{"id":24836,"date":"2008-09-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008"},"modified":"2018-06-27T00:50:26","modified_gmt":"2018-06-26T19:20:26","slug":"nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Nissar Ahmed vs B Hassainar on 20 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Nissar Ahmed vs B Hassainar on 20 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
3; &:+w.sAs.a: P;LR5\u00a3R;Th \n\nIN THE H15;-4 cows? 09' KAFWATAKA AT BA;\u00a7\u00a3:-\ufb01m- NO\u00a7S~53SZ2{}0\u00a7':\u00a7\n\nBEHNEENI\n\nNISSAR AHMED, V   \ns\/o K.MC)HMMED vA:<:;_}B,%   \nAGED ABOUT :15 $:EARs,\u00a2      \nCOFFEE      \nSALEHONNUR, '   \nESLR. PuR.A.[TALs_J;g'A..;3,  . \nCHIKMAGALUi"'~E;\u00a7I$TRI\u00a3T'."~\u00ab.___ % %\n\n  V   L' :APPEE..\u00a3_ANT\n\n(av SRI.B.\u00a5~\u00a7. saAr4A$:r\u00a7A;.Aa{;'.)\n\nA\u00a5\\\u00a3D:\n\nsgfo' \u20ac:H'EYAB;3A.,'E3\u00a7A'RY,\nAGE-D A;BGUT"-1,5 YEARS,\n\n "  _KOTF\u00a3\u00a3~\u00a7E'HARA ".\u00a5I_Li_AGE & POST,\n'A :-\u00e9ziazseaa TALUK,\n\n _CHI_\u00a7<MAGALU;_R BESTRICT.\n\n:RES?ONDEN?\n\nV  gafsjaz; gm NATARA3, ADV.)\n\n\n\n3. Gr: the basis of pleadings of the parties, "'i"r\u00a7ai\n\nSludge framed the following issues:\n\n1.<\/pre>\n
 Whether the plaintiff proves mi’
\ndefendant had issued a cheq.i;.e__for_–e””%3::i9i-iv.bf
\nes.5o,coo-00 drawn on chl:kma.g;iei\u00abiiwe-age’;____ <\/p>\n
Grameena Sank, Kettigelzara\ufb01bearing Ciaefque
\nNe. 232932 on e.12.94\u00a7._i:i’-._   A ”\n<\/p>\n
2. Whether the ~;;\u00a7ainti\u00a7f’_;:si:\u00e9:\u00a2\u00a7.rfeiS:-that the \u00e9eid
\ncheese was dishe\ufb01oer-eee..e:’i\u00bbi\u00a7l riet\u00e9iryied with an<\/p>\n
er:Ge-lrseevienii::3*}Vi’i35i3i’feient l\u00a7i\u00a3\u00a3i’t\u20ac’Vs’?
\n3;’ li*Jhe\u00a7h_e:i-lj.’t-hie”—s\u00a7:e’f\u00e9ndanl: proves that the<\/p>\n
_a\u00a7iege\u00a7:i~~ <;Vheq'L=:eA"i_sV"z\u00a7btaErse5 by ceercier: and<\/p>\n
v\u00bb\u00bb'-i;1ned"ue infi:\u00a7enc__e_?.\u00bb<\/p>\n
  VA  T.  the plaintiff is entitled for a sum
\n* A ' '-\u00abTe? 5Rs\u00ab.".Sf3V,f9OB-00 witii interest and cosis?<\/p>\n
 What erder or decree?\n<\/p>\n
  is prove the case, in the Trial Cleizrt, pieiritiff get<\/p>\n
‘keiiarnineci himse\ufb01 as PW-1 and examined we witness<\/p>\n
‘ Abdul Razak {PW~2). Exs\ufb01i Se P4 were merged. Te prove<\/p>\n
K’<\/p>\n
tha defence, defenda\ufb01t got h\u00e9maeif examined <\/p>\n
E)-(5.31 and D2 ware marked.\n<\/p>\n
