{"id":246608,"date":"2010-09-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010"},"modified":"2014-01-21T04:09:38","modified_gmt":"2014-01-20T22:39:38","slug":"n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"N.N.Shibu vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">N.N.Shibu vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 16197 of 2008(C)\n\n\n1. N.N.SHIBU,S\/O.NARAYANAN.\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :17\/09\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n             M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J.\n            --------------------------\n             W.P.(C)No.16197 of 2008 C\n            --------------------------\n\n                     JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>    By Exhibit P3 notification dated 25.09.2007,<\/p>\n<p>Government  appointed  Sri.K.P.Rajeevan,  Advocate,<\/p>\n<p>Ernakulam as Special Public prosecutor for the<\/p>\n<p>conduct of prosecution in S.C.No.357\/2004 on the<\/p>\n<p>file of Sessions Court, Ernakulam. The explanatory<\/p>\n<p>note to the notification shows that Government<\/p>\n<p>considered it necessary to appoint Sri.K.P.Rajeevan,<\/p>\n<p>Advocate, who is having the requisite qualification<\/p>\n<p>for being appointed as Special Public Prosecutor,<\/p>\n<p>to conduct the said case. Evidence in the case was<\/p>\n<p>partly recorded. At that stage Exhibit P4 order was<\/p>\n<p>passed on 23.05.2008, cancelling the appointment of<\/p>\n<p>Sri.K.P.Rajeevan  with   immediate   effect.   This<\/p>\n<p>petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution<\/p>\n<p>of India for a writ of mandamus directing the<\/p>\n<p>respondent to permit Sri.K.P.Rajeevan to continue<\/p>\n<p>as Special Public Prosecutor and to declare that he<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 16197\/08              2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>is entitled to continue with the conduct of the<\/p>\n<p>prosecution in S.C.No.357\/2004.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2. Director General of Prosecutions filed a<\/p>\n<p>statement,    which  discloses  that one  K.K.Sivan<\/p>\n<p>submitted a representation before him revealing<\/p>\n<p>that he is the eleventh accused in S.C.No.357\/2004<\/p>\n<p>and a counter case was registered as Crime No.<\/p>\n<p>74\/2001 of Piravom Police Station and a special<\/p>\n<p>Public Prosecutor was not appointed in that case<\/p>\n<p>because     of political  influence and a   Special<\/p>\n<p>Prosecutor is appointed in S.C.No.357\/2004. A copy<\/p>\n<p>of the petition filed before the Additional Chief<\/p>\n<p>Secretary, Home and Vigilance Department against<\/p>\n<p>the appointment of Special Public Prosecutor was<\/p>\n<p>also produced before him. It is also stated that on<\/p>\n<p>a  perusal    of  the  averments  in the  petition,<\/p>\n<p>Director General of Prosecutions was convinced that<\/p>\n<p>Special Public Prosecutor was appointed by the<\/p>\n<p>State without his recommendation and in violation<\/p>\n<p>of the Circular issued by Government of Kerala and<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 16197\/08              3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>therefore,    he  addressed  the   Additional  Chief<\/p>\n<p>Secretary, along with the representation of Sivan,<\/p>\n<p>to cancel the appointment of Sri.K.P.Rajeevan and<\/p>\n<p>by Exhibit P4 order, his appointment was cancelled.<\/p>\n<p>     3. Learned counsel, who appear for accused 14<\/p>\n<p>and 15 in S.C.No.357\/2004, submitted that accused<\/p>\n<p>14   and    15  filed  an  application   to  implead<\/p>\n<p>themselves as additional respondents and the case<\/p>\n<p>is   unnecessarily   being  protracted   before  the<\/p>\n<p>Sessions Court and a direction be issued to dispose<\/p>\n<p>the case expeditiously. As the presence of accused<\/p>\n<p>14 and 15 is not necessary to decide the question<\/p>\n<p>involved in the case, it is not necessary to<\/p>\n<p>implead them as additional respondents. Hence, the<\/p>\n<p>application   to  implead   accused 14   and  15  as<\/p>\n<p>additional respondents is dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>     4. It is under Exhibit P2 order, Government<\/p>\n<p>appointed    Sri.K.P.Rajeevan   as  Special   Public<\/p>\n<p>Prosecutor to conduct the prosecution in S.C.No.<\/p>\n<p>357\/2004.    The  explanatory  note  to  Exhibit  P3<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 16197\/08             4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>notification establishes that Government considered<\/p>\n<p>it necessary to appoint Sri.K.P.Rajeevan and found<\/p>\n<p>him    having  the  requisite   qualification   and<\/p>\n<p>therefore, he was appointed. Though, by Exhibit P4<\/p>\n<p>order, the appointment was later cancelled, the<\/p>\n<p>reason for cancellation is not shown in Exhibit P4<\/p>\n<p>order. Exhibit P4 order does not disclose that<\/p>\n<p>Sri.K.P.Rajeevan was found to be not qualified or<\/p>\n<p>incompetent   to be  appointed  as  Special  Public<\/p>\n<p>Prosecutor or that he is not conducting the case<\/p>\n<p>properly. The statement filed by Director General<\/p>\n<p>of Prosecutions reveals that the appointment was<\/p>\n<p>cancelled    at his instance,  as  he  received  a<\/p>\n<p>representation from the eleventh accused that there<\/p>\n<p>is a counter case and in the main case a Special<\/p>\n<p>Public Prosecutor was appointed due to political<\/p>\n<p>influence and the said Special Public Prosecutor<\/p>\n<p>was   appointed  without  consulting  him  and   in<\/p>\n<p>violation of the Circular.