{"id":246325,"date":"2009-03-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2"},"modified":"2016-10-22T13:45:29","modified_gmt":"2016-10-22T08:15:29","slug":"bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Bangalore Metropolitan &#8230; vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner &#8230; on 17 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bangalore Metropolitan &#8230; vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner &#8230; on 17 March, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNA'rA1&lt;A;.&#039;1*\nBANGALORE %  \n\nDATED THIS THE 17&quot;&#039; DAY 0?  \n\nBEF()RE._._  A\n\nTHE HOWBLE M1uUsfr1(:1a;\u00abHm.;UvA;3I.:*,.\u00a74\u00e9gzse:\u00a331: L  \n\nWRIT PETITION :$\u00e9&lt;:..~; &#039;2_._g ()1s&#039;k%2\u00a7:ms%(_1!_,;&#039;1\u00ab;&#039;s11*rk%(,)\nBETWEEN:   &amp;% %\n\nBangalcare. Metropolitan  _\n\nTransport CQ:1\u00a7(3;aiin;  _  ~  '\n\nCentrai O\ufb02_ic\u00e9;}:jK;H.R.oa\u20aci,\"\"   \n\n    '\n\nBy its Chiefifraf\ufb01\u00e9 By1a'miger,\"'V' 3\n\nRepresentt\ufb01i\ufb01' by\ufb01s --C?:-icf-Law'  ..PETITIONER\n\n(F53;'3'?-izii\ufb01;R:.i\u00a7\u00e9i\u00a7_a\u00a31:a,'V_.{\u00a7ai\u00a7?,.\u00a7 %\n\nar;:.2=  \n\n A     Commissioner\n\" ~ V a;_1c\u00a7.+Appe1Iate Autherity under\n\n' V \"i*!&lt;i\u00e9~.1?&quot;73L},\u00ab&#039;i1m5s2t sf Gratuity Act,\n\n&#039;  R\u00e9g\u00a7ir&#039;3;_3-3, Bamzerghatta Road,\n I;};fient,\n\n ____   \u00e9a\ufb01jipgi on for preliminary hearing in\n'B' Gr01f:p\u00a7'\u00a7rhis '.:i_a};,_1:h\u00bb:.=.\u00a7 Cans\": made the foliowing:\n\nV\u00a7 [~0RDER\n\n  I?_et:t10ner;--~B\u00abPs\/ITC has sought far to 133123\/Ea writ sf\n\nV    .,fo*:.quash tha orders at Annexure 'E' and 'G' dated\n\n'A  28.2.08 passed by the 2\" respondent and 1\"<\/pre>\n<p>j r\u00e9sga\u00e9indezzi respectively and far such other orders.<\/p>\n<p>2. By virtue of the impugned arder at Annexures &#8216;E&#8217;, the<\/p>\n<p>2&#8243; responcieazt, under the Payment afGrat1:ity Aci. cf 1972, has<\/p>\n<p>%W&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>4. Heard the learned Ccmzzscl for the respcct\u00e9x.\u00ab&#8217;\u00a2_ parties.<\/p>\n<p>5. it is the argument of the learned   the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner that the period of ima&#8217;uth&lt;3ri$ed. 3 &#8211;\u00abtii\u00a33.__<\/p>\n<p>extent of 2 years I I mtmths anc\u00a7,_V20 idays  Ai\u00a73&quot;add\u00a3:&#039;\u00a3i9n:A:f\u00a3\u00a7 fh\ufb01.i&quot;.g Q<\/p>\n<p>the 3rd respondent was on  fr): a&#039;  g\ufb02\u00e9ars<br \/>\nand as such petitiorrrar is   of service<br \/>\nand unless it is .fe:.:\u00a7zi worked for 240<br \/>\ndays d1Iri&#039;1.1g:: the &#039;riuring the period of<br \/>\nabsenc\u00a3&#039;&quot;\u00a7\u00a7r.V    of service he is net<\/p>\n<p>e:}&#039;tit]\u00e9d&#039;   &quot;(if  gratuity for the said: perio\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>R\u00e9iyi\ufb01g  the dacisien of the Division Bench of<\/p>\n<p>V&quot; C6321 the \u00a7\u00e9.ii&#039;rrzcd Government Pleader referring to Section<\/p>\n<p>3  ,f_h%:T&#039;P\ufb01yn1e;3t of Gxamity Act has submz\u00e9\ufb02zed that there has<\/p>\n<p>&quot;&#8212;-to  \ufb02sfrec\u00e9\ufb01c finding by ihe&#039; employer with respect to the<\/p>\n<p>&#039;A s  coIifim1:ity cf service or break \u00a332 S\u20acf&#039;\u20acfiC6 and merely because the<\/p>\n<p> iczrtified standing orders previded fer treating unaizthurised<\/p>\n<p>absence ifany to effect&quot; a break in  unless the empkmyer<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p>by foiiewing, tbs principles of natural justice hagpassed an<br \/>\ncmisr 0f break in service and aiso served th&lt;:\u00a2jV:s:\u00a7.fn\u00a7&quot;..Qn the<\/p>\n<p>concerned employae, it is not open to the  <\/p>\n<p>that there was an automatic ce\u00e9isati\u00e9rtz tot? scrvitc&#039;.&#039;c._or&#039;aV\u00ab&#039;br\u00a3:ak in <\/p>\n<p>service. Accordingly, Sttbttlitttgti&#039; .. the  Vt \\ rfiit:<br \/>\naI3Dlies tn the case on  H A V&#039; t<\/p>\n<p>7. As per  the service<br \/>\nofthe petit4i;\u00a7i:\u00a2r-C&lt;}r;\u00a5:i:r&quot;\u00e9:tjr}:j\u00a3 atga%Mt$t;;n.\u00a7\u00a7g\u00a2t\u00a7r 011 30.19.1972. He<br \/>\nattained   32.5.2005. As per the<br \/>\nst1i7:r1is:$:.i:&lt;j.yt\u00a7&#039;  \ufb01t()3t&#039;z:!\u00bb\u00ab  of service of the 3&quot;&#039;<\/p>\n<p>r\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7d11.de1:t Vis:&#039;.3\u00ab&#039;-3:  months and 1} days and there is a<\/p>\n<p>Vb_rcaI-; i&#039;1: \ufb01cnsiizetct; &#039;gzears I I months mid 20 days out ef the<\/p>\n<p>V&quot;:t&#8212;-.