{"id":249200,"date":"2009-01-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009"},"modified":"2014-04-21T01:10:41","modified_gmt":"2014-04-20T19:40:41","slug":"shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shubhangini W\/O Rangarao Patil vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Shubhangini W\/O Rangarao Patil vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN THE HIGH CCSURT OF KARVATAKA\n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARXVAD\n\nDated' this the 13\" Day afFebrtzar:y, 2009  \n\nBefore\n\nma HQWBLE we JUSHCE fIL?LiE;:'A\u00a5*:4}_)3'A~ 6 ie\u00e9ss\ufb01\u00e9szf \n\nCriminai Appeai 91612902 cit? Lff5i'r::.:na: izeuigsca P2{ii:\u00a3a\u00a7:.\u00ab--. .1185 I %\n2so2'e1'\u00ab. *. '\u00abTj; I\n\nBetween:\n\nIn Cri.A 9i6!{}2:\n\n1 Sm\u00bb: shabhmxg\ufb01xaise 1\"~2k;1:\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7g'a;;:'a::*;::;:a;\ufb01i;\u00ab~:',L' V\" \" V'\n\n36 yrs, Hous\u00a2h0\u00a7\u00a7IWo:'k\u00a7 4Rfo1\u00a7s\u00a3'1ada;_)&r_ \"\nc1;;1.;;:ec1i;:'q,;*sg1gau':;\u00a7isg:i_c1w...V   '\n\n2 S3.n%\u00a7eep_ Sf\u00a7Av1{anga1;3\u00a3\u00a5 Pat,i\u00a7,\" -29 3:13'\nSmci\u00e9-nt of: we at)  \" ' \nRf\ufb01 Ex-=i'a::_1a:ipur, \u20ac.hikk{\u00bbii gfg, iiialgamn\n\n{By Sri Eaistaljeali D m:s2=.{3de,  Curiae)\n\nS3;a.t\u00e9V<.s,fE   2 _ V  ',.\n\n'   (By S:~;._\u00e9 H e\ufb01tggm GP)\n\n" "   ';;{<:.~;~z.;R_;4\u00a7* 1203:2902:\n    Rae \ufb01aheb Paiil, 33 yrs\n.  . " ;\u00bb\u00a7g'ic;uiti1rist, R233 Mamdagur\n_ _' \u20ac\u00a7\u00b0i}za1\u00a7}\u00e9i "fig, Beigauzn Sisiric\ufb01\n\nA A"  {By Sri. A3593; R Eiaiyarz Show my-.}\n\nM"\n{J\n.\n<\/pre>\n
Appsiiams<\/p>\n
?sii\u00a3im”:sr<\/p>\n
  .;s’.:\u00e9\u00e9}4  Mr’.\n<\/p>\n
And:\n<\/p>\n
1 Smt Simbhangini W\/0 Rangarao Pat\ufb01
\n40 yrs<\/p>\n
2 Sri Sandeep Rangarac Patii<\/p>\n
Bath are rfa) Maznadapur, Chikod\u00e9 Tq
\nBelgaum District  <\/p>\n
3 State of Karnataka — by SP}? ” ‘-\u00ab \ufb01e-\u00a7po5;1en:s
\n{By Sri P H Gotid\ufb01ndi, GP for ._ .  V V ~ A H
\nsn Y Laxmikmh Redd; Adv’ my R3} =   <\/p>\n
T116 (3:imi21al\u00a7;?;pg:t.:a?\u00a7s filed;um:ler”S.3’7zi'{21_j{3r.PC praying to set
\naside the cenx\u00e9ction and 5$\u00e9_z_1\u00a3er:c\u00a2’ da-tgd ?,_8.5;30U2 by the Add}. Sessions
\nJudge, Belgaum \u00a331 SC52152! I998 “&:f1z*3Aac\u20acg1;ii the: ‘appeilants cf the charges
\nleveled against them,  37   ” , <\/p>\n
The Revis\u00e9nn pe\u00a3\u00a7tig)Ii’vis ‘\ufb011\u00e9\u20ac\u00a7…_p1″3.iyix;g to medify the judgment cf
\nconvictior: and girder’ of Vse:”:it\u00bb’;ni:5:_ ii2\u00a5\u00a7et\u00a7_. 28.5.2002 by the si\u00e9di. Sessions
\nLfudge, Belgaum 5;; Sc z\u00e9msx-93. _  ‘<\/p>\n
 Ssimiz\ufb01i  3:152:11; Ravisien Pe\ufb01tion coming 01: fer Fina}<\/p>\n
_E3T.$&a;’i:1gv\u00bb\u00a3{-iis \u00a7.*i_2ijy, the C\u00a2\u00a71;i\u00a3’\u00a7\u00ab\u20ac1\u00a7_i_i_3Z’r;’!’\u20acd {he foliowing:<\/p>\n
