{"id":244347,"date":"2009-01-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009"},"modified":"2016-11-09T11:31:52","modified_gmt":"2016-11-09T06:01:52","slug":"improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Improvement Trust vs The President on 27 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Improvement Trust vs The President on 27 January, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA\n             AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                                  CWP No.9408 of 1991\n                               Date of decision: 27.1.2009\n\nImprovement Trust, Moga\n                                            -----Petitioner\n                            Vs.\n\n\nThe President, Land Acquisition Tribunal and others\n\n                                           --Respondents\n\nCORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL\n           HON'BLE MR JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN\n\nPresent:   Mr. IPS Doabia, Advocate for Improvement\n           Trust in CWP Nos.9408, 9639 and 9640 of 1991.\n\n           Mr. AP Bhandari,Advocate for Improvement\n           Trust in CWP Nos. 13688, 13694 and 13696 of\n           1991.\n\n           None for the land owners.\n\nAdarsh Kumar Goel,J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>1.         This order will dispose of Civil Writ Petition<\/p>\n<p>Nos.9408, 9639 and 9640 of 1991 filed by the<\/p>\n<p>Improvement Trust and CWP Nos.13688, 13694, 13696 of<\/p>\n<p>1991 filed by the land owners, questioning the validity of<\/p>\n<p>the award of the Land Acquisition Tribunal. The<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> CWP No.9408 of 1991                                       2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Improvement Trust seeks reduction of compensation<\/p>\n<p>awarded, apart from challenging the award of additional<\/p>\n<p>compensation          under section   23(1-A) of   the   Land<\/p>\n<p>Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short, &#8216;the 1894 Act&#8217;) on the<\/p>\n<p>ground that the award of the Collector was 3.2.1979 i.e.<\/p>\n<p>prior to 30.4.1982, while the land owners seek further<\/p>\n<p>enhancement.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.          Land in question was acquired in pursuance of<\/p>\n<p>notification under section 36 of the Punjab Town<\/p>\n<p>Improvement Act, 1922 (in short, &#8216;the 1922 Act&#8217;) dated<\/p>\n<p>27.12.1974. The said notification was          followed by<\/p>\n<p>notification dated 19.12.1975 under section 42 of the 1922<\/p>\n<p>Act. The Collector vide award dated 3.2.1979 determined<\/p>\n<p>compensation at the rate of Rs.2700\/- per marla. On<\/p>\n<p>reference to the Tribunal under the provisions of the 1922<\/p>\n<p>Act, the compensation was enhanced to Rs.15000\/- per<\/p>\n<p>marla. The Tribunal considered 18 instances of sale<\/p>\n<p>produced on behalf of the land owners and three instances<\/p>\n<p>of sale produced on behalf of the Improvement Trust. The<\/p>\n<p>said instances have been detailed in para 9 of the impugned<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> CWP No.9408 of 1991                                     3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>award. Referring to Ex.R.1, which was a sale deed relied<\/p>\n<p>upon on behalf of the Improvement Trust, it was noticed<\/p>\n<p>that the price fetched therein was Rs.10,000\/- per marla.<\/p>\n<p>The Tribunal observed that in the site plan, the location of<\/p>\n<p>the said land was inferior to the acquired land in as much<\/p>\n<p>as the acquired land was on the main road. Even the<\/p>\n<p>Collector had not acted upon Ex.R.1. The average of<\/p>\n<p>instances produced by the claimants worked out              to<\/p>\n<p>Rs.24000\/- per marla but the said instances were mostly<\/p>\n<p>after the acquisition. It was also observed that some<\/p>\n<p>allowance had to be made in favour of land owners as<\/p>\n<p>acquisition in question was six months after the sale<\/p>\n<p>instances Ex.R.1 and acquired land was better located.<\/p>\n<p>Taking an overall view of oral and documentary evidence<\/p>\n<p>on the record, compensation was determined at Rs.15000\/-<\/p>\n<p>per marla. Oral evidence, inter-alia, comprised AW4<\/p>\n<p>Harmesh Chander, property dealer who stated that value of<\/p>\n<p>one marla of land in the area was more than Rs.30,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>and gave certain instances in support of his statement. It<\/p>\n<p>was also noticed that the acquired land abutted the GT road<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> CWP No.9408 of 1991                                            4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>towards Ludhiana. There were petrol pumps, clinics,<\/p>\n<p>cinema houses, tractor agencies near the acquired land.<\/p>\n<p>Office of SDM was also near the acquired land apart from<\/p>\n<p>Bus Stand, Police Station and Courts. Land was within<\/p>\n<p>municipal limits.