{"id":247217,"date":"2009-04-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009"},"modified":"2015-08-09T14:40:29","modified_gmt":"2015-08-09T09:10:29","slug":"thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Thimma Reddy S\/O Timmpaa vs The Joint Registrar Raichur on 15 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Thimma Reddy S\/O Timmpaa vs The Joint Registrar Raichur on 15 April, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ravi Malimath<\/div>\n<pre> nu\"  \n\nax: THE HIGH COURT 01$ KARY%ATA\u00a5~{3s~---- I \nCERCUIT BENCH AT QL:LBARGA'\u00a7._ '   \" \nDATED THES 'mg. 15:}: my  \nTHE HCDEKFBLEE MR.Ju'$T\u00a7&lt;3E RAvT2._\u00a7x:i1a=i&#039;;:1vi;a;f\u00a7~i&#039; 3\nwm? PE:&#039;r1&lt;i&#039;{:@.;e :90&quot;;\u00e90:\u00a7s9&#039;)&quot;2Q09:SL&#039;REs\u00a74\n\nBETWEEN: &#039; &#039;  &#039; &#039;\nThimma Rec\u00a7d\u00a7;&#039;&lt;sf&#039;0   V&#039; &#039; &quot;\nOcc: AER, Aga  years,    \nR\/0 RaicI1ur,,.&#039;?h\u00e9\u00a7f\ufb021a1&#039;\ufb01ifliiwtig &quot; _ &quot; V \nshazayg Naga1*,1&#039;\u00a7\u00a7&#039;aic&quot;?1_ur.  ._ \u00e9  E.  PETITIONEZR\n(By g;;:.gm\u00e9\u00a3e.;\u00ab.;33.__s;12o;gg;&#039;~Ad\u00abz3 _~\nAND: &quot;  4&#039; * u &#039; \n\n1. 1&#039; Tha J0ii1\u00a7.RE&#039;gistf\u00e9sr, \n&#039;?R;a\u00bbi&#039;&lt;f3&#039;1.\ufb01I&#039;~ &quot; ..... ..\n V &#039;E&#039;--hs&quot;  Registxar,\nTR&#039;v.\u00a7;1\u00a7[:?fA\u00a73\u00a5111f;[~ . V V \n\nA  T&#039;hc~  Rstgistrar 8:. &amp;z:im&#039;mis&#039;\u00a3ra\u00a5.01&#039;,\n\n&#039;Rkaichur.\n\n&#039; *4, R\u00e9ichur Thsnnal Pawer Employctzs\n\n Cxgsnsumefs Ccroperativcz Socisty, Rajchur,\n\n&#039;  Shakthi Nagar, Raichur,\n\nBy its Sacrrstazjyn ..,REspQr~zQEm&#039;s\n\n{\u00a33}; Sriveeresiz B.Pati}, Adv for R4}\n\n\n\n\u00a3&#039;~.)\n\n&#039;I&#039;hi.s WP. is \ufb01l\u00e9iai u.nde1* A\ufb01iclss &#039;.226 &quot;$1.16\n\nCiongtiiutian. of India pra5;i1::g to quash 1:h\u00a7::&quot;  &quot;d;\u00a7:{i3@,\n\n&#039;}&#039;.=2,2\u20ac)09 vidc: AnneXurt:~(&#039;} passgiiby thv:--&quot;1[*5&#039;=&quot; \n\na\ufb02owing the apphcaiian filed by  }%:\ufb01[iiii0unei9A&#039;aI\u00a7d&#039; \u00a7ff:13? &#039;\n\nihe Carder Lmcler A:1.r1\u00bb-F&#039; clatgzgi 13. i&#039;;2.i\u00a7:{}O8   th \u00e9&#039;0 i*:3r:r\n\ndataei &quot;X23200? Vid\ufb01 Am1~G. _\n\nThis W&#039;P. Ccymiiizg 011&#039;vi&quot;&lt;5:*   this day,\n\n{E16 Qaurt. made the f\u20ac$i1?ov:&#039;Ai11--g;{f,V }  &quot; \u00ab&#039;\n  A  \n\nTITEAE;    the President of the 493\n::&quot;\u20ac.3;::s11:i\u00a7:j:'i:T.j\u00a7Tia:.&gt;_f&lt;;\u00a7)\u20ac1:23;fiv\u00e9 Soci\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9 along with other committee\nme1::i&#039;t;&lt;;r:&#039;~;  &#039; ~.s*.~..;:&gt;\u00a7\u00e9raV5:':'9'\u00a7.\u00bb*\u20ac: Societies Act, 1951.