4. 0?: appreciation of e\\?.\u00a7d\u20acf1’C’$3; ted \u00a7”n “th’\u00e9:: ‘ca\u00a7t-2,:<\/p>\n
Eearne\ufb01 ‘friai Budge decre*:\u00e9d”*–~.};I’:e 2 ‘s\ufb01\u00e9t Vwz\ufb01\u00e9 ljg:r::.3tVs  3a1vr\u00e9ci– ‘<\/p>\n
interest. __ V _ _ _\u00bb _ V\n<\/p>\n
5. Defendant \ufb01i\u00e9d%s\u00e9M~A;.L%}%\u00a74%d;?;2fGcs1 in the Court of
\nthe Principal Distrigt Js.;\ufb01g\u00e9.af’t Eauastiening the<\/p>\n
decree pass\u00e9fi’    ::’*t,\u00a7’.’.}.\u20ac”:VV:”:\u00a7”:EV’V’VEaE Ceurt. in me<\/p>\n
appeaj’,”dV\u00e9fe\u00e9i{iar\u00a7f\u00a7\u00a7 a:’;3~p\u00a7:;a:1\u00e9’\u00a7_”‘?%’\u00a7’\u00e95 LA. %’s\u00a3e.\\.! under Grcier
\nXL! R\ufb01ia “Z7 ,.~permiss%on fer preducticerz cf<\/p>\n
addi;ti<;na!'L'\u00a3sviV_\u00e9en:eAAa:_fsCi~~*"\u00bbL\u00a7:he app\u00e9icatien was aiiowed by<\/p>\n
Firv\u00e9.i:":'Ap.Lg\u00a7e\u00a7\u00bbviate AC0'u'\ufb01"cra 2.9.2002. Sefertdant, thereafter<\/p>\n
 'g_'_'e;f\u00e9\u00a7m\u00a7r:j'e:\u00a7:.'}*iE.I\u00a7"::";.23f and \u00a7xs.93 to ms were marked.<\/p>\n
\u00e9xarnined himseif and di\ufb01 act grodagce any<\/p>\n
 decumg\ufb01ts, in the Appe\ufb01ate Coazrt.\n<\/p>\n
  On consideratic-n of record of the appem and<\/p>\n
  ‘”i;\u00a7aat of the T333 Court, \u00a3eamed Eudge ef the First Appei\u00e9ate<\/p>\n
Cmzrt raised the foiiawing po\u00e9nts fer deterrn’ijatiora:-
\n\/.\n<\/p>\n
‘ “Von record.\n<\/p>\n
11}<\/p>\n
questien, which is required ta be answered by e><an\u00a7'\u00a7–::\u00e9r3g<\/p>\n
the reco rd.\n<\/p>\n
13. Though the evidentiai burde\ufb01 is
\non the defendant by virtue of Se<:\u00a7:E<\u00a7"r3"1\u00ab1$(5.Aa)  if V
\ncan be rebestteci by the ;ciefer$Ai3er:z:;:_TV_A':by T\u00bb's;_\u00a7'\u00a7o'wEr:g" <\/p>\n
preponderance of probabi\u00a5ities;."'-that, V"eugi\u00e9x,T\u00a2v:)%{;ei5'e'r\u00e9tien V<\/p>\n
shown in the cheque f’\u00e9;3’\u00a7” Once convincing reb:.:tta\u00a3<\/p>\n
evidemzee\ufb02s ‘4:.\u00e9zci-rviAL\u00a7ce”d m%% accepted by the Ceisrt, having<\/p>\n
.\u00e9’V’i’eg;”a”‘:”\u00a7f1  we c\u00e9giemstances of the case and the<\/p>\n
‘;2%9ep{\u00e9;\u00a7d::e:rev\u00a71eef-.:’:$f probabiiitiesg the arms of prcsef shifts<\/p>\n
baek._to  whe has men: the iegai burden. In sacs’: a<\/p>\n
 “”‘~.. “‘;<;i.t;;atier2.,Zthe gresumpt\ufb01a\ufb01 under Section 13.8 of the Act
\n  be ciaimed by pieintiff. Since both eart\u00e9es have<\/p>\n
–   Hadg\u00e9uce\u00e9 evidence, the Court has is censider the evidence<\/p>\n
Whether the \ufb01rst appeuafe Ceurt has
\nV<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
