{"id":245314,"date":"2009-07-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009"},"modified":"2018-03-27T18:29:30","modified_gmt":"2018-03-27T12:59:30","slug":"paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Paul Mathew vs Bhaskaran on 23 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Paul Mathew vs Bhaskaran on 23 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 8447 of 2004(E)\n\n\n1. PAUL MATHEW, MUNDACKAL HOUSE,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. BHASKARAN S\/O. ANANDAN, PULLATTU,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THOMAS S\/O. PATHROSE, KOORAMKUNNEL\n\n3. PATHROSE, MOORAMKUNNEL PUTHENPURA,\n\n4. JOSE S\/O. VARGHESE, PULIYAMPILLIL,\n\n5. VINCENT S\/O. MATHAI,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.PAUL KURIAKOSE\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice T.K.CHANDRASEKHARADAS(RETD. JUDGE)\n\n Dated :23\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n            JUSTICE T.K.CHANDRASEKHARA DAS\n          (RETD.JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)\n                              &amp;\n                 SRI.M.R.RAJENDRAN NAIR\n       (SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)\n       ===============================\n                   W.P.(C).No.8447 of 2004\n       ===============================\n              Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2009\n\n                           AWARD\n\n\n     Parties and their counsel are present. They have settled\n\nthe matter and produced the terms of compromise in writing.\n\nThe joint memo signed by both the parties shall form part of the\n\nAward. An Award is passed as per the terms of the joint memo.\n\n\n\n\n                                T.K.CHANDRASEKHARA DAS\n                        (RETD.JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)\n\n\n\n\n                                  M.R.RAJENDRAN NAIR\n                 (SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)\ndvs\n\n\n? IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\n+Mat.Appeal.No. 560 of 2009()\n\n\n#1. B.V.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n$1. REKHA, W\/O.B.V.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. MEERA GOPAL,D\/O.REKHA(MINOR),\n\n3. REVATHI, D\/O.REKHA,\n\n!                For Petitioner  :SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR\n\n^                For Respondent  :SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY\n\n*Coram\n The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\n The Hon'ble MRS. Justice M.C.HARI RANI\n\n% Dated :24\/07\/2009\n\n: O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>               R.BASANT &amp; M.C.HARI RANI, JJ.\n<\/p>\n<p>          &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>                  Mat.Appeal No.560 OF 2009\n<\/p>\n<p>        &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br \/>\n           DATED THIS THE 24th DAY OF JULY, 2009<\/p>\n<p>                         J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n<p>Basant, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The appellant has come to this Court aggrieved by the<\/p>\n<p>direction for payment of maintenance to his wife and two minor<\/p>\n<p>children at the rate of Rs.1,000\/- each per mensem(Total<\/p>\n<p>Rs.3,000\/- per mensem).\n<\/p>\n<p>     2.    Marriage is admitted.       Paternity is not disputed.<\/p>\n<p>Separate residence is also conceded. It is further admitted that<\/p>\n<p>the parties have secured divorce.       The court below directed<\/p>\n<p>payment of maintenance at the rate of Rs.400\/- per mensem for<\/p>\n<p>a period of five years from the date of filing of the petition in<\/p>\n<p>1999. Thereafter maintenance was ordered to be paid at the<\/p>\n<p>rate of Rs.700\/- per mensem each till the date of the impugned<\/p>\n<p>order. From the date of the impugned order direction was issued<\/p>\n<p>to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.1,000\/- per mensem. There<\/p>\n<p>was also a direction to return an amount of Rs.20,000\/- which<\/p>\n<p>the appellant had admittedly received from the respondent,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Mat.Appeal No.560\/09        -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>though the respondent had claimed that an amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.50,000\/- was paid.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.    The appellant claims to be aggrieved by the impugned<\/p>\n<p>order.     What is the grievance?      So far as the amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.20,000\/- is concerned, the court below relied on the admission<\/p>\n<p>of the appellant that he had received the said amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.20,000\/-.        No contention has been advanced before us<\/p>\n<p>against the said finding of the Family Court.<\/p>\n<p>      4.    The only contention raised before us is that the<\/p>\n<p>quantum of maintenance awarded is excessive. The claim was<\/p>\n<p>filed as early as in 1999.      The court below had realistically<\/p>\n<p>awarded only lesser amounts for the earlier periods of time.<\/p>\n<p>Amounts are awarded at the rate of Rs.400, Rs.700\/- and<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,000\/- per mensem for all the claimants for various periods.<\/p>\n<p>      5.    