{"id":243938,"date":"2008-11-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008"},"modified":"2016-01-19T18:39:55","modified_gmt":"2016-01-19T13:09:55","slug":"karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; vs M\/S S M Kannappa Automobiles (P) &#8230; on 3 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; vs M\/S S M Kannappa Automobiles (P) &#8230; on 3 November, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.Sreedhar Rao C.R.Kumaraswamy<\/div>\n<pre>I\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT 01:' KARNATAKA \n\nDATED THIS THE 3&amp;9 DA\u00a5.0I\u00a7* NOVEui?;IB\ufb01\u00a7Rv'_2OG$\" ' 4 \n\nPRES_EN;T fiv Q\nTHE HONBLE MR.gIUS'i'IC3E E&lt;I. SR\nTHE HQNBLE J1\\4R.JLf\u20ac.-&#039;{fAICE&quot;CZ.R.. &#039;KUMAFEASWAMY\n\nREGULAR g_g?EAL%\u00a7Q43s9 0? 2090\n\nBETWEEN; &#039; \n\n \n\nA  k::z)I9p\u00e9ir,ate&#039;\u00bb::sta&#039;Li)2isha~:\u00ab-3&#039;3\n\nu\u00e9rzdtzr th\ufb01f\u00e9gnaizi Lransport Corporation\nAtit, \u00a3950   Of\ufb01ce\n\nAt K.._H;Road_,&#039;BaI1ga1dr\u00e9 - 560 02?\nRegreagnted by its Managing Director\n\n... APPELLANT\n\nSri: \u00e9\ufb01ndaraswamy Ramadas 81; Anand, Advs.)\n\n  \n\nA \/..__3.&#039;  Kaxmappa Automobiles (P) Ltd,\n\nA~.cognpa1:::y incorptrratxzd under\n\n.. ,  th\u20ac:~Companies Act, having its\n_ &#039;Regstm\ufb01d O\ufb01ice at No.2, New\n Manta} Hospital Road Near\n\nLalbagh, Bangalcrc H 560 O2&#039;?\nRepresented harein by its\nManagng Director.\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>(By Sri: A.Y.N. Gupta, Advocate)<\/p>\n<p>E<\/p>\n<p>2. The plaintiff stated that for completing the<br \/>\nbody building Work in respect: of 9 Clieesies, the<\/p>\n<p>defendant committed a gross delay of days<\/p>\n<p>fer completing the process._ Effie  _<\/p>\n<p>damages for the delay deiivezjy :&#8217;\u20ac;ei&#8217;i:i1:s dfe &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>eor1trae1:.. in respect ofV_v&#8217;Ctiaeeis. <\/p>\n<pre>\nplainiiif was  \" ' --fi1Ae_f\u00a7capacity of\ndefendant te   There was renewal\nof contract'    the request of\n with assurance that\n   of the contract without\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>eo11irI1i:i:tir1gV&#8221;&#8216;deIdy;  plainti\ufb01&#8221; in that regard entered<\/p>\n<p> an  in Ex.Pjl4 with the defendant. it is<\/p>\n<p>A  ., proposal of the defendant, it was agreed that<\/p>\n<p>  at a time would be delivered for body<\/p>\n<p> upon perfennanee of the contract in time. The<\/p>\n<p> \u00bb  &#8216;T  of the Chassis, three at a time weuld be delivered in<\/p>\n<p>future course for perfoztrnanoe.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3. It is the contention of learned Counsel for<br \/>\nthe plainti\ufb01&#8217; that the defendant did not the<\/p>\n<p>Chassis and complete the perfo:*1nance,__\u00a71ss*fhe<\/p>\n<p>piainti\ufb01&#8217; had to entrust the Work to <\/p>\n<p>which resulted in pay1:i;ent.. ()f  bf, &#8216;I<\/p>\n<p>Rs,8,00,()OO\/~ and odd -.