cheque with a\u00e9gnature was-\u00e9obtained frem him <\/p>\n
has icdge\u00e9 a cr\u00e9minai case aga\u00e9sst the p3ain\u20ac.\u00a7Vf\u00a7f’:’e:..\u00a7:.z:%’  \u00e9\ufb01f  <\/p>\n
connection w\u00e9th the said intzidar:-‘:-;’..bAA’V..f:Te;s<\/p>\n
cheque-Ex.P:i is 9? him and his sigvmizlzjat\u00e9 a;>;\u00a7e;afs’ t’h \u00e9:%.\u00e9\u00a7v:\u00a7”‘–..L<\/p>\n
and that the writings on the”c%.{\u00a7\u00a7que  ‘and
\nthat he is not due the’:a.q7′:az;\u00ab:*2’\u00a7’$’i:s–:{3\u00a7~f~.\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7L’-\u00a331 t\ufb02\u00e9vv\u00e9h\u00e9\u00e9ziue. En
\ncross-examinat\u00e9cn he h.aT\u00a7Q.AAfg’a:_\u00a7’:;\u00a7honnur po\ufb01ce
\nhad tcdd  one A\ufb01med
\nBasha and  be taken Eats custsdy
\nby ‘1Z}”\u20ac\u20acf”V.’iZ5′{3V3’\u00a7’i’.*’.:{\u00e9IVf, He has \u00e9en\u00e9ed
\nsuggesfiong pat. adm\u00e9tte\u00e9 that, Abdu\u00e9<\/p>\n
Razakiftad ‘\u00e9’erzt’a.V;1votA\u00a7Ac.,\u00e9,’*i.% which, he sent a rep\u00e9y. in his<\/p>\n
“‘\u00ab..evic3\u00e9}}c;.;–..ibefgareA\u00e9\ufb01awppeiiate Court, he has state\u00e9 abeat<\/p>\n
 _1’_:h’e: :\u00a7S3i.3;\u00e9:L$f \u00a5’t\u00a3%3Vt\u00a7{;& ‘:9 the po\ufb01ce, issue 92′ no\ufb01ce ta PW.2,<\/p>\n
t\ufb01a _c_.’ s’*\u00a7r\u00a51f{1a’iV :\u00e9’,:_a\u00e9e and other aspects.<\/p>\n
:iI’3.__ 3~ The \u00e9mportant documents which have been<\/p>\n
  by first appeiiate cent”: are Ex.P1, the chequa,<\/p>\n
‘  notice dated 18.12.1994 of the p\u00e9aintiff to the<\/p>\n
 .  defendant, Ex.P4-, reply dated 33.12.1994 E? defendant ta<\/p>\n
piaintiff,<\/p>\n
EX.D3,<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
notice date\ufb01 1G.8.\u00a7,99-4 issued by<\/p>\n
defendant to Chief Secretary and po\ufb01ce authorEt\u00a7es,u %\u00a7.::\u00a7_;”;’E)_V2,<\/p>\n
Ex.P9, the private cempkaint, Ex.D3B\n<\/p>\n
31.f.Q.i994 to defendants from Abdui Razak  > <\/p>\n
may of notice dated 12.1O.1994;,’_frQr:\ufb01 ii\u00e9fefz\ufb01afaf*V.t<:;_'_V\u20ac\u00e9h\u00bbei'<\/p>\n
Sub\ufb01inspector of Poiice, Kud:fen3_ukh"p9'\u00a7ice staf1v'dV;2A.  3<\/p>\n
16.<\/p>\n
The reasonaanc\ufb01 ;cVi;”–<.+:.i1tfs*3s"tai}ces \u00e9'w\u00a7%-Echv\u00e9vefg\u00e9\u00e9ed<\/p>\n
with was Court to decr\u00e9e":T;:AeLsu.%\u20ac:[a   .<\/p>\n
(a)<\/p>\n
T\u00a51fer.e  is nq_’A\u00e9\u00e9f\u00a7\u00e9’:\u00a7:\u00a7rec e”‘~\u00e9\u00a5:r.._r.i\u00e9fe%\u00a3’dant’s side that,<\/p>\n
._ -‘obtained to piaintiff with<\/p>\n
