{"id":24542,"date":"2010-11-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010"},"modified":"2017-11-02T15:07:48","modified_gmt":"2017-11-02T09:37:48","slug":"suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Suryakumari vs Sharadamma on 16 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Suryakumari vs Sharadamma on 16 November, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n<pre>SIU l..)(}MI\u00a5$N'i'\n\nThis is {l\u20acl'(3l'1(l.2:1II1['Fi \ufb01rs: appeal Chi-}.ll(.'I].glI1g .i,\u00ab%~'1&lt;=\u00a5i.j&#039;f1..-Q&quot; \n\nof the couri: below in (j}S.No.52&#039;73\/ I992_&quot;iii?&#039;~--;(::~;:\u00a7_\u00a7\u20aco&#039;i. of\n\nE1(l(&#039;lil.i()l&#039;1\u00a3--1l issiie fm.1I1e(i. pursuz-111$, git) tiiti\u00e9 \u00ab._\u00a71z.(_lg-ii1a_r_l111--of {his\n\nCourt &lt;1::m_~&lt;1 l2.(-S.2()()&#039;l in 1Ie1+&#039;A,No.5:=35w,!M97.&#039; rm1f11e&#039;s;;i;1'1(:e;a the pa1't'i('S to this  211;e'r\u00a2i't\u00e9rr{%.cl tilieir\nrank in the court: below,  l l l l\n\n2. Brief facts leeidiii\u00e9  \n\n    Sharaclamma\nwidow of  to be stepvrnother\nof la.tc*~-.  ll \"\"lmsl)z1n&lt;.i of defendarlt\nLlir.l_i:li&#039;:ai)1\u00e9.t(:(&#039;1 facts are that clefentlant\n\nS{iI&#039;yak1.1I1&#039;1VEV&#039;1&quot;;&lt;.&#039;ul l1:r1ari&#039;i.e&lt;iA.IfiV..&#039;S&#039;i&#039;Seet}o1arzun s\/o ii.V.Srikantaiah\n\n on .\u00bbi&#039;23;1.(i\u00a7 &#039;l 991. &quot;*.Siit)s&lt;:rq11&lt;n1t.ly, said Seei,haran1 (&#039;lied on\n\n~25;-8_f13\u00a3)i\u00ab.A};;\u00a3Vi.ri.g him survivi.r1g his wife the d\u00e9feridzlnt, his\n\n;:r1(i't\",ii\u00e9i&lt;&#039;__ \u00a7)l_%iii1till&#039;.\n\nl E3.lT.i1&lt;$reziI&#039;t.c:1&quot;, plaintiff filed the suit, for partition of the\n\n..\ufb02f)i&#039;&lt;3p~::1&#039;tic2s=; loft belliiid by 17c&gt;1)9rt',i(2s. In the EI33.i(l pro(:&lt;3e&lt;li11gs\n\n&#039;\\.\u00bb&#039;:.&#039;&lt;U1E\n\n\n\n-5-\n\nand 2.1130 e;*x:~m1ino&lt;l one V.it.t.al R210 as I)W.2, who is sz.:.i(l to he\n\nthe scribe cal&#039; Will (i\u00a31E(?(1 IE2.8.lE\u00a7}\u20ac.)l w&#039;f&#039;zi(.%l1 was p1&#039;0c&#039;lu(t_(2_(_._l in\n\n&#039;tlie court below \u00a3iI.}.(} :&#039;:1:;1rkf}*-T\n\ncourt below liearzl me. (.l()1u1s(r1 'f.i\u00bb;'.\"(V._)'v('\u00a73'3z(lisii1isi.lisc(1't,i\ufb01::i$A l\u00a7.';\u00a7J'Fl1.\u00a7f{}.l;iOl'l\nof defenclant regar(li1'1g__ __\u00bbWill'  S(j?:t:hara1I1\nduring his lifetime l)Ci1'tJigi\u00a7itl1lllg{ Eillli_Vh'vf$\ufb01ll\"if3bC1l1lt? item No.A\nproperty ex(:lusive1y in  \" ':'Tl'1e defendant\n\nlaeing aggrie:vQ(l_ l3y\u00a7li'.la_r:2 sV21'n'1\u20ac:;_.lias clnzri\u00e9 iipilri this appeal.\n\n7;\" 'l'Ii~._fijhis\":fi-:2{;1;j\u00a3:aE\"- ft'C'i**S&lt;:rvice of notice the\nrespond\u20aca_r1f,&#039;plai.nti\ufb01&quot;~.\u00a21}!,.ei&#039;egl&quot; ;_&#039;1ppearz;1.nCe through Counsel.