{"id":245014,"date":"2009-10-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009"},"modified":"2019-03-31T16:57:18","modified_gmt":"2019-03-31T11:27:18","slug":"gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Gangabai vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 16 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Gangabai vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 16 October, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil And K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nTI-IE I~ION'BLE MR.JUsT1eE_K.N;Is::$sHAvA1mimYA.$iAvat \u00b0\n\n1.\n\nDATED THES THE 16TH DAY 09' OCTOBER, 2o09:\"\"\u00bbr\n\n:PRESENT:\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE N.K._PAi'I\u00a7. '   % T t\"\n\n\n\nM.F.A.No. 54 zoo?   \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nGangabai  A\n\nW\/ o. late M1.1ruga1'1'a11(i:arr1'*  t t\n\n@ Mur1J.:ge';'-\"vIj_'V1W,:V'_' 38 1-{ea__rs...'\n\nM_Ar;:\u00a3ha';'-V  \" \"\n\n  Mu'%f1iga'nar1da3ri_\"V\"\"' V\n\n@ M_uruge&gt;:E1.. *\n\nAged about  .   \n\nM.sar.:hosh,-._ A\n\n.4; ' 8,1,0. 1ate'M1}iruganandaIn\n'  @..tM11_1\"ugeSh,~-- ---------- \n\nA'ged._ab.out 17 years.\n\n M ia;\n* D\/ o'.- 3;E1t';\"3 Muruganandam\n\n 'M1 xrugesh,\n\nu ,.Aged about 15 years.\n\nx I  Petitioner Nos. 3 and K; are\n\n Minors being represented by\nNext friend and guardian their\n\nMother first petitio er Smt\ufb01anga Bai.\n\n\n\n5. Andalamrna\nW\/o. late Thangaraj,\nAged about 67 years.\n\nAll are residing at\nNo.294\/285, 6\"' main road,\n2\"\" Block, 3'\" Stage,\nW.C.Road. Bangalore.\n\n[By Sri. D.L.Suresh, Advocate) _V\n. AND l\n\n1. National Insurance Co. Ltd;; \"  \"\nRepresented by its Manageif\nRegional Office.  _   ..\nMahatma. Gandhi Road,.:\n\nBangalore     \n2. NS.  _\n\nSt\/o;~Ve11kata;,Gowda? K\nYellaInnia..TeI'i1p1e.'Street, --\nNvagamangaliet, M    '\nMandya District.  \n\n Respondents<\/pre>\n<p> &#8216;V V.  -(  .E{ind&#8217;  sen\/ed ; Vlliinerepresentedl<\/p>\n<p> l&#8221;&#8211;&#8216;EV&#8217;1f1isl MFA&#8217;-..:s \ufb01led U\/S 173(1) of MV Act against the<br \/>\njridgrnelnt&#8221;jand,.&#8221;award dated: 22.01.2007 passed in MVC<br \/>\nNo..7643\/20535 on the \ufb01le of the XVI Addl. Judge, Court of<br \/>\nSmall =fCa&#8217;u&#8221;ses, Member, MACT. Metropolitan Area,<\/p>\n<p>is lV._Banga&#8217;lorAe. (SCCH.No.l4), partly allowing the claim petition<br \/>\n fer:-&#8221; compensation and seeking enhancement of<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; \u00ab . V&#8217; compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>This M.F.A. Corning n for Admission this day, N.K.<\/p>\n<p>  -~-PATIL J, delivered the fo wing:<\/p>\n<p>l \u00bb . _&#8217;  l\ufb01plpellams&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>:JUDG MENT:\n<\/p>\n<p>Admit.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. This appeal is directed against the.  *<\/p>\n<p>and award dated 22.1.2007?.._passe&#8217;di&#8221;&#8221;t.&#8211;i13Vd\u00b0<\/p>\n<p>No.7&#8217;6\u00ab&lt;18\/2005 by the learned  Akiditienei&#039;  _<\/p>\n<p>MACT, (SCCH~14), Banga1oi*e:,:&quot;&#039;fhereihafteijdfefeffed te as d<\/p>\n<p>&#039; Tribunal&#039; for short). V <\/p>\n<p>3. By its judgriiteht  Tribunal has<br \/>\nawarded a  of jj&lt;.VV\\v?\u00a7\\&quot;7i&#039;tVjh:&#039;i11terest at 6%<br \/>\np.a., from   as realisation. Being<br \/>\nhave filed this appeal,<br \/>\n ground that, the amount<br \/>\nawatded the is inadequate.\n<\/p>\n<p>4;.-L, I1&#8217;lzbFi\u20ac.f&#8217;th{5faCtS of the case are:<\/p>\n<p>     &#8212; apvpeilant No.1 is the wife and appeilant Nos.<\/p>\n<p>2  aretthedtnchildren and appellant No.5 is the mother<\/p>\n<p> the deceased Sri. Muruganandam @ Murugesh. The<\/p>\n<p> e:.&amp;&#8217;\u00bba\u00a73pe}:lants have filed a ciairn petition before the<\/p>\n<p>V%..Tiiibuna1, ciaiming compensation of Rs.8,00,000\/-, on<\/p>\n<p>it account. of the de of the deceased Sri.<\/p>\n<p>Muruganandam @ Murugesh, in the accident, which<\/p>\n<p>occurred on 14.5.2005 at about 9.00 AM, when the<\/p>\n<p>deceased was driving the car bearir1g&#8211;\u00bb_f&#8221;&#8211;\u00abNo&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>KA.02.AA.1947 on NH&#8211;48 near <\/p>\n<p>Kunigal from Chikkamagaiur to&#8217; &#8216;Ban.gaiore&#8217;.