{"id":249815,"date":"2009-08-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009"},"modified":"2014-07-29T14:14:16","modified_gmt":"2014-07-29T08:44:16","slug":"sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Gopalappa vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 11 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Gopalappa vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 11 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDAT ED THIS T HE 11'?\" DAY OF AUGUST 2009 \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A 3 BoPA:\u00a7N\u00a3\u00a7T:'V@    \u00e9 '\n\nWRIT PE'I'I'E'ION NO. 15888\/;1{\u00a7\u20ac)'?\"* {KLR \nBETWEEN:  Z   A'\n\n1 SR1 GOPALAPPA S\/O ANNEPRA\nAGED ABOUT '?2 \"YEARS  _ '\nR\/OF' DODDA GOL.LAHAL:;i*-'-.RL:,AGE\nA. D. HALL1 10051', 'I\u00bb;U\"'NDANA. H'e.81,1\"~\u00ab.%\nDEVANAHALLI TALU\";{P '   AA \n\nBANGALORE__RURAL_ \u00a7:s;%r;:]__1t:%_r  y ;A \n\n2 SR1 MANJ1:z,NA\";r;~;  GG\u00a5~'.'ALA?PA\nACiED-- ABOU*'f\"32 YEARS ' '\nR] \u20ac331' DODDA\"3TQJLLAH;A;LLI VILLAGE\nA.I}. MLLA; P'c>_sq:. KUBTDANA HOBLI\nI'}EVANA;I~{_ALLI.'--TA'\u00a3,U\u00a5{\n.. QBANGALORAE. RURAL SISTRICT  PE1'I'\u00a5'\u00a7'\u00a5ONERS\n\n (By .S\u00a7,__':\"' \n\n THEtDEPU'f'Y CQMMISSEONER\n\n.. ,  BAWGALORE RURAL DIST\n_ \"'%f\u00a7SHWESHWARAi HTOWER\n --BANGALC}RE~Q1\n\n.-\n'4'\n\n\n\n2 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER\nDODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION\nVISHWESHWARAIAH TOWER\nBAN GALGRE~{} 3.\n\n3 THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR\nNADA KACHERI, KUNDANA\nDEVANAHALLI TALUK\nBANGALORE RURAL DIS'I'RIC?'I'~  \n\n4 SR1 V RAJA GOPAL\n\nS\/O 'VENKATA RAMANAPFA\n\nAGED ABOUT 35 YEARS   , I .\n\nR\/O DODDA G{)LLAHALLi \"VILLAGE \" ~.\n\nA 9 HALLI POST, KUNDANAHOBLI\n\nEEVANAHALLI 'i'AL{_JK_ I _  _ _ \n\nBANGALORE RURAL DI-S1'-RI???   \n--  i  ';.\u00bb.:'I?E'SPQN{)ENTS\n\n(By S K r;AG.a:\u00e9;\u00a2ITf\u00a7'i%.%;:;,  'F't>'2-2%?\nR KEJMAR, 'r~:s:\u00a7<3,_P.poR_ R.jL__ '}'_O_' 3)\n\nTHIS WRIT.PI\u00a7\u00a7Ti;Fi.OH:_IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226\n55 227.052 THE \u00a31ONEa'TI'I'-UTION op mma, wrm A PRAYER\n\n.-.Tc2: QIIASH ANN-"ix ORDE D'I'.16.ES.1995, PASSED BY\n\nTHE F23, '\u00bb?ID\u00a733..\u00a7N I.H.R. 33\/95-96 AND ANN~B, THE ORDER\n\n"2uD=T,3--3_,3.C1\u00a72G03V,""VPASSED BY THE R2, VIDE m CASE\n\nN.C}.ii_'A.1S9[98--979}~AND ANI'\u00abI~C THE ORDER I)T.28.5.20G7,\nPASSED BYTHE R1, VIDE IN CASE I\\I().REVISION PEYFFION\n\n   \n\n,  I  TI\u00a7i$':Writ Petition coming on for hearing, this day,\n I ~f_;i1<::V C\ufb01cuxt made: the following :\n\nJ\u00bb\n\nan\n"n\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
The petitioner is before this Court seeIdng'”1’et’_’;\u00a7::1f\u00a7t:_.v  _<\/p>\n
of certiorari to quash the ordere date~:E~   u  <\/p>\n
31.10.2003 and 28.5.2007 whieh  tin;j3ug:ieed;\u00bb…,\u00a7.~t.;gt<\/p>\n
AI1r1eXures-A to C respecti\ufb01zely. 2  d\ufb02atedyt<\/p>\n
16.5.1995 is the order passedV_buj\ufb01t.i\ufb021e effecting
