{"id":246025,"date":"2009-10-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009"},"modified":"2018-04-19T02:24:03","modified_gmt":"2018-04-18T20:54:03","slug":"sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Shankar @ Shekar Shetty vs B Srinivasalu on 12 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Shankar @ Shekar Shetty vs B Srinivasalu on 12 October, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: N.K.Patil And K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 12\"\" DAY OF OCTOBER, 2009.\n\n: PRES ENT-.1\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.. }_?'__:'~'{\"'i\"}I};\u00a7..\"'v~v..,_D:__Vf  _\n\nAND\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE \n\nM.F.A.NO.16V56aOF 2065  . D  '\nBETWEEN: A D. 'D\n\nSri Shankar @' She-kar Sh\u00e9\ufb01.\/y,. \nNow Aged about36' 'Y6afs,' '   .\nS\/0 Manju Shetityf = . D 2 V-\nR\/0 Lakshmi \\\/\u00a7_enka'LeshW\u00e9u:a,' \"\nTea Stall, gnear Raj1.a\u00e9hekar\u00a7\" \" \n\n:V'BE1I'_.'P,(V33D(4I\"DI:'\".:\"j'\/-.?,Vl:V,\"' _  !::.'\nE3.an'ga1or_e' '  ' ~..   ._ \n \" V' A ' A ...Appe11am:'\n\n D  8: Sri.P1'11a Raddy, Advocates]\n\nA   \n\n\"  B'S':'ir\ufb01;vasaIu.\n\n-. __ Sy'~o_VBa1akrishna.\n.. Rfat N0 68, Jaladarshani,\n'B--[E.L. Layout.\n\nA  Banga10re-- 94.\n\n 2 A Sri. S Bhaskar.\n\nS\/0 P Su;Id ,\n\n\/' MW\n\n\n\ni\\.>\n\nNo 3599. 8\"' Cross.\n1 Main, Gayathrinagar,\nBangalore -- 21.\n\n3 The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.\nNo 20. Jalahalii Cross.\nChokkasandra, Banga1ore- 57.\nRep by its Manager.\n\n[By Sri. C Shankara Reddy,  \" . \u00ab. it \nRI ~ Served ; and R2 ~ Noticegdispensed w'i:ti3]}V  \n\n*'-'5\u00a2** ' :\n\nThis MFA is fiied..V_U\/SAi'1\"'\/3.{ 3) of._MV Act against the\njudgment and award. .?dai:'ed %.j_giv9\/9:\/'OAS passed in MVC\nNo.303l\/2004: on the file oifv'18th.._Addl.;_Iudge, Member.\nMACT~4, Court V of ,8'rr:'aIl\" C'a'1;i_ses,; Metropolitan Area.\n\nBangalore the claim petition\nfor Zcoinpensation  seeking enhancement of\ncornpens_ation}.\"=-._\"c  \" ' -\n\n cor:iir1g~~'i'on for Hearing, this day. N.K.\nPA\u00a7\"'H. _.J ., delivered\" the following:\n\nJUDGl\\\/KENT\n\n ._  appeal by the claimant is directed against the\n\njuldgm'e:nt,v\"'land award dated 19\"' September 2005,\n\nll  \"passed in lVI.V.C.No.3031\/2004, on the file of the XVIII\n\nl'Additional Judge, Member. Motor Accident: Claims\n\n2'\n,\n\n<'__,,___,,,,_,_,,_M,,_______~_M,,,,,,.........._...,...\n\n  ..._..Re-Sporidentis 9\n\n\n\n(W)\n\nTr1buna1~4, Bangalore City ( "iiibun-al' for brevity ) for\nenhancement. of compensation on the ground that, the\ncompensation of Rs.38,000\/~ awarded in favour of the\nClaimant appeliant as against his Claim of \n\nlakhs, is inadequate.\n\n2. The facts in brief are that, the \n\nhelper in tea shop. That on 20? t1"2"--'2Q0"3.  b\n\nPM, when he was walking on 4the_Banga1o're--Turni:u'r--.V\n\nRoad as pedestrian near V\ufb02aya Barikt ma TVSVV\n\nVictor"  gyaie ""o\u20acaring"vVE\\Io.KA~O4\/EB-5796 being\ndriver1.'by4'it's-with high speed, in a rash\n\nand negligent ma,nr;.eii"\u00aba~nd dashed against the claimant.\n\n  Eljesuit of"the..saIne, the Claimant fell down and\n\n' .sus1'rained'_'gri'e--vous injuries.\n\n i" 3.' "_"_v\u00bbQn,d'aec0unt of the injuries sustained in the\n\n  appellant. filed the Claim petition before the\n\n '"E'i'i-t_)nuna1, seeking Con;Znsat.ion of Rs.O5.00 lakhs\n\n!\n\nL\n\n\n\nagainst the respondents. The said claim petition had<\/pre>\n