Kundu\u00e9 E%s\ufb01u.\u00e9\ufb01’c\u00e9’Vand coercion by using peiice<\/p>\n
thr’ea i;’.’ <\/p>\n
\ufb02D’e_fendant did not compiain er issue natice ta<\/p>\n
,  f”‘A..,_p3=\u00e9: i~e*:”{:iff, Emmediateiy on reiease of his fans, to<\/p>\n
‘-rf\u00e9turn the b\ufb01ank stamp paper and cheque<\/p>\n
 in<\/p>\n
taken in the {}{\u00a7i\u00a7C8 statian.\n<\/p>\n
Defendant dis not ‘caka any action aga\u00e9\ufb01st
\np\u00a5air2t\u00a7\ufb01f apprehending that, piaintiff may use<\/p>\n
the btank signed paper fag fabricating<\/p>\n
33.}<\/p>\n
17.<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
clscument and that onty to escajp;g_ ffr7oEi1VVT..’t%afe<\/p>\n
iiab\u00e9\u00e9ity to pay the amcrunt, ae:=\u00a2n\u00a2a%n:%::;ea*<\/p>\n
campiaint aftey raceipvjiicm\u00e9sf”r:\u00abe:xtE’\u00a7:;e  <\/p>\n
Reaszms and  :;_i:”c:,:m:~;’\u00a3:’a’*r:ces,\u00bb”‘\u00a7f\u00a2.\u00a5\u00a7:ic\u00a7”z \u00e9zuaes\u00e9\ufb02<\/p>\n
weighed with the iower apu\ufb01e:.i:_%V’a’:e_V  f\u00e9jverge tine<\/p>\n
decree passed by Tri’a .\u00a74_._i;our.\u00a7 agid \u00a7:E’s:~;2iss thHeHs:.zEt are:<\/p>\n
-(3)<\/p>\n
Ex’AD3 that, \u00e9efendaat<\/p>\n
?EaS};\u00a7s\u00a5:.;:.2\u00a7\u00a33\u00ab r%g:i:’ice4_”tg$ ‘f\ufb01aviefi Secretary, Qirector
\n1  G\u00e9f:-f\u00abera”i7’ <'af_V":"\u00bb'*\u00a7_i\u00a7c,:':\u00e9,"ABa\u00e9jg\u00e9icre, Deputy Inspects;<\/p>\n
fG\u00e9.rra;'a"E  <\u00a7\u00bb\u00a5*v+?"ev!.i_ce,-'Bangaicare, Superintendent of<\/p>\n
'A  Po}\u00a7'c\u00e9;"..C\u00a71\u00a7:\u00a78 is {M<\/p>\n
csfvi the endersement issued by the<\/p>\n
 V{)Erec’\u00a3or Genera! cf Police to the e\ufb01ect that,<\/p>\n
 ‘\u00a7}’a’\u00e9’ concemed persans have been directed to<\/p>\n
 \u00e9ake suitabie action. Theugh PW,.1 has stated<\/p>\n
that he has net been sent with a copy :2? the
\nsaid netice, mat that does net matter, since,
\n{\u00e9efendant was making a\ufb01egat\u00e9eszs against<\/p>\n
poiice aiieging that a Mani cheque and<\/p>\n
(E3)<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
signature on a btaak stamp paper w”a5\u00e9*%”a3;7e::
\nby Baiehcrmur pcs\ufb01ce and u’2’f’;:\u00e9e;”-\n<\/p>\n
circumstances, he c.’o’i}\u00a7’:E\u00ab. ‘n\ufb01t _. %ia*%;r.e V’ vbiee\u00e9z<\/p>\n
expected to gend Va co\u00a7’;:__\u00e9’::_:d:”Tth;a:’t’ _\u00a3A}\u00e92’~t%1e <\/p>\n
Ex.D3, the parti\u00a7c’u\u00a7 ‘a7’;<s\u00bb ofhxthg' cA?\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7:q\u00a3}{\u00e94'V"{'E)5<\ufb01.P1) " '<\/p>\n
