{"id":243775,"date":"2011-09-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4"},"modified":"2017-02-16T20:41:08","modified_gmt":"2017-02-16T15:11:08","slug":"mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Avinash Vinayakprabhune vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Avinash Vinayakprabhune vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2011<\/div>\n
                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                     at\n                                               New\u00a0Delhi\n\n 1.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000582                                10.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000599\n 2.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000585                                11.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000600\n 3.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000586                                12.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000601\n 4.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000588                                13.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000603\n 5.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000589                                14.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000604\n 6.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000590                                15.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000605\n 7.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000591                                16.   CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000395\n 8.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000592                                17.   CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000398\n 9.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000593\n\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a022,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a022,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Avinash\u00a0Vinayak\u00a0Prabhune\n           113,\u00a0Pandurang\u00a0Gawande\u00a0Layout\n           Ranapratap\u00a0Nagar\n           Nagpur\u00a0440\u00a0022\n\n           The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\n\n           Respondents\n\n\n\n           Attached.\n\n\n\n\n                   Information\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                                List\u00a0of\u00a0Respondents\n\n\nS.No.   Case\u00a0No.               Public\u00a0Authority                 Represented\u00a0by\n1.      CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000582   West \u00a0 Central \u00a0 Railway,\u00a0 Shri\u00a0N.G.Hardas,\u00a0APIO\n                               Jabalpur\n2.      CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000585   East \u00a0 Coast       \u00a0   Railway,\u00a0 Shri\u00a0J.L.Jena,\u00a0SCM\n                               Bhubaneswar\n3.      CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000586   North \u00a0 Western \u00a0 Railway,\u00a0 Shri \u00a0 M.L.Meena, \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 S.R.Meena, \u00a0 Shri\u00a0\n                               Jaipur                      A.K.Mehta, \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 M.K.Sharma, \u00a0 Shri\u00a0\n                                                           Dhirumal, \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 Paramjitsingh, \u00a0 Shri\u00a0\n                                                           Laxmikant\u00a0Vyas\n4.      CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000588   Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi      Shri\u00a0J.k.Malhotra,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Rakesh\u00a0Tyagi,\u00a0Shri\u00a0\n                                                                Mahesh\u00a0Kumar\n5.      CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000589   Southern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Chennai        Mrs.T.R.Boaz,\u00a0CCO\n6.      CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000590   Railway\u00a0Board                    Shri \u00a0 Sanjay \u00a0 Manocho, \u00a0 Shri\u00a0\n                                                                H.J.Shivprasad,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Krishan\u00a0Pal\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0\n                                                                Shambhu\u00a0Anand\n7.      CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000591   South\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Hubli     None\n8.      CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000592   Eastern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Kolkata         Shri\u00a0G.C.Roy\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0N.N.Pattanayak\n9.      CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000593   North \u00a0 Eastern \u00a0 Railway,\u00a0 Shri\u00a0V.K.Gupta,\u00a0Dy.GM\/G\n                               Gorakhpur\n10.     CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000599   Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Mumbai          Shri\u00a0Vinit\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Shri\u00a0R.B.Dixit\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0\n                                                                Rajesh\u00a0Kumar\n11.     CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000600   South \u00a0 East \u00a0 Central \u00a0 Railway,\u00a0 Shri\u00a0S.Gagarin,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Santosh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0and\u00a0\n                               Bilaspur                           Shri\u00a0K.S.Mahadevan\n12.     CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000601   South \u00a0 Central \u00a0 Railway,\u00a0 Ms.Smita \u00a0 Rawat, \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 P.V.N.Ravikumar,\u00a0\n                               Secunderabad                Shri \u00a0 D.N.Kumar \u00a0 and \u00a0 Shri\u00a0\n                                                           S.B.Venkatakrishna\n13.     CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000603   North \u00a0 Central \u00a0 Railway,\u00a0 Shri \u00a0 Sanjay \u00a0 S.Negi, \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 M.Ahmad \u00a0 and\u00a0\n                               Allahabad                   Shri\u00a0P.K.Pandey\n14.     CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000604   Northeast \u00a0 Frontier \u00a0 Railway,\u00a0 Shri\u00a0Khindu\u00a0Ram,\u00a0Dy.GM\/G\n                               Guwahati\n15.     CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000605   Western\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Mumbai          Shri \u00a0 Santosh \u00a0 Kumar \u00a0 Jha, \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 kailash\u00a0\n                                                                Yadav\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0B.B.Pinele\n16.     CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000395   East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Hajipur    Shri\u00a0Humayun\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Pankaj\u00a0Kumar\n17.     CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000398   South \u00a0 Eastern \u00a0 Railway,\u00a0 Shri\u00a0R.K.Bandyopadhyay\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Jahar\u00a0\n                               Kolkata                     Basu\n\n\n\n\n                                           2\n                           In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                              at\n                                                      New\u00a0Delhi\n\n 1.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000582                                         10.    CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000599\n 2.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000585                                         11.    CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000600\n 3.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000586                                         12.    CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000601\n 4.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000588                                         13.    CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000603\n 5.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000589                                         14.    CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000604\n 6.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000590                                         15.    CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000605\n 7.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000591                                         16.    CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000395\n 8.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000592                                         17.    CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000398\n 9.   CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000593\n\n\n\n                                                           ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000582<\/p>\n
The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 Application \u00a0 dt.24.7.10 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO, \u00a0 West \u00a0 Central \u00a0 Railway \u00a0 Jabalpur \u00a0 seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n
information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Ajay\u00a0Srivastava,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a09.8.10\u00a0furnishing\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0three\u00a0<\/p>\n
points.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0supplied\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n
incorrect\u00a0and\u00a0incomplete.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0appeal,\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a027.10.10.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n
the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000585<\/p>\n
2.        The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.24.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0East\u00a0Coast\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Bhubaneswar\u00a0<\/p>\n
seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0K.S.Sahoo,\u00a0Chief\u00a0Traffic\u00a0Manager,\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a021.9.10\u00a0furnishing\u00a0<\/p>\n
point\u00a0wise\u00a0information.\u00a0\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n
Authority\u00a0and\u00a0on\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000586<\/p>\n
3.        The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 Application\u00a0 dt.24.7.10\u00a0 with\u00a0 the\u00a0 PIO,\u00a0 North\u00a0 Western\u00a0 Railway,\u00a0 \u00a0 Jaipur\u00a0<\/p>\n
seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
stating\u00a0that\u00a0application\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0forwarded\u00a0to\u00a0various\u00a0divisions\u00a0but\u00a0no\u00a0reply\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0received.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n
                                                               3<\/span>
\n Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a04.11.10.\u00a0 \u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0<\/p>\n
before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
                                                     4<\/span>
\n CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000588<\/p>\n
4.       The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.24.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n
information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a011.8.10\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0point\u00a0wise\u00a0information.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0<\/p>\n
with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
replied\u00a0on\u00a019.11.10..\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000589<\/p>\n
5.       The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.24.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Southern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Chennaiseeking\u00a0<\/p>\n
information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points.\u00a0 \u00a0Mrs.T.R.Boaz,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a025.8.10\u00a0furnishing\u00a0point\u00a0wise\u00a0information.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n
Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0is\u00a0incomplete,\u00a0<\/p>\n
incorrect\u00a0and\u00a0false.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Mangat\u00a0Rai,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a029.10.10\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0final\u00a0reply\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0sent\u00a0<\/p>\n
shortly.\u00a0\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0further\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000590<\/p>\n
6.       The\u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed\u00a0 an\u00a0 RTI \u00a0 Application\u00a0 dt.24.7.10\u00a0 with\u00a0 the\u00a0 PIO,\u00a0 Ministry\u00a0 of\u00a0 Railways,\u00a0 New\u00a0 Delhi\u00a0<\/p>\n
