{"id":246559,"date":"2008-12-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008"},"modified":"2016-10-09T17:01:40","modified_gmt":"2016-10-09T11:31:40","slug":"subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Subhashchandra vs Manikappa S\/O Sangayya Jaji on 16 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Subhashchandra vs Manikappa S\/O Sangayya Jaji on 16 December, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Manjula Chellur<\/div>\n
 THE HIGH COURT OF \nCIRCLTET BENCH AT GULBARGA\n\nD\u00a7{if'EZ{} mm THE mm DAY 0? DECEMBER ;v'\u20ac;3.;  \" \n\nFRESENT\n\n'\u00a3'HE H0?~E'BLE MRS JUST\u00a7i\ufb01If;\"?\u00a7\u00a7;\u00a7.?\u20ac3U::4\u00a7*\u00a7~CH$\u00a32E;{fR.. \n\nR.\u00a7._A,:>:o'772\u00a7\u00a7gQ_;;V%.w%\u00bb\nBzrw\ufb01gzv; W    . \n\nSubhashchandra,\n\nS50 Sangayya Jaji, \nz%g\u20ac\u00e9:Maj0r,  \u00e9    \nOcc:Bt:sines$ ;?snd'\u00bbv.r\u00a7$g\u00e9\u00a7i_g::;\u00a7tur;i,__  \nR20 Twin Hi1f.3',\u00a3aI'I:i\u00a7\ufb02.C\u00a7  \"' '\n\"\u00a7a}uk:f1;;mana\"md; '*<;,__ _   \n\nDist. Bid;%ar580ee1;_V   % .. APPELLANT\n\n{Sri San} E3:\u20ac%?I'<:iIi'i;1a1'  Mzinikappa Patii, Advecate)\n\nAND: .\n\n            \n Sf'9'Sangay:\u00a5% Ja3'i--, _\n-535$? 5'\u00ab'l'8;~\u00a7'<2:; - " '\n\n036:" Busiiie\ufb01:  }Fig"icu1{:,:re,\nK50 Town Eiumgma\ufb01ad\n\n V -- 'fa\u00a7ukfi' Eiig\u00e9ma\u00e9xz\u00e9bad.\n  '\u00a73\u00a7S\u00a7'i. Bi\ufb01sif 585 $9} .. RESFGNDENT\n\n   B;S;.Bharashe\ufb01y, Adwcata fer CXR}\n\nThis REA is \ufb02ied mfg % SPC agaixist '(ha jtx\u00e9gament and\n\n=  'i;'i'\u00e9\u00a2ree dt.i33,01;20{}'? passed in as Nmxoz 0:: the me ome Ciivii\n" .  judge (Sr.Dn} Basavakaiyaxx, ciecreeing the suit for deciaraiien sf\n\njaini ewnership.\n\n\n\nThis RFA seeming an for ADMISSION this Bay, \n\ndelivered the faiiewingz\n\nJUDGEEvIE;;\\ET\n\nHeard the learned Ceuzzsel for th\u00e9\u00a7';\u00e9i;; 3\u00a7\u00e9:i}a;1t<.;1n:d    \n\nrespenderzt.\n\n2. The agpeilaai hereig was tifzV\u00a2..LViV1:jiz~:%.2_<:\u00ab*.*.c.*;ss1'.'Lxhl'\u00e9ef\u00e9gz\u00e9ggjit befere\n\nthe t:'ia\u00a7 ccurt, In briafthe fa\u00e9i-:;i\u00a72at"E\u00a2\u00a7{';?\u00a3<:  33\u00a2 present appee\ufb01\n\nare as under:\n\nThe ;es;;0\u00a7d;%\u00a7_%t\u00a7p1a{:;t_\u00a7_%f ap{V:rf\u00a7\u00a7zi\u00a7\u00a2iVi%iiVVV' the trial court\ncantandixig    brother and the family\nevme\u00e9 z1:i:\u00a7ve:\u00a2bEAe;?