{"id":24678,"date":"2009-07-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009"},"modified":"2015-05-06T15:35:40","modified_gmt":"2015-05-06T10:05:40","slug":"h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"H Balchand vs Sri D Giriyappa on 13 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
H Balchand vs Sri D Giriyappa on 13 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar And Gowda<\/div>\n
-1-\n\nIN ms HIGH comm' OF KARNATAKA AT 3Ars:\u00e9;;AL\u00a3)::2uE\u00ab u\n\nDATED THIS THE 13?\" DAY OF 3 A T  \n\nPRESENTQ\n\nTHE HONBLE M2;35i35TIcfE~ \nTHE HOMBLE M:2Jusi':cE:%A;\u00a7xz.v:?.:rs:%L)e~om.A eowm\n\n_I\u00a7_\u00a76L\u00a7;.;A:i\u00a7'1~FIR:'\u00a7'f\u00a7T'f \n\nb\u00a7.Balc\u00a3J;a11d _  \n\nSio Hastimaiji' , \u00e9 _\nAged about\u00e9fi y:::\u00a7:.'s'  <  \u00ab\nRlat N0.45I,.._lT*3t"  " \n\n Banga\ufb01prgi\ufb01\u00e9\ufb02 65f3--.  _____  .. Appallant\n\n \u00bb{  _S1'i, Advocate}\n\n _ 'Ll\ufb01ixiyappa\nV .' Sf 23 ,{)as-\u00e9gcawda\n' _  \u00e9tbeut 68 years\n' T.R;ar:~:.1224, ar\u00e9 Block\n% __ '*17i';* 'C3' Main, 6\"' Crass\n M.\u00a5l}16Sh'Wa1'a Biock\n 'QBSK HI Stage\n < " Bangalore. .. Respondent<\/pre>\n
( By Sm’\u00a3.K..i{.’i’hayamma, Advocate for
\nA.N.Ga\ufb02gae1haraiaft1 Aeseciates }<\/p>\n
This REA is \ufb02ied under Section 96(1) of CPR, agaiii-et’$he.p
\njudgment and decree dated 8.4.2399  passed 3
\n0.3.1203?-\u00a2i~8O\/2004 on the file of t1_;1e…V_ ackilCit\u00a7,5_’\u00a7:iiii1V’Judge;’ \u00bb _
\nBangaiore, dismissing the suit for :spee&,perf0n1_1e11e.e “of 331:: *<\/p>\n
agreement.\n<\/p>\n
This REA is c0miJ:1g”:o:e_V fort’-a\ufb011;r1Viss*$i1A\u00bb{  <\/p>\n
NXKUMAR, J., delivered the fo\ufb02dixfjiig :  ._  _  <\/p>\n
This is a41ip!;;intiff’s””a;ipeai,.’:’i.a\u00a7ein\u00a7ti’\u00bb’the judgment and<\/p>\n
decree:v:passeeV’Ti3y  declining to grant a decree for
\nspecific  . purpose of convenience, the<\/p>\n
 are refereed’ to; as they are referred to in the oiiginai<\/p>\n
 isi2ii.e<\/p>\n
 ~.   matter of the suit is the property bearing<\/p>\n
 Ne.’i’224,.\u00abVsi.teated at Muneswara Block, Banashankari :11 Stage,<\/p>\n
 Bahgaiefe, measuring East-west 45 ft. arie Nm:h-South 39 ft.<\/p>\n
 een\u00e9isizing of \ufb01ve shops and a residential premises. The<\/p>\n
 Wdefendant is the owner of the aforesaid property (in shortx<\/p>\n
.. 5 ,.\n<\/p>\n
Thereafter, he has \ufb01led the suit: for speci\ufb01c pe\ufb01ormanee’\u00bbef the
\nagreementofsaie.\n<\/p>\n
3. The defendant, after appearan:e.\u00a7..,fijec1′
\nwritten statement contwing the  :4′
\nthe execution of the agreernent \u00abefr\u00e9seie
\ntransaction being one of sale   scheduted
\npraperty and aiso deniesztyithe  the V documents.<\/p>\n
His speci\ufb01c centee\ufb01on isi’tiiat;”there’v\u00a7e’s ‘ea’ idem to enforce<\/p>\n
1rtfr\u00e9iVvsaiee\u00e9reement. In the aitemative,
\nit was p\u00e9eeded thea’t;V’;gxr;e’e._:’:;f\u00abthere is one such agreement, the<\/p>\n
recite? eh_arve.Vthet,”the iepeei\ufb01c perfermance is at the instance of<\/p>\n
 aneithe piaintiff wants to get back his meney<\/p>\n
 vAV.”::’T:he defendant further contended wet, it is in<\/p>\n