seeking\u00a0 information\u00a0against\u00a0 23\u00a0points.\u00a0 \u00a0 Shri\u00a0V.K.Samuel\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a021.9.10\u00a0furnishing\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0<\/p>\n
points\u00a01\u00a0and\u00a023\u00a0and\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0final\u00a0reply\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0sent\u00a0as\u00a0soon\u00a0as\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0made\u00a0available.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0<\/p>\n
appeal\u00a0dt.1.11.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0supplied\u00a0is\u00a0incomplete\u00a0and\u00a0incorrect.\u00a0\u00a0On\u00a0<\/p>\n
not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000591<\/p>\n
7.       The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.24.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0South\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Hubli\u00a0seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n
information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points.\u00a0 \u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n
Authority\u00a0reiterating\u00a0his\u00a0request\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0S.Mohan,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a04.10.10\u00a0<\/p>\n
directing\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\/Commercial\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0within\u00a010\u00a0days\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order.\u00a0<\/p>\n
On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0further\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000592<\/p>\n
8.       The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.24.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Kolkata\u00a0seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n
information\u00a0 against \u00a0 17\u00a0 points. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a0 27.8.10\u00a0furnishing\u00a0partial\u00a0 information\u00a0and\u00a0 stating\u00a0 that\u00a0<\/p>\n
                                                          5<\/span>
\n information\u00a0on\u00a0other\u00a0items\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0supplied\u00a0on\u00a0receipt\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0PIOs.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0<\/p>\n
dt.27.9.10\u00a0 with\u00a0 the\u00a0 Appellate\u00a0 Authority\u00a0 stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0is\u00a0incorrect\u00a0and\u00a0incomplete.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n
Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a011.11.10\u00a0directing\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0complete\u00a0reply\u00a0within\u00a010\u00a0days\u00a0of\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
this\u00a0order.\u00a0\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0further\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000593<\/p>\n
9.        The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.24.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0north\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Gorakhpur\u00a0<\/p>\n
seeking\u00a0 information\u00a0 against\u00a0 17\u00a0 points.\u00a0 \u00a0 Shri\u00a0R.C.Srivastava,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a031.8.10\u00a0furnishing\u00a0point\u00a0wise\u00a0<\/p>\n
information.\u00a0 \u00a0 The\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0 an\u00a0 appeal\u00a0dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n
supplied \u00a0 is \u00a0 incorrect \u00a0 and \u00a0 incomplete. \u00a0 \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 R.P.Nibaria, \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 replied \u00a0 on \u00a0 25.11.10. \u00a0 \u00a0 Being\u00a0<\/p>\n
aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000599<\/p>\n
10.       The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.24.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n
information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0A.K.Saini,\u00a0APIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a030.8.10\u00a0furnishing\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0points\u00a01\u00a0<\/p>\n
and\u00a02\u00a0and\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0rest\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0would\u00a0be\u00a0supplied\u00a0on\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0same.\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.23.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.V.Arya,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
replied\u00a0on\u00a010.11.10\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0remarks\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0appeal\u00a0received\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\/Commercial.\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0<\/p>\n
with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000600<\/p>\n
11.       The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.24.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0South\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0Bilaspur\u00a0<\/p>\n
seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0A.K.Gupta\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a06.8.10\u00a0furnishing\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0points\u00a0<\/p>\n
12\u00a0 and\u00a013.\u00a0 \u00a0 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0 appeal\u00a0dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n
supplied\u00a0is\u00a0incorrect\u00a0and\u00a0incomplete.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0K.\u00a0Seshasayi,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a027.10.10\u00a0furnishing\u00a0<\/p>\n
clarification\u00a0against\u00a0points\u00a02\u00ad4,\u00a06\u00ad10\u00a0and\u00a014\u00ad17.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0<\/p>\n
appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000601<\/p>\n
12.       The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.24.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0South\u00a0Central\u00a0Secunderabad\u00a0seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n
information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0R.Dhananjayulu\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a027.8.10\u00a0furnishing\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0points\u00a01\u00a0<\/p>\n
                                                                6<\/span>
