{"id":245095,"date":"2009-02-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009"},"modified":"2015-07-13T10:45:19","modified_gmt":"2015-07-13T05:15:19","slug":"state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"State By Rural Police Shimoga vs R Muniyappa @ Munna on 16 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State By Rural Police Shimoga vs R Muniyappa @ Munna on 16 February, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Manjula Chellur Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH mask? 01? KARNATAKA AT  *\n\nDATE!) THIS THE 16 my QF\"'FEBl?_fL31$i\u00a7':;,l ;;2iii3\u00a7'.k  \n\nPRESEN'fV__  \n\nTHE HONBLE MRS.  MM!-JL'1,\u00a7\u00a7_; CRELLBR\nTHE HONBLE MR. J{iSTii3E2.j_B.  EISIIVASE GOWDA\nCrimi:1a3Vi\u00a3b\ufb01\u00e9a1VP\u20acQ;_2'51 \u00a2;i*VV%2&lt;302\nBetween:    :    \n\nStatse by    V\n\n_ ....  _   &#039;\u00ab1.;___ _  _ &quot; &quot;   Apprszllant\n{By Siji. G. Bifgfgvarii  SPF)&quot;\nAn&amp;  ..a ,_U\n\nR. Mumyappa@;ammg@ M11nnanaJ&#039;ka\n@ 171i.MuHiYa, &quot;\n\n. &#039; -s0iz- {Sf  years,\n\n\u00bb Carpcnt\u00ab::rT,~.f&lt;*;&#039;(; Mission Nagar,\n\n  z&#039;%.11dra\u00a71a11i,  II Stage,\n\n .~ .  A Respondent.<\/pre>\n<p>(By  B.&#8217;,{&#8216;. Indushckar, Adv.)<\/p>\n<p>AA &#8216;   (Lind 3113} Appeal filed under Section 3&#8217;?8{1} 85 (3)<\/p>\n<p> -.Cr..1?1iC by the State prayiI1g to want leave {:0 file appeal<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9ggairrst the judgment dated 28.8.2001 passed by the<\/p>\n<p>.._3~&#8217;idd1. Sessions Judge, Shiznega in S.C1. No.148\/2000<\/p>\n<p>acquittmg the respondent-accused for the affences 11\/ S5.<br \/>\n302 and 26 1 IPC.\n<\/p>\n<p>This Appeal coming on for heard &#8216;ng,&#8217;  2tiaV.y,<\/p>\n<p>MANJULA CHELLUR. J. delivered the fonowirggi&#8217; &#8216; ~ 4;;  <\/p>\n<p>This appeal is directed   &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>acquittal dated 28.8.2001 1:3 N5; 1:&lt;\u00a73,:V2\u00a7f3_0i3{&#039;  <\/p>\n<p> Brief facts thatvieafd to,&quot;LiT:iii*xg.&#039;&lt;3f&#039;tiii:s-Aagzs\ufb01veal are as<br \/>\nLmd\ufb01rz  ._ _    <\/p>\n<p>The    t0 the accused<\/p>\n<p>  E\u00a5,i_1&quot;&#039;3&#039;n&quot;&quot;n&quot;&#039;:a1}aJ&#039;ka @ R. Muniya a<\/p>\n<p>I&#039;\ufb01Sidf_&quot;&#039;i]g&#039;\u00a7i\u20acT {if  f\ufb02ihikkanayakanahalii, Tumkllr<\/p>\n<p>Distlfict. A\ufb01gr the rixzaxi\ufb01gag\u00e9z between the accused and the<\/p>\n<p> V&#039;   \u20ac:pIin&#039;;\u00e9;&quot;&#039;(i:ai1ghter 0f PW 1 Suit. Shakinabi, the<\/p>\n<p> ,__;t&#8211;.i&#039;&lt;;;;;i1&#039;sr~9;:c_:i  rasidmg at his natixfe place along with his<\/p>\n<p>  he went in Search of his livelihood leaving<\/p>\n<p> wife in the company 01&#039; his family members.<\/p>\n<p>   deceased was not Wail, the brothers of the accused<\/p>\n<p>  &#039;A  her with her mother}? for the purpose of treatment.<\/p>\n<p>V&#039; The accused used 11) visit his\u00bb Wife new and then at his in\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>laws piacc. It is the case of the prosecution that on the<\/p>\n<p>unfortunate night of 29.33.2000 the accusca\ufb01 <\/p>\n<p>company of his wife at his imiaws    &#039; ;\n<\/p>\n<p>intt&#8217;:.IVe.I1ing night of 29.53.2000 &#8220;an&lt;%:&amp;&#039;A%T3E).5;%2i:i9k: <\/p>\n<p>3.00 am. PW I was i11foxV&#039;\u00bb1:i:a:\u00a7\u20ac1..%\u00bbbyA&#039;fi_i1::  the\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>deceased committed vS31zv1\ufb01Cidt3,,~&#039;}Ll;i3Il1&#039;;E:ii1_i;&amp;1t(\u00a73\ufb01)Q&#039; &#039; &#039;hiS=&#039;\u00a3I10th\u20ac:1&#039;-\u00abill-<\/p>\n<p>law PW 1 anal sistt-3;&#8217; $   sister of<br \/>\ndeceased C3136&#8242;: {Q  dtaccaased and<br \/>\naccused Wfxftg _;&#8211;:.  amund the neck<\/p>\n<p>01&#8242;    leaning tawards the pillar.\n<\/p>\n<p>O31 1ea1&#8243;ni_:ig%  the df:t&#8217;12t3aS\u20ac:(i was no mare,<\/p>\n<p>mot};}*e3\u00b0 aI1d.Vsis1;\u00e9r&#8221;&#8216;sa\u00a7d  have raised hue and cry. At the.