M i’ .V con’n’ecti-en seitiw the Sean transac\ufb01en, his signatures were taken
\nH K  ee;;me”‘i.3ien\u00a7< stamp papers and the plaintiff has misused those
\n ibigaiekj stamp papers and created an agreement of sate and<\/p>\n
" Hreceiptzs and on the basis of the same, he has put forth his cfaim<\/p>\n
The defendant admitted the receipt of Rs.2,t3G,O0Oj-,<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
Rs.1,0G,0OO\/-, R.75,00G\/- by way of cheques. According-re the<\/p>\n
defendant, he has received in ali Rs.3,75,000\/- <\/p>\n
were executed in raped of the said ioan    <\/p>\n
submits that he is ready to refund   He <\/p>\n
issuance of iegai ne\ufb01ce and conteeded"thet;. it   _<\/p>\n
repiied so. He further  V"he:':ii.-x\u00e9s  an
\nequitabie mortgage by tjtje  of the
\nscheduled property  Bank Ltd., on
\n25.3.2004 and  ai': and he is ready<\/p>\n
and wiiiing ta'  received from the piaintiff.<\/p>\n
 Qn  nieadings, the 'aria: Court framed six<\/p>\n
V"  read as under :\n<\/p>\n
is   piainiiff prove that me defendant
\n an agreement of safe on 4.3.2003<\/p>\n
 is : egfeeing to seii me schedule property to him for a<\/p>\n
V’  -total sale consideration of Rs.20,SS,\u20ac300\/-?<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
. _ 7 _\n<\/p>\n
2. Does the plaintiff preve that he paid an amount
\nof Rs.8,S5,000\/- to the defendant on different.
\ndata as averted in the plant?   ”\n<\/p>\n
3. Does the piaintiff preve that he
\nalways ready and wining to-perfcrn_1–‘_his_.  <\/p>\n
the centract?\n<\/p>\n
4. Does the defendant’bpfdate th;3t__ the
\nobtained his s:ghah3rese_o?\u00a7’\u00bbv\u00a73\u00a7an\u00a7:
\nin connection 3 _ lean <\/p>\n
 he is ee\ufb01ded for
\nXdeatree be  performance?\n<\/p>\n
5.   what <;:dgrhoth:Je::=;#hee?\n<\/p>\n
‘  =5.   the ciaim, the pmintiff got examined<\/p>\n
hi\ufb01eeifdas  he has aise examined cane Nathulal as PW-<\/p>\n
  ‘2, whe  with rmard to payment of the armunt by the<\/p>\n
4    to the defendant. Maintiff has prcaducw \ufb01ve decumens,<\/p>\n
.  are marked as Exs.P-1 ta P-5. On behalf of the<\/p>\n
  –. Lddefendant, he got examined himseif as Dw–}. He has aise<\/p>\n
\\3\/h<\/p>\n
_ g –\n<\/p>\n
exarnineo one D.G.Anand as ow-2 and produced owree<\/p>\n
documents, which are marked as Exs.D~1 to D-3. fihe ‘aria!<\/p>\n
Court, on appreciaaon of the aforesaid orai <\/p>\n
evidence on record, heid that, one piain\ufb01ff hee,’:feetao$.iShe\u00ab:i’ <\/p>\n
execution of the agreement of  it<\/p>\n
agreeing to sell the scheduied pp;-\u00a2Pe,.t’y=  the  a,
\nsale consideration of   that, the
\npiainh\ufb01’ has estabiished   on different
\ndates as averred  the  that the piain\ufb01ff<\/p>\n
has faiied to  and wiiiingness to perform<\/p>\n
his part: ofthe   of the agreement. It also heici<\/p>\n
 5the__:tiefencia\u00a3*sthasfaiied to estabiish that the piaina\ufb01 has<\/p>\n
V”–,}’o\u00aeivned._:_his*\u00a7gnatures on hiank stamp papers in connection<\/p>\n
v\u00e9iththe ioa’n’1.transac\ufb01on. It deciined to grant decree for speci\ufb01c<\/p>\n
v”‘~…4″v.,oerformanse, out granted a decree to refund a sum of<\/p>\n