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>one occupant namely, Rajendra,A:&#8217;\u00abslo&#8217;.yiy  <\/p>\n<p>and at that time a Mitsuhishi Canter No <\/p>\n<p>KA.01.8142 came ,fro;n op&#8221;posifteV&#8221;&#8221;es.ide &#8216;driven by its<br \/>\ndriver with high speed irihaifajsh andttfnegligent manner<\/p>\n<p>and dashed  the  of 5th&#8211;e&#8211;d_ecfeased and due to<\/p>\n<p>   of the car sustained<br \/>\ninjuries&#8217;ar1&#8217;d_irnrnediatel\u00a7&#8221;they were shifted to NIMHANS<\/p>\n<p>hospjt-31A anddhdudring the course of treatment, he<\/p>\n<p>  on 15.5.2005. Further it is the<\/p>\n<p>  dVa&#8217;p&#8221;p&#8217;e11ants that, the deceased was aged 40<\/p>\n<p>years ar1d.\u00ab-&#8220;he was Working as a taxi driver in M\/ S<\/p>\n<p>dinternationai Travels, Srirampuram, Bangalore. and<\/p>\n<p>   the salary of Rs.4,000\/&#8211; per month and<\/p>\n<p>it  &#8216;&#8221;R0s.125\/~ per day as Bata. The said claim petition had<\/p>\n<p>come up for consideration before the Tribunal on<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>;\n<\/p>\n<p>:7<\/p>\n<p>22.1.2007&#8242;. The Tribunal, after hearing both sides and<br \/>\nafter analysing the oral and documentary evidence, has<\/p>\n<p>allowed the said claim petition in part and awaifded a<\/p>\n<p>sum Rs.4,66,000\/&#8211; as compensation <\/p>\n<p>heads with interest at 6% p.a., frorn the_&#8211;&#8216;datei:&#8217;of &#8221; it<\/p>\n<p>till its realisation, as against the<\/p>\n<p>appellants for a sum of Rs\u00bb.l8&#8217;;&#8217;0.Q,OOO&#8217;\/:&#8211;. <\/p>\n<p>by the said judgmentgand Vga.vsrai*d;&#8221;&#8211;.the &#8220;appellants have<br \/>\npresented this appeal!&#8221;seeisilargfeiihah-Gerrient..<\/p>\n<p>5. We have &#8216;~.l&#8217;earnedxlileounsel for the<\/p>\n<p>appellantsl   of time.\n<\/p>\n<p>6;&#8221; fl&#8217;he lear1i;eVdV&#8217;eoi1n&#8217;sel appearing for appellants<\/p>\n<p>submitted the lribunal has erred in taking the<\/p>\n<p> lithe deeelalsed at Rs.4,000\/~ per month and<\/p>\n<p> towards his personal expenses and in<\/p>\n<p>applying&#8217; l\ufb01iiltiplier &#8217;18&#8217;, while calculating the loss of<\/p>\n<p>dependency. Further he submitted that taking into<\/p>\n<p>it  &#8216;eonsideration the numbers of dependants, the<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;appropriate deduction towards the personal expenses<\/p>\n<p>of the deceased would e l\/-\ufb01lth instead of 1\/Sid and<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;&#8230;._.,,&#8230;&#8230;,,l&#8230;.(&#8230;..,,&#8230;_&#8230;,,.,..\u00bb,.,.,..-&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>appropriate Multiplier applicable is &#8216;I4&#8217; instead  &#8216;l3&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>as held by the Apex Court in the case of Sarliil:&#8221;\u20ac&#8217;:l\u00a3\u00e9f:7fraa<\/p>\n<p>and others Vs. Delhi Transport Cor&#8217;por=\u00a2:tio:1:: <\/p>\n<p>another reported in 2009   V<\/p>\n<p>submitted that the impugned:\n<\/p>\n<p>passed by the Tribunal is liableito be   it<\/p>\n<p>7&#8242;. After careful  the Vsubrnissions<br \/>\nmade by learned couriselp  the appellant<br \/>\nand after : judgment and<br \/>\naward  lhe only point that<br \/>\n  V  V<\/p>\n<p>  awarded by the<br \/>\nTribunal _ is just  reasonable?\n<\/p>\n<p>,  After earelul perusal of the material available on<\/p>\n<p> \u00bbree.o_Vrd._l not in dispute that, deceased Sri.<\/p>\n<p> @ Murugesh died in the accident<\/p>\n<p>  occurred on 14.5.2005 at about 9.00 am. The<\/p>\n<p> l..ffTvrib1.inal has awarded a sum of Rs.4,l6,000\/&#8211; towards<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  llcgssllof dependency and the same is inadequate and it<\/p>\n<p>it &#8220;needs to be modi\ufb01ed. &#8216;l%&#8217;ribuna1 has rightly taken the<\/p>\n<p>K<br \/>\nK<\/p>\n<p>instead of Rs. 44,16,000\/&#8211; awarded by the Tribunal and<\/p>\n<p>accordingly, it is awarded.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. So far as the amount awarded by  ~<\/p>\n<p>towards other conventional   of<\/p>\n<p>Consortium, loss of love and ai?feotio&#8217;n, lo-ss&#8211;_of_ es:&#8217;tat&#8217;e,,<\/p>\n<p>funerai and obsequies and trlansportationllof body&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>is Concerned, the   relasonable and it<br \/>\ndoes not call forinterlere_n&#8217;ce;-.it&#8217; 4. it A\n<\/p>\n<p>10. Hayiiatg   circumstances<br \/>\nof the case&#8217;   thlyeijinipugned judgment and<br \/>\n  liable to be modi\ufb01ed.\n<\/p>\n<p>lljappeal is allowed in part and<\/p>\n<p>the  &#8216; and award passed by the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8220;~v.