J\u00a33’DG\ufb01\u00bbIENT<\/p>\n
\ufb01g\ufb01aai is  tie accusa\u00e9 chaiienging the ordar af cazwiction an\u00e9<\/p>\n
-. .T’_j:..3,e1′:i&’::1zc;e ;3as”:\u00bbVe;\u00ab::iA’i~b}; the Eiast Track Judge, Beigaum in SC 26.151998 an<\/p>\n
 iii: acmvic\u00e9\u00e9ng an\u00e9 seniensiztg the amused far the affmce under<\/p>\n
xv<\/p>\n
{U<\/p>\n
Revision peti\ufb01ian is filed by the complainant questioning the legality
\nof the sentence bo\u00e9iing dawn from $382, IPC<\/a> ta S394 E H30 in stead af<\/p>\n
conviciing the aceuse\u00e9 fer the effence under S382, <\/p>\n
These two mauers have been taken 11;; together far \u20ac\u00a7i3\u00a72Q\u00a7a:2’__”i:\u00e9j&T  <\/p>\n
common arder.\n<\/p>\n
The deceased Rae Saheb Patil is 3 reszidentpf  u u<\/p>\n
having \ufb01ve sons Gut af which cm: of {he 30:1  <\/p>\n
Atmaram Patii and tw-‘9 of his sons viz.’, _\u00a7}i1i.p an\u00e9 ..;1:si\u00a7}i1:g _ 4<\/p>\n
at Gatragut\ufb01Viliag\ufb01iiancf:f\u00a7ii\u00a7p1i:;1j”‘\\:’i\ufb01\u00e9g\u00e9”re\u00e9fsectiv\ufb01iy. R30 Saheb had
\newne\u00e9 3.Q\ufb01 ‘a;;r\u00e9s”_of’ who are the sons of Rae Saheb<\/p>\n
Patil had \u00a7a1\u00b0tit:i:<S:1r; ciithe'V:f'2:1;ni\u00a3;\u00bb;f  among themsehzes \ufb02zereby each {If<\/p>\n
..~  __ganms {if i+333d___an;i far more than 29-12 years a\ufb01er partition,<\/p>\n
V"..*\u00a71a3s;Wer\u00a2 asgliixza\u00e9igigvtheir raspezctiva shares. iiawever, the Ian\u00e9s Wam stiil<\/p>\n
sm\u00a71ai\u00a7ig.,in i\u00a7}:ef::;me;Ce\u00a3 Rae Sahcb Patil. (311 19.5.1993 araiin\u00e9 ms 13.111.<\/p>\n
 Z   the sons of Rat: Sahab E'&\u00a3iI and R30 Sakai: Patii waste<\/p>\n
. ., ., ,  \ufb01i\u00e9isteps in front sf  B31136 fallen to the sham sf Ashaii Patil.<\/p>\n
 "i.'F1v.a1I\u00b0tEz:3:1a, IS: azccused mine mere and aske\u00e9 Ran Sahel) to get her name<\/p>\n
–. ‘?\u20ac:ass’ee;:4\u00a2\u20aci in the revenue resents pursuant to the gzartitican \ufb02zat has taken gaiace<\/p>\n
  “long back for which Rae Saheb replied that he weuid get the mine ef 2133<\/p>\n
Ex?\u00bb<\/p>\n
grand sons L6,, tiw sons of 1″ accused registered for which she insisted that<\/p>\n
the Ian\u00e9 should be mutated in her name in the revenue awards. when i: was<\/p>\n
refused, the is’ accused went inside. the house, hmught a stick anai_.s:3s\u00a72ii2.}_t\u00e9:{1<\/p>\n
an the lei’: side heaci of Rae Sahab Paul On receiving the b\u00a3;;t%\u00a7_;\u00ab..]\u00a7{\u00e9:i3’V–.S}3\u00a7’t%’.  .<\/p>\n
fe\ufb01 down anti according in the prosecution wrsigrgn, thereafi\u00e9r 1’aVnd__ ”<\/p>\n
2 kicked Raw Saheb an his chest and sioma\u00e9h, 3,5321%:  ‘S\u00e93V;\u00a7i*33’Z!”‘\u00a7’:l’&1f{\u20ac’i\u00a7jV–“‘<\/p>\n
crying to save him, at that tima CW  {Q6 a\ufb01\u00e9EA.{_fS\u00a7? 16 [c\u00e9\ufb01ng  jiand\u00e9
\nseparated the accuseci fmm the cieceased;v;VL’L’vvTfher;eaftef ‘1.5’;”an;1 2”: accused