<\/p>\n<p>   im: accused said 1:0 have \ufb02ed away from the<\/p>\n<p>  Cry attractcd tha attantion of the kith<\/p>\n<p>    the compiaillaiztw PW 1 and alssao the<\/p>\n<p>H &#8221;   Imighb\u00e9\u00e9iirs. Neighbours have I1()tiC6d the acczused<\/p>\n<p>   away from the door of the house of the<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8211;.    Y\u00e9\u00e9mplainant.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3. On the eomplaint of the mother  2 <\/p>\n<p>peliee arrived at the scene of  oiTenee,u&#8217;-rreeridxietegi ..;11e<\/p>\n<p>inquest proceedings, semi; the  <\/p>\n<p>drew a mahamr at the spot    slu\u00e9etjehvvas part of<br \/>\nthe investigation.   &#8216;(if _the investigation<br \/>\nstatements of the_ki&#8217;t.h a:::d. i\u20acin&#8221;ef:the&#8221;&#8216;&lt;ieeeaeed and so also<\/p>\n<p>neighbours of    2 <\/p>\n<p>4.  {\ufb01e   complaint is at Ex. P<br \/>\n1 whe  {rune  the mother of the deceased<\/p>\n<p>Go\ufb01me  wfioxe t\ufb01e rope is identi\ufb01ed as the one<\/p>\n<p> the fleck ofvi\ufb01evdeeeased at the time of the death.<br \/>\n J?  Ummar who has turned hest\ufb01e to the<br \/>\n  gase   \ufb01i:&#8217;eeeeu\ufb01oz1. PW 3 is the neighbour of PW 1<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8216;A&#8221;.__W&#8217;he  at the epot after hearing the sheuting of the<\/p>\n<p>A   and saw the accused eeming out ef the<\/p>\n<p>  hrrsuee. He aiso speaks of the rope armmd the neck of the<\/p>\n<p>   rleeeased. PW 4 is the sister of the deceased whe said to<\/p>\n<p>V;&#8221;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>have seen the deceased and the aeeused together during<\/p>\n<p>the night of 29.5.2000. PW 5 is one Ma}i.k.&#8217;v.e:e;i:&#8217;A&#8211;ii as \ufb02ies. <\/p>\n<p>ease of the prosecution that PW <\/p>\n<p>were in the habit of visiting: his hes _1se ens.Sai;L1r\u00a71ayl  *<\/p>\n<p>Sunday to Watch \ufb01lms on the &#8221;   sac of the<br \/>\nwitnesses to the xgfhiee IMO I rope<br \/>\nwas seized. i&#8221;W 6  {hie and a<br \/>\nwitness te Ex.     PW 7 Ismail,<br \/>\nfatlier ef the   slut in station on the<br \/>\ndate of   gene to attend the last rites<br \/>\nof his reieiiye. _ &#8216;f\ufb01e embed through this wimess<\/p>\n<p>t0 the effect t1ia&#8217;t_si.1ieide by the deceased was on account<\/p>\n<p>  but this witness has denied the same.\n<\/p>\n<p>2  happenes $1.5 &#8216;be:&#8221;&#8216;eeusiI1 of the accused<\/p>\n<p>PW . 8]  another sister 91&#8243; the deceased who<\/p>\n<p>who was residing in<\/p>\n<p>W  h()pee&#8221;ef&#8217; PW 1. ?W 9 is cousin brother of the deceased<\/p>\n<p>is examined to speak about the motive for the cause<\/p>\n<p> fer&#8217; sass: efthe deceased. pw 10 Nagarsgja is a friend of the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; h\u00e9ieexlseci who said ts have seen the accused coming out of<\/p>\n<p>V the house of the esmpiainant. PW 11 G. Sathyanarayana<\/p>\n<p> \\\\<\/p>\n<p>is the, secretary at&#8217; the panchayat<br \/>\nwas maxkcd to say that PW 1 and ,\u00a7}tI1&lt;:ri\u00a5.&quot;$iu*\u00e9&#039;\u00a72&#039;Vfcs5idiI:g&#039;&amp; <\/p>\n<p>the pmperty where the dctceasczii d3{\u00a2ci.&#039;iV  \ufb01g; ?\u00a79\u00a7.R. <\/p>\n<p>Basavarajappa wha has<br \/>\nstated that the  9f:  and<br \/>\nstrangulation. PW     1:116: spot mahazar-<br \/>\nEx. P 3, he:  iifesccu\ufb01on. PW 14<\/p>\n<p>I~i&lt;)I11i$g0a\u00a7*ti\u00a3i_\u00ab._iV\u00e91f\ufb01&#8211;_V_x\u00a7%i;*;ij3ic:$;&#039;:s Vt-5  mquest report Ex. P 9<br \/>\nwho {jag   PW 3.5 Nagaraja is a neighbour<br \/>\nwhet: the ihe deceased in the house of PW<\/p>\n<p>1.  &#8216;\u00a7*i~3.su ppo_rts&#8221;&#8216;th\u00e9  91&#8243; the prosecution. PW 16 is a<\/p>\n<p> 1% fg\u00a71i\u00a2ei&#8217;*5c1\u00a7stg;b1e \ufb01gs Car\ufb01ed the FER Ex. P 10 aleng with<\/p>\n<p>  &#8221; to the concerned mum. PW 17 is the<\/p>\n<p> Cc\ufb01lstable who apprehcnd\ufb02d the accused and<\/p>\n<p>    him befure the concerned o\ufb01icer along with the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8220;&#8216; IV&#8217;\u00e9&#8217;p6rt-Ex. P 11. PW 18 is amrnthcr poiice constable who<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;&#8221;&#8221;\ufb01ratchcd the dead body and took the dead body ta pest<\/p>\n<p>\\\u00a7\\<\/p>\n<p>mertem and after post mortcm handed over the dead body<\/p>\n<p>to the rciativcs and the: personal belongngs to the higher<\/p>\n<p>authorities under Ex P 12. PW &#8216; 19 is the P331 who<\/p>\n<p>regster\ufb01ci the case as Crime No.2 10\/<\/p>\n<p>complaint of PW 1 as per Ex.P 1. PW  <\/p>\n<p>hzspcctor of Police who tmk fmfiilaer \u00e9   th\u00e9 &#8216; L. <\/p>\n<p>matter and PW 2 1 is the Police Ii1s.1:3\u00e9ctt\u00a7r  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>the investigation and fled  sh\u00e9et: W    <\/p>\n<p>13. After {\ufb02ing of t?it3&#8242;&#8211;.\u00a7::3&#8242;}ax&#8217;-gs  committal aeurt<\/p>\n<p>committ\u00e9\u00e9i  ;n.\u00a7f;t\u00e9r:\u00bbteVV.:t11e S\u00e9-\u00e9s\ufb02ions Court as. the matter<br \/>\nwas 3x\u00a7:&#8211;i13S\u00abiv\u00e9i_s?  \ufb02zhe Court of Semsions. The<\/p>\n<p>&lt;:hargc\u00a7agaii1stji;%1e\u00a7.&#039;~ac::\ufb01\u00a7;\u20acc1 in the Sessions Court ware for<\/p>\n<p> V&#039; &quot;Vth&amp;&quot;&#039;:\u00a7\u00a7fe\u00a31r,es..puni\u00e9;1*i\u00e913ie under Sections 3012 and 201 IPC,<\/p>\n<p>  d\u00a7ccase&lt;i was strangtllated by the<\/p>\n<p>acC&#039;a1\u00a7*yed_.-e\u00a7&#039;i\ufb011AV.the help of a mm as she was unable to<\/p>\n<p>  &quot;cgnceiire,__ :a child out of the wedlock, Lh\u20ac1&#039;{?:f{)I&#039;\u20ac tried to<\/p>\n<p>VA  evidence of murder ir1to ant: \u20ac31&#039; hanging by Gnrima<\/p>\n<p>%   .,hr:\u00a7rs::-,1f, in the very same house, 1:1} Show the Whole wurid<\/p>\n<p> &#039;  that it was a case of suicide by hangng by th\ufb01 deceased<\/p>\n<p>Gorima.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>6. The accused pleaded not guilty  <\/p>\n<p>Therefore the trial Court sent tbz\u00e9ii1\u00e91tt\u00a2i=Afor&#8217;     <\/p>\n<p>witnesses were examizlegi A.\n<\/p>\n<p>documents and one  &#8220;t1_?_1&lt;-*:-\n<\/p>\n<p>marking portion of bag   3}; Ex. D 1.\n<\/p>\n<p>Though the oph\ufb01on $ &#8216;.1-:2, regarding the<br \/>\ncause of Was\u00e9:   as a result of<br \/>\n \u00a3};$-&#8216;fgyther opinion cf the<br \/>\ncloctogrf  hanging. However the<br \/>\n  ..;&#8217; .t:;:&lt;\u00e9i.\u00a7jt:V.\u00bb\u00a5:\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9:_:&quot;a#7preciating the evidence \u00abof the<\/p>\n<p>duct??? &quot;a:}her.v&quot;m\u00e9xt\u00e9i*\u00a7a1s held it was a combina\ufb01on of<\/p>\n<p> V&#039;    s\ufb01\u00e9hg\ufb01lation. Though the death was not a<\/p>\n<p>   specific case of the prosecution is that the<\/p>\n<p>aC{:1;s8(i&quot;&lt;.1{\u00e91\ufb01rnitt6d murder of the deceased with an<\/p>\n<p>  &quot;&#039;\u00bbi;f1t6nti&lt;:s\ufb01&#039; to do away with her from this worlcl, as she was<\/p>\n<p>A   u:&#039;1ai\u00a7}1e to conceive a child and he was interested to marry<\/p>\n<p>V%   &#8230;S&#039;C;IIi(i ether girl. The learned ma} Judge irxrocceded to<\/p>\n<p>V censider the matter far an effence punishable under<\/p>\n<p>Sexctien 302 IP12: and not for the other <\/p>\n<p>under Section &#039;.201 IPC.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. After considering the<br \/>\nShakinabi, WV 4 Sakira,   isx\ufb01ail father of<br \/>\nthe deceased and 1&#8242;  has coma<br \/>\nto the co31c1usiQn   the accused in<br \/>\nthsa house   on that fateful day<br \/>\nand  was tmsumessful<br \/>\nin    beytmd reasonabie doubt<br \/>\nagainsf  V Agcordmgly the accusad was<\/p>\n<p>acqylittad of \u00e9iii  c\ufb01arges. Aggicved by the said order of<\/p>\n<p>   1f:;\ufb01e.VSt.ate has come up in this appeal.