{"id":247700,"date":"2010-11-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010"},"modified":"2018-02-24T03:22:24","modified_gmt":"2018-02-23T21:52:24","slug":"sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri K T Chikka Thimmaiah S\/O Sri &#8230; vs Sri T Puttaswamy S\/O Sri &#8230; on 12 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri K T Chikka Thimmaiah S\/O Sri &#8230; vs Sri T Puttaswamy S\/O Sri &#8230; on 12 November, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\"> -  '(By_':S\u00abri RS VNANj'uN.A.TH, ADV.)\n\n1\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 1233 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2e10_\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JuST1CE JAWAD RAHEM'  .\n\nR.S.A. NO. 6 9,3006\nBETWEEN:   A_ \n\nSR1 K T CHIKKA THIMMAIAH S\/O SR1 DODDA\u00bb. : '\n\nJABEGOWDA    '  -  \n\nAGED ABOUT 42 YRS, R\/OATAA'EALAwAD'I--...S \n\nKOPPA HOBLI, MADDUR  *  }\n\nMANDYA~57I 401'   T ~ _ ...\"APPELLANT\n\n(By Sri M S PURUSHOTHAMA RAQ,. C;Mv.VENKATA REDDY,\n\nSR1 H.M.SURESH AND SR1'KE'SHAVA.,OO\"AD.Vs3)\n\nAND\n\nSRTT ~.PUTFTA'E3.;WA'M.Y\"--.\nS\/O SRI 'ci--H11&lt;T&lt;SANDM&#039;AENNA;THIMMAIAH\nA&#039;(_\u00a7E&#039;D ABO&#039;UTTAE.4&#039;7 YRS &quot; _\n\nR\/O ..ArsAL.AwA--DjI. _ KOPPA\nMADD--:_JR,- MA~NDYA~...&#039;\u00a771 401\n&#039;-A  &quot; A  RESPONDENT\n\nA-RRSATTTSP-EILED U\/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE\n\nA&#039;:uDG%EMvENTT &amp;}D&#039;EcREE DT.16.11.05 PASSED IN R.A.10\/O2\n\nON,__THE_.FI!.;ET&quot; OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) MADDUR,\nDISMISSING&#039; APPEAL &amp; CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT &amp;\n\n;,~.__&#039;A-..DEcREE__r:aT.15.12.01 PASSED IN OS 360\/91 ON THE FILE OF\n&#039; j;.,THE..PRL.CIvIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC., MADDUR.\n\n &quot;This appeai coming on for admission this day, the court\n\n  ._d__\u00e9|ivered the foilowing\n\n&#039;&lt;&quot;\n\n\n\n2\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">This is piaintiff&#8217;s appeai against the judgment in<\/p>\n<p>R.A.10\/02 dated 16.11.2005 on the file of Ciyi.!V_:&#8221;J_pd.ge,<\/p>\n<p>(Sr.Divn.), Maddur, dismissing the appeal and  <\/p>\n<p>judgment in o.s.36o\/91 dated 15g.g1gV2.g2oo11ittdi:ij\ufb01ithei\u00bb:ryi&#8217;:ed<\/p>\n<p>Civii Judge (3r.Divn.), Maddur, d_isrr_i&#8217;i&#8217;ssi&#8217;ng?._the&#8221; sd:t_y,y&#8217;=ri-.e<\/p>\n<p>appeai is pending admission&#8217;:_fi&#8217;&#8211;o_Vm 200126.&#8217; Respjovndgent <\/p>\n<p>entered appearance in response___tVo..the_vnoticet  ii\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">2. Heard.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">3. From the case ipvapeirs Vmade\u00b0\u00bb.ayai5.i&#8217;a:bie, it is seen<\/p>\n<p>appeiiant fiie.d&#8211;.. a:&#8217;}&#8217;Suiti inieS1C..g35Q\/&#8217;sii&#8217;tiaiming to be the<\/p>\n<p>absolute  No.212 in Abaiawadi viilage<br \/>\nmeasuringeayst4w_estf1:_3&#8217;~\u00ab.__yar&#8217;ds and north&#8211;south 19 yards,<\/p>\n<p>navifig &#8216;msyrciiesedj it&#8217;vid*e a5 deed of sale dated 23.6.1986 from<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02oneV&#8217;VThimrnego&#8217;wda  Mayanna. He aiieged defendant had<\/p>\n<p>:&#8217;dee.n Vi&#8217;nvaVi%;vi\u00abri&#8217;gV.Aseye4rai attempts to trespass on the property<\/p>\n<p>.  \ufb02 and&#8221;&#8221;aIsov___vd&#8217;e.stroyed the compound waii. Therefore, he fiied a<\/p>\n<p>isagitgfor permanent injunction restraining the defendant from<\/p>\n<p> _ &#8216;interfering in any manner with his peacefui possession.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">-4-.