\nwent away holding the stick.  sahetiiw1;g\u00a7:.\u00e9;;s\u00a7:s:gined bz\u00e9e\u00e9mg injury<\/p>\n
can :11: head and also an the tight s\ufb01q\ufb01i\ufb01ler  was shifted in a<\/p>\n
Trax ta P:ima1’yTvE{:;a\u00a3’:h   ‘A\u00a7'<kai'3"'a:;dV: Eater shi\ufb01ed to Nippani for
\nweaimant ashe ms  treatment amund .1 L66 pm. an<\/p>\n
the sarne: day, 51:95  1\u00a7e_\u00a7%2Va:s%_"\\.'Lshifted to Kolhapur as he was more<\/p>\n
'.s2rious.ti1\u00a7s reg\u00e9a\ufb01. \u00a7;az12p\u00a7ai;1t was aim kzdge\u00e9 which came to be<\/p>\n
 'zf\u00ab'f.*g".'st=':~,:*.:&*_,,{'i 1313:'  Nc:.65fi998 at Sadalaga Feiice Statien. After<\/p>\n
inv\u00e9stig\u00e9itigzix;"\u00e9fi;zxge .'\u00a7i'a\u00e9et was filed. Charges were fram\ufb01d against the<\/p>\n
V \u00b0 ewcusedyfer th\ufb01i {:1'"i\u20ac'\u00e9\u00a7hce under 3.392, 324, 323, sad, r\ufb01w 3.34, we During<\/p>\n
.4 " "  abs: Lptvsec\ufb01tion examine\u00e9 in 3.2.2 seventeen Witnesses 331$ gm marked<\/p>\n
 93%? documents, M Os 1 $5 2 and znateriai coniraciictions gvere gm:<\/p>\n
  at E3131\u00bb-D5. Compiaini was registered first far ?he e\ufb01bnce under<\/p>\n
  -$324, 323, 311$ 1384 later, after {he regart af deaih at the hosgital, c\ufb01ence<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
under 3.3132, IPC<\/a> was added. Afiar trial, accused were examined undar<\/p>\n
3,333, Cr.PC<\/a>‘: and thair defense was tetal denial. Tnlai court a\ufb01er <\/p>\n
both sides, held the: the accused cornmitted the a\ufb01\u00e9nce under A’<\/p>\n
and gave the bene\ufb01t of set off for the pexio\ufb01 {pf deteniion  ‘<\/p>\n
sentenced to undergo rigomus imprisonment frgvra \u00a7r\u00a2j1iGd.'{>f \ufb01issfz.  :’a<.;h." <\/p>\n
Awieved by the sai\u00e9 0\u00a3'd6}' af cunvietion and':sen'\u00a3}\u00a2nc\u00e9, 3\u00e9$E'vlI\u00a7\u20ac.'i1 \u00a3:tIT$V E$\u00e9'f;\u20ac);\u00a7A\u00e9\u00bbT.:<\/p>\n
this Court in appeal. _  _ 2
\nIn the revision \ufb02ied, comp1ahza11tVL\u00a7~\u00a3a\u00a3iz;g t\u00a71at"ti:::\u00ab_VV;\u00a7c<.i;:1se\u00a7i\u00a7(:ught to<\/p>\n
have lawn zzenvicted un\u00e9er S.3\u00a7 2;"~IPC<\/a> .’\u00e9:i1ci:_\u00a7i\u00a7\u00a7i:..$..1\u00a7\u00a7\u00bbi=.part I1, ’11>’\u00e9 and \u00a3t is<\/p>\n
mi 3 case (if gT93vej1\u00a7tav\ufb01\u00a3\u00a7f;itis\ufb01;’\u00a3I\u00a7e 1*’ ajzkiiiscd went insi\u00e9e anti assaulted
\nwith 3 stick  a Vmewi\ufb01tig\u00e9’ 3J\u00e9&~-iniymtien to mass deatii and as such, it<\/p>\n
was 31@C6S’Sa1’\u00a7,\u00a7}” {)ff’3–I\u00a5.C\u20ac'{ ..-fsb’u.3{1\u00a52, IPC<\/a> and not 9:13 zmdar 3.304 E,<\/p>\n
V ‘QC.  $331.6 s_\u00a7n\u20acer\u00a7<;i\u00e9'iz31\u00a7r.\u00a33se\u00e9 is can {he Eower side. &\u00bb:;a:\u20ac3rdiIig13?\u00bb tits<\/p>\n
'pcft\u00e9iic- z1cr hzzsv seuigh\ufb01ryr anhaneament of sentence.<\/p>\n
" ._ " :':;_riAR",B\u00a7"_{}\u00a2s%ijp:\u00a3\u00a3;de was appearing for ma apmilant. 'I'hereafter, an<\/p>\n
