{"id":247208,"date":"2009-08-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-04-02T07:50:08","modified_gmt":"2015-04-02T02:20:08","slug":"sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Pillappa @ Thammaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Pillappa @ Thammaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2909 \n\nBEFORE %\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A S BO1?.e3=S7$Ifi~.\u00a2;' 1]  3\n\nWRIT PE'I'1'I'ION N0. 17266\/2006 (KLR-RR;SSR;..  'S S }\n\nBETWEEN :\n\nPILLAPPA@'I'HAMMAIAH  =\nS\/O LATE PERIYANNA@ABBAIAI-I  \nAGED ABOUT 62 YEARS .   \nR\/AT NAYANDAHALLI vILmC~E,\"\nKENGERI HGBLI __   _  -,\nBANGALORE SOUTH TALUK     \" \"v,...\"PE2-'\u00a7'ITlONER\n\n(BY SR1: T:N'\u00a7f:SHs\u00e9;.5N.\u00a7i\u00a7f\u00a74,\u00ab;'A:\u00a7v.3  \n\nAND :\n\n1 THE STATE oF,KARN.A'w:KA\n8? [TS C\u00a7{IEF',SECRE'?'ARY\n_\\S\":&gt;HA'1~:A SoU13HA_.... \u00ab\n\n- A Dr. Bi.' AMBEDKAR VEEDHI\n\u00bb \ufb02 BA\u00a7\u20acGALORE~__~ 560 091\n\n2 ~_ 'THE SPECIi'xL'DEPUTY COMMISSIONER\n\n' BANGALQRE URBAN DiSTRIC'I'\n'T'ALU__K QFFICE BUILDINGS\nBANGALORE\n\nV. \"F}:IE ASSISTANT COMMESSIONER\n = BANGALORE SOUTH SUB-I3iVIS1ON\n- TALUK OFFFICE BUILDING\n BANGALORE\n\n\n\n6(a)\n\nTHE TAPISILDAR\nBANGALORE SQUTH TALUK\nTALUK OFFICE BUILEDING\nBANGALORE\n\nKAMALAMMA, MAJOR\n\nW\/ O LATE F' MUNISANJEEVAPPA\nR] A RAMAGONDANAHALLI\nVARTHUR HOBLI\n\nBANGALORE EAST TALUK\n\nAMMAYYAMMA\nSINCE DEAD BY LRS\n\nK CHANDRAKALA . \nD \/0 LATE KRISHNAPPA \nAGED ABOUT 30 YEARS  g .\nR\/A CHUNCHAGHATFA   V\nW\u00bb cmss, 2N_DT+J:I_A1N:' \"\n\nANNAPOORNEif'W-ARI 'i._.A\u00a5:0UT    V.\n\nBANGALQRE-262; _  '\n\nK Pf'&lt;&#039;..AKASH  S&#039;;  1;A*2\ufb01E:&quot;I{i\u00e9i--s1azr~:APPA\nAGED.AB.OU&quot;\u00a7&#039; 28.2fEAR_$  . _ \n\nK JAGAf3fS}~I 5930- _:A*rEI\u00ab.:i\u00e91sHr\u00a2APPA\nAg::+En.A:3ou&#039;r_25&#039;YEARs\n\n\u00ab &quot;:{&#039;GANES--14\u00abs\/QLATE KRISHNAPPA\n\u00bb  -AVCV3ED&#039;AI3\u00a7}UT 22 YEARS\n\n._ &quot;&#039;TL1f\u00ab:s&quot;6{i5}v..%r\u00a9.:\u00a7;{\u00e9} ARE R\/A NO. 527\nA PAI\\FTH:5;&#039;R2&#039;-EEBALYA, JANATHA canom\n\nB.iYS{}RE RGAD, NEAR B M VALLEY\nBANG.:\u00a7LORE -39\n\nA&#039; &#039; vgN1\u00a7ATAL,AKsHAMMA, MAJOR\n= ,_D_\u00a3O LATE PMUNISANJEEVAPPA\n\nR&quot;\/A VASUDEVAPURA viLLA&lt;3E\n\ni THARALU POST, KAGGALIPURA\n\nBANGALORE EAST TALUK\n\nJ\u00bb\n\n&#039;3\u00bb\n\n \n\n\n\n10\n\nI1\n\n12\n\nPADMA, MAJOR\n\nD\/O LATE F&#039; MUMSANJEEVAPPA\nR\/A RAMAGONDANAHALLI\nVARTHUR HOBLI\n\nBANGALORE EAST TEKLUK\n\nVENKATASWAMY, MAJOR\n\nS \/ O LATE PERIYANNA @ ABBAIAH\nR\/&#039;A NAYANEDAHALLI\n\nKENGERE HOBLI\n\nBANGALORE SOUTH TALUK\n\nMARIYAPPA @ MUTHAPPA . \n\nS\/O LATE PERIYANNA @ ABBt&#039;d_AE%_\nMAJOR, R\/A NAYANDAHALLI &quot; *\nKENGERI HOBLI   _  V\nBANGALQRE SOUTH TALUK   ..\n\n&#039;SHANTHA1\\dMA,MAJOR&#039; V \nW\/O LATE SEENAPPA   _  &#039;\n\nR\/A 1.~:A\u00a5..A$i&#039;x:-_AI,\u00bb~i\u00a7::;,1gI ~ \nKENVGERIHOBLI  _  .\nBAN\u20ac3Amz~2\u00a7: E\u00a7AHALL1 '\n\nKfj;-:NG_ERf HOBLE .  ..... 14 \u00bb\n\n_  _5AN&lt;3ALo&#039;&quot;1?E scum TALUK\n\n__ &quot; BALA;R-,.JU~, MAJOR\n._ 310 Law PQRIYANNA @ ABBAIAH.&#039;\n&#039;R\/A NAYRNBAHALLE\nK&#039;ENC%ERI.HOBLI\n\nBAIJGALORE SGUTH TALUK  RESPONDENTS\n\nV&#039; &quot; {BY :&#039;:ERI: 1% B SATHYANARAYANA SINGH&#039; HOG? FOR RI-4\n\nQ&#039;  BALU ASSOCIATES, ADVS FOR R5,&#039;?,8-I(3 8a \u00a7&lt;&#039;6(a-d}\n\n.  SR1: MOHAN,AD\\?. FOR REg--13;\n\n&#039;6-\n\n\n\nTHIS WRIT PETITEGN IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 8a\n227 OF&#039; THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, WITH A PRAYER TO:\nQUPISH THE IMPUGNED ORDERS DT. 18.10.2006 PASSED? IN\n\nREV. PET NO. 3\/2004-05 on: THE FILE OF&#039; THE seec1-m;.