{"id":245133,"date":"2011-05-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011"},"modified":"2018-10-24T17:28:04","modified_gmt":"2018-10-24T11:58:04","slug":"syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011","title":{"rendered":"Syed Usman @ Usman vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its &#8230; on 27 May, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Syed Usman @ Usman vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its &#8230; on 27 May, 2011<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.V.Pinto<\/div>\n<pre>6\n\neanhot be hidden inside the peeke--t.\u00a2 \n\nthe entire materials as menti\u00b0ene1ddA'a'b0'x&gt;*e' is ..e:\"eatihg\n\ndoubt regarding the invehieinent .tsf__ the and\"\n\nbenefit of such doubt sh0g.}dVVV:A'iae\"g1'_veh' tdtheiaeeused.\nHence in View of  is no specific:\nevidence thatpthe  the knife from\nhis  ease;  is appearing to\nbe artifieiai.ta11;d;.,_theretdte';  that the appeal\n\nmay be a1iew'ed.  _  _\n .Lea1*1ie--d_p 'HCG__I3~-._submits that the evidence of\n\nPWs.1At0u  whd'ate.the_f'eyewitnesses is cogent and clear\n\nand they havie  that the accused had removed the\n\n  ian&lt;;1&#039;= hadttha\u00e9ked the deceased as to Why he had\n\n   and thereafter, he has stabbed\n\ndeceased.&#039;-&quot;tj--:S}adiq Pasha. The deceased has been\n\n  shifted to the hospital and that the\n\nA &#039;dd&#039; e&#039;}id\u00abenee ef the doctor PW4 Dr\ufb01haranappa proves that\n\nthe deceased has sustained injuries on his chest He\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n7 7\n\nfurther submits that in View  ..d&#039;ire-ct-- .:_&quot;e\u00a7,:e17;\u00a7itfieee\n\naccount of PWe.1 to 3, the ideritfity oifgthe \n\nreiegates back. Howei\u00e9e-:_V:&quot;&quot;PW.5&quot; .D1:E;&#039;e-:ikate&#039;ei&#039;i&quot;: has\u00bb\n\nidentified the knife in the  hae that the\ninjury on deceased pffseiehi eaeieed by the knife\nM03 produced&#039;hefore&quot;hi1ri;.   that PWS.4\n\nand 8 are.-vin&#039;t:iee_eee ijtohthe  The argument of\nthe learned Coiine-e} foij.ith\u00bbe_&#039;ap&#039;-peilarit that the accused\n\nwas catig11at:&#039;:I:1o1d:f:A:by &#039;P. 3.1 to&quot;&#039;3&#039;&quot;:is incorrect. PW.3 says\nthat after--aboL:t.__\u00bb&#039;70()&lt;to&quot;8_COIsteps, the accused escaped\n\nfrom hieouestody  away towards Davanagere and\n\nat the time&#039; of ruiining accused was holding knife in his\n\n.   ThoughAVvPWVe.1 and 2 have accompanied the\n\n    hospital, they have not stated that they\n\nhayie  the deceased in their hands so that the\n\n hioodvvetains of the deceased would have fallen on their\n\n xWe&#039;aring apparel. Hence, there is no discrepancy in the\n\n&quot;*ev*idence of witrieeeee and therefore, the order of\n\nV&#039; &quot;&quot;cor1victior: is iiabie to be confirmed. Hence? he submits\n\n&#039;;\u00bba\n\n \n\n\n\nIO \n\nas to why he abused his father on  \n\nirnrnediately, accused took \n\np()Ck\u20acd and stabbed Sadio--.I\u00a7a~s%ha  and&quot;?\n\ndue to that, Sadiq Pas11aVAi.c.oii&#039;ap&#039;s--ed atithe solace and\nirnmediately he was  Hospital.\nA351&quot; gwiflg  Pasha, the\ndoctor    :[}at\/;anagei*e Hospital and\nafterv\u00a7%ards&quot;&#039;*Vtitie}-35%  Ambulance van with\nSadici:      &#039;C__h--igateri Hospital Davanagere.\nBut onhtwhe  succumbed to the injuries\n\nanti&#039; \u00bbther&#039;efo.re&quot;&quot;&#039;the &#039;body was brought back to\n\n. it  Bh&#039;ara~ri&#039;iasagaraiV\ufb02mdn the basis of the said information\n\n the Bhaijarriasagara Police registered a case in Crime\n\n for offence under Section 302 IPC against\n\n the a.e__eused at 12.30 pm. and issued FIR. After\n\n eo_riAiiucting the investigation, the police have filed the\n\n  eharge sheet against the accused for the offence under\n\nSection 302 IPC.