{"id":248636,"date":"2011-04-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-04-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011"},"modified":"2018-01-25T01:59:09","modified_gmt":"2018-01-24T20:29:09","slug":"university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011","title":{"rendered":"University Of Jammu vs T.S.Khan &amp; Ors on 8 April, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Supreme Court of India<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">University Of Jammu vs T.S.Khan &amp; Ors on 8 April, 2011<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A Alam<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: Aftab Alam, R.M. Lodha<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">                                          1\n\n\n\n                                            NON-REPORTABLE\n\n               IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA\n\n               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION\n\n\n\n               CIVIL APPEAL NO.3137 OF 2011 \n      [ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.18128 OF 2009]\n\n\n\nUniversity of Jammu                       ... Appellant\n\n                            Versus\n\nT.S. Khan &amp; Others                        ... Respondents\n\n\n\n\n\n                      J U D G M E N T \n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">Aftab Alam,J.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">\n<p id=\"p_2\">1.     Leave granted.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">2.     This   appeal   is   directed   against   the   judgment <\/p>\n<p>passed by a Division Bench of the Jammu &amp; Kashmir <\/p>\n<p>High Court by which it has allowed the intra-court <\/p>\n<p>appeal   filed   by   respondent   No.1,   set   aside   the <\/p>\n<p>judgment and order passed by a single Judge of the <\/p>\n<p>High   Court   dismissing   his   Writ   Petition   and <\/p>\n<p>directed the appellant-University to give seniority <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                               2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>to   respondent   No.1   on   the   post   of   Assistant <\/p>\n<p>Registrar and to pay him the salary for that post <\/p>\n<p>from the date respondents 4 and 5 were appointed to <\/p>\n<p>the post of Assistant Registrar.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">3.    The recruitment to the post of Deputy Registrar <\/p>\n<p>is   to   be   made   in   the   ratio   of   75%   by   direct <\/p>\n<p>recruitment and 25% by promotion and for the post <\/p>\n<p>of   Assistant   Registrar   in   the   ratio   of   50%   by <\/p>\n<p>direct   recruitment   and   50%   by   promotion   on   the <\/p>\n<p>basis of merit-cum-seniority from amongst eligible <\/p>\n<p>Section Officers and P.A.1-cum-Stenographers in the <\/p>\n<p>ratio   of   2:1   respectively.            The   appellant-<\/p>\n<p>University on March 1, 1996 issued an advertisement <\/p>\n<p>for   filling   up   the   posts   of   Deputy   Registrar   and <\/p>\n<p>Assistant   Registrar   by   direct   recruitment.     The <\/p>\n<p>minimum qualification prescribed for appointment as <\/p>\n<p>Assistant Registrar was as under:-<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>      &#8220;Assistant Registrar<\/p>\n<p>          A   post-graduate   Degree   with   at   least<br \/>\n      55% marks or its equivalent grade.   Other<br \/>\n      things   being   equal,   preference   may   be<br \/>\n      given   to   candidate   having   knowledge   of<br \/>\n      computer applications.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                                 3<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>           Note:-     In   service   employees   of   the<br \/>\n      University   holding   Bachelor&#8217;s   Degree   in<br \/>\n      any   discipline   and   fulfilling   other<br \/>\n      prescribed conditions shall be eligible to<br \/>\n      compete   for   appointment   to   the   post   of<br \/>\n      Assistant Deputy Registrar.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_5\">4.    Respondent   No.1,   who   was   an   employee   of   the <\/p>\n<p>University, made applications both for the posts of <\/p>\n<p>Deputy   Registrar   and   Assistant   Registrar.     The <\/p>\n<p>Selection   Committee,   constituted   for   the   purpose, <\/p>\n<p>on   a   consideration   of   the   merit,   suitability, <\/p>\n<p>academic   qualification,   experience   and   performance <\/p>\n<p>of   the   candidates   in   the   interview   prepared   a <\/p>\n<p>select   list   on   May   26,   1996   in   which   respondent <\/p>\n<p>No.1 was placed at rank XIII.  Respondents 4 and 5 <\/p>\n<p>were   placed   in   the   select   list   at   ranks   IV   and   V <\/p>\n<p>respectively.     On   the   basis   of   the   select   list, <\/p>\n<p>prepared   by   the   Selection   Committee,   respondent <\/p>\n<p>Nos.   4   and   5   were   appointed   as   Assistant <\/p>\n<p>Registrars.  