come up for Consideration before the Tribunal on 19″‘
\nSeptember 2005. The Tribunal, after considering the<\/p>\n
relevant material available on file and after appreCi_a~t_io1i<\/p>\n
of oral and documentary evidence, <\/p>\n
petition in part, awarding a sum’ of  <\/p>\n
interest at 8% per annum, from the ~r;latfe._o’f <\/p>\n
the date of deposit.  aggriev.e_dl’l.:Vb\u00a7i._:”t\u00bbhe*’; said-if<\/p>\n
judgment and award paVsseid.__bypAthe”Trib1j1nal, the<\/p>\n
appellant felt iieeeslsitatedvExt?)  this appeal,<\/p>\n
seekingmenh aneefnent’ of eornpensatioii.<\/p>\n
4. lea,i’ned’\u00ab.,eouI1sel for the appellant at the<\/p>\n
  O1._Zl:p’t’:;\u00b0.3’=\u20ac'[:__TSL!bII1lff\u20acd.–..t.hat, the Tribunal committed error in<\/p>\n
 V .not:VaW.aii’ding any eompensation towards loss of future<\/p>\n
ineorne.  though the Doctor has assessed the<\/p>\n
 disabivllity in respect of the whole body at 24%. Further,<\/p>\n
 hesubmitted that, no compensation is awarded towards<\/p>\n
loss of income during treatment period and that the<\/p>\n
compensation awarded towards loss of arnenities.
\nmedical expenses a.nd conveyance, nourishing food and<\/p>\n
attendant charges is also on the lower side. Therepfore,<\/p>\n
he submitted that the impugned <\/p>\n
passed by the Tribunal is liable  <\/p>\n
accordingly.\n<\/p>\n
5. As against this,  colunlsel \u00ab.\n<\/p>\n
Insurance Company, inter”v.._al’ia, sou.ght..p_tgs the<\/p>\n
impugned judgment *”a1j1d aw’ard.:’:puassed l:iy”tl1eV4 Tribunal<\/p>\n
stating tlrie =comp.ens’a’tieri awarded is just and
\nreason_a’r51e and.fjQes.4ne.t,”‘c_ail for interference, since it is<\/p>\n
passed after l’1e_aring’..–‘*’nthe parties and after careful<\/p>\n
 e\\;.at*uaftion ofth-e–\u00ab”oral and documentary evidence<\/p>\n
 L *avail_a’i3.l_et on__ii1–e.\n<\/p>\n
” We have heard the learned counsel for<\/p>\n
 appella.nt and learned unsel for Insurance Company.<\/p>\n
d__J_\u00a2____W__H”_r,_,._.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7. After hearing the leai-med counsel for the
\nparties and after going through the original records
\navailable on file, the only point that arises for our
\nconsideration is as to:\n<\/p>\n
“Whether the compensation awarded  _._ if <\/p>\n
Tribunal tsjust and reasonable ?\n<\/p>\n
It is not in dispute that on accou”‘maof the it<\/p>\n
occurred on 20–l2–2003, the  <\/p>\n
frontal EDH and AC?’ haae’~..fracture’ <\/p>\n
comp,oundf”‘frQntalV delpresseri fracture! laceration over
\neye lid,’ uabrasion~-.ovei’–.___r’i’ght side of forehead, abrasion<\/p>\n
over’ the right forearm near the wrist, lacerated Wound<\/p>\n
 over puosterioi” aspect of left forearm, moderate head<\/p>\n
  first instance, he was inpatient in MS.<\/p>\n
Ramaiafi -ll’-.:I’*’ospii.a11, shifted to Nil\\\/[HANS and thereafter to<\/p>\n