\u00a7ii:d:'V-i%i1*:;\u00e9'x?\u00bb$\u00e9t~\u00a5e' \ufb01rope\ufb01ies which were divided\n\nmtween the %--ryn_3t3i.<:;*sV\u00a5;3{ aflzfniijfgtfazzgemeni in ihe prese\ufb02ce of raiders\n\n an  it if; \ufb01._1\u00a7ther r\ufb01entezaded that an: of ssverai prape\ufb01ies,\n\nV.   _1;1':;:~V,%"aiix5ir;i4Vfe':;3V and aiiotiad in each of them specific properties\n\n the saici property was an agicuiturai lazz\u00e9 and\n\nV -Vboth   intendeci to convert the same and than gel} tize\n\n\ufb01ragerty  pints jeintly. In ather words, except Sy,}\u20aco.\u00a73I\n\n 10 acres 18 guntas, ail otfler properiies said ta have been\n\n"   diiiided 833 mates and bezmds.\n\n\n\n2, If is 3139 cantended that certain propertias '2 V\n\nsubject matier 0f fznniiy arrangement dt. 15.6.1992'   --\n\nthe name cf the respondent Manikag\ufb01p\u00e9 "and   <\/pre>\n
purchased by the appe\ufb01ant herein aiang s\u00a7ri$I’;\u00bb1z;.Vf.l1ird  ‘\u00a7)j;?’  ”<\/p>\n
Gmzin\u00e9a Raw. Therefare, it was the'”\u20ac%\u00a7e.of the xthe
\ntrial cmm; that in the pr0pe\u00a7’t\u00a7z_  presen’:\n<\/p>\n
appeiiant Subhasiz Chancira,    dt.6.I.84, the\nplai11tiff~respnde;:t'      with his brother\nSszbhash c;m.i\u00a7a_%fL:'%-k%ji'%  % \u00ab B 4% M\n\n3.  matter and canle up with\n<\/pre>\n
a defenceiiizatl \u00a35   an orai paztitien between the<\/p>\n
brothers. by ni\u00e9tesgv’ b\u20ac3unVc\u00a73s’.LVand the property in questien was<\/p>\n
 V’ ‘p:31fch\u00a7_\u00a7\u00e9\u00e9i..o3 6; L84  ‘ipresezit appellant and the same is his self<\/p>\n
 which he: has abselate right, t\ufb01tie axzd iaterest,<\/p>\n
Th\u00e9faif\u00e9ire,  ‘$313; \u00e9enies the right ef the respondeni herein, but<\/p>\n
 ‘\u00ab.__ c3ain1s tax? the absalizte ew:’:er cf the pwperty in Sy.No.I31 $0 an<\/p>\n
   If) acres 18 gumas. He alse denies the so sailed famiiy<\/p>\n
   :a;ifa\u00a7::ge\ufb011ent chimed \ufb02y the resw\ufb01dezr\u00e9: which is mid is have keen i\ufb01<\/p>\n
 e:<isfe:2ce siace 11.136 198?.\n<\/p>\n
 V’   piai\ufb01tiffdid  any active part at the time ef registratien efthe<\/p>\n
 V V  ‘t.he piaintiff-resgaendent that both Govind Rae and his bretizer<\/p>\n
taking equai shares as they had jeintiy purchased the propert}\/.
\nApparently, the respondent-plaintiff was ne\ufb01her :1 ~ V.