\n to\u00a04\u00a0and\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0available\u00a0against\u00a0rest\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0points.\u00a0 \u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0Vashishta\u00a0Johri,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
replied\u00a0on\u00a027.10.10\u00a0providing\u00a0further\u00a0clarification.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0<\/p>\n
appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
                                                        7<\/span>
\n CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000603<\/p>\n
13.      The\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0 filed\u00a0 an\u00a0 RTI\u00a0 Application\u00a0dt.24.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0North\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0Allahabad\u00a0<\/p>\n
seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0supplied\u00a0by\u00a0various\u00a0divisions\u00a0are\u00a0incorrect\u00a0and\u00a0incomplete.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
replied\u00a0on\u00a021.10.10.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000604<\/p>\n
14.      The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.24.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Northeast\u00a0Frontier\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Guwahati\u00a0<\/p>\n
seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Khindu\u00a0Ram,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a024.8.10.\u00a0\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0<\/p>\n
the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0Alok\u00a0Dave,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
replied\u00a0on\u00a012.10.10.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000605<\/p>\n
15.      The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.24.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n
information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Aditya\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a027.8.10\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0<\/p>\n
points\u00a01\u00a0to\u00a04,\u00a06\u00a0to\u00a011\u00a0and\u00a015\u00a0to\u00a017\u00a0and\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0rest\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0queries\u00a0would\u00a0be\u00a0supplied\u00a0as\u00a0<\/p>\n
soon\u00a0as\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0received.\u00a0\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n
Authority.\u00a0 \u00a0 Shri\u00a0 S.K.Sharma,\u00a0 Appellate\u00a0 Authority\u00a0 replied\u00a0on\u00a08.11.10.\u00a0 \u00a0 Being\u00a0 aggrieved\u00a0 with\u00a0 the\u00a0reply,\u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000395<\/p>\n
16.      The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.24.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0Hajipur\u00a0seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n
information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points.\u00a0 \u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0and\u00a0on\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000398<\/p>\n
17.      The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 Application\u00a0 dt.24.7.10\u00a0 with\u00a0 the\u00a0 PIO,\u00a0 South\u00a0 Eastern\u00a0 Railway,\u00a0 Kolkata\u00a0<\/p>\n
         seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a017\u00a0points.\u00a0 \u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0<\/p>\n
         dt.20.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0and\u00a0on\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0<\/p>\n
         dt.5.1.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
                                                           8<\/span>
\n Decision<\/p>\n
18.    The \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 decided \u00a0 to \u00a0 hear \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 and \u00a0 all \u00a0 \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents \u00a0 from \u00a0 different \u00a0 Zonal\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Railways\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0time\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0give\u00a0a\u00a0common\u00a0decision\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0sought\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0<\/p>\n
       information\u00a0from\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0Zonal\u00a0Railways\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0<\/p>\n
19.    The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0submitted\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railways\u00a0had\u00a0issued\u00a0a\u00a0Commercial\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Circular\u00a0No.20\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a02008\u00a0dated\u00a020.3.08\u00a0regarding\u00a0‘Revision\u00a0of\u00a0Passenger\u00a0Fares\u00a0–\u00a0Railway\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Budget\u00a02008\u00ad09’\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0revised\u00a0fares\u00a0were\u00a0applicable\u00a0from\u00a01.4.08.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0as\u00a0informed\u00a0<\/p>\n
       in\u00a0the\u00a0circular\u00a0about\u00a05000\u00a0sleeper\u00a0coaches\u00a0were\u00a0converted\u00a0into\u00a0high\u00a0capacity\u00a0coaches\u00a0(i.e.\u00a0from\u00a072\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
       81\u00a0berths)\u00a0\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0therefore\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0clause\u00a02.3(i)\u00a0and\u00a0(iii),\u00a05.3\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commercial\u00a0circular\u00a0mentioned\u00a0<\/p>\n
       above\u00a0,\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0passengers\u00a0all\u00a0over\u00a0India\u00a0who\u00a0have\u00a0traveled\u00a0in\u00a0these\u00a0High\u00a0Capacity\u00a0coaches\u00a0are\u00a0<\/p>\n
       entitled\u00a0to\u00a0get\u00a06%\u00a0discount\u00a0in\u00a0fares.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0\u00a0further\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0connection\u00a0he\u00a0would\u00a0like\u00a0to\u00a0restrict\u00a0<\/p>\n
       his\u00a0questions\u00a0instead\u00a0of\u00a017\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0to\u00a0two\u00a0including\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0passengers\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
       amounts\u00a0reimbursed\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0passengers\u00a0who\u00a0had\u00a0traveled\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0trains\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0defined\u00a0coaches\u00a0which\u00a0<\/p>\n
