{"id":244865,"date":"2008-07-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008"},"modified":"2018-11-26T07:57:49","modified_gmt":"2018-11-26T02:27:49","slug":"karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka Industrial Areas &#8230; vs Syed Mohammed S\/O Late Abdul Karim on 29 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Karnataka Industrial Areas &#8230; vs Syed Mohammed S\/O Late Abdul Karim on 29 July, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Manjula Chellur K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH coca? or KARHATAKA, BAuaAaoggf \",\n\nDATED T315 232 29th 2A3 or JHLY, 2Q\u00a7\u00e9~Igff ,f \n\nPRESENT\n\nwas Henvaza MRS. JUSTICE1gaxq\ufb01LA'\u00a2\ufb01$LLsRg \" _ \n\nwax HOH'BLE M. J3sTIcE\"\ufb01:n. K\ufb01sn\u00a7va$A\ufb01\ufb01%\u00a3\ufb01\u00a7\nwax? APPEAL \u00a7\u00a7.7\ufb01i725\u00a7%}Lg-u\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\"\" \nBETWEEN a'$ ' EV' \"R %'\n\n1 xAnaAmAgA.:n9UsrR:A\u00a7, _ . , \u00bb\nAREAS 9EvE;09MEEr136Aan._' \"~~\nso 14;3;x2*E\u00a7ooa,,'._=\"-w \u00bb\n\nR 9 BUIL$I\ufb02G ' 4 vhA\nNRL*EAmING\u00a5s   \nB.:;NsA1.o3\u00a3'%.,se':3 0.01; .\nB\u00a5_I$S sEcRamaa\u00a5a_=.'\nsRx.x.sn:pHAgA ~V\"\n\n2 semcxgz LAN%;AEQG\u00a7SITION orrxczn\n;KIA\u00a7B xo-g33~3,'3xd BLOCK,\nf\"34th CRoss}*~--pA - GA mg \n\nTHIS war: Appzax. ::s'~..;.=-;t;x.m t:{s*[_4.i \nKARNATAKA I-HIGH comm ACT PRAYIHG '1'\u00a3ESE'3.'_]=.A.SEDE was\n02:02:: zmssm 1:2: mm mm 'PETE,-.rIoN\"\u00ab\u00a7o.?8c:5\/aces\nDATED 5\/3\/200?.  -    \n\nThis writ  I --. for Prly.\nHearing, this day,  :,::i.=2.:a:,t:z2j_--.3, delivered\nthe followingzn'     '  '\n\n J 3' \n\n'. .\n\niieaxdi  for the appellants\nand   fotwlthe respondents.<\/pre>\n<p>2.  x&gt;e*.i;i\u00a7:i&lt;\u00a7\u00a7e\u00a2.t,&quot;&#039;2\u00e9o.&#039;recs\/zoes came to be<\/p>\n<p>&#039; ., V&#039;   aigiqg (f}&quot;~{&quot;\u00a2{,Q\u00b0*-(&quot; ?\u20acx%%\u20ac?xi {V1<br \/>\ndispggsed. af  ;i._nV taztms o:E,;&#039;\\W. ?.!~$o.3233\/2006 and<\/p>\n<p> &quot;g.-&#039;,e_::;\u00e9:&#039; c\u00e9\ufb01fnng\u00e9cged \ufb01tters disposed of on 08.08.2006<\/p>\n<p>v._V&#039;0ne an&lt;3_A&#039;i~the name.\n<\/p>\n<p>__&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;w.&#8221;;&gt;.1~w.3233\/2005.\n<\/p>\n<p>on&#8217; ._t.2&#8217;ie &#8230;\u00a7;::\u00a7ui;dV:_it1:at subject matter of the present<\/p>\n<p>writlpeti  and the earlier writ petiticms was<\/p>\n<p>Fortunately the appellants<\/p>\n<p> have furnished aopy ef the erder in<\/p>\n<p>In the said writ petition the<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; . . .\n<\/p>\n<p>contention of the petitioner that inspite of ._ the<\/p>\n<p>khatedar representing before the acqaz ng<\/p>\n<p>authorities after preliminary notificatioxi'&#8221;\u00bb\u00e9i;2t1e:f___ _<\/p>\n<p>section 23 {1} of the Xarrxatalca Iz:dg::stri;;zi&#8221;=.\u00e9LreasVL:&#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>Eevelopment Board Act (for:;_ shctt  <\/p>\n<p>bringing to the notice pf\ufb02 the A_eutho:i&#8221;ties\u00ab&#8217; the&#8221;:<br \/>\nthe interest, right   be<\/p>\n<p>tzraxzsferred to thiixi ,i*.. the &#8216;H\u00b0a.cV\u00a7uiring<br \/>\nauthorities did not oo\u00e9ag\ufb01iiiiwj-\u00a7ith_.\/t:.th}e.Viisgrovisions of<br \/>\nsection 28   &#8220;therefore, the<br \/>\nlearned   notification under<br \/>\nsection~28{\u00a7f SE the hot wee had in law and then<br \/>\npxroceededu  &#8220;same. However, the<\/p>\n<p>prelirninarg  under section 28 (1) was<\/p>\n<p>kept&#8217;; &#8216;.1&#8242;.