{"id":247945,"date":"2008-06-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008"},"modified":"2018-09-11T07:27:22","modified_gmt":"2018-09-11T01:57:22","slug":"sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Arifulla S\/O Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 2 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Arifulla S\/O Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 2 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT 01:' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE   '.\n\nDATED THIS THE 2\"' DAY OF JUNE 2008\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICES. ABI;)\u00bbifL'1'%{<12:'EEY\u20ac .:_':   ii %  \nW1zIrPE;"1r10NN0.15a3sa2oa5 (%LKsfRrQ_ &_%_%%  . 1 % '\n\nBetween:\n\nSri Arifulla,\n\nAgedabout52years._. ji L 1\u00bb _\nSic Ab&1lGafoor, ~- V  '\nR\/a No.7l0,    -- \nKo1arTown, Kolar.    2; ~\n\nThe  \n\n 3  """ \n\n   _  %     Respondent.\n\n   7  Petition is \ufb01led under Articles 226 & 227 ofthe\n  praying to quash the impinged award dated\n   2.9,8.20%G5 passed by the II Additioml Labour Court, Banglore,\n\n\n\nThis W:-it Petition coming on for Preiiminary \n\nGroup this day, the Court made the foflowing:\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Tim petitioner had been working  <\/p>\n
Koiar (for short ‘Corporation’). The <\/p>\n
6.10.1987. The charges wen: mega   . T ”  on the
\nbasis of which the”    ‘ hue: \ufb01om
\nservice.   geve {Q :.-.n[ in\u00e9mial diwute and the<\/p>\n
workman  Lexi  Section I0(4-A) of the<\/p>\n
rmn:sui;a1;j Agfberoge the H Additional Labour Court,<\/p>\n
V.    relied on the enquiry proceedings heid<\/p>\n
 produced the enquiry file. The workman<\/p>\n
H VV  \u00b0””\u00b0\ufb01>d “”   ‘lfthe domestic enqu1ry’ . Since the charge<\/p>\n
 se:i9.I.:s, tl1.e dismissal ofthe petitioner was upheld by the<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
Labourcouztandtmapplication\ufb01iedbytheworkmanwas<\/p>\n
dianissed by the inmlgned award.<\/p>\n
2. I have heard the learned Coumel forthe  ,_   ‘  <\/p>\n
Labour Court was not yum” ‘tied in ho1d:’ngM’%L%%’:\u00a7\u00a7 ;s: \ufb01e
\nproved. It is submitted that  ofnm ems mgbeen
\nI . I his \ufb02 ii’    i  .1<\/p>\n
awarded is  the charges alleged to have<\/p>\n
bow Pmved ag.amt  ‘  the  wvn\u00e9 J<\/p>\n
 _  the impugned award<\/p>\n
‘ W H ‘A  AA5.;I4_m\u00a7e:mre\ufb011lly comidered the argumas of the learned<\/p>\n
  at the bar md perused the materials’ placed on<\/p>\n
6. As noticed above, the workman has  T T<\/p>\n
conceding the fa.1mes’ s of the domestic”  iv <\/p>\n
No.1 was answered ‘m the a\ufb01rmative    <\/p>\n
Corporat1on’ has produced the relevant   the
\ndtmesic enquiry, which are
\nthe recoxw that  the   of the
\nChecking    poim of
\nallegations   {He has been mbjected to<\/p>\n
 by gm Wm   m assistance of his 00-<\/p>\n
   did not wdduce any oral evidcnee<\/p>\n
  he has submitied his written briefas per<\/p>\n
Ex%1916;*%T11\u00a7:  agaitm the petitioner in the articles of<\/p>\n
 Vvcharge   me main aixeguon’ mm’ the<\/p>\n
‘   a\ufb01er the entry made by the Tra\ufb01ic Comroller<\/p>\n
   tickets \u00a2fRs.8.5O ps. denornxzm\ufb02 ‘on, the petmon’ ‘ er w<\/p>\n
  I .        “tickets \ufb01’om S\u00a3.No.620 to 573 ofthe said danomma$1’ ‘on and<\/p>\n
in<\/p>\n
,.\n<\/p>\n
\n
while makingenay in the way bill, be ms entered numbexs 6  ” <\/p>\n
in pencil whsequently with a sole mtention     _ <\/p>\n
therea\ufb02er reuse the said so tickets by gplle\ufb01in\ufb01fme the  <\/p>\n
ulterior ma\ufb01ve has nmie entries
\nofdenonnnat1′ ‘on of Rs.8,50 ps.    \ufb01ne
\nlast 3 numbers    mum has
\nmemioned the    denomnm:1′ “on of<\/p>\n
Rs.l0r’-. The ‘\u00a7_vay_   ‘ ,   court below shows that<\/p>\n
a\ufb01erthe entry  byiE\u00a7e\u00abT’;’\u00a71:I’Ei::\u00a7\u00a7”\u20ac$:\u00a7\u00a7iIi}oileratthe bus mad mm<\/p>\n
 numbezs 6 and 3 in black ink aw<\/p>\n
   7 in between numbers 6 and 3 in<\/p>\n
peg\u00bb ya} ‘1  5\u00b0No.6 and \ufb01mn gage Nos}? to 11 has only<\/p>\n
 M  % 5 and s in black id: xmzmgan mm smoe in<\/p>\n
  at stage No.12, he ms mentioned only number 5 in<\/p>\n
Va<\/p>\n
wotkman has offered ewlanaion for having written  ” <\/p>\n
pemi1.kishiscase\ufb02ma\ufb01ahcimwd\ufb01cketsm\ufb02wpgsset;g\u00a7xg:\ufb01\u00a7 <\/p>\n
started making’ cntnes’ in the way bill in ball   *5;-. q,,- % u 1 ;  ‘  <\/p>\n