&quot;:it{!t\u00a3i\u00a7 pagia\u00e9  yaars 27 menths and 1 clay: The gratuity<\/p>\n<p>  &#039;V V ttftttze 3&quot; respondent has to be calcutated both under the<\/p>\n<p>A  Pa,\u00a7,?&#039;:22s\u00e9\u00a71\u00a7tAt0f Gratuity Act anti also under the KSRTC Gratuity<\/p>\n<p> A.  R\u00e9gi\ufb02ations.\n<\/p>\n<p>W\/.\n<\/p>\n<p>advance and loan advanced by KSRTC Credit C&lt;&#039;::\u00bb-0P5%t.ix:e<\/p>\n<p>Society and Bharath C0-nperative Society, the deducticans are<\/p>\n<p>shown to the extent of Rs.61,841,?~_ fruzn thegfa\ufb01ti\u00a3j\u00a7?&quot;&#039;a,t\ufb01QuenVt&#039;\u00abV&#039;<\/p>\n<p>and the petitioner-Cnrperation is ent&#039;i&#039;t\u00a7e\u00e9&quot;&#039;.&#039;_&#039;f&#039;ESi4 reetvjte\ufb01gzg <\/p>\n<p>ameunt, which is pem3issib\u00a7e,V&#039;sii:ee thiS~.fat:t &#039;wag vbrcgxght tn:-. V *<\/p>\n<p>the notice 0f the authorities befofe gaassi\ufb01g.  &quot;tattle: and the<br \/>\ndifference if gratuity azinmnt  \ufb01iade aitefdedzieting the<br \/>\ndues towards the Manageegellt.   \ufb01g&#039; if ac<br \/>\n3\/i\/\u00bb,V4,x..\u00ab,i  &#039;- 3&quot;\/f&#039;=;4_&lt;ae.\u00bb.A:&quot;3? (_;_?\u00a3\u00a2~L*&#039;&#8211;Vf,,,)&#039;\u20ac_&#039;;&#039;  .. *<\/p>\n<p>10. 1711&#8217;e&#8221;&#8216;Eeai\u00a3&#8217;ne\u20acf\u00a5 1;C&#8217;:\u00a7_L1_1fi:;eI f(&#8220;&gt;r.ft\u00a72e _petitioner has Siibf\ufb01i\ufb01i\ufb01d<\/p>\n<p>that the&#8221;entiit;et5t;i22\u00a7:{\u00a7\u00a7;nt i*:es&#8211;..t\u00a7eei2&#8243;*de;j%c1sited before the appellate<br \/>\naathotitjsz. &#8221; &#8220;H0i$fe\u00a7%\u00a2.;;  tig\u00e9e&#8217;-ee\ufb01zgiuhnt in deposit to the extent ef<\/p>\n<p>Rs;.6L84  .V  ;&#8217;e\u20ac_ufnve\u00e9\u00ab the petiii0r;er&#8211;Corporation and<br \/>\nreinq\u00e9gixiing; a2:1&lt;itm.tbe disbursseci to the 3&quot;: respondent.<\/p>\n<pre>H \"    peiitien is disposed of.\n\nSdl-3\nJudge\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Bangalore Metropolitan &#8230; vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner &#8230; on 17 March, 2009 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNA&#8217;rA1&lt;A;.&#039;1* BANGALORE % DATED THIS THE 17&quot;&#039; DAY 0? BEF()RE._._ A THE HOWBLE M1uUsfr1(:1a;\u00abHm.;UvA;3I.:*,.\u00a74\u00e9gzse:\u00a331: L WRIT PETITION :$\u00e9&lt;:..~; &#039;2_._g ()1s&#039;k%2\u00a7:ms%(_1!_,;&#039;1\u00ab;&#039;s11*rk%(,) BETWEEN: &amp;% % Bangalcare. Metropolitan _ Transport CQ:1\u00a7(3;aiin; _ ~ &#8216; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-246325","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner ... on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner ... on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-22T08:15:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bangalore Metropolitan &#8230; vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner &#8230; on 17 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-22T08:15:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":598,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner ... on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-22T08:15:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bangalore Metropolitan &#8230; vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner &#8230; on 17 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner ... on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner ... on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-22T08:15:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bangalore Metropolitan &#8230; vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner &#8230; on 17 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-22T08:15:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2"},"wordCount":598,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2","name":"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner ... on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-22T08:15:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-17-march-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bangalore Metropolitan &#8230; vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner &#8230; on 17 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246325","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246325"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246325\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246325"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246325"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246325"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}