\nthe mutation order my fI’:3.;JQ11i”.   respondent<\/p>\n
herein in [me NQ,*33_\/1995#\u20ac?{‘;.  M K<\/p>\n
 The f7\u00a7)ro\ufb01.etties3.:” in qiiestion in the present<\/p>\n
petition are  36 guntas, sy.No.me I<\/p>\n
meastuing  ._:V’ae1i*’e  guntas and Sy.No.107\/ 1<\/p>\n
  2’ Aa\ufb01crest ‘ge tas situate at Doddagoilaha\ufb01i<\/p>\n
‘2v’i.l.iageV,’ Devanahalli Taluk. The case of<\/p>\n
t  _ thetpetitiailefstis that the said properties belong to the<\/p>\n
H ” ‘T 0f the petitioners. The fourth respondent<\/p>\n
 e.eC-ziterids that he has the absoiute right in respect of the<\/p>\n
Vt 53.23 premrty _ and it is in that context, the fourth<\/p>\n
4::\n<\/p>\n
\n
2;\n<\/p>\n
respondent had secureci title mutation ently in IHR<\/p>\n
No.33\/1995-96.\n<\/p>\n
3. The petitioner While claiming right to the said<\/p>\n
properties would contend that the said pI’Op\u20acI’ti\u20ac\u00a7.<\/p>\n
granted in favour of his father  _<\/p>\n
it is in that Context the petitionegf ,g:o_1f1te1′}.d’S’  is  ” ”<\/p>\n
also entitled to a share in the  ‘b\u00a7i;1:g \u00a3’:::t1\u00e9i1i_:<\/p>\n
of the sons 0f Eanumant\ufb01a\ufb02aya\ufb01p\ufb01. ._ <\/p>\n
respondent is the g1’and_s;>n of  and<\/p>\n
c:1a}’II1s ~1:{:}1.4isiv\u00e9 ‘i:*ji’Vg}’:;M'{;T. \ufb01’fe “said property as having<\/p>\n
acquired t.h\u20ac:…Sa:;n\u00e9 -_13.1i;1er_17\u00e9a11 oral partition wherein his<\/p>\n
 v nfiotlg\u00e9if  acqtii1’e:i…:ight to the same.<\/p>\n
 ~ .4.  \ufb01everal C()I1t\u20ac:I”1ti0I}S haw: been<\/p>\n
addfesse\ufb01i   respective learned counsel appearing<\/p>\n
 _ {(1}: the sp\u00e9titioner\ufb01 as Wei} as the fourth rmspondant with<\/p>\n
  to the nature of right to the said property, in my<\/p>\n
 .__ *v’i\u00e9”j:;v, the same nee\u00e9 no\u00e9be admitted to at this stage<\/p>\n
5<\/span>
\nsince in the present circumstance, it would amount to<\/p>\n
putting the cart before the horse in as much as the<\/p>\n
parties are already before the Civil Court in<\/p>\n
O.S.No.}256\/2096. The said suit is a paI’titiOI1V~.:\u00a7.’fL1i_ii~V.vV<\/p>\n
said to have been \ufb01led by the second  ~<\/p>\n
who is the piainti\ufb01’. The fourth gfespondeiif i’1e;re’iI1,’_’is  <\/p>\n
said to be impieaded as the 731 d{\u00e9fe1\u00e9_.dai:i1ti1vi–:<\/p>\n
suit. The contesting parties  peti1_:io.I;i <\/p>\n
to the said suit and among ot31er:pro;*3ertieS’ine11_2i\u00a71eci in<\/p>\n
the eehe\u00a7’i;iie”toiv5the iifoperties which are the
\nsubject  o’f..Vi:Liiis.i’E5;’i}it<.19etition are also included.<\/p>\n
The Civil  .ijAe;sed on {fie evidence to be tendered by<\/p>\n
  would to decide the rights of the parties<\/p>\n
   Court would do well not to refer to<\/p>\n
V V' _those"\u00ab\u00abaspectsz:""sinee any obsexvations made during the<\/p>\n
H  of~ihjs order may affect the contentions of the<\/p>\n
 the Civii Court am} therefore the said aspect<\/p>\n
T –:'..:is'\ufb01ot a\u00e9verted to.\n<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
v”:\n<\/p>\n
\n
5. In this background, the only q1.1estio:s1V_i”<\/p>\n
consideration is with regard to the mutation .<\/p>\n