\n\nOn perusalof the g-r()ii1&#039;i&#039;rls_~~bi&#039; appeal and also the finding of\n\n- . \u00a2_ tri:1Vl&quot;&#039;C,o1;1__ft on IEX.&#039;I:)\u00ab5___tEi(;: (lisputc-zd Will this Court: framed the\n\n i&#039;gll&#039;(;wiri--\u00a7_f_ \u00a7;.c)i.:1Vt,\u00b0&#039;fr)_1f c(.)n.Si(l(3r2.1ti()I1 in this 21[)peal:\n\nV.W1i(2t:l&quot;s~22:?tl1(2 iinciirig given by the: courl; belnw in\n&quot;&quot;&#039;---1&#039;cjr:i:&#039;(&#039;:t.i:.I the ex(r(&#039;.1.it&#039;.i()1&quot;1 of I.&lt;3x.i)5 by S(?(:&#039;.ll*lE11&quot;aI&#039;I1 is\n_j1i\u00e9;lj_E1r1(l proper&#039;? Wf1(3tE&quot;1e:f ii. (&#039;:;-111541 for iriterfererice\n\nV &quot;~i1.1 this appeal&#039;?\n\n\n\n \n\n-3-\n\ncluzfiiig his iif0,ti13&#039;1\u00a3-* with a (1iroc1..i01&#039;1 thai. he should disclose\n\nthe S1-11116&#039;, to his wife as arid wE&#039;1(&#039;11 disputt&#039; arises in r(:sp.f:C_.t. of\n\n1he;~. propert.i(~s. The said N(T(E1a.k\u00a3-ii.l(.E.iiEi]&#039;l s11m.zi(:i I&quot;&#039;\u00a3\u00a31V(&#039; &quot;tiro\u00a7&#039;igfii,&lt;\n\nit to (tho 1.10Ii(:(*. of dc-*fC11(ia11ti i11&quot;11I10(iiat\u00abe1y 21&#039;ft.(%r  sziiit}-&#039;T\n\n\ufb01led by Scc1,hara1n&#039;s step m0t.h(?r S(&#039;.(?k&#039;i1&#039;}g .p21i.iitio&lt;f1&quot;011&quot; ijhil .s1._1if..\n\nschedule properties. S1;rzi:1g;{er1y saicl :N{K21Aj:(}I&#039;I1&#039;J(\u00a7\u00e9:.\u00e91kE1I}&#039;{\u00e9ffi\ufb01flxiVp\n\nthough assisted dcfezitlgmt. in V_c.()V:r&#039;1v:l_11&#039;&lt;=:..t_:ing ictasci \ufb02igffit from\n\n1992 till disposal of_1997 choose to\nkeep that: as a s(+\u00a2..i&#039;c&#039;t IHIUE.ffh\u00a7~.Si.i.it  stage of filing\nof appeal in       \n\n.12. WTEEE11  uf1g3.1&#039;1&#039;c&#039;Ie:(&#039;i over to defendant\nby Major.E\\Ie(\u00a7fa1\u00a7\u00e9:i1Eg:_ia11-.i_i{&#039;:._gii()\u00e9sngt.&#039;Wish to step into witness\nbox 2111&amp;1 pf-&#039;f.1__(_&#039;,V1&#039;Sai(&#039;i._d0.C_&#039;11IIICIII  custodian of said Will\n\nfrom 12.8 VV1991  &quot;ii;&quot;was hanc.1c3(1 over to defenclairit.\nin 199&#039;? wi*1i1e&#039;v ffi1i;ig&#039;._Vzj;3p~E3z1l in RFA.N0.535\/ .1997. Neil-\n\n(3XZ1Iil1;i&quot;I&#039;l\u20acl{:i~f)Ii of &#039;t;i*z_\u00a33&#039; said Major Ne&lt;=1akar1i&#039;.aia11  witness in\n\nt)rigih:1I &quot;;~:.i1ii&#039;_ 2&#039;xf..t_.e1&#039; its roriiazul is (1(&#039;.(,l&#039;iIiI\u20ac{E.E;al 1.0 the interest of\n\n s.(.\u00a7V(&#039;:&quot;f*f&lt;?\\IIiir\u00e9\ufb01ii-.,_jl1 \u00e9s;\u00a7.::ii.:)lisE1i11g the said Wili as g&lt;:*.1111iz&#039;1e d&lt;)(:umont..\n\n&quot;&quot;L\/3%\n\n \n\n\n\n-1.1.-\n\nsigriatlire oi&#039; Vitt.a..}. I&quot;{a0 to the saici c10c1.1n1ent. as that of\n\nscribe-..\n\n1.<\/pre>\n<p>5. Now, c()mi11g to e1-(?X\u00e911&#8217;lliI.I\u00e9LUt3Tl~iIl&#8221;&#8221;C1&#8217;i~it&#8217;f.&#8217;V &#8216;I11&#8217;*.h&#8217;i&#8217;:&#8217;-:<\/p>\n<p>crossw-:xa1&#8217;ni1&#8217;1ati()11 he would go&#8217; (.