{"id":247507,"date":"2009-02-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009"},"modified":"2015-05-18T09:56:10","modified_gmt":"2015-05-18T04:26:10","slug":"lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Lobelia English Medium Higher … vs State Of Kerala on 20 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Lobelia English Medium Higher … vs State Of Kerala on 20 February, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 4193 of 2009(Y)\n\n\n1. LOBELIA ENGLISH MEDIUM HIGHER SECONDARY\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. THE PRINCIPAL,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. NAYARAMBALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT,\n\n3. LAISY,W\/O.ABRAHAM,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.N.SURESH\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN\n\n Dated :20\/02\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                             S.SIRI JAGAN, J.\n\n                      ==================\n\n                        W.P(C).No.4193 of 2009\n\n                      ==================\n\n               Dated this the 20th day of February, 2009\n\n                             J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
      The petitioners are, the manager and the principal of a higher<\/p>\n
secondary school. The school is situated in 56 cents of land. According<\/p>\n
to the petitioners, there is a canal from the school property flowing to<\/p>\n
the Panchayat puramboke canal through the 3rd respondent’s property.<\/p>\n
The petitioners allege that in 2005 the 3rd respondent obstructed free<\/p>\n
flow of water through the canal and Ext.P1 decision was taken by the<\/p>\n
2nd respondent-Panchayat, pursuant to which,       with the aid of the<\/p>\n
police, obstruction was removed at the instance of the petitioners.<\/p>\n
Thereafter, the 3rd respondent filed a suit without challenging Ext.P1<\/p>\n
order seeking injunction against the petitioners from discharging water<\/p>\n
through the canal and again prevented free flow of water through the<\/p>\n
canal. The petitioners again approached the 2nd respondent. However,<\/p>\n
the 2nd respondent declined to interfere on the reason that a civil suit<\/p>\n
in respect of the said dispute is pending and Ext.P3 communication<\/p>\n
was issued to the 2nd petitioner in that regard. Against Ext.P3, the<\/p>\n
petitioners approached this Court and this Court passed Ext.P4<\/p>\n
judgment directing the 2nd respondent to consider the grievance of the<\/p>\n
petitioners in accordance with law. Thereafter, the petitioners filed a<\/p>\n
fresh representation, Ext.P5, before the 2nd respondent as directed in<\/p>\n
w.p.c.4193\/09                       2<\/span><\/p>\n
Ext.P4 judgment. Although the 3rd respondent filed a review petition<\/p>\n
against Ext.P4 judgment, the same was also dismissed by Ext.P6<\/p>\n
order.    Thereafter, the petitioners preferred COC No.1435\/2008<\/p>\n
against the 2nd respondent for non-compliance of Ext.P4 judgment and<\/p>\n
Ext.P5 representation. While the same was pending, Ext.P7 order was<\/p>\n
passed by the 2nd respondent, whereby the Panchayat informed the 1st<\/p>\n
petitioner that in view of the fact that there is an injunction issued by<\/p>\n
the Munsiff’s Court, Kochi in O.S.No.227\/2007, no further proceedings<\/p>\n
can be taken on the petitioners’ application, pursuant to which, the<\/p>\n
contempt case was closed without prejudice to the right of the<\/p>\n
petitioners to challenge Ext.P7. The petitioners are challenging Ext.P7<\/p>\n
order in this writ petition.\n<\/p>\n
      2.     In view of the submission that the suit had been disposed<\/p>\n
of, I directed the petitioners to produce a copy of the judgment in that<\/p>\n
suit. Accordingly, the petitioners have produced the judgment (Ext.P9)<\/p>\n
in the said suit, along with I.A.No.2426\/2009. From the same, I find<\/p>\n
that the suit had been decreed and the 1st petitioner has been<\/p>\n
injuncted from draining water through the 3rd respondent’s property on<\/p>\n
a finding that there is no water way through the 3rd respondent’s<\/p>\n
property from the 1st petitioner’s property. The petitioners would<\/p>\n
contend that despite Ext.P9 judgment of the civil court, in so far as the<\/p>\n
Panchayat is not     party to that judgment, the Panchayat can take<\/p>\n
w.p.c.4193\/09                        3<\/span><\/p>\n
appropriate action against the 3rd respondent for obstructing flow of<\/p>\n
water. I an unable to agree. When a civil court enters a specific finding<\/p>\n
that there is no water way through the 3rd respondent’s property, even<\/p>\n
the Panchayat cannot hold that there is a water way and, on that<\/p>\n
finding, direct the 3rd respondent to open the water way for drainage of<\/p>\n
water from the 1st petitioner’s property through the 3rd respondent’s<\/p>\n
property. Not only that, in Ext.P9 judgment, there is a specific<\/p>\n
direction to detain the 1st petitioner in civil prison for intentional<\/p>\n
violation of the interim injunction of the civil court in I.A.No.1167\/2007<\/p>\n
dated 16.7.2007. In the above circumstances, I do not find anything<\/p>\n
wrong with the impugned order. Accordingly, the writ petition is<\/p>\n
dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
                                                           Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
sdk+                                                S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE\n\n          \/\/\/True copy\/\/\/\n\n\n\n\n                              P.A. to Judge\n\nw.p.c.4193\/09    4\n\nw.p.c.4193\/09                      5<\/span>\n\n\n\n\n                            S.SIRI JAGAN, J.\n\n                     ==================\n\n                       W.P(C).No.4193 of 2009\n\n                     ==================\n\n               Dated this the 20th day of February, 2009\n\n                            J U D G M E N T\n\n<\/pre>\n
  The petitioners are manager and principal of a higher secondary<\/p>\n
  schol. The school is sutiated in 56 cents of land. According to the<\/p>\n
  petitioner, ther is a canal from the school proeprty folwoig to the<\/p>\n
  panchayat puramboke canal through the 3rd respondent’s property.<\/p>\n
