{"id":245364,"date":"2009-02-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009"},"modified":"2019-02-12T08:43:03","modified_gmt":"2019-02-12T03:13:03","slug":"smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt M Sharada Devi vs Sri Sundar Bhat on 18 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt M Sharada Devi vs Sri Sundar Bhat on 18 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: H N Das<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
eenceme\u00e9, the same is questioned before this Court am’ the matter was<\/p>\n
remanded for fresh eonsiderat\u00e9en to the Land Tribunai and the same <\/p>\n
pending adjueiieatien. When the matter stood at that stage,  ”<\/p>\n
pmitttiff sold 1 acre 53 eents in f3″‘e’0i11′ of second piaiz1ti1’if’._ttnder.:e’ <\/p>\n
registered sate deed dated 17.01.1981. The Qii\u00e9nal.qti:1er,..s”.<\/p>\n
No. 1635198\u00a7 against the defendants forg:’ei1t.._Mcf peimanentt “\u00a7;1jii:ietion<\/p>\n
zestraining them from interfer\ufb02tg_ with  pesseeeionj and
\nenjoyment of the plain: schedule  S-:2_(_if the same
\nmeasuring in all 3 aeresefi-3V_h appearanee
\nbefore the Trial Cottg\ufb01t.  ifsttet eii\u00e9t centending that
\ntheir lands are simated. 91}.    Vecheduie preperty and
\nthat there is aiteaei nf  p\u00a3ainti\ufb01\u00b0s and defendants
\nwhich they are   is further contended that Stat.<\/p>\n
Rita Norenita. \ufb02ied at \u00a7z’1itV_:.91g2-tithtget the res; ptamti\ufb01m as. No. 125.2197: fer
\n _of  i;qju1tetie\u00a3t”‘a:id in the said suit the eompetent civii<\/p>\n
Cotii>t_’f:eiaciT_ti1at”tt1e’  is not in possession. of any portion ef suit<\/p>\n
 ” \ufb01mase  ..\u20aciefen<ia;1ts further eentend that by suppressing the<\/p>\n
feetsthe  have \ufb01led the present suit and en these gonads<\/p>\n
 tflieelaen Of piaintiffs. It is further eentended that there is an<\/p>\n
 _3gg\u00ab*eert1he4t1t \u00a3ietvs\u00ab*ee12 the defendants and 5212:. Rita Nerenha as per 52.31.13,?<\/p>\n
 '  agreei\ufb01\ufb01 to repair the read in question by sharing the eests an else to use<\/p>\n
d\\.\/\\\/"\n<\/p>\n
the mad by hem the parties. 01: the basis of pieadings, the Txiai Cam<\/p>\n
framed the foilcewixxg issaes and additional issu\ufb01 far its eonsidaraticm.<\/p>\n
i. Whether plainiiffs prove that they are in iawfui po$s.\u00a2\u00a7$it1i’4}:4″V;. ”<\/p>\n
of the z\ufb02aint A scheduie property’?\n<\/p>\n
 Wizether the piainti\ufb01s grave the’ \u00bbiit\u00a3i21’\u00abfa1jei1;;e ,5\u00bb\u00a7 n;’._:.:ge  <\/p>\n
defendant as averted in gara III (5)   l\ufb01f  ‘~ , \u00ab. V’ ”\n<\/p>\n
iii. Whether defendant proves’ ‘\u00bb2=_.;a:isteii:,a:__ r;>’f._fo’a;d\u00a5V\u00a7i;=::1i5}’ <\/p>\n
SING. 16,538 staninggom ti1,e—E\\FVV\u00a7iti\u00a7xn\u00a7i\u00a3~\u00bb.I%.Iigl1.\u00a7v\u00e9ryvandz\u00e9a to
\nthe iand of defendant”   years’?\n<\/p>\n
iv. Further dgfaxzcigtni    and his
\npredages\ufb01\ufb01ys  ~b4\u00e9::.e*-x_\u00a7\u20ac  as of right},
\n v:’1\u00a7n:j\u00a7t}a\u00e9$”‘1%<c;'faeted his right to use the said
\nf\u00e9\u00e9i\u00e9 :"r3i'\u20acSi.'\u00bb'3'.i.'{'iV}\u00a5C:\u00a3~'LA)V'f1L.?:_' " '=– N V .<\/p>\n
V'. E' ' '+Vh\u20ac{h'<%}i' \ufb01ve; vpa.r'ties.'Var\u00e9Te%.ntit\u00a3ed to the reiiefs claimed in the<\/p>\n