About two years later, respondent No.1 <\/p>\n<p>filed   a   Writ   Petition   (Writ   Petition   No.1094   of <\/p>\n<p>1998) seeking to challenge the appointments made in <\/p>\n<p>pursuance   of   the   advertisement   and   claiming   that <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">                                4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>persons inferior to him in qualification and merit <\/p>\n<p>were appointed on the two posts.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">5.    The   Writ   Petition   was   opposed   by   the <\/p>\n<p>University.     The   University   took   the   stand   that <\/p>\n<p>under   the   University   statute   the   eligibility   for <\/p>\n<p>appointment   as   Assistant   Registrar   for   an   in-<\/p>\n<p>service   employee   was   that   he   should   either   be   a <\/p>\n<p>Section Officer or P.A.-cum-Stenographer and hold a <\/p>\n<p>Bachelor&#8217;s   degree   in   any   discipline.     It   was <\/p>\n<p>pointed   out   that   respondent   No.1   was   neither   a <\/p>\n<p>Section   Officer   nor   a   P.A.-cum-Steno.     He   was <\/p>\n<p>working only as Head Assistant which post was one <\/p>\n<p>step   lower   to   the   post   of   Section   Officer   in   the <\/p>\n<p>University.     It   was,   accordingly,   submitted   that <\/p>\n<p>respondent   No.1   was   ineligible   for   appointment   to <\/p>\n<p>the   post   of   Assistant   Registrar.     It   was   further <\/p>\n<p>pointed   out   that   respondent   No.1   had   only   54.03% <\/p>\n<p>marks   in   the   post-graduation   degree   and   for   that <\/p>\n<p>reason too he was not eligible.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">6.    On   a   consideration   of   all   the   material   facts <\/p>\n<p>and circumstances, a single Judge of the High Court <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">                               5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>dismissed   the   Writ   Petition   by   judgment   and   order <\/p>\n<p>dated May 31, 2001.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">7.    Against   the   judgment   passed   by   the   single <\/p>\n<p>Judge, respondent no.1 filed an intra-court appeal <\/p>\n<p>(LPASW   No.202\/2001)   which   was   allowed   by   the <\/p>\n<p>judgment   and   order   dated   April   24,   2009   by   the <\/p>\n<p>Division Bench.   The Division Bench found and held <\/p>\n<p>that   respondent   No.1   was   not   eligible   to   be <\/p>\n<p>considered   for   the   post   of   Deputy   Registrar   and, <\/p>\n<p>hence,   rejected   his   case   in   so   far   that   post   is <\/p>\n<p>concerned.     Coming,   however,   to   the   post   of <\/p>\n<p>Assistant   Registrar,   the   Division   Bench   took   the <\/p>\n<p>view that Selection Committee had not assigned any <\/p>\n<p>reason   for   putting   respondent   nos.   4   and   5   above <\/p>\n<p>respondent   No.1   in   the   select   list.     It   seems   to <\/p>\n<p>have   called   for   the   documents   relating   to   the <\/p>\n<p>selection process and, making its own assessment on <\/p>\n<p>going   through   the   records,   made   the   impugned <\/p>\n<p>direction.     In   this   regard,   the   Division   Bench <\/p>\n<p>stated as follows:-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_4\">                                 6<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_2\"><p>           &#8220;In   the   background   of   what   we   have<br \/>\n      stated,   i.e.   the   appellant   was   entitled,<br \/>\n      in   terms   of   the   notice,   to   be   considered<br \/>\n      for   appointment   as   Assistant   Registrar<br \/>\n      since   he   was   holder   of   Bachelors   Degree<br \/>\n      and   an   in-service   employee   of   the<br \/>\n      University,   the   appellant   was   entitled   to<br \/>\n      compete   for   the   post   of   Assistant<br \/>\n      Registrar.     The   only   thing   that   was<br \/>\n      required   to   be   seen   was   whether   the<br \/>\n      selection   committee   assessed   the   merit   of<br \/>\n      the appellant higher than respondent Nos.4<br \/>\n      and   5.     We,   accordingly,   called   for   the<br \/>\n      records and the same were produced, which<br \/>\n      only   suggested   preparation   of   a   select<br \/>\n      list   where   the   position   of   the   appellant<br \/>\n      is   below   the   respondents   4   and   5.     No<br \/>\n      material   has   been   produced   before   us   to<br \/>\n      show   that   it   is   the   selection   committee<br \/>\n      which   upon   assessment   of   merit   of   the<br \/>\n      appellant   and   respondent   Nos.   4   and   5,<br \/>\n      found   appellant   was   less   meritorious   than<br \/>\n      the respondent Nos. 4 and 5.  We wanted to<br \/>\n      know whether, apart from the select list,<br \/>\n      is   there   any   other   record   which   would<br \/>\n      suggest   assessment   of   such   merit.     There<br \/>\n      answer   to   our   query   was   a   clear   no.     In<br \/>\n      the   circumstances,   the   logical   conclusion<br \/>\n      would be that there is nothing to suggest<br \/>\n      that   the   merit   of   the   appellant   was<br \/>\n      assessed   less   better   than   the   respondent<br \/>\n      Nos. 4 and 5.