&#8217;.,X.&#8217;V[&#8216;(:&#8217;.~.T.i&#8217;f that<br \/>\nWill was pr(.=pare(i 9g3\u00ab&#8217;V;Vi;\u00abg{m(\u00a7 4_3()<br \/>\np.m., to 5 p.m. At the t&#8217;.ir&#8217;1&#8217;i(\u00bb&#8217;:.'&lt;A\u00a7if&quot;t%r_1(tl executioxi of<br \/>\nWill except.  nobody else.\n<\/p>\n<p>Irlowever, la-1-,&#8217;t\u20acrV_&#8221;.&#8217;1c\u00a7&#8221; &#8221; &#8216;iigaikes. _ $1.11 Eirrigjxovemerit on the said<\/p>\n<p>stateme11&#8217;IL'&#8221;t;~}&#8221;1.at&#8221;jt;t1&lt;=r\u00a2; xxrers: t,11rc-&#039;;\u00e9&quot;1)Ver:\u00a7i)ns the identity of third.<br \/>\npersori irvzls&#039; not kiiaaiwii &#039;t&lt;VJ &#039;t*:ir1i._ &quot;i&#039;1&#039;1z1t, rnezins to say that he is<\/p>\n<p>not cC1&#039;t:ain&#039;wiict.11e1t_ t,I;;:&quot;:%.;;:Eit&#039;1 t.hir(&#039;1 person was either Major<\/p>\n<p>~ , A Neevlat-;aJ1t&#039;z1i:&#039;1i1  1&#039;&#8211;\u00bb&#039;\u00a3aggici.i &#039;Vc:.=nkates1&#039;1. lie does not say that he<\/p>\n<p> is: wei.l .f\u00abV1Cq:,2a_i\u00abr1tt_(_2(:l with said Evlag\u00e9lcii V&lt;3r1kat&#039;,es}&#039;1 and Major<\/p>\n<p>1\\Z*3\u00e9ia,karit1a\u00a7_i_:3h&quot;;&quot;ii1(&#039;l he is not in 3. p0sit.i.0n to identify their<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; signz\u00a7j:i111&#8243;e wxm the said d()(:u1r1er1t Ex.I)5 was (:011fror1t.e(.i to<\/p>\n<p> x1t1im=.__ &#8216;iT1E.%r&lt;:f&#039;&lt;).r(:, in c:{&#039;i.&quot;(.:t:t, said DW.2 is capable of i(.ier1tifying<\/p>\n<p>.  (.$r1iy his Si\u00a7;{I&quot;lE1\u00a7.l1.F(&#039; zniri. si;_.{11;1t,m&#039;c 01&#039; St&#039;\u20ac1&#039;h8.l&#039;\u00a3E1lfl. So far as the<\/p>\n<p>(,4\/&#039;V1<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-12-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>sigi1;\u00bb1tt.:1&#8217;e of M3301.&#8217; Neelakz-ii&#8221;1tz&#8217;1iz1..h is cor1(:er;1&#8217;e(1, he is 1,u_1_abie<\/p>\n<p>to itiemify the same.\n<\/p>\n<p>16. Now eomizlg to the [)1&#8242;()ViSi()I&#8221;lS of Se(:t.iQ_I1&#8242; 63_&#8217;0&#8217;\u00a3~\u00b0t.I&#8217;1e_&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;e<\/p>\n<p>S&#8217;&gt;uceessi0ri Act, to prove the Wi1&#8243;&#8221;&#8221;atl.eas-it ();3ef.:;t_t.es;.t,i;&#8217;:g\u00bb,<\/p>\n<p>witness is requireti to be exziiiiineti. *1 {ere the C&#8217;filft\u00a7t1IbI1St2il;&#8217;1&#8217;Cf.\u20acS-.<\/p>\n<p>under which the Will is said\u00bb.te&#8221;~ljiaveh&#8217;t0_me_&#8217;VAiiigite&#8221;:._exiete:z1(:e<br \/>\nitself ereat.es a doubt. ah(Jt1t.  &#8220;.?I?..AI.hA\u20acE instant.<br \/>\ncase exee1&#8242;)t, the scribe,   scribe and is<br \/>\nalso an att.estiIig~ gt\/itn\u00a7.&#8217;:;\u00a7s&#8221;&#8221; on record to<br \/>\ne0rr0t)o1&#8217;ate_t;he  f .