 Victoria’. Hospital. The Doctor has assessed the<\/p>\n
‘ .perri\u00a7anent disability at l6% in respect of right eye, -4.9\/o<\/p>\n
“____M____W__M_.,_..\u00bb<\/p>\n
 -~~in respect of left eye aid 4% in respect of decreased<\/p>\n
:\n<\/p>\n
;\n<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
sleep and irritability, arriving at the total permanent
\ndisability” in respect of whole body at 24%. Thisaspect<\/p>\n
of the matter has not been considered iiillq\ufb01roper<\/p>\n
perspective by the Tribunal. Undoubtedly’; <\/p>\n
of the disability, the appe1lar3’t”‘has ato   of l<\/p>\n
income in future. The Tribun__al–_Vhas ‘erred’.i1:1.7nVot_u<\/p>\n
awarding any amount towards. loss’–oi”vvfu’::ure income. V<\/p>\n
The total body disability asses’s–.edlV–byA Doctor appears to
\nbe little exaggerated.   the facts and<\/p>\n
circumstances”\u00aby:.o:f’ the Ca–se,”‘w.e–:_”assess the total body<\/p>\n
disabiillity   taking the monthly
\nincome. of .\u00bbat Rs.3,000\/~, adopting the<\/p>\n
correct rriultiplie.r   and total body disability at<\/p>\n
  we award ‘a’f”sun1 of Rs.86,400\/– {i.e. Rs.3,000\/M x<\/p>\n
    11.00] towards loss of future income.<\/p>\n
8.  Tribunal has erred in awarding a sum of<\/p>\n
 Rs.u10,tGQO\/- towards loss of amenities, without taking<\/p>\n
 All\/lli'{3\u00ab’C0I1SideTatl0\ufb02 the percentage of disability suffered<\/p>\n
\/’
\n4′<\/p>\n
.= _____,,__i.,….\u00ab…–.\u00ab-\u00bb\u00bb~—-<\/p>\n
K’~\\,,_”\n<\/p>\n
by appeilant. The appeiiant has to undergo the trauma
\nduring the rest of his iife. He has been admitted first<\/p>\n
to MS. Ramaiah Hospitai, NIMHANS and there\u00e9i,:t’t’c>r t.o<\/p>\n
Victoria Hospital, totally for more than a  <\/p>\n
Doctor has assessed the permanent  .24’fc$.. <\/p>\n
which the appellant has to endtgre <\/p>\n
life. Therefore, having regard t.o’7a.1I”these”as,peet_s, <\/p>\n
deem it fit to award a sum  litowfards loss
\nof amenities on aeeiourit  “”dis’abiiity as against
\nRs. 10,000 \/ – awarded.AbyhTribL1r;a1’iix’; 1 ” <\/p>\n
 The  erred in awarding only a sum<\/p>\n
of Rs.8,t”)O(i\/’\u00ab Vtowardsexmedical expenses, conveyance,<\/p>\n
 1’10:1_iYiE\u00a7-hiilg foo’d;v~–and attendant charges. The same is<\/p>\n
 ivnac\u00a5eq.1,iat,e~having regard to the nature of injuries<\/p>\n
sustained-‘i.a;nd the duration and nature of treatment<\/p>\n
 undergone by appellant. Therefore. we award a sum of<\/p>\n
 Rs.43_\u00ab3.O0O\/– towa1’ds medical expenses and conveyance.<\/p>\n
  nourishing food and at\u00e9fndant charges.<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
10. Further. the Tribunal has erred in not
\nawarding any amount towards loss of income during the<\/p>\n
period of treatment. Admittedly, the appel1ant..’w_as_V_inv<\/p>\n
patient for a total period of more than a <\/p>\n
taken the monthly income th_e””‘ap’pelllant ‘\/_$At\/T <\/p>\n
Rs.3,000\/-, we award a sum  <\/p>\n
of income during the period ofpptreatmlent.  it  <\/p>\n
11. However, so  as ti-viilcornlpensation
\nawarded towards pair,1_.”:an(f:’_ s1\u00a7:ffeii.i’i’;_.g,s\u00ab.is concerned, it is<\/p>\n
just a;1id’evreason:alf)le  call for interference.