}. (E11 the\n\n\" by V:~\u00e9\u20ac::?'ri1&lt;?e of {km di1&#039;er;:&#039;E0r$ 0f &#039;\u00a3116 Saciety, a I10\ufb01C\u20ac:\n\n V T_i%:es\u00a7&quot;is;S:i\u00e9dV if) the petiiiener s\u00e9aking his \ufb01xpianation to the\n\n&quot; &#039;f_;v:::::3i_\u00a7; was furriisiaed by the patitiencr 01:1 21..1C}.{&quot;}8.\n\nTbs:  p{:fitioneI\u00b0 contends that without cmnsiderizx\u00e9g tha mpiy\n\n . fm&quot;\u00a31i\u00a7\u00a7h\u20act{i by him, this 12&quot;&#039; mspondetnt by ixnveking the:\n\nprovissimas sf Secfioil 30 of the: Act, superceded the\n(:(3i1&#039;1{11i\ufb01\u20ac\u20ac: and appeinteci the gpecrial officer to the 455\n\nrespazzdent. Aggiiieva\u00e9 by the samctt, the patitimzxer f\ufb02it\ufb01 an\n\n }\n\n\n\napgxezai under Sectien $06 of this Act and  an\n\ninterim may of the appoiritmtmt of the sgyeciai 9\u00a7?1{::\u00e91&#039;.&#039;  \n\nthe matter was heard on 3,1.{}\u00a73,&quot;&quot;Vth&lt;: .1$*. rt\u00a7s.;3i)&#039;n\u00e9:&#039;\u00a3ei1t--.irej\u00e9cteii&#039; AV\n\nthe application for stay. Hence,A:&#039;Eh\u00e9&#039;--pf&#039;&lt;=:se\u00a31\u00a3 .);z:$:ti. '~.. \n\n2y LC-8I'1'}Etd Clcmzlsei  peti'tV:};.F;i\u00a7'~,.\"'\u00a7_I;L'\u00a7'\" aphpoint .21 speciai o\ufb01ftcer is the 4%\n\nI:3Sp&lt;3:iid\u20ac:i1\u20ac&quot;., in  to his cententioxzs, he relied 011 a\n\n.\u00a71\u00a7&lt;;:i:$*i0:1  \u00abkvivhe A, case of Mun.iIa\u00a3;=;hmamm,a :2:-y\ufb01gpuiy\n\nA W .. _\u00a7f;e;%&#039;t:;;r.z:i:\u00a7\u00a7:iz;~;r;er gm Z988 KAR 28:4),\n\n&#039;   Lv\u00e93;:r:&quot;1&amp;r:I Cguizssi for the 43*} :*\u20acsp&lt;::m:3.:::m submits\n\nitixaigt\ufb01\u00e9re is no ermr Comnxiit-=32} by the }:&#039;c?,ii,:i%:'_\u00a7+i;:=,1*,\nthe 2&amp;1 raspen\u00e9enti a?PGi;\u00a7\u00a7l&lt;:;i the   to t11e &lt;\u00a51h\nr&amp;sp&lt;mdsm:.. The  &#039;spe\u20acia} &lt;$f\ufb01;t:sa19';\"%.3:i\u20ac said order i3 jus\ufb01fmble and hence,\n\nA. :10 .i11f\ufb01f'f\u20ac1'\u20acI1\u00a3Z\u20ac i\u00e9ecailetd far.\n\n  -{\u00a5::)'\u00a7~. fT'h&lt;3ug11 tbs agpaal has bean {dad am} an intsrim\n\n b&lt;::e:1 gmntsdk I find that no pI&#039;\u20acj1I(iiC\u20ac wouki be\n\n ca.\u00e9;:1;s\u20ac;:&#039;i.; to the petitioner. The czontmztion emf the petitioner\n\n n ,   the f\ufb01ing Qf the appeal itself would be iI1f1&#039;uct1mus if the\n\n intarim order is not granted is Llnacc\ufb01ptahle in the given\n\nci1&quot;cumsta::a.c6s ef the case and in View sf ths serricvus\na\ufb01\u00e9gatioris of the petitioner. The right 01&quot; \u00a3336 petiticsnar ta\n\nmainfzxin an app&lt;:.:--:\u00a7 is not&#039; diS&#039;\u20ac.11I\u00b0bf3(1 at all Hawtzv\u00e9r, iieziia}\n\n 4&quot;&quot;\n\n\n\nof .-3:1 interim cmier by the 181 respondent. is  just: in<\/pre>\n<p>{hrs given CiI'(&#8216;?11}11St3jt1C\u20ac3S of the case. Tim  111303<\/p>\n<p>bf; 1:116 petiiiaI1er&#8217;s (fl\/:.11;.se1 is with r\u20acfarer\u00a7\u00a2&#8217;\u00a3?.VVi.a.T.:fh&#8217;_e  \u00a3;&#8217;:.