{"id":248136,"date":"2011-08-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011"},"modified":"2017-05-22T14:51:23","modified_gmt":"2017-05-22T09:21:23","slug":"ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Ms.Rani vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ms.Rani vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 August, 2011<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                    at\n                                              New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                           File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001643\n\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a029,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a029,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Ms.Rani\n           D\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Ramesh\u00a0Mishra\n           R\/o\u00a0A\u00ad41,\u00a0st.No.3\n           Jaitpur\u00a0Extension\n           Badarpur\n           New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0044\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0Shri\u00a0Raj\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Mishra\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Ashok\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sherawat\u00a0during\u00a0\n           the\u00a0hearing.\n\n\n           Respondents\n\n           Delhi\u00a0Transport\u00a0Corporation\n           O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Senior\u00a0Manager\n           BBM\u00a0complex\n           Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0009\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Ms.Renu\u00a0Popli,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Sr.Manager\n                                   Shri\u00a0Subash\u00a0Chander\n\n\n\n\n                         Information\u00a0Commissioner          :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                         In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                          at\n                                                  New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                    File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001643\n\n\n\n                                                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">Background<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1.        The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.9.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DTC\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0four\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          points\u00a0including\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0reasons\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0person\u00a0(Regn.No.2010120085)\u00a0who\u00a0is\u00a0much\u00a0junior\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          in\u00a0 the\u00a0 employment\u00a0 exchange\u00a0 \u00a0 (Regn.\u00a0No.2010129019)\u00a0 got\u00a0an\u00a0interview\u00a0 letter\u00a0 and\u00a0 was\u00a0 recruited\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          whereas\u00a0she\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0get\u00a0even\u00a0the\u00a0interview\u00a0letter.\u00a0\u00a0.Ms.Renu\u00a0Popli,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a09.8.10\u00a0enclosing\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          the\u00a0following\u00a0information\u00a0dt.22.7.10\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0officer:<\/p>\n<p>          Engagement\u00a0of\u00a0conductor\u00a0on\u00a0contractual\u00a0basis\u00a0for\u00a089\u00a0days\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0candidates\u00a0sponsored\u00a0by\u00a0the \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          employment \u00a0 exchange \u00a0 were \u00a0 considered \u00a0 on \u00a0 seniority \u00a0 of \u00a0 registration \u00a0 with \u00a0 last \u00a0 No.2009152549. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          Contractual\u00a0engagement\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0covered\u00a0under\u00a0reservation.<\/p>\n<p>          Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0 \u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.11.10.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0is\u00a0inadequate.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a030.11.10.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.11.7.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">     2.   During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0sought\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0points.\u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0therefore\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          reviewed\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0sought,\u00a0pointwise\u00a0and\u00a0decided\u00a0as\u00a0given\u00a0below:<\/p>\n<p>Point\u00a01<\/p>\n<p>          The\u00a0Commission\u00a0holds\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0sought\u00a0against\u00a0this\u00a0point.<\/p>\n<p>Point\u00a02<\/p>\n<p>          The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0person\u00a0who\u00a0is\u00a0junior\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0had\u00a0received\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0interview\u00a0letter\u00a0from\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          the\u00a0DTC\u00a0 \u00a0whereas\u00a0she\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0received\u00a0any.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0however\u00a0maintained\u00a0their\u00a0position\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          that\u00a0the\u00a0last\u00a0person\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0called\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0interview\u00a0was\u00a0one\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0registration\u00a0number\u00a02009152549.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0who\u00a0\u00a0alleged\u00a0that\u00a0a\u00a0person\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0registration\u00a0number\u00a0after\u00a0that\u00a0give\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0<br \/>\n           called\u00a0for\u00a0an\u00a0interview\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0DTC,\u00a0however\u00a0was\u00a0unable\u00a0to\u00a0produce\u00a0any\u00a0proof\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0junior\u00a0(Roll\u00a0no.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          2010120085)\u00a0was\u00a0indeed\u00a0called\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0interview.\u00a0In\u00a0this\u00a0peculiar\u00a0situation,\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Commission\u00a0believes\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          that\u00a0\u00a0Appellant\u00a0will\u00a0only\u00a0be\u00a0satisfied\u00a0if\u00a0she\u00a0is\u00a0allowed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          engagement\u00a0of\u00a0conductor\u00a0on\u00a0contractual\u00a0basis\u00a0for\u00a089\u00a0days,\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a0a\u00a0mutually\u00a0convenient\u00a0date\u00a0\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          she\u00a0can\u00a0check\u00a0for\u00a0herself\u00a0whether\u00a0her\u00a0junior\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0called\u00a0for\u00a0an\u00a0interview\u00a0and\u00a0if\u00a0yes,\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0she\/he(the\u00a0junior)\u00a0 \u00a0was\u00a0called\u00a0and\u00a0why\u00a0she(Appellant)\u00a0 \u00a0was\u00a0not.