<\/p>\n<p>8;  Agcoiiiihg to the Isamed Addl. S.P.P. the evidence of<\/p>\n<p> Iriot-\ufb02ier PW 1, we sisters PW 4 and PW 8 and anoizher<\/p>\n<p> T. &#8216; &#8216;Asistsr PW 5 would inciicate presyence of the accused in the<\/p>\n<p>  -\u00bbv-\ufb01otzsc of the complairmnt smcc 4 er 5:3 days prior to<\/p>\n<p>29.5.2800 and so also his presence in the company of the<\/p>\n<p>il<\/p>\n<p>entire evidence on record and come te__ ;&#8217;_&#8217;\u00e9i&#8217; &#8216; _<\/p>\n<p>conclusion than that of the   cf {fie 2 <\/p>\n<p>settled law by the Apex Court  v:1  <\/p>\n<p>should be slew in   vaxgd *<\/p>\n<p>of acquittal having regard  uia-.\u00a7   Court<br \/>\nhad opportunity of   and conduct of<br \/>\nthe witnesses&#8221; vgfhc&#8217;   He also<br \/>\ncontended arc&#8217;  from the same set<br \/>\nof facile,    to the accused alone<br \/>\nis to   lee contends that even if from<\/p>\n<p>the san1eVVxsei\ufb01 ai%k&#8217;fa.\u00a7m &#8220;1\u00a7:::i\u00e9;sibi1ity of axriving at a di\ufb01erent<\/p>\n<p> v   by \ufb02iis-&#8230;..\u00a33ourt is there, the View of the trial<\/p>\n<p>   net perverse has to be accepted and seeks<\/p>\n<p> cf the acquittal order. With reference to<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;ruthe evi\ufb01ience cm record he brought to our nctice the<\/p>\n<p>._  \\<\/p>\n<p>cf mad reievant portions cf the evidence of PW 1,<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;  WV&#8217; 4, PW 3, PW 8 to contend that the presence of the<\/p>\n<p>accused in the said viilage as on the date of the incident is<\/p>\n<p>doubtful as the ?{II\ufb01&#8221;1CI&#8217; of the deceased was always<\/p>\n<p>opposcd to the marriage: between the accused and the<\/p>\n<p>deceased. Thersfare the case of the con1p1aina :m:: her<\/p>\n<p>kith and kin was only to wreck vengeang\u00e9: ._.&#8217;\u00a3hje<\/p>\n<p>accused. Mainly based an imagination   case&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>was iriitiated. On th\u00e9i\ufb01-\u20ac afgu1i\u00a7eIits&#8217;TT&#8217;._he::&#8221; &amp;fii\u00a7g11i:T1.T_:f0r <\/p>\n<p>conflrmatioia of the acqtiitt\u00e9\ufb01kaizgd  . L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>10. We have gone&#8217;   t&#8217;:Vid{3I1C\u20ac and so<\/p>\n<p>3350 the judgmexjt of=&#8221;\u20acuc-   point that would<\/p>\n<p>arise ifqr c&lt;j:i:;i\u20acie1f}\u00a71ti{i13..&#039;i$:<\/p>\n<p>i)  _VWhcV:&#8217;i\u00a7_1\u00e91f_V  j11dg111ent ef acquittal of the triai<br \/>\n&#8216; &#8216; C3n_1\u00a71I*t&#8217;watTants interfersnce?<\/p>\n<p> -V   \u00bb: &#8216;u&#8217;J1&#8243;1at order&#8217;?\n<\/p>\n<p>11&#8243;; SO  as Thf&#8217;. uzmamral daath of the deceased is<\/p>\n<p>V.   AA&lt;::::;1ce7i*1:3:ed, when we iwk at the evitsiencc of PW 12 the<\/p>\n<p>i\ufb01dication arm can gm is, it is a case ()1? throttling as well<\/p>\n<p>&quot;as strangma\ufb01en. In a caste after thmttiitlg a person, if a<\/p>\n<p>person is strangulated definiteiy the ligature: mark and<\/p>\n<p>other marks of vioienoc like finger print because of use of<\/p>\n<p>E3<\/p>\n<p>p1&#039;t3SS11I&#039;\u20ac of the hands en the neck are quite  In<\/p>\n<p>View of such material, the deetor has opinr;5:i&#039;-  <\/p>\n<p>Case of threttiing arid aiso swangmatien.  ,  .V  &#039; f <\/p>\n<p>that it is an unnatura} death. &#039;I&#039;1:&#039;1&quot;eV &lt;1rt&#039;TT&#039;1i.,?r1_ g <\/p>\n<p>is that at the hands of the  fi&#039;1e_  (if V<\/p>\n<p>the deceased Crerima.  happe\ufb01ed \ufb02ue 12.0&#039;: throttiing<br \/>\nand $tra:r::gu1ati0n. Tk1efef_z32*e    of suicide, so<\/p>\n<p>far the pI&#039;OS\u20ac_C1\u00a3tiGI1 ii;  &#039;ThLiugh the accused<\/p>\n<p>p1eade,:i the  jsuieide (flee to severe stomach pain<br \/>\nby the &quot;d.eeeasecf&#039;  &quot;i&#039;1*om the material on record<\/p>\n<p>except-\u00e9\ufb01jeii\ufb01\u00e9eeggeetien Eeing macie to the kith and kin, no<\/p>\n<p> &#039;5e:&#039;i\u20ac}us3&quot;~&quot;L03&#039;aeeeptable evidence has came on record to<\/p>\n<p>   x  deceased committed sujtzide due ta<\/p>\n<p>inie1erabie.VLetAomach pain. On the other hand, there is<\/p>\n<p>  Vesriglence &quot;to Shaw that the deceased was