{"id":247006,"date":"2009-06-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009"},"modified":"2018-05-28T09:00:07","modified_gmt":"2018-05-28T03:30:07","slug":"parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Parukutty vs Ramakrishnan on 10 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Parukutty vs Ramakrishnan on 10 June, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 1827 of 2009()\n\n\n1. PARUKUTTY,W\/O.NARAYANAN,AATTAKKARAVEEDU,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. RAMAKRISHNAN,S\/O.LATE VELAYUDHAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.RAJESH NAMBIAR\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :10\/06\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                            THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.\n\n                          --------------------------------------\n                           Crl.R.P.No.1827 of 2009\n                          --------------------------------------\n                    Dated this the 10th day of June, 2009.\n\n                                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
       Notice to respondent No.1 is dispensed with in view of the order I am<\/p>\n
proposing to make and which is not prejudicial to him. Public Prosecutor takes<\/p>\n
notice for respondent No.2.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       2.     This revision is in challenge of judgment of         learned Additional<\/p>\n
Sessions Judge, Adhoc-I, Palakkad in Crl.Appeal No.312 of 2007 confirming<\/p>\n
conviction but modifying sentence of the petitioner for offence punishable under<\/p>\n
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short, “the Act).<\/p>\n
       3.     According to respondent No.1, petitioner            who is a neighbour<\/p>\n
entered into an agreement with him on 8.6.2004 for sale of 27.25 cents of land<\/p>\n
belonging to the petitioner for Rs.2,500\/- per cent.              Petitioner received<\/p>\n
Rs.55,000\/- from respondent No.1 by way of advance. According to respondent<\/p>\n
No.1, he had spent Rs.15,000\/- for effecting cultivation in the property agreed to<\/p>\n
be sold. Later, petitioner backed out from the agreement. Respondent No.1<\/p>\n
preferred complaint to the C.I. of Police, Mannarkkad. There was a mediation<\/p>\n
as per which petitioner agreed to return the advance sum of Rs.55,000\/- and<\/p>\n
the amount (Rs.15,000\/-) respondent No.1 had spent for effecting cultivation in<\/p>\n
the property agreed to be sold. Out of that, petitioner paid Rs.29,000\/- in cash<\/p>\n
and for the balance sum of Rs.41,000\/- issued two cheques dated 10.11.2004<\/p>\n
for Rs.21,000\/- and dated 10.12.2004 for Rs.20,000\/-. Those cheques were<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.1827\/2009<\/p>\n
                                        2<\/span><\/p>\n
dishonoured for insufficiency of funds.         On getting dishonour intimation,<\/p>\n
respondent No.1 issued notice to the petitioner intimating           dishonour   and<\/p>\n
demanding payment.      Respondent No.1 gave evidence as PW1 and proved<\/p>\n
Exts.P1 to P4 series.     Exts.P1 and P2 are the cheques referred             above.<\/p>\n
Dishonour of those cheques for the above stated reason is proved by Ext.P3<\/p>\n
series. Issue and service of notice to the petitioner are not disputed and are<\/p>\n
proved by Ext.P4 series.      According to the petitioner, she had borrowed<\/p>\n
Rs.50,000\/- from respondent No.1 in connection with her daughter’s marriage<\/p>\n
and at that time given two signed blank cheques as security.            The amount<\/p>\n
borrowed was later repaid with interest but the cheques were not returned.<\/p>\n
Petitioner did not adduce evidence in support of that contention.<\/p>\n
       4.     Respondent No.1 has given evidence regarding the transaction<\/p>\n
which culminated in execution of the cheques in question. It is contended by<\/p>\n
learned counsel that the agreement referred in the complaint is not produced.<\/p>\n
But then, the complaint is for dishonour of the cheques, Exts.P1 and P2 for<\/p>\n
insufficiency of funds and for non-payment of the amount inspite of dishonour<\/p>\n
intimation and demand. It is not absolutely necessary that the original cause of<\/p>\n
action pleaded by respondent No.1 had to be proved. What is required to be<\/p>\n
pleaded and proved is the due execution of the cheques in question for the<\/p>\n
discharge of a legally enforceable debt\/liability. In this case it is admitted by the<\/p>\n
petitioner also that Exts.P1 and P2 contained her signature, are drawn on the<\/p>\n
account maintained by her and she had given those cheques to respondent<\/p>\n
No.1 though according to her, as security for       Rs.50,000\/- she had taken as<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.1827\/2009<\/p>\n
                                        3<\/span><\/p>\n
loan. But, petitioner did not adduce evidence or bring out any circumstances to<\/p>\n
prove or probabilise that she had taken a loan of Rs.50,000\/-. At any rate there<\/p>\n
