{"id":246350,"date":"2009-08-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009"},"modified":"2018-04-08T08:47:51","modified_gmt":"2018-04-08T03:17:51","slug":"s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"S.Anitha vs K.Santhammal on 10 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">S.Anitha vs K.Santhammal on 10 August, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 16419 of 2009(O)\n\n\n1. S.ANITHA,PARATHANAL HOUSE(LAKSHMI NIVAS)\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. K.SANTHAMMAL,PARATHANAL HOUSE,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. S.VENUGOPAL,\n\n3. S.SUDAMINI,\n\n4. S.GEETHA RANI,\n\n5. S.SUBHASH,\n\n6. S.SURESH,\n\n7. S.SANTHOSH,\n\n8. N.GOVINDA RAJAN,MANGALATH MADOM,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.SUNIL CYRIAC\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :10\/08\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n            S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n          -----------------------------\n            W.P.(C).No.16419 OF 2009\n           --------------------------\n     Dated this the 10th day of August 2009\n     -------------------------------------\n\n\n                     JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>        The writ petition is filed seeking the<\/p>\n<p>following reliefs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>        i)   Call for the records relating to I.A<\/p>\n<p>No. 1123\/2008 in O.S No.85\/1999 of the Sub Court,<\/p>\n<p>Pala and set aside Ext.P6 order passed therein and<\/p>\n<p>allow the application for amendment.<\/p>\n<p>        ii)    Issue such   other  writ, order or<\/p>\n<p>direction which this Hon&#8217;ble Court deems fit in the<\/p>\n<p>nature and circumstances of the case.<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.16419 OF 2009     Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>          2.     Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S<\/p>\n<p>No.85\/1999 on the file of the Sub Court, Pala.<\/p>\n<p>Suit    is   one    for  partition    after   treating  a<\/p>\n<p>partition deed and also a sale deed as null and<\/p>\n<p>void.    When the suit came up in the list for trial,<\/p>\n<p>petitioner moved an application for carrying out<\/p>\n<p>some corrections in the plaint and also another<\/p>\n<p>petition for removal of the case from the list.<\/p>\n<p>Both petitions were dismissed.        An application for<\/p>\n<p>restoration of the suit moved before the trial<\/p>\n<p>court    not     being   entertained    the   petitioner,<\/p>\n<p>preferred an appeal.         In the appeal the order<\/p>\n<p>dismissing the suit for default was set aside<\/p>\n<p>directing       its restoration.         Pursuant to the<\/p>\n<p>restoration of the suit, petitioner moved another<\/p>\n<p>application for amendment of the plaint which was<\/p>\n<p>canvassed earlier before dismissal of the suit for<\/p>\n<p>default.    That application being objected to by the<\/p>\n<p>defendants, the learned Munsiff after hearing both<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.16419 OF 2009    Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>sides     passed     Ext.P6  order    disallowing  that<\/p>\n<p>petition.      The amendment petition was disallowed<\/p>\n<p>for the reason that the decision in the earlier<\/p>\n<p>petition before the dismissal of the suit for<\/p>\n<p>default would constitute resjudicate barring the<\/p>\n<p>entertainabiltiy of the petition filed for that<\/p>\n<p>relief after restoration of the suit.         Propriety<\/p>\n<p>and correctness of that decision is challenged in<\/p>\n<p>the    writ     petition   invoking    the  supervisory<\/p>\n<p>jurisdiction vested with this court under Article<\/p>\n<p>227 of the Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          3.     I heard the learned counsel on both<\/p>\n<p>sides.     Reiterating the objections raised before<\/p>\n<p>the court below which was found appealing to the<\/p>\n<p>court below the learned counsel for the respondents<\/p>\n<p>submitted that Ext.P6 order does not call for any<\/p>\n<p>interference.       On the other hand learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>for    the    petitioner   submitted    that   a  fresh<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.16419 OF 2009     Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>application was filed in view of the fact that the<\/p>\n<p>earlier    application    was   dismissed.     Challenge<\/p>\n<p>against the dismissal of the earlier application<\/p>\n<p>could not be pursued due to the dismissal of the<\/p>\n<p>suit for default.       After having heard the counsel<\/p>\n<p>on both sides and taking note of the facts and<\/p>\n<p>circumstances       presented,    I     find,  technical<\/p>\n<p>objections should not debar a party from claiming<\/p>\n<p>reliefs which are otherwise entertainable before a<\/p>\n<p>court     of     law.       After     all,   courts   as<\/p>\n<p>instrumentalities of justice, should        not  bar the<\/p>\n<p>relief on technical objections.             Procedure is<\/p>\n<p>after all handmaid of justice and it has to bend<\/p>\n<p>and    mould      depending   upon     the   facts   and<\/p>\n<p>circumstances involved in the case.          