~.V_\nDEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URGAN o1.s*:*,RIC&#039;1&#039;.o. \n\nBANGALCBRE AND THE IMPUGNED ORDER eT.__;&#039;1;4.--2_oo4~ \nPASSED IN ems) 27\/2003-04 on me FILE OF&#039; THE ASSIVSTANT .  &#039;\n\nCOMMISSIONER, BANGALORE&#039;. SOUTH SUB--DIVIS_ION &#039;VIBE\nANX-G, AND THE IMPUGNED MUTATIO_Ne:}T. 30.11.2002 \n\nNO. 312002 on THE FILE OF THE TA1{As1LoA.R&#039;;_B-Awoai\ufb01oee _ \n\nSOUTH SUB DIVISION, BANGALORE VIBE AIa;IX~.D. 00\n\nThis &#039;Writ Petition coming  eggs, I\n\nthe Court made the following 2 &quot;\n\n   I   \n\nThe pCtiti0I}.\u20ac1&#039;ViS   :;1;1:&#039;ie mutation\n\norder in  passeo by the Tahsildar and\n\nt.hereafterA&#039;af7\ufb01imed._  Commissioner and\n\nthe  IClo1r\u00a71&#039;nIiseioI;er by their orders dated\n\n I . V   18. 10.  respectively.\n\n  &#039;ease of the petitioner in brief is that the\n\nI I  &quot;p.e&#039;titi;o:2efV&#039;io entitled to the property in question situate\n\nin &quot;\u20ac3;V.&#039;No.48\/ 1 to the entire extent measuring 2 acres 10\n\n ineiuding 16 guntas of kharab. In this regard,\n\nI\n\n&#039;$\n\n \n\n\n\nherein. ; d &quot;\n\nthe petitioner pieces reliance on the gift deed dated\n\n5.8. 1963 which is said to have been executed in \n\nof the petitioner by his father. Therefore, the  it \n\ncontends that he has exclusive right over  3 V&quot; &quot;  \n\nin ques\ufb01on which has been gfted to  it \n\ndocument and as such the&#039; -eonteetjng It:Sj;~er1g1en_t;s VA\n\nherein cannet claim right to the  &#039;:Her:1ce, it\nis the case of the  was not\n\njusti\ufb01ed in passing. the 1);eta;tiont\u00e9order_1\u00bb,ivIR No.3\/0%\n\nQ3 dire&lt;:t&#039;1r1g_ the&#039;:\u20ac&#039;exzee.ue..:Venjtriee to be kept in the joint\n\nnames of the\u00e9dpetitioner  contesting respondents\n\n ._   &#039;Avcentended by the petitioner that even\n\nV assu\ufb01ing=..&#039;:fo3&quot;&quot;&#039;a moment that the civ\ufb01 rights ef the\n\n weitld have to be decided in O.S.No.6317\/02,\n\nconeidering the fact that in the said suit, a prayer has\n\n V   made for declaring the Said gift deed dated\n\nis\n\n \n\n\n\n8\n\nO.S.No.6317\/2002 and any observations made in this\n\nregard either with regard to the extent of the property,\n\nthe nature of right eiaimed under the git deed \n\nentitlement to partition would ultimately prejtl\u00e9iicet  _\n\ninterest of the parties. Therefore,  said    u \n\nadverted to in detail. However 23.\/_A\n\ndisposal}. of the present Writ Petition   .t3:te %\n\nnature of the mutation__ orderV_.tI;\u00a3\u00e9xde&#039;V..and &#039; t11e_AArVe\u20acrenue\n\nezltries carried out, thettezlatter  coireidered in that\n\n &#039; &#039;Ir;    the facts narrated, it is seen\n\n   reepondents herein had approached\n\nth&#039;e._reve\ufb01ue&#039;~..atiti1erities for mutating the properties in\n\nV V their  &#039;siriee they had succeeded to the same. OH\n\nH H &#039;A   the dispute put forth by the petitioner\n\n exclusive right, the Tahsildar has passed\n\nT \u00abtetxtaeon order in M.R.No.3\/2002-03 holding that the\n\nJ;\n\n-\n<\/pre>\n<p>Q<\/p>\n<p>1%<\/p>\n<p>authorities were not justi\ufb01ed in rendering a fmding <\/p>\n<p>regard ta the extent of the share to which the   .<\/p>\n<p>entitled to since the same is to be L\ufb02tirnateiy&#8217;    u <\/p>\n<p>the Civi} Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. Therefore, in a__ ci1*cu\ufb011.sV{;anCe_VL0f {I}is.,_\ufb01afhre, I<br \/>\ndo not see reason to i11tei*fe\ufb021fe.  order in<br \/>\nM.R.Ne.3\/02-03   t):}?