{"id":247732,"date":"2010-03-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010"},"modified":"2014-06-08T14:31:45","modified_gmt":"2014-06-08T09:01:45","slug":"subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010","title":{"rendered":"Subramanian vs Unnian on 9 March, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Subramanian vs Unnian on 9 March, 2010<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 161 of 2006()\n\n\n1. SUBRAMANIAN, S\/O. NARAYANAN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. UNNIAN, RESIDING AT ODAVAKATTIL HOUSE,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. SHANAVAS, S\/O. KUNJUMUHAMMED,\n\n3. THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :09\/03\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n            A.K.BASHEER &amp; P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n            =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=\n                  M.A.C.A. No. 161 of 2006\n            =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=\n           Dated this the 9th day of March, 2010\n\n                        JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">\n<p id=\"p_2\">      In this appeal under <a href=\"\/doc\/147367599\/\" id=\"a_1\">section 173<\/a> of the Motor<\/p>\n<p>Vehicles Act claimant in O.P.(MV) No.2993 of 2000 of the<\/p>\n<p>Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Thrissur challenges the<\/p>\n<p>quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal for the<\/p>\n<p>loss caused to him, on account of the injury sustained by<\/p>\n<p>him in a motor accident.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">      2. The facts leading to this appeal in brief are these:-<\/p>\n<p>On September 30, 2000 at about 7.45 p.m. the claimant was<\/p>\n<p>cycling along the western side of Thrissur-Wadakkancherry<\/p>\n<p>road. When he reached in front of Keltron a jeep bearing<\/p>\n<p>registration No.KLM 9378 came from behind and knocked<\/p>\n<p>him down. The claimant sustained very serious head injury.<\/p>\n<p>At that time, he was aged 45 and was earning Rs.4,500\/- per<\/p>\n<p>month as a head load worker. According to the claimant,<\/p>\n<p>the accident occurred due to a rash and negligent driving of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">MACA 161\/06                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the offending vehicle by the second respondent. The first<\/p>\n<p>respondent as the owner, second respondent as the driver<\/p>\n<p>and third respondent as the insurer of the offending vehicle<\/p>\n<p>are jointly and severely liable to pay the compensation to<\/p>\n<p>the claimant. The claimant claimed a compensation of Rs.2<\/p>\n<p>lakhs.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">      3. The first respondent,      the R.C. owner of the<\/p>\n<p>offending vehicle, filed a written statement, stating that on<\/p>\n<p>April 1, 1999 he has sold the vehicle to one Ashraf. The<\/p>\n<p>second respondent driver of the offending vehicle remained<\/p>\n<p>absent and was set ex parte before the Tribunal. The third<\/p>\n<p>respondent insurer of the offending vehicle filed a written<\/p>\n<p>statement, admitting the policy.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">      4. The claimant was examined as PW1 and Exts. A1 to<\/p>\n<p>A13 series were marked on the side of the claimant. On the<\/p>\n<p>side of the contesting third respondent, copy of the policy<\/p>\n<p>was marked as Ext.B1. On an appreciation of the evidence,<\/p>\n<p>the Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs.46,500\/- with<\/p>\n<p>interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of petition till<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">MACA 161\/06                   3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>realization and costs. The claimant has come up in appeal,<\/p>\n<p>challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">      5. The accident is not disputed. The finding of the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal that the accident occurred due to the rash and<\/p>\n<p>negligent driving of the offending jeep by the second<\/p>\n<p>respondent is not challenged in this appeal. Therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>only question which arises for consideration is whether the<\/p>\n<p>claimant is entitled to any enhanced compensation?<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>      6. The claimant sustained the following injuries:-<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>      1) Head injury with cerebral oedema.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_2\"><p>      2) Extra dural heamotoma in the left occipital<br \/>\n          area.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_3\"><p>      3) Haematoma 4 x 3 c.m. on vertigo of head.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_4\"><p>      4) Abrasion on right leg, right foot, left elbow,<br \/>\n          right forearm, right scapular area and right<br \/>\n          toe.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_5\"><p>      5) Lacerated wound on right foot.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_7\">Ext.A2 is the wound certificate. Ext.A6 is the discharge<\/p>\n<p>summary, which shows that the claimant was an inpatient in<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">MACA 161\/06                    4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the hospital from 30-9-2000 to 9-10-2000. Ext.A7 is the<\/p>\n<p>medical certificate. Ext.A8 series are certificates regarding<\/p>\n<p>the treatment. Ext.A9 is the medical certificate showing the<\/p>\n<p>treatment undergone by the claimant. Ext.A10 is the salary<\/p>\n<p>certificate showing his salary as Rs.4,595\/-. Ext.A12<\/p>\n<p>disability certificate shows that he has 18% disability.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">       7. The Tribunal awarded a total compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.46,500\/-. The break up of the compensation awarded is<\/p>\n<p>as under:-\n<\/p>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       Loss of earnings                  :    Rs.7,500\/-\n       Medical expenses                  :    Rs.11,000\/-\n       Pain and suffering                :    Rs.10,000\/-\n       Loss of amenities and enjoyment :      Rs.8,000\/-\n       of life.