___whieh    to. :be<\/p>\n<p>claimed as damages in the&#8217;*s&#8217;g1it,<\/p>\n<p>4. Per Cofdrzi,   submits that the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff never de1iveredVVti;i\u00a7:-?\u00a7:La}a:&#8217;e er&#8217; 36 Chassis as per<br \/>\nthe terms in E)x.PI&#8217;4\u00a2_._&#8217; * Tkierefrjregihe defendant is not<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01abl\ufb01 \u00a39 pay  d;2anag\u00e97S-&#8220;\u00ab&#8217;V:  eeeee -4 \u00abZ\n<\/p>\n<p> 5.    has dismissed the suit of the<br \/>\npiaj\ufb01xm onAtu&#8221;1_Ve gmmd that the plaintiff has failed to<\/p>\n<p>  the part 01&#8242; defendant. It is held<\/p>\n<p> .. ,4 .    were never delivered. Therefore, the<\/p>\n<p> not liable to pay any damages. Hence, the<\/p>\n<p> is in appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>the request of defendant was renewed and get alive for<br \/>\n19 years, but the defendant did not take anj?&#8221;&#8211;.steps to<\/p>\n<p>take delivery of the Chassis. &#8216;i&#8217;herefo1je~,-<\/p>\n<p>cannot be accused o\ufb02&#8217; in not de\ufb01ve\ufb01ng: it&#8221;o._<\/p>\n<p>the defendant for perfomianee    if <\/p>\n<p>argued that the T1&#8217;ialV,(Z&#8217;eur&#8217;t  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>appreciating the facts _V&#8217;;eviVdence  dismissing<br \/>\nthe suit.\n<\/p>\n<p> going through the arguments<\/p>\n<p>of   ive are unable to be mrsuaded by<\/p>\n<p>,,ie~submxis.sic;1 that there is a breach on the part of<\/p>\n<p>if   It may be that the defendant is guilty of<\/p>\n<p>A&#8217; -.breae&#8217;i3..o_f&#8217;eont1&#8217;aet on earlier occasion, but as per the<\/p>\n<p> ef the contract, he has paid penalty to the<\/p>\n<p>if &#8216;T  fer delay in building buses. The present claim<\/p>\n<p>it is in respect of 36 Chassis, which according to the<\/p>\n<p>defendant is not delivered to him, therefore, he is not<\/p>\n<p>liable to pay damages. in the context of facts, it is<\/p>\n<p>4\/<\/p>\n<p>asseiztial far the piai:&#8221;:t\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;f $12.1: \u20ac:sE&#8221;aE3E\u00e93E&#8217;1 E._\u00a7&#8217;i\u00e91i.  <\/p>\n<p>i:&#8217;1i&#8217;ima?:'(~:zt% igh\u00e9z z&#8217;\u00a5::f%::&#8217;1{i.a:&#8221;1t. that&#8217;, &#8216;i1i*1\u20ac~: \u00bb{f:&#8217;;3a$si$  :&#8217;\u00e9:3,;&lt;&quot;i\u00a7g&#039; &quot;&#039;f};)r &#039;<\/p>\n<p>\u20ac\u00a7\u20ac3:\u00a7\u00a7&#039;\u20ac\u00a33}&#039;_&#039;,? ami Gail 111.2011 &#039;zine {i EE:f&#039;6;2&#039;3\u20aci\u00a3%;i\u00a511&#039;\u20ac. &quot;\u00e9&#039;.\u00a73&#039; &#8211;3ff3\u20ac)\u20aci&#039;\\s_\u00a7t3. _ &quot;:}:1\u00a7:<\/p>\n<p>gam\ufb01. In 1L_h%: iiii\ufb01ia\ufb01i \u00a3::a:;:?::,_ &#039;i:&#039;_1i:\u20ac \u00a7}i\u00e9&#039;ii7i_&quot;_i\u00a7\u00a7ff E&quot;:a\u00e9I,:i\u20ac;:i&#039;: ijiazt\u00e9fi&#039;<\/p>\n<p>E111}? mai.\u20ac:*\u00a7a\u00a7 Eta $E&#039;1&lt;:x\u00a7;.2&#039; i&#039;}:&#039;1g;,\u00a7i&#8212;&#8212; S:&#039;\u00bb.{:i\u20ac3E:&#039;;i&quot;-._iE&#039;1\u00a7ii1i$i\ufb01:\u00a37?7i*7E~V:E3818 \u00a7;:2e\u20ac:&#039;;.