&#8217;;_&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>refusal at&#8221; interim stay wi\ufb01zmi\u00e9j assigi1\u00a7ngTj&#8217;&#8211;r\u00e9:a5QLIiS,__ 131 this:  :<\/p>\n<p>2111319111. case, or: perusa}: gt&#8217; t11 e&#8217;&#8212;-;&#8221;;e&#8217;ix1v.jo13.gz;),:::&#8217;t2&#8217;3=.A,<br \/>\nsees: that the I&#8217;espondeni$&#8217; h:V\u00e9V\u00a7 refhefr\u00e9ci&#8217; of<br \/>\nthe pa\ufb01tiwner  Eiigan though the<br \/>\n331116 may nest Cont\u00e9zgixa&#8217;   as expected of, the<\/p>\n<p>fu1di1;gs:.Gi&#8217;:.f:;h;?&#8217;r r\u00e9 s.pQ:i\u00e9\u00abE:1t$}&#8221;~i\u00a7g&#8217;h\u00a71\u00e9 Epsissing hnpugncti order<\/p>\n<p>:\u00a7%0u1{i_Af\ufb011e*.\u00a7s&#8221;;;\u00a7;i3\u20ac:;tcnf. of Law. The respondent who<\/p>\n<p>paS.:;:\u00a7:ii _t.&#8217;z1$:2.V_ iL*\u00a7i}\u00a7:i,i5giT\u00a3\u00e9&#8217;C1&#8243;&#8221;&#8216;C)f&#8217;Ci\u20ac1f mead not require &#8217;03 givt: 3<\/p>\n<p>,-:1.ataj_ieu{3 ._:\u00a7;&#8217;i16:&#8221;,  &#8216;-E31? the irgstzagni case, the rej&lt;2&lt;::$:i:1 of the<\/p>\n<p>  \u00abi\u00e9&#8221;\ufb013.eref&lt;}re 311st agn\u00e9 proper and 1 (it) not 1311:?<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;E?\u00a7if,f&#8217;Vi&#8217;:i:\u20ac\ufb01&#8217;&amp;\u00a7fj1f&#8217;1 .t0 infrzrfere with &#8216;ih\ufb01 impugneti order.<\/p>\n<p>. &#8216;v{&#8216;\u20ac:} L\u20acar1;.e\u00a3% {I&#8217;0uIzst:ti far 1325 &#8216;p\u20ac&#8217;::i?:i03f:\u20acr n\u20ac,x\ufb01j; eenttizidztd<\/p>\n<p> n  tiriai his social statug staiz\ufb01s e\ufb01ecte\u00e9. ix; viexxv of th\ufb01 dsniai of<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; t\u00a7&#8221;:z3 itztarim m\ufb02er, The sai\u00e9 carxiention ef the petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>-xs3i1011}r unsustainabla. The qizssfieu of the personal<br \/>\nI&#8217;6:p:3t.ati&lt;):r: {if {he p(\u00e9tit\u00a7(3ncr dams met come into g\ufb02ajg SQ far as<\/p>\n<p>these pmceetiings are &lt;re:r:x1\u20ac\u20acd<\/p>\n<p>mm<\/p>\n<p>is pexfomn his Sf\u00a73.{E1E(J-}.&#8221;&#8216;}&#8217; 0b1igaT_io11-s and he is 11:3&#8242;: ttxzxdfziing<\/p>\n<p>813.}? ptzrsonal service in the sociaty. The crampliancc-.\u00e9fV1;-iwi&#8217;is&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>?;h\u20ac:}&#8221;\u20acftZ)1E&#8217;\u20ac required by such 2.11 o\ufb01ic\u00e9tr wh0H__ha&#8211;s 56811 so<\/p>\n<p>electsid. Even Qthewaiset if the cet\u00e9\u00e9iucfi &#8216;of the-I &#8216;pa_t;ii\u00a7{;I;\u00e9&#8217;r&#8217;V 137<\/p>\n<p>fomzd to be 1161: in a&lt;tco1&quot;da11ce.with 1aw, &#8211;ih\u20ac qtg\u00e9zsilozi ef }.%1i:s <\/p>\n<p>persanal statug ther\ufb01fore xs\u00a37ii&#8217;1z:i &#8220;&#8216;~:&lt;}.&lt;)&#039;t }:i::._Ve\ufb01?\u00a7\u20ac:te:\u00e9ib  any<\/p>\n<p>II1EiIl,1}\u20ac1&#039;.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Hence; $3116 peti\ufb01-an is daveid&#8221; (if n&#8217;ic1friTfS and the same<\/p>\n<p>is I&#8217;\ufb01j\u20acCV\u00a7f\ufb01f3&#8230;.,v _   ;\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/~<br \/>\nIUDGE<\/p>\n<p>S151.