*: Defendant entered appearance and resisted the suit<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">-x<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">3<\/span><br \/>\ninter aha contending that he is the absolute owner of the<br \/>\nproperty which is adjacent to the schedule property-;,j To<\/p>\n<p>prove his title, he averred Mayanna and his your1g_e&#8217;r.VVbroth&#8217;er,<\/p>\n<p>Chikkathimmagowda had sites nos.212[:i&#8217;fana\ufb02&#8221;&#8216;2%1c2[3%&#8221;&#8216;&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>measuring east&#8211;west 36&#8242; and north\u00a5soLjt&#8217;i: ._1\u00a5&#8217;-l_&#8217;. <\/p>\n<p>site no.212\/1 measuring 36&#8217;_x 14&#8217;14&#8217;to:&#8221;his <\/p>\n<p>Chikkathlmmagowda under a orsaie&#8217;rda~:elari;&#8217;3i.&#8217;93973;&#8217;A<\/p>\n<p>therefore, Chikkathimma~g_owda'&#8221;w&#8217;li-oi&#8217; owned the&#8221;&#8216;adjacent site<br \/>\nbearing no.212\/2, became-lthelfow&#8217;ne.r:_:lof_&#8217;.:&#8217;ptO_perty measuring<br \/>\n36&#8242; x 28&#8242;. He\u00a7.va&#8217;verpi&#8217;ed that s.ince&#8221;&#8216;tlhj_e.Vplafinltiff claims to have<\/p>\n<p>purchased the .C&#8217;jl:iil{\u00a7\ufb01Aat&#8211;liimmagowda, he could<\/p>\n<p>not have a_colLjilred..,Vti3&#8217;tle &#8216;larger than the extent than what was<br \/>\nthe proplert\ufb01kieofl &#8216;Chil{ka_th.i_n\ufb01&#8217;ahagowda. In other words, he<\/p>\n<p>averred&#8217; the plaintiflf has talseiy shown the measurement as<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;V395: .2&#8221;}&#8221;*:&#8217;and.c_._that  to the extent in respect of the land<\/p>\n<p>Ai&#8217;mea_st\u00a3rin\u00a7~\u00ab._3&#8242;.ix..-V13&#8242; has no relevance because if at all the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff,__*ha,d?&#8217;purchased, he could have purchased the<\/p>\n<p>uh&#8221;4&#8243;&#8216;&#8211;.V:L&#8221;proaperty&#8217;..&#8211;of Chikkathirnmagowda who was the owner of land<\/p>\n<p>  extent of 36&#8242; x 28&#8242;, and the total extent cannot be<\/p>\n<p>%  &#8230;beyond that.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">4<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">5. With this plea, both sides led evidence and produced<\/p>\n<p>sale deeds in their favour. Defendant on his part further laid<\/p>\n<p>claim in respect of land belonging to Panchayat,7&#8242;..\u00a7\u00a7uring<\/p>\n<p>evidence, the trial court noticed plaintiff had <\/p>\n<p>clear admissions, one of them being that..sde4f\u20acf:\u00a3Id&#8217;a:nti.Ais<\/p>\n<p>occupation of land beionging to thePanchavatf4._Si.n&#8217;ce&#8217;-.o_ne:<\/p>\n<p>the boundaries to the prope&#8217;rt3\/g owned&#8221; by  <\/p>\n<p>shown as Panchayat land, thevlvl\u00e9t\ufb01al _court-._h\ufb02eiI&#8217;d plaintiff has<br \/>\nadmitted defendant is  belonging to the<br \/>\nPanchayat.    A . l<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">6. Toe second _aspgec4t:&#8221;notice&#8217;d was, plaintiff had failed to<br \/>\nproduce wtiat,,was_ e5&#8221;i 5?&#8217; or only 36&#8242; x 14&#8242; x 2. On that basis,<\/p>\n<p> l\u00abthe,v&#8221;trVialE&#8217;7court. heldmthe plaintiff had failed to show he is<\/p>\n<p>Aentitlegdis-for-..,anfjorder in respect of land measuring 39&#8217;x 57&#8242;,<\/p>\n<p>.  and &#8220;-\u00abaccordi.n.fglv dismissed the suit. Against it, he was in<\/p>\n<p>reiterating the same plea.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">  ~The appellate court, on reappraisal of evidence, has<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">  -confirmed the finding of the trial court.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;W ,<br \/>\n&#8220;V<br \/>\n5%<br \/>\nE<\/p>\n<p>._g___\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">5<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">8. Considering the reasons assigned by the trial court<br \/>\nand appellate court, it is seen the piaintiff had failed to show<\/p>\n<p>that his vendors were owners of site measuring 391&#8217;T5&lt;s.57&#039;.