{"id":243564,"date":"2009-07-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-12-12T17:28:41","modified_gmt":"2017-12-12T11:58:41","slug":"state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"State Of Karnataka vs M Tippanna S\/O M. Hanumanthappa on 16 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of Karnataka vs M Tippanna S\/O M. Hanumanthappa on 16 July, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DI-IARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY,_\\:25O\/9i'    -\n\nBEFORE   \nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUsTIoE J;I:\u00b0I'.1[I't[)i'eel2i!&amp;-1{:I'1\\.\/ii\"  \n\nCRIMINAL REVISION RE-TITIO%\\*. No.2   \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nState of Karnataka,\nBy the Su'o--Inspector     '  '\nofRoIIce,Koppa1,f     -  ...PETITIONER\n\n{By Sri P.I-I  it '\n\nAND:\n\nM.TippariI1a; \u00ab V _ \"   \nS \/ o. M.HanU_II'Ianthappa,\" _ \nAged about 3S=years,.'-- \" \nOcc: E-jriveer, \" A. _\n\n - R1\/o. ._1_t\"3gi,\\..{\u00a7amp1i. \"  ..... I .  RESPONDENT\n\n ._  Revision Petition is \ufb01led under Section 397\nr\/w; {I01 of C'i'\u00ab;P.C. by the SP? for the petitiOner\/ State praying\n\n V to set\" aside\" the order passed by the SI)\". Koppai dated\n-    I2.2oO7_I?n Cr1.A.NO.17O\/2007.\n\nit  This petition coming on for Orders this day, the court\n\n  the following:\n\nowe\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>This revision is directed against the t..Q.1ld.eir*i:i&#8217;dated<\/p>\n<p>7.12.2007 passed in Crl.A.No.130\/2007 on theiile of..se$si\u00a7nsi&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Judge, Koppal, dismissing the appea&#8217;1&#8243;as&#8221;belated.;.\u00ab  _ V\n<\/p>\n<p>2. This petition is not yet  ii&#8217;1\\ioti_oe <\/p>\n<p>admission was issued to the responden&#8217;t&#8211;accus&#8217;e_d,&#8217;izVh&#8211;i.(:h&#8211;&#8216;notice. &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>is also not yet served by the State agency &#8220;even though this<br \/>\nrevision is by the State. &#8216;*&#8211;.l5e_spite %ifevpe&#8217;atedi&#8217;time granted by this<br \/>\ncourt to ensure the notieeis served respondent, the<br \/>\njurisdictional l\u00ab..po]iioe_&#8217;.   ireipiorted that due to<br \/>\nunavailability respondent in the village where he resides,<\/p>\n<p>they couldinot seir&#8217;veiit&#8217;he&#8217; niotioe. This matter is listed today on<\/p>\n<p> board\u00e9ipiforrr orders &#8220;toeonsider whether further opportunity could<\/p>\n<p> beegiventiito. t.he&#8217;&#8211;..appellant to get the notice served.<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;Whether any worth purpose would be served by<\/p>\n<p>  ofsorrie time has to be considered. Hence, I have heard<\/p>\n<p>a._ith_ie&#8221;1&#8211;e&#8217;arned Government Pleader Sri P.H.Gotkhindi for the<\/p>\n<p>  -petitioner. It is noticed that the respondent was arraigned for<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01r<\/p>\n<p>the offence punishable under Section 279 and 304(A)_ of IPC<\/p>\n<p>and was put to trial in C.C.No.218\/ 2006. The le_ar.n:e\u00abd&#8221;]frial<\/p>\n<p>Judge considered the prosecution evidence  <\/p>\n<p>of the said offence. But noticing thecircuinstaricesl&#8221;in&#8221;which \u00bb _ <\/p>\n<p>real incident occurred, the learned &#8216;ifrial_&#8221;Judg6.t0ol\u00a7:&#8217; decifisidnjto<\/p>\n<p>show lenient View and grantedilbenefitll under 3 .85   S&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>the Probation of Offender&#8217;s Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. The State fe..e1,i&#8217;ng  the inadequate<br \/>\npunishment to&#8221;the.irespond_e&#8217;rit iinxrjolixediiiprovisions of Section<br \/>\n377 of Cr.P.l&#8217;}. t:jc_iichallen4ge:l.&#8217;iit:in&#8221;~CrlfAll\\Io.170\/2007 before the<\/p>\n<p>learned .4.&#8221; ii<\/p>\n<p>  appeal. Was \ufb01led belatedly. The office<\/p>\n<p> ,..r,:_ompu*te;;l-etheppdelairias&#8221;I3l2 days. Seeking condonation of delay,<\/p>\n<p> Section 5 of the Limitation Act, supported<\/p>\n<p>byilthe  of the jurisdictional District Magistrate was<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;filed. In  said Affidavit, he averred as follows: ,<\/p>\n<p>ac?&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> if &#8216;li&#8221;*&#8211;&#8220;.. i&#8211; F7}? 01:53 \u00abx:&#8221;\u00a7&#8217;zr&#8217;c=&#8217;;::3-\u00a7&#8217;&amp;\u00a703p .\u00ab~.&#8221;:&#8217;5&#8242;{&#8216;i[\u00a7r:5Ti I&#8221;I&#8221;e,3&#8217;zfcx\u00b0L&#8217;\u00bb<br \/>\nF &#8216;F<\/p>\n<p>i  -&#8216; ft 3 &#8216; &#8216;\\  E l &#8216;3 &#8220;:3 &#8216; .3&#8221; U6-{-\n<\/p>\n<p>~  :66\u00bb em am; as eg, 53 are .51: ,a2.,&#8217;L&#8217;\/&#8217;Q 3.2 _\/~tf~\\_3r.JT&#8217;.(L;r;&#8211;*\u00bb-si  rs&#8217;; Fa rm rm<br \/>\n_ W, .,<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;s 6<\/p>\n<p>Ii<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">1<\/span><\/p>\n<p>i i&#8217; ii &#8221; J V 1 E \u00ab.5  , &#8221; 3<br \/>\n&#8216;z-C\u00a7f&#8221;\u00a5(\u00a7fj,&#8217;;x_..g&#8217;;g;~q \u20ac,Z:-;aj&#8211;\\.