i   teeter-\u00ab:s.a;i%as,ooo\/W receivw by the defendant with interest at 9% gm.<\/p>\n
r  fpaggrievw by the said judgment and decree passed by the trial<\/p>\n
 r  Court, the piairstiff has preferred this appeaf. <\/p>\n
.. 9 ..\n<\/p>\n
6. Sri V.B.Shivakumar,. Seemed coensei appearis\ufb01for the<\/p>\n
appeilant, zmaiiing the correctness of the gudgrrzerit i\u00e9ietzree<\/p>\n
of the trial Court: contended that, when the teei,.A’_:Ceii:rt:.heldi  <\/p>\n
the agreement of sale is estabiishee,
\nunder the agreement is a2so’_eetebiiehe’d, it
\nserious errer in holding that,  ready and
\nwilling to perform his’ ;’3e’r’t.oi–*V. The evidence on
\nrecord cieariy snows thet.”ti:e\u00a5  requisite be\u00a5ance
\nsafe  ifteetieiiiend wining to pay and
\ntherefore,–. ‘tee judgment and decree of the<\/p>\n
triai Couit._requii?e$ ” interfered with and pfeinti\ufb01’ to be<\/p>\n
 V. ‘_ gtaeted_e decree’*1fer__$g)eci\ufb01c performance.<\/p>\n
?’;f\u00e9Per\u00bb;ontre, Smtimayamma, Ieamed counsel appearing<\/p>\n
Afei+’_t33e”n$g\u00a7oritier:t-\u00bbdefendant submitted that, the ersti re mate:-iai<\/p>\n
on”recorti’ -cieariy establish that the pieine\ufb01’ is a money iender.<\/p>\n
  i\ufb01efeedent eppreacheo him for the sake ef obminieg Keen. The<\/p>\n
  agtiotm are paid by way of cheque. The signeterm of the<\/p>\n
‘i\/<\/p>\n
-1g,<\/p>\n
defendant were taken on blank stamp papers, which has been
\nmade use as an agreement of sale and acknovvledgertiii\u00e9-tfit..’of
\nfurther amount. ‘ihe material on record cieariy  _
\nthe plaintiff did not perform his part  u
\nbalance of sale consideration as contendedtry <\/p>\n
as weli as in his evidence. The tria*i.._\u00a7:oiirt-  the  *
\nentire evidence on recorciand  of rnateziai on
\nrecord, has reoorded the v\ufb01ndieg”thakt:\u20acohe–de’fendant is riot ready<\/p>\n
and willing to  1his:’part’c~\u00a7 eihich in the light<\/p>\n
of the iegal evide’ni:e\u00ab..onirecoid,_ do.’ not cal! for interference.<\/p>\n
8. _ Frorn”~th’e aft>res:aid*”rnatenal and the submissions made<\/p>\n
 \u00e9the;\u00b0iearned..Aadxiocaim appearing on behalf of both parties,<\/p>\n
the’ poi’iit::that  for considera\ufb01on is, as under “whether the<\/p>\n
  finding 0fv_’3\u00a3i’ie_>i*i31AaV.l Court that plaintiff was not ready and wiiiing<\/p>\n
  perforrniriis part of contract is supported by the iegai evidence<\/p>\n
 i.di3._’re:drd or new \\\u00ab\\i\/<\/p>\n
– 1; –\n<\/p>\n
9. The material on record clearly estabiisha that Ex.P-1 –<\/p>\n
an Agreement of Saie came to he entered into betweehj the
\nparties on 4.3.2003. The recitals in the said deed
\nsum of Rs.3,00,DO0\/- was paid by way ef cash  K
\nby way of cheque. Surther there
\nhaving received a sum bf Rs.1,0_a\u20ac),3\u20aci{3j-r’hi,r
\nRs.:,oo,ooo;- way of cheque at defe’hda’nt.’  the ht
\nplaintiff has paid a sum by _kwatI”AAo?VV cash and
\nRs.75,DO0\/- by way of cheque.    case of the<\/p>\n
defendaht that  ehiy Rs.3,75,0GO\/- as a loan to<\/p>\n
be repaid  hirira  the speci\ufb01c case of the piaintiff<\/p>\n
 . that paym*ent_s..are made in accordance with the terms<\/p>\n
“i,oi=..:he.agreeir:entef saie. As the ma; Court has recorded a<\/p>\n