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_10\">8.    It   appears   to   us   that   the   Division   Bench <\/p>\n<p>followed a procedure for which there is no sanction <\/p>\n<p>in   law.     In   the   first   place   the   Division   Bench <\/p>\n<p>overlooked   that   according   to   the   statutory <\/p>\n<p>eligibility   criterion   only   a   Section   Officer   or   a <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_5\">                              7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>P.A.-cum-Stenographer was eligible to be considered <\/p>\n<p>for   appointment   as   Assistant   Registrar   and <\/p>\n<p>respondent   No.1   was   a   Head   Assistant.     Moreover, <\/p>\n<p>the Division Bench was in error in sitting over the <\/p>\n<p>select list prepared by the Selection Committee as <\/p>\n<p>an Appellate Authority and re-arranging the select <\/p>\n<p>list   prepared   by   a   Committee   of   experts   on   the <\/p>\n<p>basis   of   its   own   valuation.     The   Division   Bench <\/p>\n<p>seems to have overlooked that while respondent Nos. <\/p>\n<p>4 and 5 were at ranks IV and V in the select list, <\/p>\n<p>respondent No.1 was at rank XIII and by brining him <\/p>\n<p>at par with respondent nos. 4 and 5, the Division <\/p>\n<p>Bench   clearly   ignored   the   claims   of   the   seven <\/p>\n<p>candidates who figured in between from rank VI to <\/p>\n<p>XII and who were above respondent No.1.  <\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">9.    On hearing counsel for the parties and on going <\/p>\n<p>through   the   materials   on   record,   we   are   satisfied <\/p>\n<p>that   the   impugned   order   passed   by   the   Division <\/p>\n<p>Bench is wholly unsustainable.  It is, accordingly, <\/p>\n<p>set aside.  The appeal is allowed but with no order <\/p>\n<p>as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_6\">                  8<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">                       &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;J.<br \/>\n                       (Aftab Alam)<\/p>\n<p>                       &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;J.<br \/>\n                       (R.M. Lodha)<br \/>\nNew Delhi;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">April 8, 2011.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of India University Of Jammu vs T.S.Khan &amp; Ors on 8 April, 2011 Author: A Alam Bench: Aftab Alam, R.M. Lodha 1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3137 OF 2011 [ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.18128 OF 2009] University of Jammu &#8230; Appellant Versus T.S. Khan [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-248636","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supreme-court-of-india"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>University Of Jammu vs T.S.Khan &amp; Ors on 8 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"University Of Jammu vs T.S.Khan &amp; Ors on 8 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-04-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-24T20:29:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"University Of Jammu vs T.S.Khan &amp; Ors on 8 April, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-24T20:29:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1137,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court of India\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011\",\"name\":\"University Of Jammu vs T.S.Khan &amp; Ors on 8 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-24T20:29:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"University Of Jammu vs T.S.Khan &amp; Ors on 8 April, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"University Of Jammu vs T.S.Khan &amp; Ors on 8 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"University Of Jammu vs T.S.Khan &amp; Ors on 8 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-04-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-24T20:29:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"University Of Jammu vs T.S.Khan &amp; Ors on 8 April, 2011","datePublished":"2011-04-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-24T20:29:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011"},"wordCount":1137,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Supreme Court of India"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011","name":"University Of Jammu vs T.S.Khan &amp; Ors on 8 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-04-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-24T20:29:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/university-of-jammu-vs-t-s-khan-ors-on-8-april-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"University Of Jammu vs T.S.Khan &amp; Ors on 8 April, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248636","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248636"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248636\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248636"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248636"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248636"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}