&#8221;\u00a7&#8217;\\&#8217;tt):&#8221;t&#8217;:ivt&#8221;t(3II\u00a3f.)t. is made by<br \/>\n(l(\u00a5f\u20ac3Ik(i\u20actV1~u&#8217; V\/\u00a3&#8221;C.\\ ._  of either Major<br \/>\nNeelz1k\u00e91hta_j21hVVVt5r.Mtigztct&#8217;i\u00ab.:\u00a7t7&lt;.%.:ii;at\ufb01esi1 to substantiate that. the<\/p>\n<p>Win was e2:_eeute(i&#039;=0i&quot;i~.12,8&#039;;\u00ab~\u00a71._\u00a7)E\u00a7i_ in the house of Seetharam.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;;jl&#039;7.e,&#039;t&#039;i1e  below has property ztppreciated the<\/p>\n<p>.evi&amp;(&#039;_1(&#039;3i&#039;:ee \u00e9&#039;iVz_1i&#039;i2;ble on i&#039;o(.:()r(i 211.1 id has gone threatl 1;);-u&#039;e into<\/p>\n<p>i&#039;t&#039;h(:.i&#039;:_.-3:ti&quot;r;-2?:&#039;:,u\u00a3(&#039;i .AE&#039;i-:15&quot;; (:(m&quot;2e to the. c()neit1.Xp121ir:(:(i &#8216;pi'()p(~:rly zmctl the same beiiig producecii at the time<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; .()f&#8217;\ufb01_r_st appeal, \ufb01zrtlier riot:~-p170d11t:t.t.013 Of Will at eariier being<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Wt<\/p>\n<p>-13..\n<\/p>\n<p>not CXp1E1iI1(&#8216;.(l propcrrly tritlier by (l(&#8216;{CI&#8217;1(la1&#8217;1i, or the alltagctl<br \/>\n(\u00a7i1Sl()(1i2&#8217;1i1 from ilE)92 till 199&#8217;? would 11o(.loul)t cr(?at(.*. 3. cloulot<\/p>\n<p>i'(:gz:ii'(lir&#8217;ig ttio g(&#8216;ilt.1iI&#8217;1.(&#8216;ii(&#8220;SS of said Will and its (:xc-r(:i.1Vti()-zillby<\/p>\n<p>St:(:t:l1zi1&#8242;;.m1 (luring his lif(\u00a5i.i1i1c. Thcz&#8217; stiggsstioiiifWi&#8217;t&#8217;1\u00a3t(l&#8211;c-r___&#8221;ii;i__&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>(:r(&gt;ss&#8211;(-.:xai1&#8217;1iiiatiori to the c\u00a3&#8217;1&#8217;crct E\u00a73ectl1araI1_1~si.gi&#8217;i~c:(.l*~,l.)l\u00ab:ir1k &#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Sh(;&#8217;.\u20ac&#8217;.tS, lurpt. the sariic in his liousc for th.c-3 tist:&gt;oi?_tr&#8217;:.s1st;. &#8216;h{.&#8221;iI3;\u00a7f, .&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>utilised for prt:pai&#8217;aii()11 of saiii,_Will,\u00abV&#8221;c_\u00a7irir1()t<br \/>\nTherefore, this Court. find tl&#8217;iV\u00a3i\u20ac:_V&#8221;&#8216;i}&#8217;iVe&gt;  &#8216;Vt)ellt)yv lafter<br \/>\nanalysing all tl11i)i(:i,f\/lo. it  5&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>18. O11=r(r~iig)}3&#8242;:f\u20ac%t:.iz:tt:lg.)i&#8217;1 of the facts and (:&#8217;.Vi(&#8216;1(-\u00a5t1C\u20ac3<\/p>\n<p>E1Vail;l{)l(:~.Qn reoo.r_clV,i&#8217;.l1is Court is of the V163&#8243;! that t.l1.ere is no<\/p>\n<p>;&#8217;:zst&#8217;,ili:it3l.;\u00e9f i7C&#8217;.\u20ac1SOi&#8217;1 to iiitorftrrc with the well reasoried<\/p>\n<p>j:i(l\u00a7:;rit%ri.f&#8217;f&#8217;&#8211;\u00abgiass-:?tfl by the cciuift: below in mjedirig the<\/p>\n<p>p_o_:i~1 \ufb01lr-.