 S\ufb01ig?  A. " …… ..\n<\/p>\n
' L__ *\u00e9i.__. 2 V =    decree'?\n '_ : 'jg: an a2,g;.g99';,\n<\/pre>\n
 L “‘e%g%\u00a7i\u00a3:tl1er the cozinter aiaizn \u00a33 baxre\u00e9 by Law ef<\/p>\n
. _ _ H Limitation?\n<\/p>\n
74.. Before the Tzial Ceurt {ha piainti\ufb01s examined twe witnesses as<\/p>\n
  P.W.2 and got marked EX.P.1 to Ex.P.28. Th\ufb01 defendants<\/p>\n
__}\\-\/<\/p>\n
s\u00e9aamined twe wimesses; as IlW.l and If},W.2 and got marked Ex.B.1 to<\/p>\n
Ex:.D.21. The Trial Court en apgzreciaticm 0f the pleadings, era! and<\/p>\n
\u00e9eaumentary evidence passe\u00e9 the imguged jadgnmt dismissing the s;zit.._<\/p>\n
of plaintiffs. The plamti\ufb01s being aggrieved by the judgnent of the.’<\/p>\n
Caurt \ufb01i\ufb01d an apyeai in RA. ‘\u00a30. 10.2006 and the same Cathie   <\/p>\n
ciismissad and confirmed the judgmaent of tha .7frial..    <\/p>\n
secenci appeai.\n<\/p>\n
5. Thong the matter is Eisted for \u00e9\u00e9njission, tIi::;_13z\u00a3f\u00a3\u00a7:f is  \u00a3311″:<\/p>\n
merixs by consent cf the learned 2:gci.vccate\u00a7V.r.1r{t:<:tli' -.t_.1_1c si\ufb01ir\u00e9 'and
\nthe entire appeai gapers. V V. H a<\/p>\n
6. It is net in disgwgztgj  cf entire
\nsurvey N0. 16533    dispute that Smt,
\nRita Norcnha \ufb01lgdi   V’La:;’2:\u00a7:VdvV”I’:ibunal for gem: of
\naceugsancy \ufb01g\u00e9jts  _gf?\u20ac\u00bb\u00a32’1$  jam; gfgwsurvey Na. 16533. Farther
\nit is not in dis\ufb01umtfzat gamed 01211:; 99 cents in favour<\/p>\n
of Smt. Rita-Norenhgi afid rej\u00e9ct\u00e9\u00e9  claim \u00a30 tha remaining extent. This<\/p>\n
 ‘c<3ii1"r:-get asi\u00e9ia T3313 owler of L3\ufb01d"Tzibw:a1 in S0 far as it reiates E0 rejectian<\/p>\n
ef"c\u00a3\u00a7ii1; '_07f –S:t::\u00a3, 1?'fita_ and rernanded the matter ta the Land<\/p>\n
_ ,__ jf;ibuna'i  np1\u00a7\u00e9 i'i?geA '::S3Z11\u20ac is pending adjudication. W\u00a71:'~::n the matter<\/p>\n
 . _-'\u00a7\u00a7$C'}\u20ac}l._?I at that st;:;g'\u00a2, the first pkzinti\ufb01c said a parting of the ssheduie property<\/p>\n
':  "    {}f_second piaiati\ufb01" under 3, regstered Saba deed dated 17.01 ' 1931.<\/p>\n
$"-…\/<\/p>\n
<:jA'{'\\-F<\/p>\n
Tlmse admitted facts an record clearly establishes the fact that the claim af<\/p>\n
Smt. Rita Norenha far gant of eccugancy rights in respect of the entire<\/p>\n
suave}: No. 16938 including the plaint schedule pmperty is the subjergt\u00bb<\/p>\n
matter before the Land Tr\ufb01bunal. in the circumstances, wltether tile"<\/p>\n
made by the \ufb01rst glaintiff in faveur cf second plaintiff is  oylrllji <\/p>\n
depends on the outcome of the result in the ma.-tttet'~-panditxg ll\u00e9f\ufb01f\u00e9\u00bb  <\/p>\n
Land Tribunal. It is ant specifiad as to what are tlie;ba:{t\u00a7id.irie:\u00e9'@ft1l A<\/p>\n
granted in favour cf Smt. Rita Neronlm, 'x}:r.l}'3t~..is tl1eA'l:r3;111s1a;r$\/.i\ufb01  <\/p>\n
of the lands sold its second plaintiff under ti1ra.V\u00e9a\u00a3e_ tl\u00e9igd ofltlie. V\u00a7f\u00a7arJ\u00a7981
\nand what are the boundarias (if laszrllt rataaine\ufb01' :\u00a7;jk"v–f';;;*st";:,rlai12tifl\u00b0. In the
\nabsenca af these details, bath the C0urtsj:'lxela:\u00a7,r~\u00bb.1;a\u00a7'\u00e9'rejected the<\/p>\n
claim of glalntiffs faszjgiant 'pmm\u00a7inet},t 'V V' <\/p>\n