       were\u00a0\u00a0attached\u00a0to\u00a0them\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0passengers\u00a0as\u00a0also\u00a0the\u00a0total\u00a0amount\u00a0yet\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0reimbursed\u00a0<\/p>\n
       in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0trains\u00a0with\u00a0high\u00a0capacity\u00a0coaches\u00a0(non\u00addefined)\u00a0attached\u00a0to\u00a0them\u00a0only\u00a0\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
       exigencies,\u00a0It\u00a0was\u00a0the\u00a0contention\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0that\u00a0most\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a05000\u00a0coaches\u00a0were\u00a0not\u00a0made\u00a0use\u00a0<\/p>\n
       of\u00a0\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0purpose\u00a0they\u00a0were\u00a0allotted\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0passengers\u00a0had\u00a0therefore\u00a0to\u00a0face\u00a0harassment\u00a0due\u00a0<\/p>\n
       to\u00a0shortage\u00a0of\u00a0berths.\u00a0\u00a0According\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0the\u00a0coaches\u00a0which\u00a0were\u00a0not\u00a0defined,\u00a0\u00a0were\u00a0then\u00a0<\/p>\n
       used\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0exigencies\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0effort\u00a0was\u00a0made\u00a0to\u00a0follow\u00a0the\u00a0instructions\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       circular\u00a0in\u00a0terms\u00a0of\u00a06%\u00a0reduction\u00a0in\u00a0fares\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0such\u00a0coaches,\u00a0thereby\u00a0defeating\u00a0the\u00a0purpose\u00a0<\/p>\n
       for\u00a0which\u00a0these\u00a0coaches\u00a0were\u00a0identified.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0\u00a0also\u00a0proposed\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       money\u00a0that\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0set\u00a0aside\u00a0for\u00a0reimbursement\u00a0to\u00a0passengers\u00a0who\u00a0had\u00a0traveled\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0undefined\u00a0<\/p>\n
       coaches\u00a0(in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0exigencies)\u00a0,\u00a0presumably\u00a0running\u00a0into\u00a0crores,\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0transferred\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Prime\u00a0 Minister’s\u00a0 Relief\u00a0 Fund\u00a0 since\u00a0at\u00a0this\u00a0stage\u00a0it\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0physically\u00a0impossible\u00a0to\u00a0reimburse\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       amounts\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0lakhs\u00a0of\u00a0passengers\u00a0who\u00a0had\u00a0traveled\u00a0in\u00a0these\u00a0undefined\u00a0coaches.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0expressed\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n
       intention\u00a0to\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0PIL\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Court\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0connection.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
                                                           9<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
 20.   The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0scheme\u00a0was\u00a0introduced\u00a0in\u00a0April\u00a02008\u00a0but\u00a0was\u00a0later\u00a0withdrawn\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n
      February\u00a02009\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0 \u00a0the\u00a0fare\u00a0was\u00a0automatically\u00a0discounted\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0time\u00a0of\u00a0booking\u00a0of\u00a0tickets\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n
      trains \u00a0 with \u00a0 defined \u00a0 coaches \u00a0 , \u00a0 \u00a0 across \u00a0 India. \u00a0 They \u00a0 also\u00a0 \u00a0 admitted\u00a0 that\u00a0 a \u00a0 number\u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0 allotted\u00a0<\/p>\n
      coaches(out\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a05000)\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0defined\u00a0accordingly,\u00a0\u00a0and\u00a0were\u00a0used\u00a0\u00a0only\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
      exigency\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0trains\u00a0with\u00a0normal\u00a0coaches\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0refund\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0made\u00a0to\u00a0passengers\u00a0<\/p>\n
      since\u00a0such\u00a0coaches\u00a0were\u00a0not\u00a0considered\u00a0as\u00a0\u00a0falling\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0ambit\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0scheme\u00a0that\u00a0was\u00a0launched.\u00a0<\/p>\n
21.   While \u00a0 most \u00a0 PIOs \u00a0 expressed \u00a0 their \u00a0 doubt \u00a0 during \u00a0 the \u00a0 course \u00a0 of \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 about \u00a0 the \u00a0 availability \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n
      information \u00a0 sought \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 based \u00a0 on \u00a0 the \u00a0 submissions \u00a0 of \u00a0 two \u00a0 PIOs,\u00a0<\/p>\n
      including \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 Northern \u00a0 Railways, \u00a0 HQs, \u00a0 Baroda \u00a0 House \u00a0 (who \u00a0 had \u00a0 already \u00a0 provided \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
      information)\u00a0\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0little\u00a0bit\u00a0of\u00a0effort,\u00a0directed\u00a0the\u00a0PIOs\u00a0of\u00a0all\u00a0Zonal\u00a0<\/p>\n
      Railways\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
22.   (i)\u00a0\u00a0no.\u00a0of\u00a0coaches\u00a0defined\u00a0as\u00a0high\u00a0capacity\u00a0coaches\u00a0allotted\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Zonal\u00a0Railway,\u00a0(if\u00a0available\u00a0\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
      the\u00a0\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0passengers\u00a0who\u00a0\u00a0had\u00a0traveled\u00a0in\u00a0them<\/p>\n
      (ii)\u00a0no.\u00a0of\u00a0non\u00addefined\u00a0coaches\u00a0used\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0exigency\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0passengers\u00a0who\u00a0<\/p>\n
      had\u00a0traveled\u00a0in\u00a0such\u00a0undefined\u00a0coaches\u00a0for\u00a0both\u00a0classes\u00a0<\/p>\n