\n\n\n\nll\n\n18. PW} -~ Md. ibrahim i_smVtahe   \n\nhas reiterated the version given&#039;-by  1n.111\u00a2eo&#039;::1p1\u00e9;1:1:\n\nand has identified the satne....as E1xfl3&#039;l_\\i\u00a7hile&quot;*vdepesing.l&#039;\n\nbefore Ccurt. He has statedm1=ega1jding&quot;the ittcident of\n13.11.2000<\/pre>\n<p> and 111:\u00bb  en 14.11.2000<br \/>\nhimself and the leaders the  had gathered<\/p>\n<p>near the shopilldf   at about 11.00<br \/>\nam. He has also&#8217; stated that .Vtl&#8217;1ey&#8230;h\u00bbad summoned the<\/p>\n<p>accused  when the accused<br \/>\nreacltjeldmthew accused as to why he<br \/>\nhas abt1s&#8217;ed &#8216;Ja1hja}tath&#8221;1\u00bbpeople. At that time, the<\/p>\n<p>deceased alsc en-.q1A1ire&#8217;d&#8221; the accused as to why he has<\/p>\n<p>  ab:dsedA&#8217;:}1i,s father&#8212;.&#8212;&#8212;\u00abThen accused suddenly took a knife<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;  i&#8217;1.is'{\u00a7ant&#8212;-packet and stabbed on the left side chest<\/p>\n<p>  Then Sadiq Pasha sustained bleeding<\/p>\n<p> he said &#8216;Awe&#8217;. His clothes stained with<\/p>\n<p>  bleed.  in the crosswexamination, it is suggested that no<\/p>\n<p> incident has happened as alleged by him and that<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; &#8220;no such discussions were he\/id regarding the Jarnayath<\/p>\n<p>E7<\/p>\n<p>witheut any intention to commit nn::de;%} and the VV &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>learned Sessiens Judge f0und&#8221;xth&#8217;.at&#8217;the. <\/p>\n<p>guilty of Causing culpable  r;_tt&#8217;arn{)&#8217;n&#8211;n.t:ng to-&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>murder.\n<\/p>\n<p>19. I have carefnh\u00a7?-  the evidence on<br \/>\nrecord and alee&#8217; the  It is seen that<br \/>\nPV\\\/3.1 to   incident and all three<br \/>\nof them :Vh.ai%eV;&#8221;&#8216;:_Veqn  Vdgthat the accused had<br \/>\nwhenwthe deceased asked the<br \/>\naccueedias to had abused the father cf<\/p>\n<p>deceasedD&#8221;&#8216;The..eextidednce of PWs.4 and 8 further<\/p>\n<p>  ea&#8217;tab]\u00a7f;a1&#8243;1e_s that&#8217;t-he\u00ab&#8217;knife identified by the eyew\ufb01nesses<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   _&#8217;\u20ac1&#8217;\u20acd at the instance of the accused. PW5<\/p>\n<p> .1&#8217;ias_\u00abAfii&#8217;tther&#8217;.t&#8217;:etated that the death of the deceased was<\/p>\n<p>hdm0cid;d:&#8221;&#8221; death. The FSL report produced by the<\/p>\n<p> p1fcsectt&#8217;tien and marked as Ex.P12 states; that the knife<\/p>\n<p>A&#8217; &#8216;~_a&#8217;i:&#8211; attiele No.4 is stained with blood and EZXPIB further<\/p>\n<p>   _*iI1tZtiC?E3.{\u20acfS that the bieed grenp in the knife and the bleed<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">19<\/span><\/p>\n<p>any other cases and that incident has happened:&#8217;tn&#8217;L:&#8217;sf;s.r<\/p>\n<p>of movements E arm of the opinion that the:_:se.1:1\u00a3e&#8217;nce\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment imposed on the 2;ccti&#8217;sed\u00a5.is ondthey higher<\/p>\n<p>side. It is seen that the accused i}vs.s in&#8217;Ve1A:stody&#8217;:.&#8217;t1*on:.yV<\/p>\n<p>12.10.2000 to 22.6.2004 i.e&#8221;&#8216;efof\u00bbabout .;V3&#8217;ye&#8217;21rs?_8V&#8217;VVn1onthsVV<\/p>\n<p>7 days. The accusedyytvas V\u00e9tftet the date<br \/>\nof conviction for a pe1&#8217;ji_ovdfI&#8217;he accused was<br \/>\nalmost in&#8217;    4 years. It is<br \/>\n and is responsible<br \/>\nfor   children. They are no<br \/>\nother   against the accused. At<\/p>\n<p>the; time xyhendthevn offence was committed, he was 21<\/p>\n<p>  hoy\u00b0\u00ab&#8211;aged about 22 years. Hence, I am of the<\/p>\n<p>  period of sentence already undergone<\/p>\n<p>the &#8220;fine would be the just and proper punishment<\/p>\n<p>2 .. Atfoi\ufb01offvence committed by him.