\/frilbslina\ufb01l in Nef7e43\/ 2005 stands modi\ufb01ed, granting<\/p>\n<p>  .eeeapeee,&#8217;a\u00a31Vee&#8217;.i~~e{ Rs.5,54,000\/&#8211; instead of Rs.4,66,000\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>{eeeegneeimeet being Rs.88,000-). The enhanced<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;oornpe1i,s:ation of Rs.88,000\/&#8211; shall carry interest at 6%<\/p>\n<p> . it p_V.&#8217;a&#8211;.,&#8230;l5frorn the date of petition till its deposit.<\/p>\n<p>The first respondentdnsurance Company is<\/p>\n<p>directed to deposit the comgensation amount with interest,<\/p>\n<p>it<\/p>\n<p>within six weeks from the date of receipt of the copypi&#8221; this<\/p>\n<p>juclgme nt and award.\n<\/p>\n<p>Out of the enhanced compensation of  <\/p>\n<p>sum of Rs.10,000\/&#8211; each with interebst  Win&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>the names of appellant Nos. 2 to 41in. any\u00bb.natiOnaliz&#8211;ecl&#8217; Tior<\/p>\n<p>scheduled bank, till they att;iir&#8217;i-..rna}'()&#8217;l1&#8217;it3lJV&#8217;. The*apAp;elJaVnt5N0i.  L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>shall be entitled to Withdraw .Vinterest.&#8221;ac.cri1edvf?0n it, for<br \/>\nthe welfare of appellant&#8211;\u00ab..l_\u00a7l:r&#8217;Js_l  ta &#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>Out of Aremainj.r1\u20ac5.._ }aifl.5;\u00a3.,pt&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;v:if;&#8217;75R\u00e9&#8217;.58,000\/- with<br \/>\ninterest\u00bb    interest shall be<br \/>\nreleased    and the remaining<br \/>\naH1Ou1.&#8221;;1vlllA .&#8211;l&#8217;jv_r1vVterest shall be released in<br \/>\nfavour def ,:l:_i:rr1rriediately, on deposit by the first<br \/>\nresp_rmdpent&#8217;33irisurance- Ccirzpany.<\/p>\n<p>V  l)rawA.the  accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>tsn*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Gangabai vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 16 October, 2009 Author: N.K.Patil And K.N.Keshavanarayana IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE TI-IE I~ION&#8217;BLE MR.JUsT1eE_K.N;Is::$sHAvA1mimYA.$iAvat \u00b0 1. DATED THES THE 16TH DAY 09&#8242; OCTOBER, 2o09:&#8221;&#8221;\u00bbr :PRESENT: THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSTICE N.K._PAi&#8217;I\u00a7. &#8216; % T t&#8221; M.F.A.No. 54 zoo? BETWEEN: Gangabai A W\/ o. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-245014","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Gangabai vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 16 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gangabai vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 16 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-31T11:27:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gangabai vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 16 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-31T11:27:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":985,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Gangabai vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 16 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-31T11:27:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gangabai vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 16 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gangabai vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 16 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gangabai vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 16 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-31T11:27:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gangabai vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 16 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-31T11:27:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009"},"wordCount":985,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009","name":"Gangabai vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 16 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-31T11:27:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangabai-vs-national-insurance-co-ltd-on-16-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gangabai vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 16 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245014","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=245014"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245014\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=245014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=245014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=245014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}