<\/p>\n<p>issimai 11%;} this \u20aci\ufb01if\u20act:}&#039;1(\u00a7&#039;\u00a3\u00e9QI&#039;.i;\u00a7&#039;E{)._%%\u00a331}{&amp;t:{i\u00a7\u20acffi;1f;?\u00ab*E;I&#039;\u00a7 sf Chasai\ufb01 for<\/p>\n<p>}:=e_\u00a7&#039;\u00a701&#039;1;:33:10\u00a7:.\u00a7\u00a7&quot; =&#039;f._\u00a7&#039;.\u00a7E3 :Ci&#039;}E&#039;}}f1&#039;\u00a7%1Cif4  &quot;%:\u00a7&#039;;;\u20ac i.t2m1s; af &quot;{\u20ac\u00a7:5&lt;.P4.<\/p>\n<p>$;i&#039;:::?: :v\u00a7\u00a7\u20acf\u20aciIi}\u00a7\u00e9&#039;\ufb01,.}{&#039;_&#039;V\u00a7;iE\u00a7S -.\u00a7:\u00e9&#039;):?,\u00a5;::ii1:::.{:{i b1&#039;::a&lt;:h {sf \u20ac:::}r1E:2&#039;a&lt;:i.. in<br \/>\nfarzt, ii,&#039; i$ 7&#039;\u00a31\u20ac:i&lt;\u00a7&#039;viiizfg*t\u00a7T:&#039;\u20ac:__f\u00e9E\u00e9\u00a7i\u00a7}ti\u00a7&#039;i&#039; \u00a3&quot;3a.$ <i>n}311it\u00a7ied 3:3rea&lt;::\u00a7&quot;2 ii&quot;:<\/p>\n<p>11103:? &lt;;\u00a7:?:1iv\u20ac:3\u20ac2i&#039;;g V&#039;{}.&quot;\u00a7 \u20aci {&#039;iE&#039;1a::;$i$, as \u00a7}\u20ac::&#039; &#039;i:E&#039;&quot;1\u20ac I&#039;:.t-:t1&#039;ms sf &lt;:01igi&#039;.1&#039;aCi..<\/p>\n<p>V&#039; \u00ab.\u00a5&#039;*fIi\u00a71x:\u20ac\u00a7&#039;s\u00a7{:::;u &quot;\u00a7:3;_1=E: piaimifif ii\u00e9\ufb01ii\ufb01 1253?. ?E1&quot;i\u20aci1.\u00a3E&#039; em}; E&#039;ia%3\u00a7\u00a7i\u00a7\u00a7; fay<\/p>\n<p> ._ (&quot;\u00a7T\u00e9\u00e93;}%a},?i::e\u00a7i&quot;.x&lt;,ii1e}%};2.\u20ac:\u00a7&quot;\u00a7.zF 0:&#039; 11:31&#039;; \u00a31\u20ac_\u00a7.:&#039;32&#039;\u20ac::&#039;_;=&#039; 0? \u00a3&#039;_\u00a7Ei:a=sS\u00a7.S vitzki iikms\u00e9i 4<\/p>\n<p>&lt;) \u00a7&#039;&#039;&#8212;-E:x;..&#039;P?% ; &quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8221;~}&#8217; \u00a7%&#8217;::;&gt;r \u00a31213 \u00a7&#8217;\u20ac:\u00a7\ufb01;:&#8217;:\u00a7\u20ac}3&#8243;:$. agzfg\ufb01 &lt;&#039;i.%~;\u00e9.:cu$S.i\u20ac3:&#039;1$ izzsaaie<\/p>\n<p> V3;&#039;5:;\u00e9\u00a7.\u00ab&#039;s3, E316 pEa3E:3;\u00a7:.;&amp;.\u00a7&#039;\u00a7 313$ faiiitci 3:3 \u00a7}E&quot;G\u00a5fi &#039;iizai. {\u00a7&#039;i;Ti\u20ac<\/p>\n<p>&quot;T\u00a7:1\u00a7\u00a74:\u00a7&#039;::23\u00e9:\u00a3:3:: E3223 b\u20acf&quot;;\u20acEE&#039;\u00a7 gi:v{+?;:T: :;;f:21&#8217;1{i;\u00ab1:1E; 53011:. the<\/p>\n<p>\u20ac;Z%&#8221;;a$$%4$ \u00a7.~1:&#8217;s;3r 3*\u00a7:z2;&lt;.i\u00a7,-\/-&quot; fem&quot; {1\u00a7i1i&#039;%?&#039;f3T&quot;\u00a7&#039;, T&#039;h\u20ac:&#039;s:fa:sz&#039;&lt;~%,. ii; is<\/p>\n<p>izgipaznxissiizl\u00e9 {hr {.216 plaiz\u00e9\ufb01ff 113:&quot;; \u20ac,?(3E&quot;:z&#039;\u00a3\u20aci{&quot;1d.; \u00a5fi1\u20ac%_?ET,\u00a5;;&#039;{%\u00e9&#039;(iI&quot;\u00a7\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>brtzacfs an t:}:1&lt;i pza.:*&#039;:. sf def\u20ac:&quot;1&lt;ian.t;&quot;&quot; &#039;3E&#039;?}i;e c:\u00a71&#039;:ie417*a-:\u00a7.\u00a7ff r:3is:_1j:;.is%;.ai &#039;<\/p>\n<p>9f the $121.&#039;: by \u00a335162 Triai C14:-urt  $.i\u00a7t.ii&#039;:d ;555f;\u00a7fE&#8211;. p:j03;{5\u00e9:.&#039;_. i1\u20ac;_1;.<\/p>\n<p>for {he reasarz Siat\u00e9zci E3}?  __ {f\u00bbf.&#8211;&#039;zVIA.