\ndecument ef \u00a3984 nor the partition between Govix\ufb01f:   —
\nSubhash Chandra in 1995. In support of c\u00a2;;ii\u00a2nt\u00ab:an  Vgfgggt
\nthere was an oral pa\ufb01zition in 1978: ‘T <\/p>\n
even piet Nos.8G & 91 came to be”‘ee:\u00a7IV’1″etted  she<\/p>\n
constructed house on plot    to his name
\nin the year 1983 er  he  \ufb01eeument to Show
\nthat subsequent’  eeeiduct of the parties apart
\n\ufb01om this Vci3aI1geAV.;__;\u00a7A\u00a7es.911ae}.\ufb012;.i\u00e9\u00e9s*a…}?1a0 have also come forward to say that<\/p>\n
‘:\ufb01i1iS Tw-as gurehesed in the year 3984, the respondent \u00bb<\/p>\n
 _ .\u20aci,(_}\u00a3’\u00a7ui}’ii’3#f1’i;. \ufb02ifhey trial C’0til1; was _\u00a7us1:\u00a3fied ii} saying that mere absence
\n   Lfe\ufb01pondent-piaizztiif would not indicate that the property was<\/p>\n
  \u00e9imehaeed by the apyeiiant izz his izzditzidual capacity. It is the case of<\/p>\n
Subhash Chandra have paid sale congideration in equal am_\u00a2::_z znt.
\nEveii the evidence ef DW’-2 is to the effect that 59%. a<\/p>\n
consideration for purchasing Sy; R1131 was paid  1 ”<\/p>\n
Chandra am! the cather 50% was pa\u00a3>d    TP:e:*e
\nhard and fast rule that whenexz\u00e9r'”‘2;:1*nemi\u00e9\u00a7}er’– ‘VVf{m? 1ily
\npurshases a, prosperty in his  \u00a3’i’z:if”‘1:}.;’&;\u00a7’ ghiyuld  l\ufb01\u00e9ntion of
\nsuch purchase on behaif of   .AA”;\u00a7;V{‘zi”S’t\u20acI]C6 ef a joint
\nfam:i\u00a5y has ta} bf:  1%:  geveral facts and
\n  brought an record. If
\nthere was’    apparently, neither of
\n\ufb01le pax1ie\u00a7ha\u00a7z\u00e9_  t\ufb01e p1otN.9I was purchased in
\nthe yegru ~.ir1 ‘\u00a3\u00a7’z\u00a7V the respondez\ufb01 my piaintiff in his<\/p>\n
 V’ \u00ab-\u00e9txdiwv-i\u00a7\u20ac\u00a7a1p_’–2fa;n.\u00a7. IfA\ufb01}.t’e2i:i3.’? there was a partition in the ‘year 19358,<\/p>\n
  \u00a7lf;iIned this pI:3tNo.91 as the property earning ta<\/p>\n
  39138 i\u00a3se\u00a7f. The Municipai records show that in<\/p>\n
  ‘ afifxe ye\u00e9w ‘~}VVi\u00a7’S8-V89, piet N991 which was standing ii} the zzarne of the
\n‘ ;i}%;;3;:;)f;L1\u00a7iient-plaintiff was transferred t0 the name of the apgeliazzt
\n ji\u00e9mch is get denie\u00e9 by the appe\ufb01am. On the other han\u00e9, the<\/p>\n
‘4 appellant has adxr\ufb01\ufb01ed that a\ufb01er chazige cf Katha in respeci sf pie:<\/p>\n
was the famiijv’ pmper\u00e9ies atanie is be \u00e9iv\u00e9\u00e9e\u00e9 in {he ‘year LE9$’f.__b\u00a7=<\/p>\n
famiiy arrangemeni ‘Between the two brethers and the gg\u00e9\u00e9g 2,
\narrangemsnt was acted upon and therefareg ihare e:E”.;an’g\u00a7\u00e9’ “sf H