have been rngnti Q21'\u00e9Ci:  " V' ' .\n<\/p>\n
The pia\u00e9ntifffias the ammmt was<\/p>\n
9a.i5% f\u00a3t\u00a7.  S\u00ab. iG.1\u00a794 and the<\/p>\n
Eh’?-*;q{.\u00a7e”?i.;aV5″-iy\u00e9\u00e9fzV__E\u00a7si:ed.V_to him Easter and it is<\/p>\n
” -\u00a7{:a1;\u00e9z\u00a7 :*%;3.2;\u00a7*3.\u00a7-4′,wheiieaa the no\ufb01ce E:.~<:.93 Es<\/p>\n
" 4:da\u20ac\u00e9c\u00a7:t '\u00a3Lf\u00a7V.a~., i%9"'__'i.'e., two menths prior t0 the<\/p>\n
V '*–.;:\u00a7%Eav\u00a7r:V\u00a7if\u00a7 A;;_a'\u00a5;r'\u00a7sf'\u00e95g money to defendant an\ufb01 ?3?'}i$<\/p>\n
.__c%rcA:i'rn~s%:.a.='zce has not bear: axaiained by tha<\/p>\n
"'%:v"p\u00a7'a\u00a7—-nt\u00a7\ufb01', which $5 a strong circumstance is<\/p>\n
V'  that EXP: has been signed by him when<\/p>\n
1  <5)<\/p>\n
% E: was biank.\n<\/p>\n
Defendant has \ufb02ied a cr\u00e9minai case against
\npiaintiff and PW.2 on 5.9.1995. making
\naiiegations that his signatures are iaken by<\/p>\n
Balehennur poiice on a blank Teque area biank<\/p>\n
(d)<\/p>\n
1?\n<\/p>\n
stamp paper and further fabricated_.\u00a3:}\u00a7}5;\u00bbV,\u00a7if’eisfz;;\u00a7*;_<\/p>\n
paper irate an agreement of sa\u00a7eV__e’E2:j eiV’_::.Ewee,ee..: _A V’ <\/p>\n
fer Rs.5G,0O0\/\u00ab~.\n<\/p>\n
The defendant has _pree4u;ed._ abuzf\u00a73’e.:\u00a7?;~ :*;’:a:te\u00e9’\u00a7avE” <\/p>\n
to show that he \u00a7\u00e9’e\u00a7’-.ta%:~;E1:.1;1’\u00abshe3~sgt~e:at'<\u00ab.ee't\u00a3_'\u20ace.._Y\u00a7f3$ issuee to ?SE.,<\/p>\n
\u00a7(u_e%*e.%\ufb01'\u00a3\u00e9kh 'pi:v\u00a5_iV\u20ace.is;te'i:\u00a3eVe' a\ufb01eg\u00e9rzg that, ee Es<\/p>\n
"t;$\u00a7_,giapg"::f:-ige :':ar\u00a7'estEi\u00e9fendant iiiegaiiy, which<\/p>\n
 ' 4.eerreVbe'\u00a7Va\u00e9e\u00e9_:Afhe..–~aiiagatien of defendant in tee<\/p>\n
 "'w:i_i"ti:f\u00e94rst..:\u00e9pp.\u00a7\u00a7’%aA:ej<\/p>\n
Court has fecor\ufb01ed reascms \ufb013:i__revafi*:=~.;\u00a7r’:’*~;3 the\u00bbf\u00a7%-zt\ufb01infg 03? 5.215′,<\/p>\n
T:’ia3 Ceurt. The iower Appe\u00a33\u00e9t’\u00a32_”:C::\u00bb_L;rt V\u00a7\u00a7a,\u00e9\u00ab_V’fev{1n\u00a7i’:\u00a7the case<\/p>\n
of g\ufb01aintiff to be faise.’ <\/p>\n
19. In t_ha=;:”,:; :vi’::~,:\u00a3>$E:\u00a7s\u00a7;\u00a7s\u00a3$-Ti-\u00a7\u00a75ER, reported in {$396} 8<\/p>\n
set 5535, Tit%Jh\u00e9as  h_a’i\u00a7\u00a7_’Vthat.rVV”V’v
\n1f1;__..’;.,f\u00a5’%*:e%_.’f.?\u00e9jVEs\u00a7t’y._\u00a7\u00a7the piea of the pia\u00e9ntiff aiso
\n_wou\u00a7\u00e9=.be a_’Ea%:t_dr’~\u00bb’;’T\u00e9 be considered by the court.