True, there<\/p>\n<p>was some delay on the part of the petitioner \/<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff in applying for the amendment.       But after<\/p>\n<p>going through the amendment application, I find<\/p>\n<p>what is sought for is only correction in the date<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.16419 OF 2009     Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>and number of the deeds which probably might have<\/p>\n<p>occurred while drafting the plaint.        Having regard<\/p>\n<p>to the totality of the facts and circumstances<\/p>\n<p>presented, I find disallowing of the amendment<\/p>\n<p>application     in    view  of  the   dismissal  of  the<\/p>\n<p>previous application      may work out injustice.    The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner \/ plaintiff could have moved a review<\/p>\n<p>petition for annulling the order passed in the<\/p>\n<p>previous petition on restoration of the suit.        But<\/p>\n<p>for the reason that petitioner has filed a fresh<\/p>\n<p>petition without filing a review it cannot be taken<\/p>\n<p>as a circumstance to hold that the relief claimed<\/p>\n<p>is barred by resjudicate without appreciating and<\/p>\n<p>examining     the   circumstances   surrounding  in  the<\/p>\n<p>filing of the fresh petition.         So much so, I find<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P6 order passed by the court below is liable to<\/p>\n<p>be set aside, and I do so.           The injury that is<\/p>\n<p>likely    to   be    suffered by    the  respondents  in<\/p>\n<p>permitting an amendment filed belatedly has also to<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.16419 OF 2009     Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>be taken into consideration.        The amendment sought<\/p>\n<p>for by the plaintiff can be granted only on terms.<\/p>\n<p>As a condition precedent in allowing the petition<\/p>\n<p>for amendment petitioner          shall pay a sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.500\/-     to    the   counsel    appearing  for   the<\/p>\n<p>respondents      before this court within a week, and<\/p>\n<p>file a memo evidencing such payment.         If cost is<\/p>\n<p>not paid within the time limit stipulated, the<\/p>\n<p>amendment petition shall stand dismissed without<\/p>\n<p>any   further      orders.     Subject   to   the  above<\/p>\n<p>directions, the writ petition is disposed.<\/p>\n<p>          Post after two weeks for report.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                            Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                   S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN,<br \/>\n                                           JUDGE<br \/>\n                     \/\/TRUE COPY\/\/<br \/>\n                                       P.A TO JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>vdv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court S.Anitha vs K.Santhammal on 10 August, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 16419 of 2009(O) 1. S.ANITHA,PARATHANAL HOUSE(LAKSHMI NIVAS) &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. K.SANTHAMMAL,PARATHANAL HOUSE, &#8230; Respondent 2. S.VENUGOPAL, 3. S.SUDAMINI, 4. S.GEETHA RANI, 5. S.SUBHASH, 6. S.SURESH, 7. S.SANTHOSH, 8. N.GOVINDA RAJAN,MANGALATH MADOM, For Petitioner :SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-246350","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>S.Anitha vs K.Santhammal on 10 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S.Anitha vs K.Santhammal on 10 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-08T03:17:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"S.Anitha vs K.Santhammal on 10 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-08T03:17:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":806,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009\",\"name\":\"S.Anitha vs K.Santhammal on 10 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-08T03:17:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S.Anitha vs K.Santhammal on 10 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S.Anitha vs K.Santhammal on 10 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S.Anitha vs K.Santhammal on 10 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-08T03:17:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"S.Anitha vs K.Santhammal on 10 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-08T03:17:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009"},"wordCount":806,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009","name":"S.Anitha vs K.Santhammal on 10 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-08T03:17:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-anitha-vs-k-santhammal-on-10-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S.Anitha vs K.Santhammal on 10 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246350","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246350"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246350\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246350"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246350"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246350"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}