su\ufb01e\ufb01jlg from<\/p>\n<p>  &#039;iii\ufb01xess prim&quot; 1:0 her death and this Wee the main reason<\/p>\n<p> -\u00bbw1:1\u00a7; the relatives of the husband left her in the parental<\/p>\n<p>heuse fer the purpose ef treatment as the accused was<\/p>\n<p>residing at Bangalere. The accused is a carpenter by<\/p>\n<p>profession. The fact remains that in the absencc __of the<\/p>\n<p>accused establishing 2-1 case of suicide by <\/p>\n<p>dac\ufb01ased the proof of o\ufb01ence by the accused&#8221; : f\u00a31\u00e9&#8217;v <\/p>\n<p>prosecution so far as the o\ufb01bnce 3pun.ishai\u00a7)1e i:ii{1\u00a7:f&#8217;Sais;:ti0nV &#8216; L. <\/p>\n<p>30:2 and 201 IPC. The mat\u00a2:ia1:%%%%%%5i:  <\/p>\n<p>contents of Ex. P 9 inquest  a1i\u20aciat:Ex. P&#8217; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;3 weuid estabiish  it wa\ufb01h  \ufb01iitaath. The<\/p>\n<p>questian is whaither the accii\ufb01\u00e9d \\3z\u00e9s{&#8216;_r\u00a2&#8217;spensib1c for this<\/p>\n<p> :13. &#8216;M .  &#8216; &#8216; &#8216; ~ <\/p>\n<p>12. App\u00e9:1jent13%&#8221;z1e5\u00a31e\u00bb*  witnesses of the prosecution<\/p>\n<p> _ art-:..:=,\u00a7y&lt;*=: wit{1es\u00a7S&#039; Via&#039; the; incident in question. &#039;They all speak<\/p>\n<p> \u00bb:g};3c~11t f.:i\u00a511=:%111:\u00e9js&#039;{.i_t_.re i.e. the accuseti disciosing and declaring<\/p>\n<p>&#039;.i;i1\\;:\u00a7~t-.i*1\u00e9 \\xVf&#039;t3;11\u00a7:7\u00a3:.Viike ta take a second wife and therefore he<\/p>\n<p>  deceased Garima to\u00bb die. Them is another<\/p>\n<p> \u00a7&#039;..j1=i5Veas9n {Qzhy ht: was not happy with his wife i.e., she did<\/p>\n<p>&#039;  fitgxt Hcrsnc\ufb01ive a child after the marriage between the<\/p>\n<p>&#039;4 \u00a76C\u20ac3.S\u20acd anti th\ufb01 accused. in Gfd\ufb01i&#039; 1:-&lt;3 accept {his motive<\/p>\n<p>being the causzt far the \u00e9eath of the deccasmd, when we<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">36<\/span><\/p>\n<p>13. What is important in this Isaac is the:  pf<\/p>\n<p>the prosecutian is based upon circums:ta&#8217;1:1;ia\ufb01_T&#8217;\u20ac:\\\ufb01de:1C\u00a2&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>$p&lt;3keI1 through the. kith_an&lt;:1   <\/p>\n<p>14. Then ceming to the agtual icff\u00e9n\ufb01e, <\/p>\n<p>pmsecution 911 29.5.2008   \ufb01ras at<br \/>\nheme, PW 1 ajieng wi&#8217;i:.h.__PW&#8217; S  daughter of PW 1<br \/>\nleft the house to the houvsfg   ta watch a \ufb01lm<\/p>\n<p>as it w&#8217;\u00e9L$&#8217;VT&#8217;a:&#8217;wi&lt;;%ek  has\u00e9iso came in the &lt;-avidence 01&quot;<\/p>\n<p>these v;&#039;7itnassc&#8211;sV,  1 that the accused was in<\/p>\n<p>the  xriiiiagfz for 4 i&#039;.o 5 days as it was fastjval of Ramzan<\/p>\n<p> &#039;  _anii. day 3:1&lt;*;:V1&#039;j\u00a7\u00a3\u00abi(ii&#039;Vg(}Iz&lt;: to the eldest daug11ter of W 1<\/p>\n<p>  It has also came: in the evidence of FW 1<\/p>\n<p>that wfmn\u00e9iv\u00e9r a\ufb01cuaed was in her house 01&#039; during his<\/p>\n<p> i&lt;}_ Vi:i1e viiiagc: she wouid net gt) out of the house<\/p>\n<p>A   to Watch &#039;KEV. to see week and \ufb01lm. if it was<\/p>\n<p>   .._v\u00a7it}1i11 her 1{I1OW3.\u20ac(\u00a7gC that the accused was in the village<\/p>\n<p>V&#039; and gone to visit Shabu the eldest sister of the decmsed,<\/p>\n<p>Why she has gene 1:0 the house of PW 5 to Wat\ufb02h fiim along<\/p>\n<p>PW 8, is not at all explained? This is  <\/p>\n<p>normal conduct during the visits of \u00a3116..  &#039;to &quot;t1&quot;if:  <\/p>\n<p>vijiiaga, Accorciing to hm? whet}: si&quot;%\u00a7:4&#039;;:;I&#039;};<i>   <\/p>\n<p>house after having their d&#8217;i13__ner, &#8216;    &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>mformed them that she gou to    si$ter&#8217;s<br \/>\nhousc to bring the   AAt1;1xat was the<br \/>\ninformatinn gven to   WV 1 did not<br \/>\nstay back      return of the<br \/>\nacczls\ufb01fg  Gorima. This is<br \/>\nvar}? S'{.