      (iii)\u00a0amount\u00a0refunded\u00a0to\u00a0passengers\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0non\u00addefined\u00a0coaches<\/p>\n
      for\u00a0the\u00a0period\u00a0April\u00a02008\u00a0to\u00a010.6.10.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
      In\u00a0the\u00a0event\u00a0any\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0any\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0PIOs,\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0an\u00a0affidafit\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
      Commission\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0affirming\u00a0the\u00a0non\u00adavailbility\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0giving\u00a0<\/p>\n
      reasons\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0same.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
      It\u00a0was\u00a0agreed\u00a0by\u00a0all\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0will\u00a0 \u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0possible\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0 \u00a0amount\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0refunded\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
      passengers\u00a0who\u00a0had\u00a0traveled\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0non\u00addefined\u00a0coaches.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
23.   The\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Railway\u00a0Board\u00a0to\u00a0also\u00a0provide\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0a\u00a0list\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0high\u00a0capacity\u00a0<\/p>\n
      coaches\u00a0(totaling\u00a0around\u00a05000)\u00a0\u00a0that\u00a0were\u00a0allotted\u00a0to\u00a0each\u00a0Zonal\u00a0Railway\u00a0.<\/p>\n
24.   The\u00a0complete\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0by\u00a022.11.11.\u00a0<\/p>\n
25.   The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
                                                           10<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
                                                                              \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                     Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:<\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n1.      Shri\u00a0Avinash\u00a0Vinayak\u00a0Prabhune   2.    The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n        113,\u00a0Pandurang\u00a0Gawande\u00a0Layout         West\u00a0central\u00a0Railway\n        Ranapratap\u00a0Nagar                      General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n        Nagpur\u00a0440\u00a0022                        Indira\u00a0Market\n                                              Jabalpur\n\n\n\n3.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority         4.    The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n        West\u00a0central\u00a0Railway                  East\u00a0Coast\u00a0Railway\n        General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office              General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n        Indira\u00a0Market                         ECoR\u00a0Sadan,\u00a0Chandrasekharpur\n        Jabalpur                              Bhubaneswar\u00a0751\u00a0017\n\n\n\n5.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority         6.    The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n        East\u00a0Coast\u00a0Railway                    North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\n        General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office              Headquarter\u00a0Office\n        ECoR\u00a0Sadan,\u00a0Chandrasekharpur          Hasanpura\u00a0Road\n        Bhubaneswar\u00a0751\u00a0017                   Jaipur\n\n\n7.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority         8.    The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n        North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway                 Northern\u00a0Railway\n        Headquarter\u00a0Office                    Headquarter\u00a0Office\n        Hasanpura\u00a0Road                        Baroda\u00a0House\n        Jaipur                                New\u00a0Delhi\n\n\n9.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority         10.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n        Northern\u00a0Railway                      Southern\u00a0Railway\n        Headquarter\u00a0Office                    General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n        Baroda\u00a0House                          Park\u00a0Town\n        New\u00a0Delhi                             Chennai\u00a0600\u00a0003\n\n\n\n\n                                        11<\/span>\n 11.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority    12.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n      Southern\u00a0Railway                 Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0railways\n      General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office         Railway\u00a0Board\n      Park\u00a0Town                        Rail\u00a0Bhawan\n      Chennai\u00a0600\u00a0003                  New\u00a0Delhi\n\n\n13.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority    14.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n      Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0railways             South\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\n      Railway\u00a0Board                    Headquarters\u00a0Office\n      Rail\u00a0Bhawan                      Hubli\n      New\u00a0Delhi\n\n\n15.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority    16.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n      South\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway            Eastern\u00a0Railway\n      Headquarters\u00a0Office              General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0office\n      Hubli                            17,\u00a0N.S.Road\n                                       Kolkata\u00a0700\u00a0001\n\n\n\n\n                                 12<\/span>\n 17.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority          18.   The\u00a0PIO\n      Eastern\u00a0Railway                        North\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway\n      General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0office               General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n      17,\u00a0N.S.Road                           Gorakhpur\u00a0273\u00a0012\n      Kolkata\u00a0700\u00a0001\n\n\n19.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority          20.