{"id":249634,"date":"2010-05-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010"},"modified":"2019-02-17T07:32:03","modified_gmt":"2019-02-17T02:02:03","slug":"jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010","title":{"rendered":"Jignaben vs State on 10 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Jignaben vs State on 10 May, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Abhilasha Kumari,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/5875\/2010\t 6\/ 6\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 5875 of 2010\n \n\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nJIGNABEN\nMAHENDRABHAI POPAT &amp; 1 - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT THROUGH SECRETARY &amp; 2 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nANSHIN H DESAI for\nPetitioner(s) : 1 - 2. \nMS MINI NAIR, ASST. GOVERNMENT PLEADER for\nRespondent(s) : 1, \nNone for Respondent(s) : 2 -\n3. \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHON'BLE\n\t\t\tSMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA KUMARI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 10\/05\/2010 \n\n \n\n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1.\tThis<br \/>\npetition has been filed with the following prayers :\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\"> [A]\tYour<br \/>\nLordships may be pleased to admit and allow this petition.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">[B]\tYour<br \/>\nLordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the<br \/>\nnature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction,<br \/>\nby directing the Special Secretary, Revenue Department (Appeals),<br \/>\nAhmedabad, to hear and decide the injunction\/stay application filed<br \/>\nby the petitioners in Revision Applications no.MVV\/HKP\/PRB\/9 and<br \/>\n18\/2010 forthwith, and\/or, within a period of two   three weeks<br \/>\nfrom the date of the order of this Hon&#8217;ble Court in the present case,<br \/>\nin the interest of justice.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">[C]\tYour<br \/>\nLordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ n the<br \/>\nnature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction,<br \/>\nby quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 4\/2\/2010<br \/>\npassed by the Collector, Porbandar, at Annexure B  to he<br \/>\npetition, in the interest of justice.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">[D]\tPending<br \/>\nadmission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, Your<br \/>\nLordships may be pleased to<\/p>\n<p>[i]\tstay<br \/>\nthe operation, implementation and execution of the impugned order<br \/>\ndated 4\/2\/2010 passed by the Collector, Porbandar, at Annexure B<br \/>\nto the petition, in the interest of justice;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">[ii]\tdirect<br \/>\nthe respondents, their officers, agents, employees and officers, not<br \/>\nto in any manner dispossess the petitioners from the lands in<br \/>\nquestion, namely, the land  bearing survey No.144 paiki, admeasuring<br \/>\nAcre 2   00 Gunthas, situated at Lushala, Mouje Keshod,<br \/>\nDist.Junagadh, and as far as the revenue entries No.864, 866, 953 and<br \/>\n980 are concerned, the status quo may kindly be ordered to be<br \/>\nmaintained, in the interest of justice.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">[E]\tYour<br \/>\nLordships may be pleased to pass such other and further relief in<br \/>\nfavour of the petitioners, as deemed just and proper, in the facts<br \/>\nand circumstances of the case.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">2.\tAt<br \/>\nthe very outset, Mr.Anshin H. Desai, learned advocate for the<br \/>\npetitioners has submitted that the petitioners have filed a Revision<br \/>\nApplication against the order of the Collector, dated 04.02.2010<br \/>\nbefore the Special Secretary, Revenue Department (Appeals) in March,<br \/>\n2010. Along with the Revision Application, an application for grant<br \/>\nof interim relief, has also been preferred. Thereafter, the<br \/>\npetitioners filed an application dated 23.03.2010, for early hearing<br \/>\nof the stay application, but by communication dated 15.04.2010, the<br \/>\npetitioners have been informed that the hearing of the stay<br \/>\napplication has been kept on 05.07.2010.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">3.\tThe<br \/>\nlearned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the interest<br \/>\nof justice would be met, if the concerned authority is directed to<br \/>\nhear the stay application at an early date, as the entry in favour of<br \/>\nthe petitioners has been cancelled and there is an apprehension that<br \/>\nthe possession of the land in question may be taken away from the<br \/>\npetitioners.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">\tThe<br \/>\nlearned counsel for the petitioners has drawn attention of this Court<br \/>\nto order dated 22.12.2009 (Coram : M.R.Shah, J.) passed in Special<br \/>\nCivil Application No.13631\/2009. As the said order is relevant in the<br \/>\nfacts and circumstances of the case, it is being reproduced<br \/>\nhereinbelow :\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\"> 1.\tIt<br \/>\nis very unfortunate that a litigant has to come before this Court for<br \/>\nan appropriate writ, order or direction directing the revisional<br \/>\nauthority to decide and dispose of the stay application at the<br \/>\nearliest.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">2.