<\/p>\n<p>21; Accordingly, appeal is allowed in part. The<\/p>\n<p>order of conviction for offence under Section 304 part &#8211;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">20<\/span><br \/>\nH IPC is hereby confirmed and senteribe of<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment imposed on the appeilant <\/p>\n<p>the period already undergone and is direete\u00e9i  <\/p>\n<p>as ordered by the Tried Court. }1&#8217;e.ord_;er the<\/p>\n<p>payment of Compensation is a1s:{;.1\u00a7e;1\u00a7i&#8217; ,  _ &#8221;<br \/>\n \u00a7:;2;:\u00e9g\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>nwj \/ VSK<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Syed Usman @ Usman vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its &#8230; on 27 May, 2011 Author: B.V.Pinto 6 eanhot be hidden inside the peeke&#8211;t.\u00a2 the entire materials as menti\u00b0ene1ddA&#8217;a&#8217;b0&#8217;x&gt;*e&#8217; is ..e:&#8221;eatihg doubt regarding the invehieinent .tsf__ the and&#8221; benefit of such doubt sh0g.}dVVV:A&#8217;iae&#8221;g1&#8217;_veh&#8217; tdtheiaeeused. Hence in View of is no [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-245133","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Syed Usman @ Usman vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Syed Usman @ Usman vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-24T11:58:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Syed Usman @ Usman vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its &#8230; on 27 May, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-24T11:58:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011\"},\"wordCount\":511,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011\",\"name\":\"Syed Usman @ Usman vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-24T11:58:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Syed Usman @ Usman vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its &#8230; on 27 May, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Syed Usman @ Usman vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Syed Usman @ Usman vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-24T11:58:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Syed Usman @ Usman vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its &#8230; on 27 May, 2011","datePublished":"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-24T11:58:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011"},"wordCount":511,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011","name":"Syed Usman @ Usman vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 27 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-24T11:58:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-usman-usman-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-27-may-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Syed Usman @ Usman vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its &#8230; on 27 May, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245133","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=245133"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245133\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=245133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=245133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=245133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}