(l by r1sc~qu&lt;-;&#039;.nt.ily, the<\/p>\n<p>%~u&#039;\u00ab&#039;\u00a7<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-14-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>jlxigrnerlt. :ru1d d0(:1.&#8217;cc (.1a.i:c(i 4.3. 1997, Illcaciificd on 2().(3._\u00a3__ZQO3<\/p>\n<p>in ()S.N0.5f2&#8217;73\/ {Q92 is; (:01&#8217;1fi1&#8243;1&#8217;11c(.i vx,-&#8220;i\u00a3:1&#8217;1(mt, any ()r&#8221;(&#8216;ia\u00a71&#8217;*V fa)<\/p>\n<p>costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>Nd\/~<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Suryakumari vs Sharadamma on 16 November, 2010 Author: S.N.Satyanarayana SIU l..)(}MI\u00a5$N&#8217;i&#8217; This is {l\u20acl'(3l&#8217;1(l.2:1II1[&#8216;Fi \ufb01rs: appeal Chi-}.ll(.&#8217;I].glI1g .i,\u00ab%~&#8217;1&lt;=\u00a5i.j&#039;f1..-Q&quot; of the couri: below in (j}S.No.52&#039;73\/ I992_&quot;iii?&#039;~&#8211;;(::~;:\u00a7_\u00a7\u20aco&#039;i. of E1(l(&#039;lil.i()l&#039;1\u00a3&#8211;1l issiie fm.1I1e(i. pursuz-111$, git) tiiti\u00e9 \u00ab._\u00a71z.(_lg-ii1a_r_l111&#8211;of {his Court &lt;1::m_~&lt;1 l2.(-S.2()()&#039;l in 1Ie1+&#039;A,No.5:=35w,!M97.&#039; rm1f11e&#039;s;;i;1&#8217;1(:e;a the pa1&#8217;t&#8217;i(&#8216;S to this 211;e&#8217;r\u00a2i&#8217;t\u00e9rr{%.cl tilieir rank in the court: below, l [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Suryakumari vs Sharadamma on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Suryakumari vs Sharadamma on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-02T09:37:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Suryakumari vs Sharadamma on 16 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-02T09:37:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":811,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Suryakumari vs Sharadamma on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-02T09:37:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Suryakumari vs Sharadamma on 16 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Suryakumari vs Sharadamma on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Suryakumari vs Sharadamma on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-02T09:37:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Suryakumari vs Sharadamma on 16 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-02T09:37:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010"},"wordCount":811,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010","name":"Suryakumari vs Sharadamma on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-02T09:37:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suryakumari-vs-sharadamma-on-16-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Suryakumari vs Sharadamma on 16 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24542"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24542\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}