{"id":244693,"date":"2008-09-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008"},"modified":"2016-04-05T02:10:07","modified_gmt":"2016-04-04T20:40:07","slug":"abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Abdul Muthalib vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Abdul Muthalib vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 September, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nBail Appl..No. 5480 of 2008()\n\n\n1. ABDUL MUTHALIB,S\/O A.P.ABDULLA,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. MUHAMMED SHERIF, S\/O YUSUF,\n3. ABDUL SALEEM,S\/O HAMEED,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KUMBALA.\n\n3. STATE REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA\n\n Dated :23\/09\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                                   K. HEMA, J.\n\n                   -------------------------------------------------\n                      Bail Appl.No. 5480 of 2008\n                   --------------------------------------------------\n\n            Dated this the 23rd           day of September, 2008.\n\n\n                                      ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>            Petition for bail.\n<\/p>\n<p>            2. The alleged offence is under Section 8(2) of the Abkari<\/p>\n<p>Act. According to prosecution, on 19.8.2008 at about 6.15 p.m. a car<\/p>\n<p>was found parked near bus stand and, 2500 packets of Karnataka<\/p>\n<p>made arrack, each containing 100 ml., were seized from the car.<\/p>\n<p>There were three persons inside the car. They ran away, on seeing the<\/p>\n<p>police, but they were arrested from the spot itself. Petitioners are the<\/p>\n<p>said three persons.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioners<\/p>\n<p>are absolutely innocent of the allegations made.                     Petitioners were<\/p>\n<p>arrested not under the circumstances alleged by the prosecution and<\/p>\n<p>they have nothing to do with the arrack seized from the car. The car<\/p>\n<p>did not belong to the petitioners, but, the owner of the car has not<\/p>\n<p>been made an accused in this case. Petitioners are falsely implicated<\/p>\n<p>by the Circle Inspector.        The mothers of first and second petitioner<\/p>\n<p>filed a complaint before the Director General of Police, Trivandrum<\/p>\n<p>complaining about       the false implication and an enquiry is being<\/p>\n<p>conducted into this by the D.Y.S.P.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4. According to petitioners, the car of the first petitioner (A1)<\/p>\n<p>collided with the car from which the articles were seized. There was a<\/p>\n<p>dispute in this respect and the mater was settled and Rs.50,000\/- was<\/p>\n<p>agreed to be paid to the first petitioner. The first petitioner had gone<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">[B.A.No.5480\/08]                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>to collect the amount from the driver of the car and he collected<\/p>\n<p>Rs.50,000\/- from him. The first accused was returning after collecting<\/p>\n<p>the amount, while the police came and arrested him and implicated<\/p>\n<p>him and that articles were seized from the car. The second and third<\/p>\n<p>petitioners    were arrested while they were playing cricket and<\/p>\n<p>regarding such arrest, Annexure-I complaint has been filed before<\/p>\n<p>the Director General of Police the mothers of the petitioners. Learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the petitioners also submitted that petitioners are working<\/p>\n<p>abroad and they were waiting to return to Gulf countries and they have<\/p>\n<p>valid passport and visa.     These in short, are the contentions of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners.\n<\/p>\n<p>       5. This petition is opposed.     Considering the gravity of the<\/p>\n<p>offence and the quantity of the article involved, it is submitted that it is<\/p>\n<p>not a fit case to grant bail. According to prosecution, petitioners were<\/p>\n<p>found inside the car and they were caught from the place of<\/p>\n<p>occurrence itself and the allegations to the contrary are denied.<\/p>\n<p>      6. On hearing both sides, in the light of the counter allegations<\/p>\n<p>made regarding false implication, I have gone through the documents<\/p>\n<p>produced and also the allegations made in the petition. It appears that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners themselves have no consistent case regarding the<\/p>\n<p>circumstances under which they were arrested. As per the compliant<\/p>\n<p>Annexure-I, first and second accused were playing cricket along with<\/p>\n<p>3rd accused on 19.8.2008 at about 2 p.m., while police took them into<\/p>\n<p>custody. But, as per the allegations in the petition, first accused was<\/p>\n<p>arrested while he was returning after collecting Rs.50,000\/- from the<\/p>\n<p>drive of the car. It is relevant to note that Annexure-I was given by<\/p>\n<p>none other than the mothers of first and second accused, that too,<\/p>\n<p>after four days of the incident on 23.8.2008 but they had no case in<\/p>\n<p>Annexure-1 that the first accused was arrested while he was returning<\/p>\n<p>after collecting money.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">[B.A.No.5480\/08]                   3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      In the above circumstances, I am not satisfied at this stage that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners are not guilty and hence, in view of Section of 41A of<\/p>\n<p>Abkari Act, bail cannot be granted.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Petition is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                    Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                               K. HEMA, JDUGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nKrs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Abdul Muthalib vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 September, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Bail Appl..No. 5480 of 2008() 1. ABDUL MUTHALIB,S\/O A.P.ABDULLA, &#8230; Petitioner 2. MUHAMMED SHERIF, S\/O YUSUF, 3. ABDUL SALEEM,S\/O HAMEED, Vs 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, &#8230; Respondent 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244693","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Abdul Muthalib vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Abdul Muthalib vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-04T20:40:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Abdul Muthalib vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-04T20:40:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":616,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Abdul Muthalib vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-04T20:40:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Abdul Muthalib vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Abdul Muthalib vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Abdul Muthalib vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-04T20:40:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Abdul Muthalib vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-04T20:40:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008"},"wordCount":616,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008","name":"Abdul Muthalib vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-04T20:40:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-muthalib-vs-the-sub-inspector-of-police-on-23-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Abdul Muthalib vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 23 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244693","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244693"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244693\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244693"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244693"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244693"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}