Going by the needs of the claimants, by no stretch of<\/p>\n<p>imagination, can it be held that the amount of maintenance fixed<\/p>\n<p>at the rates shown above is excessive. The amount of Rs.1,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>per mensem is hardly sufficient for the claimants to keep body<\/p>\n<p>and soul together. Judged from their requirements, the amount<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Mat.Appeal No.560\/09         -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>awarded cannot hence be held to be excessive.<\/p>\n<p>      6.    The learned counsel contends that the appellant has<\/p>\n<p>only a monthly income of Rs.1,795\/-. For this purpose, he relied<\/p>\n<p>on a certificate which he received from Mannam Memmorial<\/p>\n<p>Residential Higher Secondary School. The court below was not<\/p>\n<p>prepared to accept that, that is the only monthly income of the<\/p>\n<p>appellant. The court below took note of Exhibits A1 to A6 which<\/p>\n<p>conveyed unmistakably that the appellant was having alternative<\/p>\n<p>sources of income. He was a Musician and he was undertaking<\/p>\n<p>programmes for various organisations and institutions. The court<\/p>\n<p>below took note of his own claim in a notice issued through the<\/p>\n<p>counsel that he had suffered loss exceeding Rs.3 lakhs on<\/p>\n<p>account of the conduct of the wife, who obstructed his activities<\/p>\n<p>as a Musician.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7.    It is true that the wife was not able to produce specific<\/p>\n<p>evidence about the quantum of income which the appellant<\/p>\n<p>derives.    But it would be puerile for a court to expect such<\/p>\n<p>authentic documentary evidence in all cases. Exhibits A1 to A6<\/p>\n<p>are the available documents which indicate the possible and<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Mat.Appeal No.560\/09      -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>probable income of the appellant. It does not require the wisdom<\/p>\n<p>of Solomon to conclude that the appellant was not living on the<\/p>\n<p>meagre income of Rs.1,795\/- which he was allegedly getting as<\/p>\n<p>monthly income from one School. In any view of the matter,<\/p>\n<p>according to us, the court below has committed no error or<\/p>\n<p>indiscretion in assuming, in the light of the totality of inputs<\/p>\n<p>available, that the husband, i.e., the appellant herein will be in a<\/p>\n<p>position to pay monthly maintenance prospectively at the rate of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,000\/- per mensem to the three claimants. In any view of<\/p>\n<p>the matter, in exercise of the appellate jurisdiction vested in us<\/p>\n<p>under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, that decision does not<\/p>\n<p>call for interference.  The same appears to be fair, just and<\/p>\n<p>reasonable to us.    This Mat.Appeal is in these circumstances<\/p>\n<p>dismissed in limine.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                 R.BASANT, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                 M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>dsn<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Paul Mathew vs Bhaskaran on 23 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 8447 of 2004(E) 1. PAUL MATHEW, MUNDACKAL HOUSE, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. BHASKARAN S\/O. ANANDAN, PULLATTU, &#8230; Respondent 2. THOMAS S\/O. PATHROSE, KOORAMKUNNEL 3. PATHROSE, MOORAMKUNNEL PUTHENPURA, 4. JOSE S\/O. VARGHESE, PULIYAMPILLIL, 5. VINCENT S\/O. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-245314","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Paul Mathew vs Bhaskaran on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Paul Mathew vs Bhaskaran on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-27T12:59:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Paul Mathew vs Bhaskaran on 23 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-27T12:59:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":743,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Paul Mathew vs Bhaskaran on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-27T12:59:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Paul Mathew vs Bhaskaran on 23 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Paul Mathew vs Bhaskaran on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Paul Mathew vs Bhaskaran on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-27T12:59:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Paul Mathew vs Bhaskaran on 23 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-27T12:59:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009"},"wordCount":743,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009","name":"Paul Mathew vs Bhaskaran on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-27T12:59:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/paul-mathew-vs-bhaskaran-on-23-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Paul Mathew vs Bhaskaran on 23 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245314","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=245314"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245314\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=245314"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=245314"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=245314"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}