\tIn<br \/>\nthe present case, the Revision Application has been preferred by the<br \/>\npetitioners along with the stay application and the said stay<br \/>\napplication is pending since last six months, due to non-availability<br \/>\nof the Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department, State of Gujarat, who<br \/>\nwas to hear the stay application was on leave.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">3.\tAs<br \/>\nand when any stay application is preferred the endeavor should be to<br \/>\ndecide and dispose of the same at the earliest but not later than two<br \/>\nweeks from filing of the Revision Application. By not deciding and<br \/>\ndisposing of the stay application some times it will make the<br \/>\nproceedings infructuous. A litigant is supposed to know where he<br \/>\nstands and for that purpose there shall be a decision on the Stay<br \/>\nApplication at the earliest. Under the circumstances, the revisional<br \/>\nauthority is hereby directed to decide and dispose of at least the<br \/>\nStay Application in Revision Application No.9\/2009 at the earliest<br \/>\nbut not later than two weeks from today.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">4.\tWith<br \/>\nthis, the present Special Civil Application is disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">3.\tMs.Mini<br \/>\nNair, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1 has<br \/>\nappeared on an advance copy of the petition. It is stated by her that<br \/>\nthe application for interim relief has been fixed for 05.07.2010,<br \/>\nwhich is not such a longer date.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\">4.\tHaving<br \/>\nheard the learned counsel for the respective parties and in view of<br \/>\nthe fact that the Revision Application has been filed in March, 2010,<br \/>\nbut the stay application has not been heard till date and the hearing<br \/>\nthereof is fixed for 05.07.2010, this Court is of the considered view<br \/>\nthat this is too long a period of time, and by keeping the stay<br \/>\napplication pending, a situation may be created in the interregnum<br \/>\nthat may act to the prejudice to the petitioners. This Court may also<br \/>\nobserve that even though there may be a huge pendency  of cases, a<br \/>\nsincere endeavor may be made, at least, to dispose of the stay<br \/>\napplications after considering them, in accordance with law. The<br \/>\nRevision Application itself would take a considerable period of time<br \/>\nbefore it is finally decided and if, in the interregnum, an adverse<br \/>\nsituation is created, the Revision Application may be rendered<br \/>\ninfructuous. Further, not hearing the stay application expeditiously<br \/>\nmay result in multiplicity of litigation, as has occurred in the<br \/>\npresent case. In view thereof, the following order is passed :\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_16\">\tThe<br \/>\nSpecial Secretary (Appeals) may consider and decide the stay<br \/>\napplication preferred by the petitioners, in accordance with law, as<br \/>\nexpeditiously as possible and preferably on, or before, 15.06.2010.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_17\">\tThe<br \/>\npetition is disposed of, in the above terms.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_18\">(Smt.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_19\">Abhilasha Kumari, J.)<\/p>\n<p>~gaurav~<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Jignaben vs State on 10 May, 2010 Author: Abhilasha Kumari,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/5875\/2010 6\/ 6 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5875 of 2010 ========================================================= JIGNABEN MAHENDRABHAI POPAT &amp; 1 &#8211; Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH SECRETARY &amp; 2 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-249634","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jignaben vs State on 10 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jignaben vs State on 10 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-17T02:02:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jignaben vs State on 10 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-17T02:02:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010\"},\"wordCount\":985,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010\",\"name\":\"Jignaben vs State on 10 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-17T02:02:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jignaben vs State on 10 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jignaben vs State on 10 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jignaben vs State on 10 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-17T02:02:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jignaben vs State on 10 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-17T02:02:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010"},"wordCount":985,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010","name":"Jignaben vs State on 10 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-17T02:02:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jignaben-vs-state-on-10-may-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jignaben vs State on 10 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249634","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=249634"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249634\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=249634"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=249634"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=249634"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}