\nmutatien in rsspe\u00e9t 0f piai NGSEG  ‘{;:”..’supp{\u00a7:’\u20ac’._a}f s\u00e9rid<\/p>\n
piaadings, he breught {he \u00e9videx\u00e9ce Q31 ree\u00e9r\u00e9. 1′}f}_{eref:3f\u00a7%  is rzaiifx-s:  ”<\/p>\n
simatian where the appeIIa.;&:t*..~g\u00a7;as  \u00a3Siith”f%:gard ta
\nihe acttxa}: case ofthe p1a,inti\ufb01’g  ”  V ” x V’<\/p>\n
‘.1 9:1 per1;:sa3:?vBW~i, the aciuai
\naharacter of    ‘gees ta the e\ufb01eni sf saying
\nthat he dg\u00e9\ufb01gtza\u00e9eay \u00bb:\u00a7 is:1:.it,’i:’;”\u00bb=_\u00a7’Vi{‘i;VE’ <;:'V<:.'i in as Na, iaazgs by him
\nalong    The sa:i& \u00a7i"3CE\u00a3\u00a5I{1rE3\ufb01t is<\/p>\n
marked 3% E:=:.4P.3V_ a1ad.5-ih\u00e9"v.siVg2'iat:;\u00a7es of the pzzr\ufb01es are marirge\u00e9 33<\/p>\n
 "Exs.?;.I\u00a7(&\u00a7"L\u20ac0  Si\u00e9\ufb01amr\u00e9s ef resp0n\u00e9er:t\u00abpEain\u20ac%\ufb01' is at E:={\u00a7'.3{g}<\/p>\n
 *f;1:1\u00e9_.a\u00a7pei}a2';1. admits iha: ha camstructe\ufb01 a hamge in<\/p>\n
Fi\ufb01  that ii is; mazai\ufb01\u00e9 besfi\u00e9e iha }'i{\u00a7%i$\u20ac of Suiaizagiz<\/p>\n
 '\u00a77ajgashe\ufb01j,~s;__ 3%3e r\u00e9\u00e9zzatiazzi\u00e9y admits iaier :32': \u00a3333: 3.: the insianea :35
\n big bmi\u00e9zez he Eizas mi': 2\/'gig sigraaiisre an $33 p3ai\u00a7::i. '\u00a7'%:%s
\n ja\u00a7\u00a7:_2i;\u00a7<\u00a7 \u00a7;=:*':E\u00a7: raf\u00e9e\ufb01 \ufb01zc \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01iiiii Gf \ufb01i\ufb01 aprgei\u00e9ani. 2%-'%1e:*2e\u00a5ef \u00e9i is<\/p>\n
 a:<:s21*e.renie.:2\u00a3. $23 Ezim ha wmzi\u00e9 accepi ihe cage :63? i\ufb01e \u00a7\u00a5a%:::\u00a7:Eff and the<\/p>\n
E8<\/p>\n
rzaixmis a\u00e9imiggicmie gm\u00e9g agaimi hint; he wzml\u00e9 my he saiei $9 :33" d\u00e9\u00e9<\/p>\n
:10': a':  inzztance Gf his b:"’pi;a.z”fy’  ‘V<\/p>\n
reiief of iiijllii\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01. .\n<\/p>\n
8. in ‘auppsrt of ;::c::2:\u00a7;~.;i;;a; pi\u00e9\u00e9;\u00a7\u00a7}\u00a7’g;V ;:::\u00a2. the  ‘c:’a\u00a7\u00e9e, %:ot}1 the
\nparties have iet in evi\u00e9ence   Elfi\u00e9 has came: an
\nrecord, the}: ham  t1*zAs\u00e9E:’b’L’.f}i<)~<:1v3;::_':'V1:e7:'3':';s arx\u00e9 examining
\nwiizlesses.    'paxties is gane thraugb.\n<\/p>\n
incizz\u00e9\u00e9izgv\ufb01i\u00e9\u00e9v 55  wii&\u00a7:\u00a7\u00e9$’S\u00e9g, it is noticed that era}
\npa\ufb01itien  is “net at 33% esiabiished. 3:: was<\/p>\n
expected :9 exL1\u00a7E:1i;_i \u00a33012? pic: \u00a7\\\u00a7{\u00a7s.8\u20ac3 & 91 came is his share if i\u00a7:a$a<\/p>\n
‘ Ewe \u00a7;0:’parEi.es’v~-vgere n\u00e9t””e’ve:3 gmnzhage\u00e9 in }\u00a7?8, iha smsa\u00e9isd am}<\/p>\n
