{"id":249137,"date":"2009-04-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009"},"modified":"2018-06-04T08:25:06","modified_gmt":"2018-06-04T02:55:06","slug":"sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sindhu Bernard vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sindhu Bernard vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2009<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 3646 of 2007(H)\n\n\n1. SINDHU BERNARD,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE ADDITIONAL LAW SECRETARY TO\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K)\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON\n\n Dated :01\/04\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n              P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.\n             ------------------------------------------\n                   W.P.(C) No.3646 OF 2007\n              -----------------------------------------\n             Dated this the 1st day of April, 2009.\n\n\n                         J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">     The prayer of the petitioner is for directing the first<\/p>\n<p>respondent to issue &#8216;Certificate of Registration&#8217; to her     as a<\/p>\n<p>Notary under Rule 8(4) of the Notaries Rules, 1956; pursuant to<\/p>\n<p>completion of all formalities in response to her application for<\/p>\n<p>appointment as Notary and remittance of the fees as prescribed.<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner also relies on Exhibits P3, P5 and P6 proceedings<\/p>\n<p>issued by the concerned authority under the Law Department<\/p>\n<p>asking the petitioner to appear for a hearing and to produce the<\/p>\n<p>relevant records for verification as per the Notaries Rules.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">     2.   The second respondent has filed a counter affidavit<\/p>\n<p>stating that the entry with regard to the name of the petitioner in<\/p>\n<p>the Notarial Register was only a mistake, as no appointment<\/p>\n<p>could have been given to the petitioner since it exceeded the<\/p>\n<p>sanctioned strength.      According to the second respondent,<\/p>\n<p>necessary inspection was conducted by the Law Department<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">W.P.(C) No.3646\/07               2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>pursuant to the application made by the petitioner to ascertain<\/p>\n<p>the infrastructure and such other credentials of the petitioner,<\/p>\n<p>also calling for a report from the Bar Council. There is no case<\/p>\n<p>for the second respondent that the petitioner is not a fit person<\/p>\n<p>or not a suitable person to be appointed as a Notary. On the<\/p>\n<p>other hand, the only case projected in the counter affidavit is that<\/p>\n<p>there was &#8220;no vacancy&#8221; to accommodate the petitioner in respect<\/p>\n<p>of the concerned area\/Revenue District\/District (as applied for).<\/p>\n<p>It is also pointed out that the competent authority, after the local<\/p>\n<p>inspection and enquiry, had submitted a report\/recommendation<\/p>\n<p>to the Government stating that no vacancy was available to<\/p>\n<p>accommodate the petitioner (paragraph 2). The said statement<\/p>\n<p>rather appears to be a paradox, in so far as the absence of<\/p>\n<p>vacancy was very much known to the Law Department, and if it<\/p>\n<p>be so, what prompted the Department to inspect the office of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner and to ascertain the availability         of necessary<\/p>\n<p>infrastructure, simultaneously calling for a report from the Bar<\/p>\n<p>Council, remains to be a matter of mystery.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">       3. It has been stated in paragraph 4 of the counter affidavit<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">W.P.(C) No.3646\/07                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>that, pursuant to the amendment of the relevant rules (Sub Rule<\/p>\n<p>(4A) inserted in Rule 8 of the Notaries Rules 1956), the<\/p>\n<p>maximum ceiling as to the permissible number of Notaries was<\/p>\n<p>specified in the schedule as &#8216;375&#8217;, as stated in paragraph 5 of the<\/p>\n<p>counter affidavit. Learned Government Pleader points out that<\/p>\n<p>the said number has now gone up to &#8216;563&#8217; by virtue of the<\/p>\n<p>amendment         of  the  schedule (as  per   amendment     dated<\/p>\n<p>19.05.2006). Placing reliance on the above position, particularly<\/p>\n<p>as to the absence of vacancy, it is asserted by the learned<\/p>\n<p>Government Pleader that no interference is possible since the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner does not have any vested right to be appointed as a<\/p>\n<p>Notary.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">       4.    It is relevant to note that there is no case for the<\/p>\n<p>respondents that the petitioner is not a fit or suitable person to<\/p>\n<p>be appointed as a Notary or that she is disqualified in any<\/p>\n<p>manner.        As pointed out, the concerned authority also had<\/p>\n<p>submitted a report before the Government stating that no<\/p>\n<p>appointment could be effected due to &#8216;lack of vacancy&#8217;.       But,<\/p>\n<p>since the specific case of the Government is that the petitioner<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">W.P.(C) No.3646\/07                4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>could not be accommodated for want of vacancy, it has<\/p>\n<p>necessarily to be inferred that nobody else has been appointed by<\/p>\n<p>the Government as Notary in the particular area in respect of<\/p>\n<p>which the petitioner had put forth a claim. Learned counsel for<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court that steps were<\/p>\n<p>being pursued by the respondents to effect appointment of<\/p>\n<p>Notaries       contrary to the rules and norms as highlighted in<\/p>\n<p>Exhibit P7 news paper report. The first respondent has filed a<\/p>\n<p>counter affidavit\/ additional affidavit dated 17.12.2007 in<\/p>\n<p>I.A.No.375\/2007,       where   it has   been    asserted  that   the<\/p>\n<p>Government has no proposal at all to appoint &#8216;240&#8217; Notaries as<\/p>\n<p>alleged and that the averments\/allegations in the above news<\/p>\n<p>paper report did absolutely have no basis at all. In view of the<\/p>\n<p>categoric assertion in the above affidavits, the Court is made to<\/p>\n<p>believe that no appointment of Notary has been effected by the<\/p>\n<p>Government in respect of the area in question.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">       5.     In the above circumstances, it is hereby declared that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner does not have any vested right to be issued the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Certificate of Registration&#8217; merely for having entered her name in<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">W.P.(C) No.3646\/07                 5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the Notarial Register by way of mistake, when there was no<\/p>\n<p>vacancy as per the Rules. However, it is made clear that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner will be entitled to be appointed as a Notary in the<\/p>\n<p>particular area, if the Government has appointed anybody else,<\/p>\n<p>whose application is subsequent to the application preferred by<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner, as a Notary in the said area. This aspect as to the<\/p>\n<p>eligibility shall be considered by the first respondent and<\/p>\n<p>necessary orders shall be passed in this regard within a period of<\/p>\n<p>three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment,<\/p>\n<p>after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.      The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the first<\/p>\n<p>respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">       This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">                                  P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON<br \/>\n                                             JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>smp<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_4\">W.P.(C) No.3646\/07     6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                      P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">\n<p>                      W.P.(C) No. 3646 OF 2007<\/p>\n<p>                            J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n<p>                             01.04.2009<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Sindhu Bernard vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 3646 of 2007(H) 1. SINDHU BERNARD, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE ADDITIONAL LAW SECRETARY TO For Petitioner :SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER The Hon&#8217;ble MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-249137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sindhu Bernard vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sindhu Bernard vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-04T02:55:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sindhu Bernard vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-04T02:55:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":918,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Sindhu Bernard vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-04T02:55:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sindhu Bernard vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sindhu Bernard vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sindhu Bernard vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-04T02:55:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sindhu Bernard vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-04T02:55:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009"},"wordCount":918,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009","name":"Sindhu Bernard vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-04T02:55:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-bernard-vs-state-of-kerala-on-1-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sindhu Bernard vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=249137"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249137\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=249137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=249137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=249137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}