\u00a7f.A.-&#8217;13, @&#8217;6d,.3,\u00a2f~7;&#8217;C;:;_e;::};j)\u00a2\u20ac_j5&gt;L\u00e9}<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01t&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>considering the explanation offered to condone the delay as the<br \/>\nquestion involved was relating to inadequacy ofv~._se_ntence<\/p>\n<p>passed against the respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. Even in this revision the iE3t&#8217;ate&#8217;:i has*..failed_ [go &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>satisfactorily explain the delay.  thgati. the <\/p>\n<p>Commissioner avers is that he ihiaidgone to~l3aIi&#8211;galore  attend<br \/>\ntraining and came   ,. Ministeieg meeting.\n<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, he kept himself the visit of Chief<br \/>\nMinister. Thereafter,    training for two<br \/>\nmonths and&#8217;   &#8216;file the appeal. Such<br \/>\nstatemelritiitotaliy  of duty on the part of the<br \/>\n Virtually, he is responsible<\/p>\n<p>for frustratingi process-of&#8217;~appeal by not only indifference, but<\/p>\n<p> ,_alsc_&#8217;: faili;:re&#8230;t:.o take appropriate action in prosecuting<\/p>\n<p> thoappvevalv time. Hardly any of the circumstances speak<\/p>\n<p>abouts&#8217;sufticientiicause. Rightly, the Sessions Judge rejected<\/p>\n<p>[the san,ie&#8217;.., I do not \ufb01nd any merit in this revision.<\/p>\n<p>if 10. Besides it is noticed that though the revision was<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;filed in this Court on 8.2.2008, despite lapse of 1 &#8216;\/2 years, the<\/p>\n<p>State has not served the notice regarding adrnission to the<br \/>\nrespondent. It speaks for itseif the State&#8217;s half hearted attenzpt<\/p>\n<p>in conducting the proceedings which needs to be.&#8211;de&#8217;f5ricajted&#8217;;&#8230; .<\/p>\n<p>11. Finding no merit in the re_ViSi_on._ a:nd\u00ab..inac_it_ion_C.n &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>the part of the State in getting &#8220;noticevfserxdred <\/p>\n<p>respondent, it only deserves to .,rejectedV.&#8221;   <\/p>\n<p>12. Hence, the CrirninaI&#8221;Rbe&#8217;visioinv?etit~ion is rejected.<\/p>\n<pre>wp\/-        JUDGE\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court State Of Karnataka vs M Tippanna S\/O M. Hanumanthappa on 16 July, 2009 Author: Jawad Rahim IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DI-IARWAD DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY,_\\:25O\/9i&#8217; &#8211; BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUsTIoE J;I:\u00b0I&#8217;.1[I&#8217;t[)i&#8217;eel2i!&amp;-1{:I&#8217;1\\.\/ii&#8221; CRIMINAL REVISION RE-TITIO%\\*. No.2 BETWEEN: State of Karnataka, By the Su&#8217;o&#8211;Inspector &#8216; &#8216; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-243564","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of Karnataka vs M Tippanna S\/O M. Hanumanthappa on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Karnataka vs M Tippanna S\/O M. Hanumanthappa on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-12T11:58:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Karnataka vs M Tippanna S\\\/O M. Hanumanthappa on 16 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-12T11:58:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":642,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009\",\"name\":\"State Of Karnataka vs M Tippanna S\\\/O M. Hanumanthappa on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-12T11:58:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Karnataka vs M Tippanna S\\\/O M. Hanumanthappa on 16 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Karnataka vs M Tippanna S\/O M. Hanumanthappa on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Karnataka vs M Tippanna S\/O M. Hanumanthappa on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-12T11:58:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Karnataka vs M Tippanna S\/O M. Hanumanthappa on 16 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-12T11:58:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009"},"wordCount":642,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009","name":"State Of Karnataka vs M Tippanna S\/O M. Hanumanthappa on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-12T11:58:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-vs-m-tippanna-so-m-hanumanthappa-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Karnataka vs M Tippanna S\/O M. Hanumanthappa on 16 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243564","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=243564"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243564\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=243564"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=243564"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=243564"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}