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 16197\/08                        5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     5. Exhibit R1(a) is the Circular issued by the<\/p>\n<p>Government         on      25.03.1992,           prescribing     the<\/p>\n<p>guidelines      to     be    followed       while      appointing  a<\/p>\n<p>Special Public Prosecutor. The five guidelines read<\/p>\n<p>as follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>           (a) The appointment of Special Public Prosecutors<br \/>\n           will be permitted only in very exceptional<br \/>\n           circumstances, where the cases involved are highly<br \/>\n           sensational or have extensive public interest.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           (b) The appointment will be made only after<br \/>\n           consultation    with   the    District   Collector\/<br \/>\n           Superintendent of Police concerned who will<br \/>\n           specifically  express   his   view    whether  the<br \/>\n           appointment of Special Public Prosecutor is<br \/>\n           absolutely necessary to conduct the prosecution<br \/>\n           effectively.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           (c) If the District Collector\/Superintendent of<br \/>\n           Police is so satisfied, he will also forward to<br \/>\n           Government a letter from the Advocate proposed<br \/>\n           to be appointed as Special Public Prosecutor,<br \/>\n           indicating  his   willingness   to    conduct  the<br \/>\n           prosecution on payment of regularisation fee<br \/>\n           prescribed in the Kerala Government Law Officers<br \/>\n           (Appointment and Conditions of Service) and<br \/>\n           Conduct of Cases Rules, 1978.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           (d) No private individual will be permitted to meet<br \/>\n           expenses connected with engagement of a Special<br \/>\n           Public Prosecutor.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 16197\/08                       6<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>           (e) Requests for appointment of a Junior Counsel<br \/>\n           to assist the Special Public Prosecutor will not be<br \/>\n           entertained when the appointment is made under<br \/>\n           Section 24(8) of Criminal Procedure Code.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The guidelines do not provide that consent or<\/p>\n<p>opinion of the Director General of Prosecutions is<\/p>\n<p>mandatory       for      appointing         a     Special       Public<\/p>\n<p>Prosecutor. Therefore, for the reason that consent<\/p>\n<p>or opinion of the Director General of Prosecutions<\/p>\n<p>was not sought for or granted before appointing<\/p>\n<p>Sri.K.P.Rajeevan as Special Public Prosecutor, his<\/p>\n<p>appointment could not have been cancelled. If the<\/p>\n<p>grievance is that in the counter case no Special<\/p>\n<p>Public prosecutor is appointed and at the same time<\/p>\n<p>a Special Public Prosecutor is conducting the main<\/p>\n<p>case, the better course should have been to appoint<\/p>\n<p>a Special Public Prosecutor in the counter case<\/p>\n<p>also.      The      unilateral          cancellation          of   the<\/p>\n<p>appointment of Sri.K.P.Rajeevan, without any valid<\/p>\n<p>reason, is arbitrary and illegal. It can only be<\/p>\n<p>quashed.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC 16197\/08             7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     Petition    is allowed.   Exhibit   P4  order,<\/p>\n<p>cancelling the appointment of Sri.K.P.Rajeevan as<\/p>\n<p>Special     Public  Prosecutor   to   conduct    the<\/p>\n<p>prosecution in S.C.No.357\/2004 on the file of I<\/p>\n<p>Additional Sessions Court, Ernakaulam, is quashed.<\/p>\n<p>It   is    declared that  Sri.K.P.Rajeevan  has   to<\/p>\n<p>continue as Special Public Prosecutor in S.C.No.<\/p>\n<p>357\/2004 on the file of Additional Sessions Court,<\/p>\n<p>Ernakulam. Additional Sessions Judge is directed to<\/p>\n<p>dispose the case expeditiously.\n<\/p>\n<p>17th September, 2010   (M.Sasidharan Nambiar, Judge)<br \/>\ntkv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court N.N.Shibu vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 16197 of 2008(C) 1. N.N.SHIBU,S\/O.NARAYANAN. &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR Dated :17\/09\/2010 O R D [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-246608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>N.N.Shibu vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"N.N.Shibu vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-01-20T22:39:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"N.N.Shibu vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-20T22:39:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1013,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010\",\"name\":\"N.N.Shibu vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-20T22:39:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"N.N.Shibu vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"N.N.Shibu vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"N.N.Shibu vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-01-20T22:39:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"N.N.Shibu vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-20T22:39:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010"},"wordCount":1013,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010","name":"N.N.Shibu vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-20T22:39:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-n-shibu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-17-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"N.N.Shibu vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246608","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246608"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246608\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}