}\u00e92iI1g E   has not given proper<\/p>\n<p>explalua\ufb01an. &#8216;-\n<\/p>\n<p>  -..Th:\u00e9~4s:f&amp;*:7{\u00a7iex1ce at; PW 1 and PW 8 would indicat\ufb01 that<\/p>\n<p>xs%h\u00e9:1&#8217;th\u00e93\u00e9 i1ef\u00a3&#8221;&#8216;i: tht: house only Gcrima and th\ufb01 accusad<\/p>\n<p> W6I&#8217;\u00a3Et: a~\u00a7.\u00a3&#8221;}::1(:i.&#8217;VI1&#8217;:1(:- They said to have retmrxed silly at 12.00<\/p>\n<p>A Cf Meanwhile PW 4 Sakira also visits her mother&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>  piiice at afmlzt. 1G.3Qp.m. The evidence of Sakira is t0 the<\/p>\n<p>.4 \ufb01ifwt that prior to ?W 1 anti annther sister PW 8<\/p>\n<p>retlm\ufb02ng \ufb01nm the house of 1%\/Ialik, she Came to have food<\/p>\n<p>at about 10.30 p.131. and as no one <\/p>\n<p>3.-\u00a7I&#8221;iGCk6d at the door, ehe pushecythe   ,\ufb01iev&#8221;ho3.:lSe.<br \/>\nwhich opened anti she quietly \\%?a1k:e(1..i\u00a7iE\u00a7&#8217;:hei:e_:to &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>have dirmer. After having dinner ehe&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>behind the cuI&#8217;t.a\u00a7:n Where  the  and the<br \/>\ndeceased used to siee\ufb01f j She 5,f.,&#8217;eEt&#8221; the deceased was<br \/>\nlying en the i3.eu:&#8217;,__ Bu.i&#8221;Sixe&#8217;;  wake up either<\/p>\n<p>the accused er   fact remains: that<\/p>\n<p>aeeerding tci&#8221;*\u20ac;\u00a7\ufb01sVVi$zit:1e$eVV__When she {same to the house ef<br \/>\nPW 1 the\ufb01t:-\u00ab:::i&#8221;S were&#8217; _R3\u20ac:.ked either frenl inside or from<\/p>\n<p>eutsitie. _ This.yvitr1es\u00e9: Cili\ufb01ng the crass examination has<\/p>\n<p>     the peiiee her visit to the heuee of<\/p>\n<p>1 e\u00a71V&#8217;:&#8217;the night of 29.5.2300 at 19.35 p.m. to<\/p>\n<p>haxfe  If such statement admittedly not &#8216;stated<\/p>\n<p>.4 &#8221; &#8221;  .VL hefe\u00abqre am; police during inveetigation, her evidence before<\/p>\n<p>  ?i;E_i::*&#8221;\u20acf?eL1I&#8217;t that she visits, her methefs place at 10.15 pm.<\/p>\n<p>VT  &#8220;te have dixmer and eeeing the deceased lying on the \ufb02oer<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>ii&#8221;) a peculiar manner cannet be &lt;*;0{1s.idered. At the most<\/p>\n<p>she must have come ten the spet ef incident 0:13}; cm the<\/p>\n<p>next mnrning when other family  mg <\/p>\n<p>mmatural death of the deceased;\n<\/p>\n<pre>16. If the eviderxctt af this    we\nhave the \u00e9videncs    ar;dV'AAsi%.ter of the\ndectzascd PW    PW' 1 811131;.\n<\/pre>\n<p>Shakinabi  fef\ufb01-&#8220;16  &#8216;hasi \u00abnest: explained What<br \/>\ncumpelied   :3? Maiik against the<br \/>\nnonnaiy  %%%;ch T. V. or not to ieave the<br \/>\nhouse  \ufb01i\u00e9  her son in law i.e., accuser}.<\/p>\n<p>Accor;dL1g it} hgf&#8217;5:11c&#8221;de.&lt;:cas6d and thus accused said to<\/p>\n<p> i*1a\u00a7\u00e9  vthe house of hm&#039; sides: daughter Shahbu<\/p>\n<p>i:v.h\u20aci__ zfssidiiig 200 yards from her hcuse and her<\/p>\n<p> _ anqigiiry&#039; the: eldest daughter an the maxi: morning<\/p>\n<p> VV}*cv\u00a2?=;ajs  \u20acI;1at by 10.00 pm. on the previnus night the<\/p>\n<p>fsic\ufb01\u00e9iis\u00e9zd and the ciec\ufb01asecl returne\u00e9 ta her house. if this<\/p>\n<p>j  V&#039; evidence of PW 1 were to be taken intx::..1;s:t&#8217;\u00a7?1VVV&#8221;&#8216;i*7|Tf3tB3 &#8216;i\u00e9I1s&#8217;idsr:&#8221;.VE The flrst<br \/>\n{int}: of this iady an\u00e9     if any stranger<br \/>\nhad entaerad  h2eI&#8217;e kapt open\ufb01d.\n<\/p>\n<p>She \u00e9i\ufb01 HQ   &#8216; did not even suspect<br \/>\nany  to peep through the<br \/>\n{:11rt,aihhtg;\ufb01s &#8220;she  and son in iaw is not 1:133<\/p>\n<p>ncamska}. xc01&#8217;fciuV{;t&#8221;&lt;3f  parent. if she were to notice<\/p>\n<p>. .   of daughttil.