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          provided\u00a0with\u00a0attested\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0documents,\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Point\u00a03<\/p>\n<p>          The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0runs\u00a0into\u00a010000\u00a0pages\u00a0and\u00a0compiling\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          would\u00a0disproportionately\u00a0divert\u00a0the\u00a0resources\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0When\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0suggested\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          that\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0form\u00a0of\u00a0a\u00a0CD,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0even\u00a0then\u00a0it\u00a0would\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          disproportionately\u00a0divert\u00a0the\u00a0resources\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0since\u00a010000\u00a0pages\u00a0will\u00a0first\u00a0have\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          scanned\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0are\u00a0copied\u00a0into\u00a0a\u00a0CD.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">          In\u00a0the\u00a0light\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0submission,\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Commission\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0allow\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          relevant\u00a0records\u00a0on\u00a0a\u00a0mutually\u00a0convenient\u00a0date\u00a0and\u00a0time\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0him\u00a0with\u00a0attested\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          documents\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0identified\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0\u00a0upto\u00a0100\u00a0pages\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0charge\u00a0him\u00a0at\u00a0Rs.2\/\u00ad\u00a0per\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          page\u00a0for\u00a0pages\u00a0beyond\u00a0that\u00a0number.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">          Point\u00a04<\/p>\n<p>          The\u00a0Commission\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0against\u00a0this\u00a0query.<\/p>\n<p>          All\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a029.9.11.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">\n<p id=\"p_6\">3.        The\u00a0Commission\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0action\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0initiated\u00a0against\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          him\/her\u00a0u\/s\u00a020(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0replying\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0against\u00a0points\u00a03\u00a0and\u00a04.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          He\/She\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0his\/her\u00a0written\u00a0response\u00a0so\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a05.10.11.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">4.        The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">                                                                                                 (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                        Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<br \/>\n (G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">1.      Ms.Rani<br \/>\n        D\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Ramesh\u00a0Mishra<br \/>\n        R\/o\u00a0A\u00ad41,\u00a0st.No.3<br \/>\n        Jaitpur\u00a0Extension<br \/>\n        Badarpur<br \/>\n        New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0044<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">2.      The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n        Delhi\u00a0Transport\u00a0Corporation<br \/>\n        O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Senior\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n        BBM\u00a0complex<br \/>\n        Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0009<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">3.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n        Delhi\u00a0Transport\u00a0Corporation<br \/>\n        O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Chief\u00a0General\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n        I.P.Estate<br \/>\n        New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">4.      Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC<br \/>\n Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission&#8217;s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0<br \/>\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(3)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0<br \/>\nconsiders\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0<br \/>\ninformation\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Ms.Rani vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 August, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001643 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a029,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a029,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Ms.Rani D\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Ramesh\u00a0Mishra R\/o\u00a0A\u00ad41,\u00a0st.No.3 Jaitpur\u00a0Extension Badarpur New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0044 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0Shri\u00a0Raj\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Mishra\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Ashok\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sherawat\u00a0during\u00a0 the\u00a0hearing. Respondents Delhi\u00a0Transport\u00a0Corporation O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Senior\u00a0Manager BBM\u00a0complex Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0009 Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Ms.Renu\u00a0Popli,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Sr.Manager Shri\u00a0Subash\u00a0Chander Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001643 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.9.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DTC\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0four\u00a0 points\u00a0including\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0reasons\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0person\u00a0(Regn.No.2010120085)\u00a0who\u00a0is\u00a0much\u00a0junior\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0 in\u00a0 the\u00a0 employment\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-248136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ms.Rani vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ms.Rani vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-22T09:21:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ms.Rani vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-22T09:21:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":733,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Ms.Rani vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-22T09:21:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ms.Rani vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ms.Rani vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ms.Rani vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-22T09:21:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ms.Rani vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-22T09:21:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011"},"wordCount":733,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011","name":"Ms.Rani vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-22T09:21:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-rani-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-29-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ms.Rani vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 29 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248136"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248136\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}