&#8221; &#8216; &#8216; &#8216;V<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Thimma Reddy S\/O Timmpaa vs The Joint Registrar Raichur on 15 April, 2009 Author: Ravi Malimath nu&#8221; ax: THE HIGH COURT 01$ KARY%ATA\u00a5~{3s~&#8212;- I CERCUIT BENCH AT QL:LBARGA&#8217;\u00a7._ &#8216; &#8221; DATED THES &#8216;mg. 15:}: my THE HCDEKFBLEE MR.Ju&#8217;$T\u00a7&lt;3E RAvT2._\u00a7x:i1a=i&#039;;:1vi;a;f\u00a7~i&#039; 3 wm? PE:&#039;r1&lt;i&#039;{:@.;e :90&quot;;\u00e90:\u00a7s9&#039;)&quot;2Q09:SL&#039;REs\u00a74 BETWEEN: &#039; &#039; &#039; &#039; Thimma Rec\u00a7d\u00a7;&#039;&lt;sf&#039;0 V&#039; &#039; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-247217","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Thimma Reddy S\/O Timmpaa vs The Joint Registrar Raichur on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Thimma Reddy S\/O Timmpaa vs The Joint Registrar Raichur on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-09T09:10:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Thimma Reddy S\\\/O Timmpaa vs The Joint Registrar Raichur on 15 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-09T09:10:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":392,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Thimma Reddy S\\\/O Timmpaa vs The Joint Registrar Raichur on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-09T09:10:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Thimma Reddy S\\\/O Timmpaa vs The Joint Registrar Raichur on 15 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Thimma Reddy S\/O Timmpaa vs The Joint Registrar Raichur on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Thimma Reddy S\/O Timmpaa vs The Joint Registrar Raichur on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-09T09:10:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Thimma Reddy S\/O Timmpaa vs The Joint Registrar Raichur on 15 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-09T09:10:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009"},"wordCount":392,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009","name":"Thimma Reddy S\/O Timmpaa vs The Joint Registrar Raichur on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-09T09:10:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/thimma-reddy-so-timmpaa-vs-the-joint-registrar-raichur-on-15-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Thimma Reddy S\/O Timmpaa vs The Joint Registrar Raichur on 15 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247217","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247217"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247217\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247217"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247217"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247217"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}