 that the agreement of sate hears the<\/p>\n
“,.,_.4..”VsignatureV:”cif the defendant and as the defendant has faiied to<\/p>\n
   his signatures are obtained an biank stamp papers<\/p>\n
.   may have been misused, the said \ufb01nding being based on<\/p>\n
  j”i3\u00a7_ia\u00a5 evidence, we \ufb01nd no reason to interfere with the same. \\\\\u00a3’\/\/t<\/p>\n
_ 13 –\n<\/p>\n
10. It is a setizied phncipie that, in a suit for speci\ufb01c<\/p>\n
performance, the piaintiff who comes to the Court stgeiielttasrer<\/p>\n
and prove his readinas and willingness to perfor:’_othe’A <\/p>\n
terms of the contract which are ”\n<\/p>\n
Therefore, to succeed in a suit for  <\/p>\n
first piece, piaintiff should aver  is .readyijentiv”\\ir%iii’hg <\/p>\n
perform his part of the centract.A..i’The_reefter, the ‘piain\ufb01ff has to
\nadduce evidence to proireif  are wiilingness to
\nperform his part.’  conttect  the piaint shows
\nthat, there is’   the effect that he is ready and<\/p>\n
willing te peiferm his   coneact. But, in the course of<\/p>\n
 , his ey\ufb01jevnce, he he-.2  produced any document te show that at<\/p>\n
V”1.,tiie”reievaht  of time, the plaintiff was ready with the<\/p>\n
balance seie.V–V’cn\ufb01si’dere\ufb01on of Rs.12,m,000i- to be paid to the<\/p>\n
 ‘Vqefenciehvttovhave the saie dmi executed in his favour. The<\/p>\n
4    for compietion of the contract is four months.<\/p>\n
”  ,..\ufb02It  well settied mat, re:-idioms and wiilingrms shouid be there<\/p>\n
  from the date of agreement tiii the date of suit. Though the<\/p>\n
\\.i\/<\/p>\n
– 13 –\n<\/p>\n
piain\ufb01ff is net expected to actuaiiy tender the amount to the<\/p>\n
defendant or to deposit in Court the balance sale censieeretion
\nwhich he has te tender, but he has to estabiish
\nthe avaiiabmty of the funds and his readinassarsgsiigsrsiiinegnggg
\npay the agreed consideration arriourii:\u00a2.V   <\/p>\n
the examinatien-in-chief, he hae  ahncii L’
\nwilling to perferm his pazji: of’v.t.’*.ef”j\u00a2ontafacti iii’-\u00e9oweiizer, in the
\ncross-examination when  V”1′::i3;?’iether he is ready<\/p>\n
with the tzaianrzeeae\u00e9e  answer which he has<\/p>\n
givenisias  ‘ V<\/p>\n
” ”  have  say whether I had the
\n_amoerii~ _’pay’abie. V”*’iies.\u00bb\\:ards balance of saie
\n.f “‘\u00ab:cq:jsid_eratiiir’i.?%. ….. .. \u00bb<\/p>\n
‘A  11’A.a..%N;i”1d_ecumentary evidence is produced on recerd to<\/p>\n
ri\u00e9iaxfaiiabitiity of the funds 119 pay the baiance of sale<\/p>\n
_q co::s;ider\u00e9\u00a7i;\u00a7.o?i'”.Vby the plaintiff, on the dat of the agreement: or at<\/p>\n
 V’ ‘2..jjthe’expir\u00a7r of feur months pemd agreed upon for mmpie\ufb01ng the<\/p>\n
Seveldpment Autmrity has executed i..ease~cem-Sale Agreement<\/p>\n
on 29.9.1984. Therefore, the plaintiff ought to have
\naformaid balance sale consideration after
\nobtained the sale deed and a copy of”‘wh\u00abich
\ndue plainti\ufb01’. No explanation is_ a
\nbalance sale coreideretjon and    V
\nto show that the  the”‘belance sale
\nconsideration. It is  teal Coort on<\/p>\n
a proper   evidence on
\nrecord, ‘held   failed to prove his readinms<\/p>\n