not complete the entries on aocoum ‘of   <\/p>\n
he mac the pencil mm in the way ut’Vii\u00a3!,V it.Vis
\npetitioner has not o\ufb01\u00e9red any
\nmbers 6 and 8 in black ‘ml: geavm space
\nin between. It is     :0 \ufb01tmish
\nany explanation’ “””  black ink a: stage
\nthe serial nInnAl’3\u00abe.’rs:cf  ‘ of 123.850 ps. When<\/p>\n
  with his ball pen. Even in respect of
\n   has not cffered plausible explanation
\nV “V:{‘Y?& 0\ufb01 .&pprec1: ‘a1en’ of the material on record has come<\/p>\n
 eamgmiaa\ufb01 that pants’ hue: lms made the are.-mid esm’1es’<\/p>\n
  with an ultetiorhgaative to reuse the tickets of<\/p>\n
Ir’<\/p>\n
denomimion ofRs.8.5~O ps. mm connection, the court   <\/p>\n
observed aslmderr<\/p>\n
“lfat ail the am pmty man lost   his p~;n%%rg43}%  %
\nmm workmg,’ I do not  am\u00e9   H
\ncould write the   14:0,: is;\n<\/p>\n
the very same ink ex\u00e9e’;it–th3_’  _’ ‘ to
\nticket of aenm’m:iong\u00a7Rs;s.so’  551: me ban
\npea ofthe  liad  the pencil
\nentries   am. all remammg’ ‘
\n ;.em, which clearly
\n ” ‘ ‘on of Rs.8.$0
\nps. has  i::oo;:2pie$;;\u00a7’ei\u00a7Etxias and thereafter used
\n_ peagm as me  with a sole mm to erase
\n [  7 written in pencil and themaita’ re-<\/p>\n
 7.  below wasalsooftheviewthattheworkman<\/p>\n
VA  ‘- L\ufb02to \ufb01mnsh’ pmper explanation for having punched no<\/p>\n
 h  Eof denomination of Rs.8.5O ps. \ufb01om Stage No.1 to 12. The<\/p>\n
Kk.\n<\/p>\n
\n
\ufb01ndings recorded by the count beiow are based on the   A4  _<\/p>\n
Court<\/p>\n
8. Now the question is  is
\nentiuiry? AS Peffhe       involved
\nin as many as 17  .  3  i       the revenue of<\/p>\n
tiw       pumshmem’ . It is<\/p>\n
service for  mmti vi “waned;  misconduct” in the pm and<\/p>\n
 was  iiato service in the year 1997. It is<\/p>\n
   ” awarded by the disciplinary’ authority’<\/p>\n
   to the charge, should not be<\/p>\n
 imterf’ V   exercise cf the power of review. While<\/p>\n
 thin:  the amount efmeney misappropriated that becomes a
\n  fed for awardingpunislmem. On the contrary, it is the<\/p>\n
kn<\/p>\n
1.<\/p>\n
9. I do not find any  <\/p>\n
it is dismissed. No costs. V<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Arifulla S\/O Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 2 June, 2008 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer IN THE HIGH COURT 01:’ KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE ‘. DATED THIS THE 2″‘ DAY OF JUNE 2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICES. ABI;)\u00bbifL’1’%{<12:'EEY\u20ac .:_': ii % W1zIrPE;"1r10NN0.15a3sa2oa5 (%LKsfRrQ_ &_%_%% . 1 % […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-247945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Arifulla S\/O Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Arifulla S\/O Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-11T01:57:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Arifulla S\\\/O Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 2 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-11T01:57:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":786,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Arifulla S\\\/O Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-11T01:57:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Arifulla S\\\/O Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 2 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Arifulla S\/O Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Arifulla S\/O Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-11T01:57:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Arifulla S\/O Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 2 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-11T01:57:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008"},"wordCount":786,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008","name":"Sri Arifulla S\/O Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-11T01:57:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-arifulla-so-abdul-gafoor-vs-the-divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-on-2-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Arifulla S\/O Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Controller K S R T C on 2 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247945"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247945\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}