&#8217;::e, force..v_V_i\u20ac1i.re\u20ac:ting the parties to proceed<\/p>\n<p>   Tumagtter from the stage of sulbrmltting<\/p>\n<p>1 \u00e9i;s.V&#8211;:*&#8217;co::tezq&gt;la.tec1 under section 28 (2)<\/p>\n<p>1 &#8216;V of the Ae\u00a3;2h<\/p>\n<p>3&#8230; ;Tf,l&#8217;hoz:gh the subject matter of the present<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;:&#8217;eszgr;:f.&#8217;aV*t:-.azpetition are the very same preliminary and<\/p>\n<p> notifications, unless the facts which were<\/p>\n<p>be khata changes on two occasions &#8212; in 1995-96<br \/>\nand later on in 2001. The entries in the RTC<\/p>\n<p>reflect upto 1999-2000} &#8216;the name of Sangazrninnth<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;L<\/p>\n<p>.. the landlord of the property was  ,.<\/p>\n<p>coitunm no.9 of the REC. so far as co&#8217;lmQ <\/p>\n<p>it is left blank. The ma };zi*oc\u00a7v.ce\u00a7:; 3V;z;;f -\u00a31u=_{&#8216;-,<\/p>\n<p>respondent Syed Mn\u00e9xanraed   \u00ab.\n<\/p>\n<pre>onward? for the year  only'    of\nSyed Mohanmed \"    Jinoted.\nApparently the   in this\n<\/pre>\n<p>case is date&lt;i.V..&#039;3.3..20&#8211;G:\u00a5\u00a5&#8230;::&#039;V  happened<br \/>\nfrom    in order to<br \/>\nconvince   contention of the<br \/>\n   ignorant of the<br \/>\nacquisivtiion right from the inception<\/p>\n<p>is true or Irxotg  \u00a322; perzzsal of the records<\/p>\n<p> *  .._hy the &#8212;&#8212;&#8211; nplzellant authority we notice<\/p>\n<p>thntu[onr4:&quot;1VS-,:&#039;7.-2001 both syed Mohammad and syed<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7Iti.&#039;3..s3&#039;:&quot;-:.in V  given their objections in writing to<\/p>\n<p>g the &quot;Lanna \ufb01soquisition Officer for the preliminary<\/p>\n<p>it &#039;jn.\u00a3q\u00a32xax&#8221;V;;g~.c\u00a7:e},&#8221;:=,#&#8221;&#8216;~<\/p>\n<p>respondent approached the._T&#8217;v::ivii  .CO&#8217;%.1I3&#8217;_&#8217;2  it<\/p>\n<p>equal rights in they .propgr&#8217;%:i\u00a7:s&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;\u00a7.:; qzi\u00e9stiaiz. In<br \/>\n2004 by virtue oft&#8217;    between the<br \/>\nbrothers ccnpr\u00a7.&#8217;n;&#8217;.se:A&#8217;Vd\u00e9crg\u00e9;:&#8217;  giving *2<br \/>\nshare to _    Syed Hussain.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;.I.&#8217;he:::efor\u00a2V,:  ~  til}. 2004 the<br \/>\ndate   ., j the properties were in<br \/>\njoint ;So.\u00a7\u00e9ess&#8217;iV&lt;:_;f1&#039;e\ufb01joy:r:e:zt having tenancy<\/p>\n<p>right:-;.. in \u00e9egzmzg;  :35; that View of the matter,<\/p>\n<p>&#039;&#039; V&#039; &quot;v:*\u00abz1;etb;r&#8230;&lt;t}2\u00a3.4&#039;:. 1&#039;? resjs\u00e9iii\u00e9ient has taken active part in<\/p>\n<p> of aczquisition on 13.&#039;?.2901, can<\/p>\n<p>h\u00e9.-i &#039;;\u00a79rqadii3._ this Court contending that principles<\/p>\n<p>&#039;pf natiixfai justice is denied to him by act<\/p>\n<p>V&#039;  him as conteznplated under smtion 28 of<\/p>\n<p>&#039;  tit;  .\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;M2<\/p>\n<p>5. As a matter of fact, the  2<br \/>\nbefore the Special Land Acquisitio\ufb01r g\u00a7\u00a3\u00a7\u00a2e\u00a7f&#8217;<br \/>\ndis\u00a2l\u00a2ses on 17.7.2001 both the*hroth\u00e9rrr\u00e9\u00a7#\u00e9#re&amp;r<br \/>\nand gave their representatio\ufb01, Fi\ufb01 \ufb01hgfrr\ufb01rgrgfr<\/p>\n<p>the matter, the order of r\ufb01g learned_S\u00a3\u00a7g@e\u00bbJ\ufb01dge * <\/p>\n<p>that the writ pe-tit.V_1&#8243;_.on   the<br \/>\n1&#8243; respondent shcuiii\ufb02rivg &#8216;of in terrras of<br \/>\nw.9.3233\/zeos  da.1;e:;1. =.  is not<br \/>\nsustainab1e.