{"id":249100,"date":"2009-11-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009"},"modified":"2016-12-18T04:33:24","modified_gmt":"2016-12-17T23:03:24","slug":"smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Chandu Hengsu vs Smt Kustu Hengsu on 2 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Chandu Hengsu vs Smt Kustu Hengsu on 2 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H.G.Ramesh<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">R.S.A.25 18 g 2007\n1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDA'rED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF   4' \n\nBEFORE V V _\nTHE HON\"BLE MR.    \nR.S.A.NO.25_1_8zVi_2;Q;(\u00a7_?3j;.' \" AA\nBETWEEN: V  \n\nSmt. Chandu Hengsu\n\nAdult  ,\n\nD\/0. late Kuppa Poojary _  \u00ab\n\nJadkalvillage   '\n\nKundapuraTa1u1g--.\u00ab&amp;   V    \nUdupiDistrict--%\"376\u00a72'Q1 _     \"   APPELLANT\n\n{By Sri;:SAV\u00a7if1'\u00e9.;:aat'V ':'\\r\u00bb1'2m:V('\u00a7 -Sizetiy. Adv.)\nAND: ' 4 ' M ' '\n\n1. \ufb01iustu Eieng$'LV1 \n  \/0. Iate\ufb01uppa Poojary\n\nAd\ufb01lt\n\nV' \"  *   sri Sadhu\n\n= ._ _,Adu1t\n\n  VA  Smt. Devaki\n\nAdult\n\n\u00ab 6. Smt\". Jaya\n\nAd ult.\n\n\n\nR.S.A.25l8;f2007\n\n7. Sri Mani\nAdult\n\nR-2 to Rm'? are the\n\nChildren of R-1 herein\n\nAnd are r\/a. Shelkodu _'\nJ arnbradimane, Jadkal Vi11age:'&amp;A'Poei'.' \nKundapurTaluk   7\nUdupi District - 5\"?'6 201\n\n8. Sanju\nAdult\n9. Susheela\nAdult.\n10. Girija      \nAdult     \n1 1. Sgaroja. 1 ll \nAdltilil\n12. Ravili\nAdult\".\n\n_  Rm--\u00a3iCi:&lt;i &quot;R.-l2 herein are\n_  ..the_ehildren_ oi&#039;Chandu Hengsu\n\n i[e\u00bb..,l&#039;ap&#039;pell.ar1t herein and all of\n\nA &quot;&#039;Vi:hem-a;-*eA&#039;1=&#039;\/0. Selkodu Ofdadkal Village\n\n*~.__Ku_ndapjIur Taluk &amp; &#039;\nUxdlupi District -- 576 201  RESPONDENTS\n\n. &quot; ._&amp;[Byl&#039;&quot;lSri. H. Jayakar Sheity. Adv. for R1 to R-7\n* ._ Ml.-2-8 to R42 served]\n\nThis appeal is filed u\/55.100 of CPC against the\n\n0 &quot; jiidgment and decree clt&#039;.d.2.4.2007 passed in RA. No.57\/2002\n0. &#039; on the file of the Civil Judge. (Sr. Dn.}, Kundapura. allowing\n\nthe appeal and setting aside the judgment and decree dtd\n04.03.2002 passed in C).S.l\\i0.i59\/I987 on the file of the Pr].\nCivil Judge (Jr. Dry}. Kundapura.\n\n\n\nR.S.A.2518\u00bb\/A2007\n3\n\nThis appeal coming on for Admission, this day-,&#039;--.__the\nCourt delivered the following: i &quot;\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">This second appeal by themMplaint.iff&#8221;=isf_\u00bbdiieeetedu  it<\/p>\n<p>against the judgment and decree vzdatwl <\/p>\n<p>by the Lower Appellate C(3UI&#8217;iT:t&#8217;V1&#8242;&#8221;i&#8217;\u00a53.. Court\ufb01of.&#8217;CVi.yi1..J1_13dge  L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>(Sr.i)n.), Kundapura, in theApapupeai&#8221;.._in i5{.Pi..NA0.f:57\/2002<br \/>\nwhich was filed by defen&#8217;d&#8211;a.nt_  the impugned<\/p>\n<p>judgment, the 1_._\u00a7jw__er   reversed the<\/p>\n<p>judgment it    in the suit in<br \/>\n&#8220;dismissed the suit of the<\/p>\n<p>appeliaiatp1sin\u00a5riff&#8217;fi1ed&#8217; for partition claiming 1\/15 share<\/p>\n<p> in the  pieperties.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">  heard the learned Counsel for the<\/p>\n<p> _ appe&#8217;I&#8217;iant&#8221;\u00e91nd perused the judgments of the two Courts<\/p>\n<p>k V&#8217; &#8216; &#8211;  loeiow.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">&#8216;    The plaintiff and defendant No.1 are sisters. It<\/p>\n<p>it is not in dispute that occupancy right relating to the suit<\/p>\n<p>dd properties  granted in their fathermiiuppa Poojary who<\/p>\n<p>\\ it,<br \/>\nii; 3\/<\/p>\n<p>R.S.A.251_8g2007<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>died in the year 1985. It is the ease of defendant No.1<\/p>\n<p>that her father had executed a Will&#8211;Ex.D.22 dated<\/p>\n<p>12.4.1983 and was registzered in the office of <\/p>\n<p>Registrar. Byndoor; by the said Will his  <\/p>\n<p>bequeathed all the suit properties :&#8217;;1i&#8221;h&#8217;er.     <\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">4. The Lower Appellate.Courtn.oh&#8211;._a rega.ppreeia;t.lo&#8217;nd&#8217;V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>of the evidence on record has  that  of<br \/>\nthe trial Court. was    thlatuvvthe suit<\/p>\n<p>properties j\u00e9ieduiredldloroperties of the father-<br \/>\nKuppa Foojary  Registered Will~Ex..D.22<\/p>\n<p>executed by him was dulgz proved. In this Context, it is<\/p>\n<p> relexr\u00e9int  to following observations made by<\/p>\n<p> Court at paras 31 81 32 of its<\/p>\n<p>A l .jucigi\ufb01ner1*:i&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>3 H  As stated supra, Ex.D.22 is :1 registered<br \/>\ndd  No doubt, Will is not compulsorily<br \/>\n registerable. The overleqfqfpage No.1 0fEx.D.22<br \/>\nclearly goes to Show that Kappa Poojary<br \/>\nappeared before the Sub Registrar Office,<br \/>\nI:3_z;r1dorr and I-7u,.