and willinghees to  part of the contract. Therefore, it<\/p>\n
 has d_ecli.hA\u00e9d~i:o…grant a decree for speci\ufb01c performance<\/p>\n
endfnwei  any illegality in the judgment and decree<\/p>\n
 byr:a..eeei Court. The 3133 Court has rightly directed the<\/p>\n
  V.defenderrfi’:.to refund a sum of Rs.8,.55,mG\/- with interest at 9%<\/p>\n
dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
\ufb01ance, there is no me-it in mas appeal and the same is<\/p>\n
1%<\/p>\n
In view 9f the dismissai cf
\nMis<:.Cvl.No.8122\/2009 mad for temporary..i4r}ju:\u00a7\u00e9i%\u00a7f\u00a5:V.~\u20acig:\u00a7\u00e9S .'\u00a7f2;)t"V, & <\/p>\n
survive for consideration and accordi'n.gIy _'_Tti*ie  is "
\ndismissed.\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court H Balchand vs Sri D Giriyappa on 13 July, 2009 Author: N.Kumar And Gowda -1- IN ms HIGH comm’ OF KARNATAKA AT 3Ars:\u00e9;;AL\u00a3)::2uE\u00ab u DATED THIS THE 13?” DAY OF 3 A T PRESENTQ THE HONBLE M2;35i35TIcfE~ THE HOMBLE M:2Jusi’:cE:%A;\u00a7xz.v:?.:rs:%L)e~om.A eowm _I\u00a7_\u00a76L\u00a7;.;A:i\u00a7’1~FIR:’\u00a7’f\u00a7T’f b\u00a7.Balc\u00a3J;a11d _ Sio Hastimaiji’ , \u00e9 _ Aged about\u00e9fi y:::\u00a7:.’s’ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24678","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nH Balchand vs Sri D Giriyappa on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"H Balchand vs Sri D Giriyappa on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-06T10:05:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"H Balchand vs Sri D Giriyappa on 13 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-06T10:05:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1833,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009\",\"name\":\"H Balchand vs Sri D Giriyappa on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-06T10:05:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"H Balchand vs Sri D Giriyappa on 13 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"H Balchand vs Sri D Giriyappa on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"H Balchand vs Sri D Giriyappa on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-06T10:05:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"H Balchand vs Sri D Giriyappa on 13 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-06T10:05:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009"},"wordCount":1833,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009","name":"H Balchand vs Sri D Giriyappa on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-06T10:05:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-balchand-vs-sri-d-giriyappa-on-13-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"H Balchand vs Sri D Giriyappa on 13 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24678","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24678"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24678\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24678"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24678"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24678"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}