&quot; she coul\u00e9 have aiertad her<\/p>\n<p> hw hat sleep pmperly. But :~3i:range1y this<\/p>\n<p>iady. kept -\u00a7#;1Aiet. She: again. names gut with 3 $ta.teJ:{1e:m:<\/p>\n<p>    midnight she heard very&#8217; strange sound from<\/p>\n<p>  the&#8217;:-: @1396 where the deceased and her son~i31~1aw were<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;&#8216;S\u00bbiE\u20acpiI]g. But she thought: that it may he only the noise of<\/p>\n<p>a cat. At 3.00 am. when her s0n~in&#8211;1aW woke her up} She<\/p>\n<p>naticed the tmnatural dtiath ef her daughter. She said to<\/p>\n<p>have scan the deceased leaning towards<br \/>\naround her neck. Her evidence: I-Wiiia-if} i\u00a7f1di_g:~aite&#8217;._fj:1at[.&#8217; Sh-c &#8216;<br \/>\nhad genuine: reason to raise hue: aizgi  asfgthe V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>same foui play at that mags;\n<\/p>\n<p>knew that the    her<br \/>\nhusband from the houhh hf she goes to the<br \/>\nhouse of PW    of the hmlsc<br \/>\nwere nut  V1101: suspect any foul<br \/>\nplay.   curtain and notices<br \/>\nheir daL;ig&#8217;,hi:t\u00a7r grhund in a strangc marmer,<\/p>\n<p>she: di&lt;:i_ not4&quot;ss1V$peC&#039;t  and kept quiet. When she<\/p>\n<p>3 V&#039; snang\u00e9h hiji\u00e9\u00e9 in the midnight stjl} she kept quiet<\/p>\n<p> anything. All this W0,-uid only indicate<\/p>\n<p>\ufb021at,\u00bb.._i1o:1a TV those incidents were noticed by her and<\/p>\n<p> &#039;~__ $hc has;  her daughter being dead only in the merrxing<\/p>\n<p> _;&#039;:&#039;2u.3f1(1-._x_a\u00a7%;it11 a strong suspicion against the accused she<\/p>\n<p>   the compliant against him.\n<\/p>\n<p>Another impartant<\/p>\n<p>  ~ &#8220;vhwitness in this cast: for the prosecution would be Mrs.<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p>Shabu the eldest daughter of t_he complajlmnt. She aione<\/p>\n<p>would have been able to say whether the<br \/>\n1:0 tbs: house at&#8217; the WV 1 a}0ng&#8230;w_i_&#8217;;h  {Sr  <\/p>\n<p>alime returned to the house. if t\u00a7E 1 e~   lfi\u00e9use <\/p>\n<p>were 110:, iocked either ~.\u00a7;1:t\u00a5si'&lt;i%__ DIV&#039;<br \/>\npowsibility of any arm  th\u00a7:_AAheE11s\u00a2 cannot<br \/>\nbe ruled out. Even  4 02311110: be a<br \/>\ncorrebora\ufb01v\ufb01 giic\ufb01t   evi\u00e9encc 0f the<br \/>\nprosecutiegm   did retunu to\u00bb the<br \/>\n the house of Shabu at<br \/>\na &quot;\ufb01nd the evidence. af either pw 4<\/p>\n<p>er PW Sxtliat V.V\u00e91t__  or 12.00 midnight they pecped<\/p>\n<p>   the  secs: the accused and the deceased<\/p>\n<p>   If ?W 8 and PW 1 had suspicion<\/p>\n<p>agaii:1s1;_ i.&#039;};\u00a3:_ ziccused war; 3 minute or miner material or<\/p>\n<p> pec1iii. $r:. condxict or irmident would aicrt them to check<br \/>\n  was happening. in spite cf noticing very strange and<\/p>\n<p>V.  fmcu\ufb01ar things, none of the kith am} kin including the<\/p>\n<p>mother of the; deccascd were caut:i011s e11o1:1gl1 to pmbe<\/p>\n<p>furth\ufb01r. This wauld only indicate that they did not know<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">23<\/span><\/p>\n<p>any thing during that night and they were <\/p>\n<p>ef the death of the deceased dtlriilgmthat:  V. <\/p>\n<p>cvidenca 0f the Witnesses w0u}d:=.,rcv{s:a1f1&#8217;th.:a,t. ~.at- 7&#8243; ; ii1<\/p>\n<p>the momimg on 30.5.2O{)0V&#8217;jVp:)\u00a7icc &lt;;.a\ufb01&#039;s&lt;::V % <\/p>\n<p>o\ufb01enca no complaint came    on<br \/>\n30.5.2000. The exp1:a&amp;1.$V\u00e9;\u00a3io1\u00a7+L   was Waiting for<br \/>\nthe ar\ufb01val sf herv&#8211;hu$bax1d..- i&#039;1\u00a7;31__iiic  arrived at the<\/p>\n<p>spot they    &#039;i1$t}\u00e97s:.tigati0n and wouid<\/p>\n<p>not wa\u00e9it    to arrive and lodge a<br \/>\ncomp1a1n::,_ &#039; %%Hox,;;eg%:;%;,%A &#039;&#039;&#039;complaint is iedged by the<\/p>\n<p>mcth\ufb01r  Vz1\u20acxV1;_  t\ufb01\u00e9 f\u00e9ather of the (iectased. All these<\/p>\n<p>  indicate that because of SOIH6<br \/>\n against the accused they had strong<br \/>\n _ susf;:i.cic_i&#039;1&#039;  {ha acts {If the accused involving 1:1 the<\/p>\n<p>H H &quot;  Junt.