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n      North\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway                  Central\u00a0Railway\n      General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office               General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n      Gorakhpur\u00a0273\u00a0012                      CST,\u00a0Mumbai\n\n\n21.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority          22.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n      Central\u00a0Railway                        South\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\n      General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office               Headquarters\u00a0Office\n      CST,\u00a0Mumbai                            Bilaspur\u00a0495\u00a0004\n\n\n23.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority          24.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n      South\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway             South\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\n      Headquarters\u00a0Office                    General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n      Bilaspur\u00a0495\u00a0004                       Secunderabad\u00a0500\u00a0071\n\n\n25.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority          26.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n      South\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway                  North\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\n      General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office               Headquarters\u00a0Office\n      Secunderabad\u00a0500\u00a0071                   Subedarganj\n                                             Allahabad\n\n\n27.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority          28.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n      North\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway                  Northeast\u00a0frontier\u00a0Railway\n      Headquarters\u00a0Office                    General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n      Subedarganj                            Maligaon\n      Allahabad                              Guwahati\u00a011\n\n\n29.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority          30.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n      Northeast\u00a0frontier\u00a0Railway             Western\u00a0railway\n      General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office               Headquarters\u00a0Office\n      Maligaon                               Churchgate\n      Guwahati\u00a011                            Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0020\n\n\n31.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority          32.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n      Western\u00a0railway                        East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\n      Headquarters\u00a0Office                    General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n      Churchgate                             Hajipur\u00a0844\u00a0101\n      Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0020\n\n\n33.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n      South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway\n\n\n\n                                       13<\/span>\n Headquarter\u00a0Office\nGarden\u00a0Reach\u00a0Road\nKolkata\n\n\n\n\n                     14<\/span>\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Avinash Vinayakprabhune vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi 1. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000582 10. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000599 2. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000585 11. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000600 3. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000586 12. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000601 4. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000588 13. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000603 5. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000589 14. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000604 6. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000590 15. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000605 7. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000591 16. CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000395 8. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000592 17. CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000398 9. CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000593 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a022,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a022,\u00a02011 Parties: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-243775","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Avinash Vinayakprabhune vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Avinash Vinayakprabhune vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-16T15:11:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Avinash Vinayakprabhune vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-16T15:11:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4\"},\"wordCount\":2025,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4\",\"name\":\"Mr.Avinash Vinayakprabhune vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-16T15:11:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Avinash Vinayakprabhune vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Avinash Vinayakprabhune vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Avinash Vinayakprabhune vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-16T15:11:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Avinash Vinayakprabhune vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-16T15:11:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4"},"wordCount":2025,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4","name":"Mr.Avinash Vinayakprabhune vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-16T15:11:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-avinash-vinayakprabhune-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2011-4#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Avinash Vinayakprabhune vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243775","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=243775"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243775\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=243775"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=243775"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=243775"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}