is no evidence to show that cheques were given in signed blank form as security<\/p>\n
or that the liability under the loan allegedly taken by the petitioner from<\/p>\n
respondent No.1 was discharged. It is pertinent to note that petitioner did not<\/p>\n
reply to the statutory notice.  Nothing is brought out to disbelieve the evidence<\/p>\n
of respondent No.1. Courts below in these circumstances are justified in holding<\/p>\n
that the petitioner issued the cheques in question for the discharge of a legally<\/p>\n
enforceable debt\/liability and that she failed to rebut the presumption under<\/p>\n
Section 139 of the Act. Hence conviction of the petitioner is legal and proper<\/p>\n
and required no interference.\n<\/p>\n
       5.     Learned magistrate sentenced the petitioner to undergo simple<\/p>\n
imprisonment for three months and pay Rs.41,000\/- as compensation. In default<\/p>\n
of payment of compensation, petitioner was directed to undergo simple<\/p>\n
imprisonment for 60 days. Appellate court confirmed conviction as well as the<\/p>\n
direction for payment of compensation.         Learned counsel contends that<\/p>\n
petitioner and respondent No.1 are neighbours and that in the facts and<\/p>\n
circumstances of the case      sentence may be modified.         Learned counsel<\/p>\n
requested    four months’ time to deposit the compensation in the trial court.<\/p>\n
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the<\/p>\n
offence committed, I am satisfied that simple imprisonment till rising of the court,<\/p>\n
payment of compensation as awarded by the learned magistrate and in default<\/p>\n
of payment, simple imprisonment for two months is sufficient in the ends of<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.1827\/2009<\/p>\n
                                          4<\/span><\/p>\n
justice.\n<\/p>\n
       Resultantly, this revision is allowed in part to the following extent:<\/p>\n
             i.      Substantive sentence awarded to the petitioner is modified<\/p>\n
as simple imprisonment till rising of the court.\n<\/p>\n
             ii.     Petitioner is granted three months’ time to deposit the<\/p>\n
compensation as ordered by the learned magistrate, in the trial court. In case of<\/p>\n
default, she shall undergo simple imprisonment for two months.<\/p>\n
             iii.    Petitioner shall appear in the trial court on 12.9.2009 to<\/p>\n
receive the sentence.\n<\/p>\n
       Execution of warrant if any against the petitioner will stand in abeyance till<\/p>\n
12.9.2009. Communicate the order to the court concerned.<\/p>\n
       Crl.M.A.No.5534 of 2009 will stand dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                 THOMAS P.JOSEPH,
\n                                                           Judge.\n<\/p>\n
cks<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Parukutty vs Ramakrishnan on 10 June, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1827 of 2009() 1. PARUKUTTY,W\/O.NARAYANAN,AATTAKKARAVEEDU, … Petitioner Vs 1. RAMAKRISHNAN,S\/O.LATE VELAYUDHAN, … Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC For Petitioner :SRI.RAJESH NAMBIAR For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon’ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH Dated :10\/06\/2009 O […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-247006","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nParukutty vs Ramakrishnan on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parukutty vs Ramakrishnan on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-28T03:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Parukutty vs Ramakrishnan on 10 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-28T03:30:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":911,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Parukutty vs Ramakrishnan on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-28T03:30:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parukutty vs Ramakrishnan on 10 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parukutty vs Ramakrishnan on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parukutty vs Ramakrishnan on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-28T03:30:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Parukutty vs Ramakrishnan on 10 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-28T03:30:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009"},"wordCount":911,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009","name":"Parukutty vs Ramakrishnan on 10 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-28T03:30:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parukutty-vs-ramakrishnan-on-10-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parukutty vs Ramakrishnan on 10 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247006","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247006"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247006\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247006"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247006"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247006"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}