer for appointment of a new t:iist’ee. in.’ resp_e’ct_ of the ‘gnu: j<\/p>\n
petitioner–Trust which was not made   and, in”\n<\/p>\n
whereof no relief was sought \\xzhil_e \ufb01ling  seeking<\/p>\n
leave to file the suit. It is hisrl-c*o-ntention thlat”the~’application
\nitself was not maintainabhle”asl._thg\u00e9 pflavimiiifs have to proceed
\nagainst the 2″” pet’ii.ioner3l’riJst V-afresh petition seeking
\nleave and oriijf aft:e.r’;’._leai(e_s__is..grantedgthe proceedings against
\nthe Zed”‘pe”i.ii;:ioi1f1er:ttiist”can l)e”‘pnrsued. It is his further<\/p>\n
contention. “ma:  petitioner–trust is impleaded as<\/p>\n
a partyllhv res’pond.e’ntdJ’ in the proceedings in
\n _Misg:\u00a7\u00a7l?eti_tios3_.17E\u00a7}”2Ci(}5vfi1ed by the plaintiffs seeking leave to<\/p>\n
 filveihce  suit, the said application was allowed by the<\/p>\n
com;be1c\u00a7x;ei’j::nA’:he miscellaneous proceedings by observing that<\/p>\n
‘V the el:\u00a7:i.ste.1:V1c.e”or nonexistence of the 21″‘ petitionectriist will be<\/p>\n
  “:mat.ter”i1’i respect whereof the parties could lead evidence. it<\/p>\n
  to be noticed that after the suit was registered, an<\/p>\n
” ‘applicatio11 was filed seeking to implead the Zed petitioner–Trust<\/p>\n
it as defendant No.14. The said application has been allowed.<\/p>\n
3. Learnecf counsel for the petitioners referring to the order
\npassed on 02.09.2008 submits that the question  the<\/p>\n
2″‘ petitiorier-trust was in existence is a matter-.i1;.__resp’ect<\/p>\n
whereof the parties could lead evidence. In  <\/p>\n
also confirriied the order passed sul::;set1ue’11\u00abtl’y_jon;’   if<\/p>\n
VV.P.E\\los. 16574 & l6575\/20O8. making clearblat ‘Apa;-agr\u00e9phl.’-5<\/p>\n
that the {\u00a7i.it?Stl’OI1 whether theit-eilruras anyp   called
\nlvfothikhanc ‘I”himmappaia_h Jain”tfidhjf\/airthilfNil’a3?a could be
\nagitated at an appropriate   be for the Trial
\nCourt to l’1’a1nf:’  the same. In the
\nbackgroun<fg'ol v"f3"tlv.:\u00bbpetitioner– trust is already<\/p>\n
iII1plE"\u00a31(_l.'f3til"Nils. question is whether the
\npresent;aii\u00e9"cnciir1eiit" by the Trial Court suffers from<\/p>\n
any aplriai-vii:.iiiiegali_ty'or'error of jurisdiction so as to warrant<\/p>\n
 c_vinte}"f'e1*en\u00e9ta':by l"llZ\u00a7Sv…C.Qi_11'f in exercise of the writ jurisdiction.<\/p>\n
AEViV'(f.\u00e9:lVl'1 –.l_;'=.j~a  from the impugned order, particularly the<\/p>\n
obseri;r'at'4_iiS1isp:giiade in paragraph–l 1, the Court below has noted<\/p>\n
j that ting-2 }:'\u00a7aii"i1ii"i" A respondents herein have stated in the plaint<\/p>\n
 'p–a-._i}'2igli";1pi'1+3(b) that the free residential accommodation<\/p>\n
prtotrlitleci was at the Mothikhane Thimmappaiah Jain<\/p>\n
 .Vl'dl.']}'\u00a3ll.'ll'li Nilaya which is referred as Jain Hostel and is<\/p>\n
A ChaI'\u00e9-1(".l(?I'\u00a7':<i'.(Il as a charitable trust established for the benefit of<\/p>\n
Jr<\/p>\n
imp211't:ing_g education to jain students coming from rural areas.