\ufb024 \ufb01\ufb01\u00a2:\u00a7fQr\u00a7;; Twrr &#8220;head that the<br \/>\naPIl&gt;el3.ant  \ufb01\u00e9eviated from the<br \/>\nprovisii\u00e9\ufb01ii\u00e9 &#8221; &#8216;  {5 f:_&gt;;f &#8216;A 2  \ufb01\u00e9\u00bb  rition proceedings<br \/>\nxaunchrrd 1233-V it-he year 2001 and the<\/p>\n<p>respox_1&lt;:1en.t%.. herej;n\u00a71\u00ab3rV&#039;~~-&quot;&#039;LVhas full apportunity of<\/p>\n<p> mfg;-:;::\u00a2sez1&#039;A*E&#039;ezit&#8230;&#8230;:,z\u00ab*i,*. the right stage. so far as<\/p>\n<p>ac::qu3;sif\u00a3:i:1\u00abv_\u00ab6f__ the land of the 1&#8243; respondent both<\/p>\n<p>uzxci\u00e9r&#8217;  and final ;2otifin is<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; vazfci.  frcm any angle the contention of<br \/>\nitizer,.1&#8243;&#8216; &#8216;E::espond.ent=&#8217;3 counsel is not acceptable to<\/p>\n<p>Accordxngiy, the agpeal is alloWe\u00a7._$\u00e9\u00a3\u00a3i\ufb01\u00a7 <\/p>\n<p>aside the orders af the learned $i\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7e a\u00a7\u00a7ag%FA<\/p>\n<p>dated 935133.200&#8217;? in &#8216;\u20ac&#8217;\u00a5.P&#8217;.&#8217;?805\/20\u20ac}&#8217;6&lt;. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Karnataka Industrial Areas &#8230; vs Syed Mohammed S\/O Late Abdul Karim on 29 July, 2008 Author: Manjula Chellur K.N.Keshavanarayana IN THE HIGH coca? or KARHATAKA, BAuaAaoggf &#8220;, DATED T315 232 29th 2A3 or JHLY, 2Q\u00a7\u00e9~Igff ,f PRESENT was Henvaza MRS. JUSTICE1gaxq\ufb01LA&#8217;\u00a2\ufb01$LLsRg &#8221; _ wax HOH&#8217;BLE M. J3sTIcE&#8221;\ufb01:n. K\ufb01sn\u00a7va$A\ufb01\ufb01%\u00a3\ufb01\u00a7 wax? APPEAL \u00a7\u00a7.7\ufb01i725\u00a7%}Lg-u\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7&#8221;&#8221; BETWEEN [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244865","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Karnataka Industrial Areas ... vs Syed Mohammed S\/O Late Abdul Karim on 29 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka Industrial Areas ... vs Syed Mohammed S\/O Late Abdul Karim on 29 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-26T02:27:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Karnataka Industrial Areas &#8230; vs Syed Mohammed S\\\/O Late Abdul Karim on 29 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-26T02:27:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":724,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Karnataka Industrial Areas ... vs Syed Mohammed S\\\/O Late Abdul Karim on 29 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-26T02:27:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka Industrial Areas &#8230; vs Syed Mohammed S\\\/O Late Abdul Karim on 29 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka Industrial Areas ... vs Syed Mohammed S\/O Late Abdul Karim on 29 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka Industrial Areas ... vs Syed Mohammed S\/O Late Abdul Karim on 29 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-26T02:27:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Karnataka Industrial Areas &#8230; vs Syed Mohammed S\/O Late Abdul Karim on 29 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-26T02:27:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008"},"wordCount":724,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008","name":"Karnataka Industrial Areas ... vs Syed Mohammed S\/O Late Abdul Karim on 29 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-26T02:27:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-industrial-areas-vs-syed-mohammed-so-late-abdul-karim-on-29-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka Industrial Areas &#8230; vs Syed Mohammed S\/O Late Abdul Karim on 29 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244865","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244865"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244865\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244865"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244865"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}