\n  :*a;L::{\u00a7*e::.:\u00a7f__ p.:’ocf is of academic interest when
\n $s;z*\u00a7\u00ab.;:Ife:*:ce was adduced by the parties. The
\na’is. required to examine the evidence am
\n co.\u00a7j\u00a7V\u00a71\ufb01Ve.% whether the suit as pieaded \u00a7r: the gz\ufb01a\u00e9nt
\n zh\u00e9s h\ufb01\u00e9en estab\ufb01shed and the suit requires ta be<\/p>\n
 A.  \u00e9\u00e9creed or dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
2A”\u00a7f\u00a71 e’AAreasor:ir:g of the Eewer Appaiiate Court is bases an<\/p>\n
x wsroper asjprec\u00e9ation of both era} and documeatary evi\u00e9anca<\/p>\n
an record. It has is be nete\u00e9 that, name sf tha \u00e9ecuments<\/p>\n
\\<\/p>\n
\/.\n<\/p>\n
3.9<\/p>\n
produced by the eefeedant are under eheiienge e’f\u00a7”~.the<\/p>\n
piaintiff, The iewer Appe\u00e9iate Cour: has dravvr:e.~\u00ab%~s\u00e94fe.%{e’_e%:{efe..\u00ab<\/p>\n
\ufb02owing from the circumstances appe;:_;\u00a7_i’e;;. T\ufb01\u00e9je  ‘:%’:ef_ <\/p>\n
ciecumentary ev\u00e9dence produced  thet.\u00a7\u00abef’enfie*:\u00a7\ufb01;~.u\u00a7*i,e’?\u20ac\u00a7e;\u00ab<\/p>\n
it cannot be said that the tiers; ap;\u00a7’eAi_\u00a7ete caeere:-:’e’2\u00a7a’s e;?’:ee’*–.e<\/p>\n
perverseiy and arb\u00e9trar\u00e9ty in ‘\u00a7*e>.};’e’rs\u00a7ng Vft%:_e”‘f\u00a7.%:zdi.%:;g 5? tee
\nTrial Court. Since, V  d.\u00e9Ve’i\u00a7_%ee’e::;Vt.er\u00a7.__fest\u00a7mony being<\/p>\n
in confermity:_%A%itj\u00a7a.e1.the “deur\ufb01e%’1t\u00a7’ ;5′:”evr_i…t.:;}.i:ed, the inferences<\/p>\n
drawn,’Vejf’VTthee.:ei:;we\u00a7?V\u00a7ie’pe\u00a7:i.’ate   is justified.<\/p>\n
29.” has admitted that he paid the<\/p>\n
 em.a\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7’:ite’to the an 5.103.994. His case was that,<\/p>\n
  a\ufb01egznt was paid by him to: the defendant, the<\/p>\n
ei\ufb01equev  was issued. Admittediy, piaint\u00e9ff did not<\/p>\n
heel”  :0 pay to the defendant. Accerd\u00e9eg to him,<\/p>\n
  %’:ee-{aieed the ameunt from his brothers and re\u00e9atives. To<\/p>\n
:\u00b0a:\u00e9iv%.\u00e9’nce the man, it cannot be expected that, a persee wii\u00e9<\/p>\n
 ‘Waise funds from his fami\u00e9y members and reiativee, w\u00e9z\u00e9ch<\/p>\n
circumstance itseif creates a strong does: 11 the ease e?<\/p>\n
\/.\n<\/p>\n
21<\/span><\/p>\n
eroduce\u00e9 by both eerties in the aepenate Court, en cerrect<\/p>\n
appreciation ef the era? and decumentam; ev\u00e9dence\ufb01the<\/p>\n
appe\ufb01ate Cezzrt has set aside the decree passec3__’44’fo\u00a7;f”:E”;fi.e%V.<\/p>\n
Court.\n<\/p>\n
21. Both the parties havevied :e’v\u00a7.\u00e9ie%ice’\u00a7az:E’t?z'”%ege”e\ufb01_:\u00ab<\/p>\n
E><.P3. and on aepreciatien  eraiwi 2n_d";\u00e9ieV;e\u00abmVeeta%y <\/p>\n
evidence by the \u00a7ower AppeiiaVteVV'jCe_:::t_\u00bb, \u00a7t"ha\u00ab\u00e9:fece%rded the
\nfinding that Ex\ufb01l wa\u00e9eot\u20ac;;si;,3eci'"'~f;;:i:"a.n'y cens\u00e9deration
\namount receivecieed t:1'a%~,– f5{*.eV"p'\u00a7'*e_s'i\u00ab2f.I'n;::'iii\u00e93":'\u00e9. under Sect\u00e9ee<\/p>\n
118(a:)\\_ef. the"\u00a7\u00a3a<;*:..1:faeae'-$3.339-eared. Suit was dismisses
\nsince t%i1e__'_'piei\ufb01t\u00e9\ufb01e':2~e\u00a7'*..\u00bbe."4fei%ed ta prove payment ef<\/p>\n
consffeeration  tie the defendant. Hence, Ea the facts<\/p>\n
.aje\u00a3i_V ci_Va?c:;s:fe\u00a7;=,"%c:-znces cf the case, the dec\u00e9s\u00e9ens as': which<\/p>\n
re'!'Ti–aVe\u00a7\u00a7:\u00bb,%,ag.[\u00a7:;"';3Iace\u20aci by the ieamed ceunse\ufb01 for the<\/p>\n
apf\ufb01eiiae\u00e9 "hes no appiicat\u00e9on. The orai evidence of ewe:<\/p>\n
  Being i :\u00a7 eonfcrmity with the documentary evidence ptazze\u00e9<\/p>\n