  In 2005 the 3d respondent obstruted the free flow of water through<\/p>\n
  the canal is the allegaions rasied by the petitioner in this original<\/p>\n
  petition. Oridinally, Ext.P1 decision was passed by the 2nd<\/p>\n
  respondent Panchayat and with the aid of the police obstuction was<\/p>\n
  remoed at the instance of the petitioners. Thereafter, the 3rd<\/p>\n
  respondent     fild a    suit  wihtout   chalenging   Ext.P1  order<\/p>\n
  seekinginjunction against free flow of watner through the canal. The<\/p>\n
  petitioners again approached this 2nd respondent. However, the 2nd<\/p>\n
  respondent declined to interferew with in view of the fact that the<\/p>\n
  civil suit is penidng and Ext.P3 communication was issued to the<\/p>\n
w.p.c.4193\/09                       6<\/span><\/p>\n
  petitioner in that regard. Against Ext.P3 the petitioner appraoched<\/p>\n
  this Court and this Corut passed Ext.P4 judgment directintg the 2nd<\/p>\n
  respondent to consdier the grievancve of the petitioner in<\/p>\n
  accordance with law. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a fresh repn<\/p>\n
  Ext.P5 before the 2nd sp as direcated in Ext.P4 judgment. Altough<\/p>\n
  the 3rd respondent filed a review petiton against Ext.P4 judgment the<\/p>\n
  same also dismissed by Ext.P6 order. Thereafter, the petitioners<\/p>\n
  preferred CCC No.1435\/2008 agiasnt the 2nd sp for non-compliance<\/p>\n
  of Ext.P4 judgment and Ext.P5 representation. While the same was<\/p>\n
  pending, Ext.P7 order was apssede by the 2nd respondent wehreby<\/p>\n
  the Panchayat inforemd that petitioner that in view of the fact that<\/p>\n
  tere is an injucntion issued by the Civil Court in O.S.No.227\/2007 no<\/p>\n
  further proceedings can be taken on the petitioner’s application. The<\/p>\n
  petitioners are challenging Ext.P7 order in this writ petition<\/p>\n
       In view of the fact that the suit had been dispsoed of, I directed<\/p>\n
  the petitioner the petitioners to produce a copy of the judgment in<\/p>\n
  that suit. Accordingly the petitioners have filed Ext.P9 judgment in<\/p>\n
  the said suit. From the same I find that the suid had been decreed<\/p>\n
  and the 1st petitioner has been injuncatieond from draining water<\/p>\n
  through the 3rd respondent’s property. On a finding that there is no<\/p>\n
  water way through the 3rd respondent’s prpoerty from the<\/p>\n
  petitioners’ property. The petitioners would condent that despite<\/p>\n
w.p.c.4193\/09                       7<\/span><\/p>\n
  Ext.P9 judgment of the of the Civil Court in so far as the Panchayat<\/p>\n
  is not    party to that judgment, the Panchayt can take appropait<\/p>\n
  action against the 3rd respondent for obstructng flow of water. I an<\/p>\n
  unable to ageree. When a civil court enters a specific finding that<\/p>\n
  tehr is no water way thorugh a person’s property, even the Panchayt<\/p>\n
  cannot hold that tehre is a water way and and on that finding direct<\/p>\n
  the 3rd respondent to open water way for drainage of water from the<\/p>\n
  petitioners’ property through the 3rd respondent’s proeprty. Not only<\/p>\n
  that, in Ext.P9 judgment, there is a specific directin to detain the 1st<\/p>\n
  petitioner in civil prision for intional voilation of athe interim<\/p>\n
  injunction of the Corut in I.A.No.1167\/2007 dated 16.6.2007. In the<\/p>\n
  abvoe circumstances, I do not find anything wrong with the<\/p>\n
  impugned order. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.<\/p>\n
      The writ petition is disposed of as above.\n<\/p>\n
\n
sdk+                                             S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Lobelia English Medium Higher … vs State Of Kerala on 20 February, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 4193 of 2009(Y) 1. LOBELIA ENGLISH MEDIUM HIGHER SECONDARY … Petitioner 2. THE PRINCIPAL, Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, … Respondent 2. NAYARAMBALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, 3. LAISY,W\/O.ABRAHAM, For Petitioner :SRI.T.N.SURESH […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-247507","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nLobelia English Medium Higher ... vs State Of Kerala on 20 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lobelia English Medium Higher ... vs State Of Kerala on 20 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-18T04:26:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Lobelia English Medium Higher … vs State Of Kerala on 20 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-18T04:26:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1184,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Lobelia English Medium Higher ... vs State Of Kerala on 20 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-18T04:26:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lobelia English Medium Higher … vs State Of Kerala on 20 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lobelia English Medium Higher ... vs State Of Kerala on 20 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lobelia English Medium Higher ... vs State Of Kerala on 20 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-18T04:26:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Lobelia English Medium Higher … vs State Of Kerala on 20 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-18T04:26:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009"},"wordCount":1184,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009","name":"Lobelia English Medium Higher ... vs State Of Kerala on 20 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-18T04:26:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lobelia-english-medium-higher-vs-state-of-kerala-on-20-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lobelia English Medium Higher … vs State Of Kerala on 20 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247507","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247507"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247507\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247507"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247507"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247507"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}