=.;&#8217;3 arzci lf)u_.=..2 have identified said<\/p>\n<p>E3 \/<br \/>\n,<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">1<\/span><\/p>\n<p>R.S.A.2518[20{)7<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Bgndorr and. Pw.3 and Du\u00bb? have identified_said4&#8217;i:&#8221;&#8216;V;~<br \/>\nKuppa Poojarg before the Sub Registrar,  H<\/p>\n<p>and accordingly, the Sub Registrar   <\/p>\n<p>obtained LTM of said Kilppw po\u00a3g;:rga:Vz&#8217;d___ <\/p>\n<p>registered the Will. Therefore, i\u00a3A.is&#8217;v&#8211;clear.tE1avt the&#8217;:  l<br \/>\ndefendant Na} has lesutoblishedhl athe <\/p>\n<p>execution of the Will,\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">32. According&#8217; to  plairttijf. -there is a<br \/>\nsuspicious e&#8217;ireu:7&#8217;Lf;iai&#8217;ice, &#8216;sihce  Poqjarg<\/p>\n<p>has disinherited hils iahothjervldauglhter, plaint\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>anri&#8221;hi.s&#8217;iu\u00a7{:;,Fe  &#8216;l3ut in page No.1 of<br \/>\nsaid Will:  22, Kuppa Poqjary<br \/>\nhas lCle_larly  his daughter Chandu<br \/>\nIffoojarg  separate house and agricultural<\/p>\n<p> and hefftriancial condition is also good<\/p>\n<p>V-itTaad\ufb02tlierefore. he is bequeathing all his<\/p>\n<p>H  his another daughter Krishni<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&#8221;f\u00ab&#8217;o(yari=t&#8217;l&#8217;ig, Since Krtshni Poojarthg was residing<\/p>\n<p>g wilthdhim and she was looking after him and his<\/p>\n<p>   Kappa Pocgjarg has also stated in page<\/p>\n<p>No.2 of Ex.D.22 that he is aged about 80 years<br \/>\nand his wife Sheshi Poojarthi is also aged one<br \/>\nand Krishni Poqiarthi, defendant No.1, should<br \/>\nlook after their welfare and health.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">1<\/span><br \/>\ngig<br \/>\n\/<\/p>\n<p>R.S.A.25 18[2007<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_4\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">5. I find no error in the I&#8217;\u20ac&#8221;appF\u20acCi8J;\u00a70&#8217;11&#8242;[Qfl<\/p>\n<p>evidence made by the Lower Appellate     <\/p>\n<p>opinion, no substantial questian Zof\ufb02lawh&#8217; &#8230;aris&#8217;e&#8217;s,_ for.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>determination in this see0r1d&lt;appea1.&quot;  grer.u&#039;f:{_i,t4_Q aclirnvit <\/p>\n<p>the appeal. The appeal is a1c:&lt;:opd&quot;ip_gly  V}<\/p>\n<p>Appeal     Sd\/_<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Chandu Hengsu vs Smt Kustu Hengsu on 2 November, 2009 Author: H.G.Ramesh R.S.A.25 18 g 2007 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DA&#8217;rED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF 4&#8242; BEFORE V V _ THE HON&#8221;BLE MR. R.S.A.NO.25_1_8zVi_2;Q;(\u00a7_?3j;.&#8217; &#8221; AA BETWEEN: V Smt. Chandu Hengsu Adult , D\/0. late Kuppa [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-249100","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Chandu Hengsu vs Smt Kustu Hengsu on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Chandu Hengsu vs Smt Kustu Hengsu on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-17T23:03:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Chandu Hengsu vs Smt Kustu Hengsu on 2 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-17T23:03:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":557,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Chandu Hengsu vs Smt Kustu Hengsu on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-17T23:03:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Chandu Hengsu vs Smt Kustu Hengsu on 2 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Chandu Hengsu vs Smt Kustu Hengsu on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Chandu Hengsu vs Smt Kustu Hengsu on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-17T23:03:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Chandu Hengsu vs Smt Kustu Hengsu on 2 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-17T23:03:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009"},"wordCount":557,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009","name":"Smt Chandu Hengsu vs Smt Kustu Hengsu on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-17T23:03:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chandu-hengsu-vs-smt-kustu-hengsu-on-2-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Chandu Hengsu vs Smt Kustu Hengsu on 2 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249100","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=249100"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249100\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=249100"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=249100"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=249100"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}