\n<\/p>\n<pre>3.          We        have   heard   learned   counsel   for   the\n\nImprovement Trust.           None has appeared for the land\n\nowners.\n<\/pre>\n<p>4.          Learned counsel for the Improvement Trust<\/p>\n<p>submitted that the compensation awarded was excessive as<\/p>\n<p>average of sale instances produced by the land owners<\/p>\n<p>could not be taken into account being subsequent to<\/p>\n<p>acquisition except instances 2, 3 and 4, which related to<\/p>\n<p>very very small pieces of land\n<\/p>\n<p>5.          We are of the view that the Tribunal has reached<\/p>\n<p>its conclusion based on appreciation of evidence. Two<\/p>\n<p>instances relied upon by the land owners are prior to<\/p>\n<p>acquisition and support the value arrived at by the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal. The location of land has not been disputed, which<\/p>\n<p>is within the municipal limits and in the heart of the town.<\/p>\n<p>Even if two views are possible, finding of the Tribunal is<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> CWP No.9408 of 1991                                      5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>not liable to be interfered with in exercise of writ<\/p>\n<p>jurisdiction unless the same is shown to be perverse or<\/p>\n<p>without any evidence.        We also find no scope for<\/p>\n<p>enhancement as claimed by land owners. In these<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, we do not find any ground to interfere with<\/p>\n<p>the determination of market value by the Tribunal. We,<\/p>\n<p>however, find merit in the contention that additional<\/p>\n<p>compensation under section 23(1-A) of the 1894 Act could<\/p>\n<p>not be awarded to the land owners, in view of judgment of<\/p>\n<p>the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court in <a href=\"\/doc\/1938607\/\">K.S.Paripoornan v. State<\/p>\n<p>of Kerala, AIR<\/a> 1995 SC 1012, as the award of the<\/p>\n<p>Collector is prior to 30.4.1982.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.          Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of by<\/p>\n<p>not interfering with the determination of market value but<\/p>\n<p>with a direction that benefit under section 23(1-A) of the<\/p>\n<p>1894 Act will not be available to the land owners.<\/p>\n<pre>\n                                   (Adarsh Kumar Goel)\n                                       Judge\n\n\n\nJanuary 27, 2009                   (Jintendra Chauhan)\n'gs'                                    Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Improvement Trust vs The President on 27 January, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.9408 of 1991 Date of decision: 27.1.2009 Improvement Trust, Moga &#8212;&#8211;Petitioner Vs. The President, Land Acquisition Tribunal and others &#8211;Respondents CORAM:- HON&#8217;BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON&#8217;BLE MR JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244347","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Improvement Trust vs The President on 27 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Improvement Trust vs The President on 27 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-09T06:01:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Improvement Trust vs The President on 27 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-09T06:01:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":713,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Improvement Trust vs The President on 27 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-09T06:01:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Improvement Trust vs The President on 27 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Improvement Trust vs The President on 27 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Improvement Trust vs The President on 27 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-09T06:01:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Improvement Trust vs The President on 27 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-09T06:01:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009"},"wordCount":713,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009","name":"Improvement Trust vs The President on 27 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-09T06:01:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/improvement-trust-vs-the-president-on-27-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Improvement Trust vs The President on 27 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244347","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244347"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244347\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244347"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244347"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244347"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}