 p.a:’%i%:ii\u00a7::;  a\ufb01ygr hand, the fa\ufb01ts 0:’: recar\u00e9 woui\u00e9 p3’z:\u00a7a\u00a7\u00a7;\u00a7\u00a7se<\/p>\n
the case <i:f\u00a7he";fg\u20ac {}\ufb01}}’  ti} preducs EX,?.2, {ha f3_sa3i.\u00a7y anfmrigemagzi mi Wag a\u00e9ge<\/p>\n
VA   i;e:\u00a7f;r\u00e9\u00a7:g an 3?’=ita3{1;ii”\u00e9\u00a7’1\u20ac zna\u00e9ayia\u00e9 in Sizimz $213: $36 $0~=a:a\ufb01$\u00e9 fam\ufb01y<\/p>\n
 : \u00a7’_{“}_”‘.’f;\u00a7i;}gt3.’1.’\u00a7\u00a7\u20acE”E%E 3,? Z\u00a7Zx.?%E{ was zwiazi i\u00a7\u00a7\u20ac}I1 E3}? ghazzging ‘$5.32.: ka\ufb01za in ih\u00e9<\/p>\n
\ufb01\u00e9ame sf \u00e9he zzgps\u00e9faizi kerei\ufb01 wh\u00e9zzh is; <3per:l\u00a7:' adznitted by the<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
appeiiani befere this Court. In that View of the mattezc, the plaintiff<\/p>\n
was }usti\ufb01\u00bb::d in saying that he also has a share in the pr0p\u00a7ai*\u20acg?\u00a7”%;;<\/p>\n
Sy.’;’\u20acz\u00a7.13.’t measuring 10 322165 E8 gunias siitmte at Humngh\u00e9a\u00e9l.’   A4  %<\/p>\n
9.’ ‘$51163 we go through. the eonte\ufb01fs   <\/p>\n
S\u00a7=.N0.}33 is concerned, it Woizid  t\u00a71a{.”as.__”c\u00bbf i\ufb01is
\n\u00e9acumeni in Euna 1987, iizegre  \u00e9’\u00a7v.%.\u00a7:aA. \u00a7m\u00a7e\ufb01}r
\nbetween Govind Rae and {fie C.1r1a_\u00a72d\u00a7’a.\n<\/p>\n
“iherefereg with \u00a7e.f{e;:*e:3\u20ace     hrathers have
\naa\ufb01rzzi\ufb01ed that  in Syn?’-$9.13} is.\n<\/p>\n
zsshaiwer  er: 6.}.’3\u00a784 aivsng with
\n\u00a7QVif\ufb01\ufb01  ”  i.:s:%’ be 2% agsres: 35 gxzzlias, in “%”i\u00a7EE’\u00a5<\/p>\n
Q5 \u00e9\u00e9visioii %>\u00e9’i\u00a5.;\u00e9@:z G::*2_:-=’\u00a7f::\u00a7’ E3′-13% 353$ $23 pregezzz apge\ufb01ani in 19%:<\/p>\n
 = ._fFg%’;’:\/cs_’:@’\u00a73.p\u00a7e:g\u00a7:ts”f;_\u00a7z ‘w\u00a7;\u00a7z:’E\u00e9..3._;G.acm:~; 18 gsmtas ix; Sy.N0m}3\u00a3. E.:>;.P.2 aim<\/p>\n
sagz\u00e9 “:’:%3pa;%_\u00a7\u00e9<i3\u00a7:\u20ac.–\u00a7\u00a7a%;1:i\u00a3f has hajf sham in the said prvzygeriy which<\/p>\n
::e\u00a7::.%\u00a7"i:\u00a7 '\u00e9z\u00e9  {Sf Subhash Chandra. A: the and 9f {\ufb01e \u00e9ocumanig<\/p>\n
 f\u00a3?\u00a7':ar:=.: $4 2: gmgiev\ufb01zat if the gmpe\ufb02jg were is be c0nve:'\u00a3e\u00e9 arz\u00e9 sai\u00e9, tbs<\/p>\n
A gigrea 'E9 3&1} {ha mine jointly and 'aka: the sake grosee\u00e9s<\/p>\n
 je\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7sf:\u00a7\u00a7;. E': is the cage 9f the piaintiff~res;3:"::1\u00a7:;%:'s': ihai: \ufb01xing}: sash an<\/p>\n
'4 un\u00e9emia\ufb01di\ufb01g and ayeemerii was there Exeiaasaen \u00a323 pariieg. the<\/p>\n
 AA _ \u00a3\u00a7.'v…4\u00bb\u00a7ppare11t\u00a53g \u00a3112 Earzd in question in S_*\u00bb;.E\\\u00a70k}31 nzea\ufb01uring