\n ‘In  facts and circumstances of
\nthe caseu,””alp.peal filed by appellant is allowed<\/p>\n
in\u00bb The\u00bb iI’n.p3;gr:ed judgment and award dated 19″”<\/p>\n
r :Septtem_berv.tll’2QO5, passed in M.V.C.No.303\u00a3\/2004, on<\/p>\n
l’.V–l'(;__flf’tlie XVIII Addl. Judge, lVle;rnbe’r, Motor<\/p>\n
 Accident, Claims Trib’unal–4, Bangalore City is hereby<\/p>\n
A  nrnotiyified, awarding a s In of Rs.1,42,400\/~ as against<\/p>\n
.—-\u00bb—“”””””””””-“‘”‘””‘~<\/p>\n
I0<\/p>\n
Rs.38.000\/~ awarded by the Tribunal. The i:)reak–up is<\/p>\n
as under:\n<\/p>\n
i) Towards pain and sufferings Rs.\n<\/p>\n
ii] Towards loss of income<\/p>\n
During the period of treatment Rs. __<\/p>\n
iv} Towards medical expenses, not1’ris.hing l<\/p>\n
V) Towards Disability and <\/p>\n
2o,o’oo\/5<\/p>\n
   _<\/p>\n
iii) Towards loss of future incorne  = \/–  it ‘v <\/p>\n
Food and attendant Charges  <\/p>\n
loss of Amenities of life!’-..V_   26,000\/~<\/p>\n
  i”r6\u00a3a1s\u00ab.  ” ‘     1,424.00\/W<\/p>\n
1’-The-InVst1ran’ee’Clo1npany is directed to deposit the<\/p>\n
enhancled!cornpensatiionluof Rs.l.04,400\/– with interest<\/p>\n
at” 15% per annum, within a period of four Weeks from<\/p>\n
  daltepof\u00e9ireeeipt of copy of the judgment. and award.<\/p>\n
‘ vf\ufb01utj-._o\u00a3’V’the enhanced Compensation. a sum of<\/p>\n
 with proportionate interest shall be kept: in<\/p>\n
f
\n1, _w_M_W__H_w__,,….–\n<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
 Fixed VVi:)ep0sit in the name of the appellant in any<\/p>\n
Al\ufb01lationaiized or Scheduled Bank for a period of five<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
years, renewable by another five years with liberty
\nreserved to him to withdraw the quarterly interest.<\/p>\n
The re’maim’r1g sum of Rs.29.4~004\/_?\u00bb-_\ufb01”‘ayith<\/p>\n
proport.ior1ate interest sha\ufb01 be released, <\/p>\n
deposit by the Insurance Compazjgy.<\/p>\n
Office to draw award accoi:(:1ir:g1y*\u00a7<\/p>\n
  ;  3ooeE<\/p>\n
BMV*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Shankar @ Shekar Shetty vs B Srinivasalu on 12 October, 2009 Author: N.K.Patil And K.N.Keshavanarayana IN THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 12″” DAY OF OCTOBER, 2009. : PRES ENT-.1 THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.. }_?’__:’~'{“‘i”}I};\u00a7..”‘v~v..,_D:__Vf _ AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.F.A.NO.16V56aOF 2065 . D ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-246025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Shankar @ Shekar Shetty vs B Srinivasalu on 12 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Shankar @ Shekar Shetty vs B Srinivasalu on 12 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-18T20:54:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Shankar @ Shekar Shetty vs B Srinivasalu on 12 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-18T20:54:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1140,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Shankar @ Shekar Shetty vs B Srinivasalu on 12 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-18T20:54:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Shankar @ Shekar Shetty vs B Srinivasalu on 12 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Shankar @ Shekar Shetty vs B Srinivasalu on 12 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Shankar @ Shekar Shetty vs B Srinivasalu on 12 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-18T20:54:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Shankar @ Shekar Shetty vs B Srinivasalu on 12 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-18T20:54:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009"},"wordCount":1140,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009","name":"Sri Shankar @ Shekar Shetty vs B Srinivasalu on 12 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-18T20:54:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankar-shekar-shetty-vs-b-srinivasalu-on-12-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Shankar @ Shekar Shetty vs B Srinivasalu on 12 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246025"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246025\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}