<\/p>\n<p>The document filed by him showed that his venc&#039;f~ors_jVha_d&#039;.j&#039;thiVt;e<\/p>\n<p>in respect of property measuring 36 &#039; x14&#039;  view <\/p>\n<p>of the matter, the appeliate court<br \/>\nof the trial court. it 1 it it &#039;i it<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">9. Even on re&#8211;appraisaI of the&#8217;t&#8217;arTn_Vateria|V&#8217;on   seen<br \/>\nthe piaintiff had faiiecifto esita&#8217;bi:is_i_i.&#8217;\ufb02iawfuI&#8217;possession in<br \/>\nrespect of the property  though of<\/p>\n<p>course he had&#8221; wa&#8217;s:&#8217;.V&#8217;o*wner&#8217;*&#8217;to-the extent less than<br \/>\nthat covered&#8221;r_&amp;u&#8217;nde&#8217;r The finding of fact<br \/>\nappreciating&#8217; theVV&#8217;e&#8211;vxidenVce__&#8217;on_v  does not give rise to any<br \/>\nSt}&#8217;b&#8217;~5tv?_3nti:\u00a7_i&#8217;:\u00ab:qi\u00a7\u00a7:fsti.9hV.&#8217;of&#8221;}a.w_..v In the result, the appeal fails.<\/p>\n<p>The&#8211;con.current&#8217;fin&#8217;di\u00e9n&#8217;g_of the courts below is confirmed.<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/*<br \/>\nJUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri K T Chikka Thimmaiah S\/O Sri &#8230; vs Sri T Puttaswamy S\/O Sri &#8230; on 12 November, 2010 Author: Jawad Rahim &#8211; &#8216;(By_&#8217;:S\u00abri RS VNANj&#8217;uN.A.TH, ADV.) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 1233 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2e10_ BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR.JuST1CE JAWAD RAHEM&#8217; . R.S.A. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-247700","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri K T Chikka Thimmaiah S\/O Sri ... vs Sri T Puttaswamy S\/O Sri ... on 12 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri K T Chikka Thimmaiah S\/O Sri ... vs Sri T Puttaswamy S\/O Sri ... on 12 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-23T21:52:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri K T Chikka Thimmaiah S\\\/O Sri &#8230; vs Sri T Puttaswamy S\\\/O Sri &#8230; on 12 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-23T21:52:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":764,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri K T Chikka Thimmaiah S\\\/O Sri ... vs Sri T Puttaswamy S\\\/O Sri ... on 12 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-23T21:52:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri K T Chikka Thimmaiah S\\\/O Sri &#8230; vs Sri T Puttaswamy S\\\/O Sri &#8230; on 12 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri K T Chikka Thimmaiah S\/O Sri ... vs Sri T Puttaswamy S\/O Sri ... on 12 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri K T Chikka Thimmaiah S\/O Sri ... vs Sri T Puttaswamy S\/O Sri ... on 12 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-23T21:52:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri K T Chikka Thimmaiah S\/O Sri &#8230; vs Sri T Puttaswamy S\/O Sri &#8230; on 12 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-23T21:52:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010"},"wordCount":764,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010","name":"Sri K T Chikka Thimmaiah S\/O Sri ... vs Sri T Puttaswamy S\/O Sri ... on 12 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-23T21:52:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-t-chikka-thimmaiah-so-sri-vs-sri-t-puttaswamy-so-sri-on-12-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri K T Chikka Thimmaiah S\/O Sri &#8230; vs Sri T Puttaswamy S\/O Sri &#8230; on 12 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247700","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247700"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247700\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247700"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247700"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247700"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}