\n       Permanent disability              :    Rs.10,000\/-\n                                              -----------------\n                Total                    :    Rs.46,500\/-\n                                              =======\n\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_9\">       8. The learned counsel for the appellant has sought<\/p>\n<p>enhancement of compensation mainly for the loss of<\/p>\n<p>earnings, pain and suffering endured and for the disability<\/p>\n<p>caused. There is force in the above contention. The claimant<\/p>\n<p>was a head load worker.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\"><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">MACA 161\/06                   5<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">      9. The Tribunal awarded Rs.10,000\/- for the pain and<\/p>\n<p>and suffering endured by the claimant which we feel is very<\/p>\n<p>low. Taking into consideration the nature of the injuries<\/p>\n<p>sustained and the period of treatment the claimant has<\/p>\n<p>undergone, we feel that a compensation of Rs.20,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>would be adequate on this count. Thus, on this head the<\/p>\n<p>claimant is entitled to an additional compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.10,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">      10. For the disability caused, the Tribunal awarded a<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.10,000\/-, which appears to be very low.<\/p>\n<p>The claimant was aged 45 at the time of the accident and<\/p>\n<p>used to earn Rs.4,500\/- per month, as testified by him as<\/p>\n<p>PW1. He produced Ext.A11, a certificate issued by the<\/p>\n<p>General Manager of Malabar Building Products, Thrissur to<\/p>\n<p>show that he used to earn Rs.4,595\/- per month. A copy of<\/p>\n<p>Ext.A11 is made available for our perusal by the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the appellant. The Tribunal took his monthly<\/p>\n<p>income as Rs.2,500\/- which appears to be low. In the light of<\/p>\n<p>Ext.A11 certificate, we feel that his monthly income can be<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_4\">MACA 161\/06                    6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>reasonably fixed as Rs.3,000\/-. In Ext.A12, the certificate of<\/p>\n<p>disability, a copy of which is made available by the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the appellant for our perusal, it is certified that<\/p>\n<p>the claimant has now occasional post traumatic headache<\/p>\n<p>and giddiness and his disability is assessed at 8%. Having<\/p>\n<p>regard to the disability noted by the doctor in Ext.A12, we<\/p>\n<p>feel that the percentage of disability assessed by him<\/p>\n<p>appears to be on the higher side. Taking into consideration<\/p>\n<p>the disability noted in Ext.A12, we feel that an additional<\/p>\n<p>amount of Rs.10,00\/- would be reasonable on this count.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">       11. For the loss of earnings, the Tribunal awarded<\/p>\n<p>Rs.7,500\/- for three months at the rate of Rs.2,500\/- per<\/p>\n<p>month. We have fixed the monthly income of the claimant as<\/p>\n<p>Rs.3,000\/-. Therefore, for the loss of earnings the claimant<\/p>\n<p>is entitled to Rs.9,000\/- . Thus, on this count the claimant is<\/p>\n<p>entitled    to  additional    compensation     of   Rs.1,500\/-.<\/p>\n<p>Compensation awarded by the Tribunal under other heads<\/p>\n<p>appear to be reasonable. Therefore, we are not disturbing<\/p>\n<p>the same.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\"><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_5\">MACA 161\/06                    7<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\">      12. Thus, the claimant is entitled to an additional<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.21,500\/- with 9% interest p.a. from the<\/p>\n<p>date of petition till realization. The claimant is entitled to<\/p>\n<p>proportionate costs. The third respondent, the Insurance<\/p>\n<p>Company, shall deposit the amount within two months from<\/p>\n<p>the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The award of<\/p>\n<p>the Tribunal is modified to the above extent.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_16\">      The appeal is allowed as found above.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_17\">\n<p id=\"p_18\">                               A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_19\">\n<p>                               P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_20\">\nmn.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Subramanian vs Unnian on 9 March, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 161 of 2006() 1. SUBRAMANIAN, S\/O. NARAYANAN, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. UNNIAN, RESIDING AT ODAVAKATTIL HOUSE, &#8230; Respondent 2. SHANAVAS, S\/O. KUNJUMUHAMMED, 3. THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY For Petitioner :SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH For Respondent : No Appearance [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-247732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Subramanian vs Unnian on 9 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Subramanian vs Unnian on 9 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-08T09:01:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Subramanian vs Unnian on 9 March, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-08T09:01:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1039,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010\",\"name\":\"Subramanian vs Unnian on 9 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-08T09:01:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Subramanian vs Unnian on 9 March, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Subramanian vs Unnian on 9 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Subramanian vs Unnian on 9 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-08T09:01:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Subramanian vs Unnian on 9 March, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-08T09:01:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010"},"wordCount":1039,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010","name":"Subramanian vs Unnian on 9 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-08T09:01:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subramanian-vs-unnian-on-9-march-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Subramanian vs Unnian on 9 March, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247732"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247732\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}