 \u00a7.::ansfe\u00a7""–.af.._:\u00a71\u00e9-afzatteg" from the 9:1,. Eench to \ufb02harward, Sr\u00e9 S I}<\/p>\n
" "  '\ufb01f\u00e9iagnalaaz\ufb01iav\u00e9r was appearing and due to iii-mheaith he couid mt prcsenuie<\/p>\n
 Eki\ufb01giase.  Sri Dhanvade was appointe\u00e9 as \ufb01amicus Curiae to defend the<\/p>\n
 3::;_t3__,*:.\u00a7ed.\n<\/p>\n
9\/<\/p>\n
5934\u00bb<\/p>\n
It is the argument cf the counsel representing the accu5e;*.v.ttta.t’\u00bb\u00a5:11e<\/p>\n
accused are irmecent of the ailegaei offence and the}; have.  _<\/p>\n
impiicated in the case. So far as the ever: act Gf the-.2:”:\u00e9vV;ics::tse\u00a31 far <\/p>\n
cencerned, it is 3 two fald argument ~\u00bb it i}; statgtit _i’:e”‘tti{i4.Atzot’}xaV\u00a2_’ .’<\/p>\n
knowledge of the act and that he ought\u00bbnpt hawt\u00e9 aiedt
\nCourt and as such the triai is vitiatad an\u00e9’V’a.\u00a5%\u00e9\u00bbaccardiii;\u00e9’t. *5   \u00a3116
\ncomplainant is none ether than t\ufb01egye wi\ufb01iestt of t1t\u00e9”de\u20ac\u00a7\u00e9ased and
\nhe has said nothing about the  to  Eitftt and presenceg
\nBut, subsequently, as.a.z@t:att_er of has been included
\nand he has been  t:3\u00a5;e.::H::=VV.l’.’2:s neither participated in
\nthe ct3rnn1issia;2’n”c\u00a3     the death cf the cteceasaci
\nand accordi1tg1_y.,{‘  on reward is net su\ufb01isziemt to<\/p>\n
task! the aceus\u00a2\u00e9VV”gu\u00a7ii;y”v.0t;Vti1\u00a24V(*2\u00a7’ft~\u00e912~:\ufb01%”a\u00a3ti1er under 3.382 01’ 354 II, PC”<\/p>\n
 . “Fqrt;h\u00a2f,V.<;antrcv\u00a2rt\u00a711g the argument 0f the revision petitioner, it is<\/p>\n
s1:bti'1i\u00a3:t\u00e9t"\u00a7__Vt\u00a7t.\u00e9t'  iiitkitaak o\ufb02" the property the sempiainant {H108 again<\/p>\n
V has cotrt\u00e9up  Ie\ufb01sion anti 3 fala\u00e9: case has been foistad against the<\/p>\n
..,  ,\u00e9i:;;i's;tc1Vta1i'\u00a71cstigh there is 1:0 iztvalvsznent of the acause\u00e9 in the cczmxnissien<\/p>\n
et.i11a:)\ufb01l=::2'::e, =<\/p>\n
the 15: accusc\u00e9 and had not gum: H) the spot with any pre meciitafion bu:
\nrather, an the spur of the moment, the incident. has taken place. As such<\/p>\n
rightly the frial court canvicted and sentenced the accused. Aitheugh were<\/p>\n
are same 'vital admissions even by the doctor regarding the caus\u00e9 .\u20ac\u00a7_i'w<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
\ufb01sath and the pessibility of death due to nzpture of veins and    ~<\/p>\n
View ef the specific overt act attribuie\u00e9  21:5   .a\ufb02~  <\/p>\n
materi\u00e9\ufb01 Witnesses and also in\u00e9ependent Wimesgss bewsl\u00e9id <\/p>\n
is’ accused has been falsely irnplicated irithg case’ had ‘there gs:  s_1;\ufb01Vic_.;\u00e9ent
\ncogeni evidence on recerd tr) hold the 3″  gum)’  f’3\u00a3’fE-srvisse under<\/p>\n
3.364 Part II, IPC<\/a>‘. in the circi.:;1;.is’itance\u00a7,$$,  accused has been<\/p>\n
convicted and”s\u00e9n\u00a3ez1\u00a7:;d  ‘\u00a52Iidef’g9&VVitnpris.<_ittiiteni.<\/p>\n