\u00ab..V:t.t1.eV\u00a31;)f%e\ufb02ate as wen<\/p>\n<p>as revisiona1\u00a7atii&#8221;.1f;d.{:i.ties. ..:_E:I\u20ac)s.z\u00a7&#8217;e&#8217;a!eI5,&#8217;it is made clear that<\/p>\n<p>since  Ci_v&#8217;_iAi&#8221; between the parties, the<\/p>\n<p>Tahsi1darA&#8217;s1;\u00e9l1  in column No.1: with<\/p>\n<p>regard its t,11e4.i(iis_p_\u00a51;:t1e  in the eriginal suit and<\/p>\n<p>  reta &#8220;&#8221; sned till the parties re&#8211;approach<\/p>\n<p>  the dispute is resolved in the civi}<\/p>\n<p>V VV suit. &#8220;It is&#8217;-._&#8217;31s:$&#8221;&#8221;made clwr that since this Court has new<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;.v.&#8221;&#8216;a\u00a7prevedV&#8221;&#8221;{:he joint mutatio\ufb02 in the name of the<\/p>\n<p> pe\ufb01fie\ufb02er and the contesting respondents keeping in<\/p>\n<p>T  the civii suit which is alxeady pending, neither the<\/p>\n<p>J<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;B<\/p>\n<p> _ of. No&#8221; ees$j.vs;&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>said revenue entries existing as of now create any other<\/p>\n<p>right nor actual physica} possession of the propefiy.<\/p>\n<p>shall be decided based on the revenue entries,&#8217;  &#8221;<br \/>\ncivil Court; or any other forum before which  1 V&#8217;  .,<br \/>\nmay arise shall render izldependenie : <\/p>\n<p>to the right of the parties withou}: re\u00e9fereiice <\/p>\n<p>by the existing revenue  made &#8216;~  to<\/p>\n<p>B\/1.3%. No.3 \/02-03.     obsereations<\/p>\n<p>made in the course of fhe..0.rd.e1&#8217;-.passedV  the revenue<\/p>\n<p>authorities    to while<br \/>\nchiming :*ig11t toV_ Lfhe  Civil proceedings<br \/>\nwhich is pexgtciizlg   <\/p>\n<p>   pet.itio:1 stands disposer}<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-5<br \/>\nIudgg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Pillappa @ Thammaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2909 BEFORE % THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A S BO1?.e3=S7$Ifi~.\u00a2;&#8217; 1] 3 WRIT PE&#8217;I&#8217;1&#8217;I&#8217;ION N0. 17266\/2006 (KLR-RR;SSR;.. &#8216;S S } BETWEEN : [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-247208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Pillappa @ Thammaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Pillappa @ Thammaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-02T02:20:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Pillappa @ Thammaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-02T02:20:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":304,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Pillappa @ Thammaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-02T02:20:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Pillappa @ Thammaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Pillappa @ Thammaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Pillappa @ Thammaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-02T02:20:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Pillappa @ Thammaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-02T02:20:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009"},"wordCount":304,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009","name":"Sri Pillappa @ Thammaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-02T02:20:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-pillappa-thammaiah-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Pillappa @ Thammaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247208\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}