\nApart from the same. as rightly observed by the Trial Court, the<\/p>\n
plaim.il"i"s have described in their affidavit filed <\/p>\n
plaintiff, the name of Mothikhane Thimmappaiiahl' <\/p>\n
Vidhya.rth\u00e9 Nilaya stating it as M.T.Jajn   <\/p>\n
Motl1i.khai1'1c;: Thimmappaiah Jairiz\ufb01
\nl\\\/i.'I'.dai11 l-.:ioa1*ding Home. etc.'lll__V"'~~ it   l M if\n<\/p>\n
4. It is not in dispute  the sole
\ntrustee and  also in sole  hostel. It is also
\nnot in dispute tliai. the proplertylin.l:respectTtyhereof the scheme
\nsuit is fi.1ed  the 3″‘ defendant +
\nSociety?” llll ‘go-i  2″5_”V’petitioner as an additional<\/p>\n
Cl\u20acf\u20acIlClEfill’i’l.’ xjidthe amendment of the plaint that is<\/p>\n
sought to !-_.>c=_ri1ade d_oe’s_ notllintroduce any new cause of action,<\/p>\n
 nor _”(.l’3Qc$__ E r ii-iiroduc.e…altogether a new party in the array of<\/p>\n
p3ifL’i:’>s “\u00a3,(_:’iH4;.\u00a7:i\u20ac’_ l’su’it. The dispute remains the same and the<\/p>\n
essence of dfir\u00e9 griexrzince made by the plaintiffs continues to be<\/p>\n
‘V the s;}:n;\u00a2=1’- .:;sli’lhc 2*” petitioner~trust, according to the plaintiffs,<\/p>\n
“am; (_’lt’s4c’1’%l)eCl by styling it as Mothikhane Thimmappaiah<\/p>\n
— Jain’Vticlitiy:;i.:’i..i’ii Nilaya and by other names and as the presence<\/p>\n
 ofltiw irusi had become necessary such an application was<\/p>\n
A made for izimlezaciing and subsequently by carrying out<\/p>\n
2%”\n<\/p>\n
n 6 1:\n<\/p>\n
nec\u00a3%s;s;e11’y &”1I”I1(‘:’I1dI’]]\u20acI1i. to the plaint. The Trial Court has taken
\nnote of 21% these relevant factors and has rightiy allowed the<\/p>\n
app1ic’~ati<.;::. The same does not require interference–'jeisv.I"d.driot<\/p>\n
find ;my z.1}.)p21I'(–:n1 illegality in the order passed} <\/p>\n
made Clem' by this Court in its <\/p>\n
disprisinggj of W. P.I\\\u00a3'0s. 16574-575\/2t3O81'_A_it"  ~   ivtlje<\/p>\n
defendaiiiss to take such contentiqn by'filing_\ufb01eces_Sary Written V<\/p>\n
statement and whereupon the 'I_'_1f_i\u00e9l'1~ ,C01,_1rt wilibe enjoined with
\na duty to frame prop-er' _is'suej_'  decide the same in
\naCC01'(.1\u20ac1]1(?(t with lmv.   .  V<\/p>\n
5. With tlficf-ii a1′”\u00a75o\u00a7re”‘t1*;’e’ writ petitions are<\/p>\n
disniisssi-.ri.”i’ – ‘<\/p>\n
S\ufb01ffg
\nIuclqe<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Karantaka Jain Association … vs Sri Naveen Kumar on 11 November, 2010 Author: B.S.Patil W 1 W IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 1 1″‘ DAY OF NOVEMBER. 2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.-JUSTICE 13.5. 1=A.’\ufb02L 4.11:’: \u00b0” A WP Nos.24686-687\/20,09.[GM+OI5’C}*:’.’;\u00bb BETWEEN : 1. The Karnataka Jain […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-242696","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Karantaka Jain Association ... vs Sri Naveen Kumar on 11 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Karantaka Jain Association ... vs Sri Naveen Kumar on 11 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-16T07:06:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Karantaka Jain Association … vs Sri Naveen Kumar on 11 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-16T07:06:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":955,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010\",\"name\":\"The Karantaka Jain Association ... vs Sri Naveen Kumar on 11 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-16T07:06:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Karantaka Jain Association … vs Sri Naveen Kumar on 11 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Karantaka Jain Association ... vs Sri Naveen Kumar on 11 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Karantaka Jain Association ... vs Sri Naveen Kumar on 11 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-16T07:06:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Karantaka Jain Association … vs Sri Naveen Kumar on 11 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-16T07:06:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010"},"wordCount":955,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010","name":"The Karantaka Jain Association ... vs Sri Naveen Kumar on 11 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-16T07:06:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-karantaka-jain-association-vs-sri-naveen-kumar-on-11-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Karantaka Jain Association … vs Sri Naveen Kumar on 11 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242696","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242696"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242696\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242696"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242696"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242696"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}