?.      Noronha alaiming to
\nbe in gossessiolliaf \u00e9ntlre'  in Slirvey No. 165313 \ufb01led a suit
\nin 0.3. l\\?0.A.125{19'?4l"azl\u00e9 zzmsagile  tc Ere decreed holding that Smt.
\n  ;)o$A.\u00a7essitltiVt3'f'\u00e9:titire survey No. 16.538 and first glainti\ufb01f<\/p>\n
is ital:  lpGss\u00e9ss_l6n"'c\u00a3any portion of it. By suppressing this fact the<\/p>\n
' ll vplairltiffs lt\ufb01aiie  suit before the Trial Court. Further during the<\/p>\n
 ol"..tl\u00a7e;_ suit a Coax: Comrnissitmer was appointed and he<\/p>\n
'1."'\u00abst;\u00a7'm:;itt:\u00a7dll\u00abl..;*e\u00a7ort and sketch specifying existence of road between the<\/p>\n
A'   defendants and lands in survey Ne. 16533. Agaln by<\/p>\n
'V '  A s\ufb01ptp\u00e9t\u00e9\ufb01sing the existence of the mad tha plainti\ufb01s have filed the suit. The<\/p>\n
draw<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt M Sharada Devi vs Sri Sundar Bhat on 18 February, 2009 Author: H N Das eenceme\u00e9, the same is questioned before this Court am’ the matter was remanded for fresh eonsiderat\u00e9en to the Land Tribunai and the same pending adjueiieatien. When the matter stood at that stage, ” pmitttiff sold 1 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-245364","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt M Sharada Devi vs Sri Sundar Bhat on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt M Sharada Devi vs Sri Sundar Bhat on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-12T03:13:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt M Sharada Devi vs Sri Sundar Bhat on 18 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-12T03:13:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1019,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt M Sharada Devi vs Sri Sundar Bhat on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-12T03:13:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt M Sharada Devi vs Sri Sundar Bhat on 18 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt M Sharada Devi vs Sri Sundar Bhat on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt M Sharada Devi vs Sri Sundar Bhat on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-12T03:13:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt M Sharada Devi vs Sri Sundar Bhat on 18 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-12T03:13:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009"},"wordCount":1019,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009","name":"Smt M Sharada Devi vs Sri Sundar Bhat on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-12T03:13:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-m-sharada-devi-vs-sri-sundar-bhat-on-18-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt M Sharada Devi vs Sri Sundar Bhat on 18 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245364","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=245364"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245364\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=245364"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=245364"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=245364"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}