&lt;\u00a7wa_fx&#039;i.. iracident which laltixnately restlited in the death<\/p>\n<p>_&#039;  &lt;if 1:Ii?1&lt;\u00a7 deceased Gorima. However strong the smspicion of<\/p>\n<p>VT  V&#039;  camp-laixlant and athcrs, it cannot take the place of<\/p>\n<p>A procaf. Suspiciun however strong, remains a suspicion and<\/p>\n<p>not proof of a fact. in the absence of the prosecution<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">24<\/span><\/p>\n<p>establishing the charges with the relevant  to<\/p>\n<p>prove the charges aginst the accused  <\/p>\n<p>doubt especially in a case of cirC}3;}1&gt;sta;11t:'{:a&#8217;1&#8243;   <\/p>\n<p>$i;roI1g suspicion wiil aiso not assist the: .;)ros~\u00a2\u20ac:24ti9i1:i\u00a33A\u00e9x:1y<\/p>\n<p>1333131161&#8242;. Nuns of the circu\ufb01mfances 21371:&#8217;: e $ia_b}ishcd in . L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>this case. Under th\u20ac:$(&#8216;:__(2iI'(11}I1}1:SV3iLi:-&#8216;.I&#8217;_i{3rf:3E&#8217;\u00bb, we  is no<br \/>\nperversity&#8221; in the \ufb01:1ci3:*1g&#8217; T -of L.t1\u00a7\u20acj. 1\u00e9a:n\u00e9\u00e9_ trial Judge in<\/p>\n<p>ccnciudilag tha\u00a7&#8217;:_*?he   iitt\ufb01riy faiied to<\/p>\n<p>estabiish t\u00a71cTA\u00e9:i\u00e9_z3r;g\u00e9s%  the acctised.<br \/>\nAccordingly\u00bbfipi1fi\u20ac\u00abft\u00a7&#8221;1at. the appeal desenres to be<br \/>\ndismissed alid ._$t2mds&#8217;Ciisi11issed.<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>Tudge<br \/>\nSd\/-it<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court State By Rural Police Shimoga vs R Muniyappa @ Munna on 16 February, 2009 Author: Manjula Chellur Gowda IN THE HIGH mask? 01? KARNATAKA AT * DATE!) THIS THE 16 my QF&#8221;&#8216;FEBl?_fL31$i\u00a7&#8217;:;,l ;;2iii3\u00a7&#8217;.k PRESEN&#8217;fV__ THE HONBLE MRS. MM!-JL&#8217;1,\u00a7\u00a7_; CRELLBR THE HONBLE MR. J{iSTii3E2.j_B. EISIIVASE GOWDA Crimi:1a3Vi\u00a3b\ufb01\u00e9a1VP\u20acQ;_2&#8217;51 \u00a2;i*VV%2&lt;302 Between: : Statse by V [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-245095","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State By Rural Police Shimoga vs R Muniyappa @ Munna on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State By Rural Police Shimoga vs R Muniyappa @ Munna on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-13T05:15:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State By Rural Police Shimoga vs R Muniyappa @ Munna on 16 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-13T05:15:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":3624,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009\",\"name\":\"State By Rural Police Shimoga vs R Muniyappa @ Munna on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-13T05:15:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State By Rural Police Shimoga vs R Muniyappa @ Munna on 16 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State By Rural Police Shimoga vs R Muniyappa @ Munna on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State By Rural Police Shimoga vs R Muniyappa @ Munna on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-13T05:15:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State By Rural Police Shimoga vs R Muniyappa @ Munna on 16 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-13T05:15:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009"},"wordCount":3624,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009","name":"State By Rural Police Shimoga vs R Muniyappa @ Munna on 16 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-13T05:15:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-rural-police-shimoga-vs-r-muniyappa-munna-on-16-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State By Rural Police Shimoga vs R Muniyappa @ Munna on 16 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245095","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=245095"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245095\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=245095"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=245095"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=245095"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}