\nA  T:.\u00ab}9VVa\u20acr%\u00a7 \u00a38 gun\u00e9as is an ag\u00e9cuiturai land. {:1 this, aha respeizde\ufb01f;
\n piaintiff ciaims 59% share. fie Ems sought fer dec\u00a7a:'ai\u00a7<::n of his<\/p>\n
" s\u00a7':am 0:" jerim ownership ahimg W'\u00a7'\u00a7\u00a7'} the app\u20ac1\u00a73.ii'ii as {big \u00a7E'0\u00a7:'.'2'\u00a7:;"<\/p>\n
1'?\n<\/p>\n
new<\/p>\n
ap\u00a7eIEar:”\u20ac irie\u00e9 10 36% away this pmpe3’iy in Sy.131 i;1\u00e9%vid2.;aEEy,
\niherefore, an occasion amass is {\ufb01e {he suit Seeking \u00e9iractiarz ggginsi
\nthe appeiiam The pmyer if} the piairii wads as under: \u00bb<\/p>\n
“;’s.) That it be \ufb01at:-iare\u00e9 fihai 131:3 Pga\u00e9nti\ufb01  Cf  j” <\/p>\n
aiefendazlt are \ufb01n: joini cawnersg z1,2;\u00e9”‘p::$se$%:a:sr$’%3\u20ac’:. ‘4<\/p>\n
the: iand Sy,’;\\.?\u20ac,ai3i. .1 $
\ni’\u00ab?..;~’\u00a7. Rs46=~\u00a75 pg   Tag,
\n    ‘V  V<\/p>\n
     be ki\ufb01diy-‘
\n    V\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01tghorities {<3 eater
\n\u00e9:hevv"\u00a7;z\u00a7.%2f:\u00a2 ~.%\u00a7\u00a7"Rw0-R of the gait land
\n V;}%1e:::;f\u00a3*o\ufb01\u00e9d V\u00e9f\u00e9xxwe 0f E\ufb01imnabad aieng<\/p>\n
–  \u00e9:;\u00a7\u00e93i1L:t%~;e–:;a:ne ofvii\u00e9fendant, as ja\u00e9ni awn-er,<\/p>\n
3  ”   ether reiief be grante\ufb01 be which the<\/p>\n
X  \u00e9\u00e9ntiziaa<\/p>\n
was miztz GE Ehe aazbjeci mam.-r af gZ\u20ac.\u00a7.2′ IE. $3 3139 ii’; ‘ac \u00e9zgiag\u00e9i ~ V<\/p>\n
en the date sf \u00a3:%:.?.2\u00a7 Ehe praper\u00e9g’ was s\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9 \ufb01n\u00e9izfi\u00e9a\ufb01  H
\nGgrvind Raw 311$ apgeiiani S1ih\u00a7’}3S\u00a7\u00a5; \u20aci”x2iii\u00a7i’\u00e9i;’ “\u00a7*:3$i\u00a7f:\u00a7EEy<\/p>\n
{\ufb01e \u00a7’\u00a33$p\u20ac\u20acE\u00a7Vi: $ha:*::es af \u00a7\u00a7a\u00a7:::%i\ufb01” 2:215′: &9\u00a7:.’~:_\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7z1 in  AS\u00a7’.?xE:\u00a7.’3,3*:.A ”<\/p>\n
ceuki mi be i\u00e9eizti\ufb01e\u00e9 ag an that da3f;’;\u00a7;3\u00a7\u00a7are&::t1}!. \u00a327  @135
\n\ufb01ze exam: grayerty that ca;n$’:'”Ea.A_be j4E?:;*;’Vti%;ar.\u00a7a21 \u00a7’0V\\}%i’nd Raa an\u00e9
\nthe \u00a7I’\u20ac:’\u00bbSs’i=\ufb01’\u00a7 apm:-Eiant was   contents at
\nEx.P.2 d\u00e9scieses 3\ufb01’1\u00a7”!:$:,f2’\u00bb?8I1:=’_’TLL\u00a71  \u00a3318 brothers have<\/p>\n
equal ghare i.\u20acf  in fi72\u00e9\u00e9:s11f\u00e9;i?::=:;\u00a7%; V:3fA’V-1C3’=,;asz*e:s E8 guntas, \ufb01xey have<\/p>\n
aqua} s%1a;f\u00e9 ‘}”\u00a7ze.i331a.E:1%\u00a7\u00a7i\u00a7?’\u00a7 p:}\u00a7’iion \u00a7%;%\u00e9\u00a3:1d {we 3 acres 9 gurzias’ As