 'tiim and the aepreciat\u00e9on of evidence by the Eower<\/p>\n
 'Tsppeiiate Court being in accordance with \u00e9aw, the fmdmgs<\/p>\n
and conc\u00e9usions recorded by it, as not ca?! foxinte\ufb02erence.<\/p>\n
\/'<\/p>\n
22<\/span><\/p>\n
First agpeiiate Court taking Erato corzs\u00e9deraticn the V{ja’a’\u00e9,::.’f::”e’~.’:T:f\u00a7aS<\/p>\n
evidence on record, has assigned reasons ast:~\u00a7_\u00e9~.<\/p>\n
‘Mai Court decree required reversai. _…?{_i?\u00a7e.:e*~.[.:’is._ sic” <\/p>\n
perversity er iiiegaiity on the pal?! <\/p>\n
Ceurt in passing of the Empug\ufb02ned \u00e9}’z:_\ufb02;m+antv*’V3A:\u00a7:;’i \u00e9z\u00e9e\u00e9igr\u00e9i-:-;_ “~ <\/p>\n
Substargtiai quastson of Eaw is \u00e9cicgsrclingijf ‘a.:\u00a7ffs*.n\u00e9’\u00a7er\u00e9\ufb01.
\nFor the foregoing’–.4\u00e9\u00a7%s;u:\u00a7sEc;’\u00e9vL”a\u00a73d..ifeaserzs, ihe apgaea\u00e9
\nis devoid of merit asf:r.i… ijs–..  In the<\/p>\n
cErcumstancgsi_iof\ufb01\ufb01fe c\u00e9-;–se}_ b’art4_E’es ‘t<\u00a7"i::e'ar their ressective<\/p>\n
Sd\/-'
\nIudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Nissar Ahmed vs B Hassainar on 20 September, 2008 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda 3; &:+w.sAs.a: P;LR5\u00a3R;Th IN THE H15;-4 cows? 09′ KAFWATAKA AT BA;\u00a7\u00a3:-\ufb01m- NO\u00a7S~53SZ2{}0\u00a7’:\u00a7 BEHNEENI NISSAR AHMED, V s\/o K.MC)HMMED vA:<:;_}B,% AGED ABOUT :15 $:EARs,\u00a2 COFFEE SALEHONNUR, ' ESLR. PuR.A.[TALs_J;g'A..;3, . CHIKMAGALUi"'~E;\u00a7I$TRI\u00a3T'."~\u00ab.___ % % V L' :APPEE..\u00a3_ANT (av SRI.B.\u00a5~\u00a7. saAr4A$:r\u00a7A;.Aa{;'.) A\u00a5\\\u00a3D: sgfo' […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24836","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNissar Ahmed vs B Hassainar on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Nissar Ahmed vs B Hassainar on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-26T19:20:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Nissar Ahmed vs B Hassainar on 20 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-26T19:20:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2200,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Nissar Ahmed vs B Hassainar on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-26T19:20:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Nissar Ahmed vs B Hassainar on 20 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Nissar Ahmed vs B Hassainar on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Nissar Ahmed vs B Hassainar on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-26T19:20:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Nissar Ahmed vs B Hassainar on 20 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-26T19:20:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008"},"wordCount":2200,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008","name":"Nissar Ahmed vs B Hassainar on 20 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-26T19:20:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nissar-ahmed-vs-b-hassainar-on-20-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Nissar Ahmed vs B Hassainar on 20 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24836","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24836"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24836\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24836"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24836"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24836"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}