\u00a71:&quot;*_E:T &#039;?:\u00a7\u00e9_ 1?t.&quot;&#039;fi\u00a71&#039; tii\u00e9&#039;<\/p>\n<p>Iveasma $&#039;{;a.t:&lt;::c&#039;i in $133 3,\u00a7:r;3\u20ac\u00e9;E} &#039; &quot;-\u00bbi;.\u00a3&#039;1e:2 \u00a2}rs;i&#8211;:%1*..~ i$ {:13 13::<\/p>\n<p>c\u20acmfirme:c1. The af\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9 is  <\/p>\n<p>3d\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; vs M\/S S M Kannappa Automobiles (P) &#8230; on 3 November, 2008 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao C.R.Kumaraswamy I IN THE HIGH COURT 01:&#8217; KARNATAKA DATED THIS THE 3&amp;9 DA\u00a5.0I\u00a7* NOVEui?;IB\ufb01\u00a7Rv&#8217;_2OG$&#8221; &#8216; 4 PRES_EN;T fiv Q THE HONBLE MR.gIUS&#8217;i&#8217;IC3E E&lt;I. SR THE HQNBLE J1\\4R.JLf\u20ac.-&#039;{fAICE&quot;CZ.R.. &#039;KUMAFEASWAMY REGULAR g_g?EAL%\u00a7Q43s9 0? 2090 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-243938","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs M\/S S M Kannappa Automobiles (P) ... on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs M\/S S M Kannappa Automobiles (P) ... on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-19T13:09:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; vs M\\\/S S M Kannappa Automobiles (P) &#8230; on 3 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-19T13:09:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":852,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs M\\\/S S M Kannappa Automobiles (P) ... on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-19T13:09:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; vs M\\\/S S M Kannappa Automobiles (P) &#8230; on 3 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs M\/S S M Kannappa Automobiles (P) ... on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs M\/S S M Kannappa Automobiles (P) ... on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-19T13:09:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; vs M\/S S M Kannappa Automobiles (P) &#8230; on 3 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-19T13:09:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008"},"wordCount":852,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008","name":"Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs M\/S S M Kannappa Automobiles (P) ... on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-19T13:09:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-ms-s-m-kannappa-automobiles-p-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka State Road Transport &#8230; vs M\/S S M Kannappa Automobiles (P) &#8230; on 3 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243938","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=243938"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243938\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=243938"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=243938"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=243938"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}