\n{hers wasfi\ufb01 \u00a7_d\u00e9nt\u00a7V\ufb01C:{\u00a7iQ\u00a3:v\u00ab:3_f’*-rgsgective shares if 336 prospaf\ufb01es,<\/p>\n
they seems \u20aca h37i.:\u00a7e ;::fsa’,–.:\u00a7e a:_ z\u00e9c\u00e9e \u00a3323′: in case the larzds are acid 0:’<\/p>\n
 V’ ‘-:%.r;>2:<.?::'*\u00a5x%<4::\u00a7:\/,A;i:;":*{:;vM. giats; {\ufb01e}: '$33 ameum will be distributed equaiiy<\/p>\n
 "A\u00a7 ;*3'i*:':.\u00a5if:\u00a7_g  by seiiing {ha game join\ufb01y. The \u00a7:'ape:'iies which<\/p>\n
s\u20ac06d,__ the Bf p\u00a7aintiff~resp0:2\u00e9sn\u20ac wags aima\ufb01y i:"ar=:$\u00a7a;:'*:"ea'\u00a7 ii}<\/p>\n
 'the z3a\u00a7n\u00a3:_\u00a7*<.\u00a7?::e.a\u00a7*::\u00e9\u00a7%i"\u00a7:, E13"-si\u00e9iag
\nV' is \ufb01zz: aagpe\ufb01\ufb01anis Eggs: \u00a7'i?f\u00a7\u00a7}i3E"%\u20ac\u00a7$E'1f di& 39: as}; {gr ahazzge af\n<\/p>\n
-.._ “%a?3′:\u00a7?:a ‘ac iiic\u00e9zs\u00e9sx his mama aiscs as jar\u00e9zzi awzaer sf \u00e9he \u00a7i”‘G\u00a7\u20acf\u00a7}’ \ufb01r:<\/p>\n
 S}’.:’\u00a7=.i}.\u00a73\u00a7’ Bi3i.’\u00e9\u00a5”\u20ac$1′.\u00a7 198′? azz\u00e9 28$}, \ufb01ve years gap is them mad<\/p>\n
E4<\/p>\n
much wafer \ufb02ew made? E116 br\u00e9\u00e9ge, In ihis view’ of ihe n’:a\u20aci\u20ac::;n.f;he.<\/p>\n
triz\ufb01 C\ufb01\u00e9ifi was jusiti\ufb01e\u00e9 in rejesting the defence <\/p>\n
appeliaai herein by balding that \u00e9he pEa\u00a7nt\u00a7f’i’-r::3p<3r:d\u00e9\u00a7%\u00a7:–  K<\/p>\n
share in S\u00a7*.?\u20ac<3,13\u00a3. '@1222; {E25 pm";\/er ::';1x'<;-Q'<\/p>\n
axiar\u00e9s ihereia are menticmezd in such 3 fa3hiV\u00ab._m \u20achat '\u00a3}ae:fE”;E_.%:1c\u00e9’-{“f\u00a3se;:’\u00a7’.:<3"i\u00e92:\u00a7\u00a3d<\/p>\n
the reiief depaga\ufb01\u00e9gg upen   gm: ‘3’sg\u00a7\u00a7i3\ufb01C\u20ac3
\n\u00e9\u00e9mughi 9:’; iecer\u00e9;  A ‘  V<\/p>\n
\u00a31. \u00a33”:   Ez\u00a2\u00a7he3;$h Chandra ami<\/p>\n
<:9:1seq;:\u20ac_;}\u00a7;\u00a73;:  V;;\u00a7;sp:;:\u00a7'1_2\u00a7;:'\u00a7'\u00e9' " Subhash Shaniim \u00a35: regiraizzed<\/p>\n
' V' ";;3~a\u00a7:3\u00a7a\u00a7'\u00a7\u00a3e:1i:\u00a7L\u00a7\u00bb* \u00a7':mf:21 ::e'?V1'ifig"'%}9:e Said ;::mpert\u00a7,=' \u00a7i'id\u00a7"if'\u00a7<.'\u00a7%ja1\u00a7\u00a7=' without the<\/p>\n
\u00a7;s;;a_2i(ie:\u00a7i\u00ab._be\u00a7x\u20acgT_j\u00e9ined as a seiler whenever an Gccasien arises ta<\/p>\n
$e\u00a7E'\u00e9}3\u00a7\u00a7 pr\u00e9g\u00e9\ufb01g, <\/p>\n
 s\u00a7;<:;:\u00a7~;dingE3f, the appeal is \u00e9ismigged.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\u00bb