As regzre\ufb01-fiievctgnteznfieri' iinit the 2" accused cmght not have been<\/p>\n
  S\u00a2\u00a7\u00a7s\u00a39;1.s seen? the 2" accuseci is seventeen years cf\n<\/p>\n
 3.g;_6:’a$V V(‘}I’\u00a3.,\ufb011{-.’r..(:F,’VI’aV’t’~3  alleged inci\u00e9eni as such he \u00a3063 rzot come under tha
\nV {1\u20acf\u00a5i’ii\ufb01:l$\ufb01-.~{)fv tlw Act to S\ufb01\ufb01k exempt\u00e9on. Mere ever, the
\nV  be mad: applicable \u00a30 the cam on hand as it came<\/p>\n
 fi:z*a;;3__\u00a3>21IV1\u00a7*”\u00a2:i:1r\u00e9ng 20% and {he incident has {aka} isiace during 1998.<\/p>\n
 ”   So far as the 2″ accused is cancexne\u00e9 as aiready discusseti by me<\/p>\n
 by “a\u00a7ove, his pariieipaticzn is net with an intentisn it} cause death if the<\/p>\n
r<\/p>\n
deceased. Neither it can he said that he had the Ezmwledge and inientitrn to<\/p>\n
cause death of the deceased. His act at the most maid be aii\u00e9ributcd t_0.__tk1at<\/p>\n
0f causing simpie hurt attracting offence undar S323, WC. Since .\u00ab <\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
\ufb01at: uf his arrest tili he has N331} reieased on baii, he was   ~<\/p>\n
Ready 21 c\ufb01ays, wh\u00e9le convicting \u00a3he 2″} accused for 0\ufb01’7eiz b\u00e9”\u00e9:i;;ief”S,323, <\/p>\n
IPC<\/a>‘, he has bean sentenctsd fer the perioci v2.}4rea:-;.i3s jg: &
\n.   \\”,?_M0\u00b0(7[” 5′
\nundergonc. E-Iowever, he has to payFf;’n\u00a7 (Bf   f3\u00a7iingV jzvihich
\nadditional sentence of ens month simple   13}: a\ufb01\u00e9iergone.<\/p>\n
Aaceydingly, Whiki a110v:fi;i”g._the  p%ir\u00a3.\u00a7\u00a7;hiic  the<\/p>\n
erciar of ccn%?iCVti\u00a33g1a;3;;1 se:?i’\u00a3atice”12a;\u00a7s\u00a3*.d 135:} as 3*’ accused is cancaaneci,
\nthe 2″ acctis\u00e9d\ufb01s siInpIy.’\u00a7:9nvici\u00e9\u00e9.’.fi3{ the o\ufb01\u00e9nce under 3.323, IPC<\/a>‘ and<\/p>\n
smtcneed \u00a30 \u00a7h\u20acVV\u00a7\u20aciji \u20ac}d ofa\u00a7_e:te 1zt\u00a75n;.”~\u00e9}ready undergcme and arise is pay fine<\/p>\n
.af Rs.1,\u00bbG%\u00a71{)f5 in defatili,”‘vt\u00a3?.._3_\u00a5\u00a5!<*-\u00e9tgiv simpie iznprisonmmt fer am: monih,<\/p>\n
"wh1'!e sc\u00a3j\u00a3i:;g as5iria ii:e__ order sf c\ufb01nvictien and sez\ufb01enca passed for \ufb02it:<\/p>\n
3'04  QC.\n<\/p>\n
S9 fafv_;=m~ tigrevisian f\u00e9ed ‘\ufb01g: the cgmpiainam, it \u00e9eets rm: stirvive for<\/p>\n
” :v\u00bb’v’*T’\u00a71’1′.’\u00a7;ids’:’I’2lii\u00a3L\u00a7:\u00a3’iv,\u00a7’_4’**’\u00a3V1 sxaminatimz af the maiaria\ufb01 evi\u00e9ergze an racerii am also
\n ‘-hziisiigg. gzjsga\u00e9 $0 the fag: thai the dcceased was airaasziy aged 85 yearg and 3<\/p>\n
K   Wmzid ha slzf\ufb01sieni :9 cause his deaih. On the spur 9f the<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
1″\u00bb?1s”suf”2:r\u20ac:i”LL’-anti’. ‘ ‘Q C”‘_’\u00b07’\u20ac <\/p>\n
.c1’\u00ab\u00ab?.\u00bb.-W ‘v.’3; 5*’<\/p>\n
F5;&};%=\u00a2 F55<\/p>\n
1′?\n<\/p>\n
