{"id":246511,"date":"2008-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008"},"modified":"2015-06-10T01:43:13","modified_gmt":"2015-06-09T20:13:13","slug":"shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Shri D.M. Solanki vs South East Central Railway on 18 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri D.M. Solanki vs South East Central Railway on 18 November, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>                        Central Information Commission\n                                      *****\n<\/pre>\n<p>                                                      No.CIC\/OK\/A\/2008\/01106<\/p>\n<p>                                                     Dated: 18 November 2008<\/p>\n<p>Name of the Appellant              :    Shri D.M. Solanki<br \/>\n                                        240, Shree Nagar<br \/>\n                                        Empress Mill Housing Colony<br \/>\n                                        Nagpur, Nagpur, 440015<\/p>\n<p>Name of the Public Authority       :    South East Central Railway<\/p>\n<p>Background:\n<\/p>\n<p>      Shri D.M. Solanki of Nagpur filed an RTI-application with the Public<br \/>\nInformation Officer, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, on 24 January 2008,<br \/>\nseeking information\/documents relating to the expenses incurred by the<br \/>\nRailways towards the arbitration cases from the date 5 March 2004 to the date<br \/>\nof award on 25 August 2007.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.    The PIO vide his letter dated 31 January 2008 replied to the RTI-<br \/>\napplication.   Not satisfied with the reply of the PIO, the Appellant filed an<br \/>\nappeal with the first Appellate Authority on 28 March 2008 who vide his letter<br \/>\ndated 18 June 2008 replied to it. Thereafter, the Appellant approached the<br \/>\nCentral Information Commission with a Second Appeal on 21 July 2008.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    The Bench of Dr. O.P. Kejariwal, Information Commissioner, heard the<br \/>\nmatter on 12 November 2008.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.    Shri Pradeep Kumar, Sr. DCM &amp; PIO, Shri P.K. Kshatriya, Sr. Divisional<br \/>\nEngineer and Shri D.K. Krishna Kumar, Ch. OS, represented the Respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.    The Appellant, Shri D.M. Solanki, was neither present nor send any<br \/>\nrepresentative for the hearing.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>6.    In the absence of the Appellant, the Commission heard the Respondents<br \/>\nand noted that the Appellant had asked for information under different heads<br \/>\nregarding the expenses incurred by the Railway authorities in arbitration cases<br \/>\nover a period of nearly three years. The heads under which the information<br \/>\n asked for included salaries of different officials engaged in these cases, the TA<br \/>\nbills of such employees, fees paid to Railways Advocates and cost on affidavits<br \/>\ntyping, Xeroxing and the cost of arbitration, etc. The Respondents replied in<br \/>\nthe first instance that the information was being collected and would be sent in<br \/>\ndue course to the Appellant. However, according to the Respondents, the case<br \/>\nwas discussed within the Department and a consensus seems to have emerged<br \/>\nthat the information asked for by the Appellant was covered by Section 8(1)(j)<br \/>\nof the RTI-Act. Accordingly, the information was denied to him. Subsequently,<br \/>\nthe PIO opined that the issue was not covered under Section 8(1)(j) and that the<br \/>\ninformation should be supplied.          Accordingly, the complete information was<br \/>\nsupplied to the Appellant vide the Respondent&#8217;s letter of 25 August 2008.<br \/>\nDuring the hearing, the Respondents explained that although the final reply was<br \/>\nsent on this date, the Appellant was kept in touch through interims replies<br \/>\nwhich contained part information.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.          In his Second Appeal, the Appellant has wanted to know as to how Section<br \/>\n8(1)(j) was applicable in this case and was ordered by whom.              In fact, the<br \/>\nCommission agrees with this doubt of the Appellant and is at a loss to<br \/>\nunderstand as to how Section 8(1)(j) was made applicable regarding this<br \/>\ninformation, all of which was in the public domain. In fact, the case is basically<br \/>\none of public interest and should have been treated as such. It is obvious that<br \/>\nthe Respondents tried to sweep the sensitive information under the carpet and<br \/>\nhad it not been for the vigilant PIO, the case would be dragged on longer.         The<br \/>\nCommission, therefore, directs as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>     (i)       Now that the information has been supplied to the Appellant, he is<br \/>\n               directed to write to the Respondents in case he feels that the<br \/>\n               information supplied is neither incorrect nor incomplete.           The<br \/>\n               Appellant may, therefore, specify the lacunae that he finds in the<br \/>\n               Respondent&#8217;s reply.    The Respondents will get 20 working days to<br \/>\n               provide any further clarification\/information desired by the Applicant.<br \/>\n               The case, however, will be treated as finally closed in case there is no<br \/>\n               communication from the Appellant by 5 December 2008.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>     (ii)      The Commission joins the Appellant in his concern over refusal of the<br \/>\n               information supplied under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI-Act           The<br \/>\n               Appellant is directed to go to the Respondent&#8217;s office and inspect the<br \/>\n               file in which the case has been considered and take photocopies of<br \/>\n              the same free of cost. He is free to approach the Commission with<br \/>\n              another complaint about the denial of the information as well as the<br \/>\n              delay, on receipt of which the Commission will take further action.<br \/>\n              This may be done by 19 December 2008.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>8.         The Commission ordered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                 Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                     (O.P. Kejariwal)<br \/>\n                                                           Information Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated true copy:\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>(G. Subramanian)<br \/>\nAssistant Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      1.     Shri D.M. Solanki, 240, Shree Nagar, Empress Mill Housing Colony, Nagpur,<br \/>\n             Nagpur, 440015<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      2.     The Public Information Officer, South East Central Railway, Divisional<br \/>\n             Railway Manager&#8217;s Office, Nagpur Division, Nagpur<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      3.     The Appellate Authority, South East Central Railway, Divisional Railway<br \/>\n             Manager&#8217;s Office, Nagpur Division, Nagpur<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      4.     Officer Incharge, NIC<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      5.     Press E Group, CIC\n <\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Shri D.M. Solanki vs South East Central Railway on 18 November, 2008 Central Information Commission ***** No.CIC\/OK\/A\/2008\/01106 Dated: 18 November 2008 Name of the Appellant : Shri D.M. Solanki 240, Shree Nagar Empress Mill Housing Colony Nagpur, Nagpur, 440015 Name of the Public Authority : South East Central Railway Background: Shri D.M. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-246511","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri D.M. Solanki vs South East Central Railway on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri D.M. Solanki vs South East Central Railway on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-09T20:13:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri D.M. Solanki vs South East Central Railway on 18 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-09T20:13:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":785,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Shri D.M. Solanki vs South East Central Railway on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-09T20:13:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri D.M. Solanki vs South East Central Railway on 18 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri D.M. Solanki vs South East Central Railway on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri D.M. Solanki vs South East Central Railway on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-09T20:13:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri D.M. Solanki vs South East Central Railway on 18 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-09T20:13:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008"},"wordCount":785,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008","name":"Shri D.M. Solanki vs South East Central Railway on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-09T20:13:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-d-m-solanki-vs-south-east-central-railway-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri D.M. Solanki vs South East Central Railway on 18 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246511","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246511"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246511\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246511"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246511"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246511"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}