\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Subhashchandra vs Manikappa S\/O Sangayya Jaji on 16 December, 2008 Author: Manjula Chellur THE HIGH COURT OF CIRCLTET BENCH AT GULBARGA D\u00a7{if’EZ{} mm THE mm DAY 0? DECEMBER ;v’\u20ac;3.; ” FRESENT ‘\u00a3’HE H0?~E’BLE MRS JUST\u00a7i\ufb01If;”?\u00a7\u00a7;\u00a7.?\u20ac3U::4\u00a7*\u00a7~CH$\u00a32E;{fR.. R.\u00a7._A,:>:o’772\u00a7\u00a7gQ_;;V%.w%\u00bb Bzrw\ufb01gzv; W . Subhashchandra, S50 Sangayya Jaji, z%g\u20ac\u00e9:Maj0r, \u00e9 Occ:Bt:sines$ ;?snd’\u00bbv.r\u00a7$g\u00e9\u00a7i_g::;\u00a7tur;i,__ R20 Twin Hi1f.3’,\u00a3aI’I:i\u00a7\ufb02.C\u00a7 “‘ ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-246559","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSubhashchandra vs Manikappa S\/O Sangayya Jaji on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Subhashchandra vs Manikappa S\/O Sangayya Jaji on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-09T11:31:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Subhashchandra vs Manikappa S\\\/O Sangayya Jaji on 16 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-09T11:31:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1882,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Subhashchandra vs Manikappa S\\\/O Sangayya Jaji on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-09T11:31:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Subhashchandra vs Manikappa S\\\/O Sangayya Jaji on 16 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Subhashchandra vs Manikappa S\/O Sangayya Jaji on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Subhashchandra vs Manikappa S\/O Sangayya Jaji on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-09T11:31:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Subhashchandra vs Manikappa S\/O Sangayya Jaji on 16 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-09T11:31:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008"},"wordCount":1882,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008","name":"Subhashchandra vs Manikappa S\/O Sangayya Jaji on 16 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-09T11:31:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhashchandra-vs-manikappa-so-sangayya-jaji-on-16-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Subhashchandra vs Manikappa S\/O Sangayya Jaji on 16 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246559","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246559"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246559\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246559"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246559"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246559"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}