mement, the 1″ accused mused death and theta: was no inientiafl’
\nme\ufb01itation \u00a30 causa the death. As such, as \ufb01ghtiy hrsid by   ‘
\nsquareiy faiis undsr exceptian 4 of S368,  Iz_14t&;f1e tic,’ u u
\nnot \ufb01nd my merit in the csnteniicn of the pittiiffipncf 1e  . <\/p>\n
of santencs impesed \ufb01y the trial! ceurt.  _V
\nAcear\u00e9ingly, revision pe\ufb01tjon is,di\u00a7:I:i$\u00a7scd.”” – . 2<\/p>\n
Fee csf arnicus cmfiaa is \ufb01xed:3t–Rs;3,Gi.)0f;L”‘V V L * <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Shubhangini W\/O Rangarao Patil vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh IN THE HIGH CCSURT OF KARVATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARXVAD Dated’ this the 13″ Day afFebrtzar:y, 2009 Before ma HQWBLE we JUSHCE fIL?LiE;:’A\u00a5*:4}_)3’A~ 6 ie\u00e9ss\ufb01\u00e9szf Criminai Appeai 91612902 cit? Lff5i’r::.:na: izeuigsca P2{ii:\u00a3a\u00a7:.\u00ab–. .1185 I % 2so2’e1’\u00ab. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-249200","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShubhangini W\/O Rangarao Patil vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shubhangini W\/O Rangarao Patil vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-20T19:40:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shubhangini W\\\/O Rangarao Patil vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-20T19:40:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1884,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Shubhangini W\\\/O Rangarao Patil vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-20T19:40:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shubhangini W\\\/O Rangarao Patil vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shubhangini W\/O Rangarao Patil vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shubhangini W\/O Rangarao Patil vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-20T19:40:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shubhangini W\/O Rangarao Patil vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-20T19:40:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009"},"wordCount":1884,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009","name":"Shubhangini W\/O Rangarao Patil vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-20T19:40:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shubhangini-wo-rangarao-patil-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shubhangini W\/O Rangarao Patil vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249200","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=249200"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249200\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=249200"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=249200"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=249200"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}