ZHR No.33] 1995-96 which is assa_j1ed__by the  9″‘ it<\/p>\n
herein. As against the order pas:sed1’_’_by’;  if<\/p>\n
the petitioners were before tI1e_”Assist’;5.rit \u00a33o}3:;1Ii.issio:’ier<\/p>\n
in RA No. 189\/ 199s–99t,, Theo–A-ssistiarzt Commissioner,
\non considering the rival 4eor1te13\u00a7ior1s,:”i\u00e9\u00a7;isi  fact come to
\nari appropriate; tooxielusiorii  neeizre of dispute
\nbetween theijie\ufb01rties ‘i3,fou3.(_i._ ‘iiliat the same would
\nhave 1;o:’v.}:’;>e –.reso1%:.e;d:’ir\u00a7’afiivii -‘Court and therefore, the<\/p>\n
Assistant “E’ommis_sioner”‘_.’eV had rightly dismissed the<\/p>\n
 e.pP\u00a7\u20ac.-xi.  ‘W1V1er1V.i ti-“1eV___pe::itioner herein had assaiied the<\/p>\n
 ._or%cier:’..\/iefiated 31.10.2603 before the Deputy<\/p>\n
 Revision Petition No.38\/2005-O6<\/p>\n
  were \ufb01led under Section 186(3) of the Kariistaka<\/p>\n
  \u00abRevenue Act<\/a>, the Deputy Commissioner also has<\/p>\n
 _.__”\u00b0dismissed the revision by noticing these facts. Even to<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
.-\n<\/p>\n
‘8-\n<\/p>\n
\n
N3<\/p>\n
the extent of the contention put forth by the learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the petitioner to assajl the said orders,:’;ihe<\/p>\n
same also does not arise for consideration a\u00a53”’;3re$e1′:t._ ” <\/p>\n
since the suit is still pending as already   e,   l <\/p>\n
9 .\n<\/p>\n
6. Based on the rights tl1at:’w0\u00a3i_ldT1Ve.:<\/p>\n
in the suit, the revenue ent1ies_’\u00a5v.ou1d’have_to.Vbe._jaltered<\/p>\n
if need be. To the extent of m\u00ab:lli%r.a1:s:1dar ‘ effecting the<\/p>\n
mutation order in {HR  appellate as<\/p>\n
Well as “correctly noticing the
\nposition of VlawVt}1z;f’Vt\u00a7ne’  would have to be decided<\/p>\n
before, -the   have come to their conclusion.<\/p>\n
 ‘1’his”‘e'{‘Qoi;*\u00a3’rt does nrjfllsee any reason to jrltezfere with<\/p>\n
  “le\u00a5e1\u00a7%eVer, the only elarif1ea1:ion that requires<\/p>\n
‘  _ to mime. this order is to indicate that since the<\/p>\n
e gaxties Z before the em Court and the rights are<\/p>\n
 e.eiaimed, the present revenue entries will no: form the<\/p>\n
VT  “baeis for considering the rights of the parties and the<\/p>\n
J:\n<\/p>\n
..\n<\/p>\n
r.\n<\/p>\n
\n
Civil Court would have to consider the right of the<\/p>\n
parties independent of the said entries, on the o~:her<\/p>\n
evidence that would be tendered before the V K<\/p>\n
It is also made clear that any of the obser\\fatio::1eiV’_11iVz\u00a7,”\u00a7!e <\/p>\n
during the course of the order cf \ufb01\ufb01e fe?eni.3_.e -iautfiori\ufb01ee <\/p>\n
or by this Court shall not prejudiee file Cix\u00e9\ufb02e,  <\/p>\n
any ;manner while coming to  “er3nci1isieo\u00a71.–v-I After the
\nCivil Court decides t.11e;._iSsi,1ei; it:v\u00a20’L11V\u20ac1*-.be epen for the
\nparties to re-approach__ “the v’tfe{zer1’ue”\ufb01alsithoritjes for
\nappropriatev enfzfies  t:his\u00e9’.regardV.”<\/p>\n
in teI;iI3\u00a7 0f the  the peiition stands disposed<\/p>\n
 V.  I}Iv\u00a7,<)1:\u00a7T1V:e:'Vv_e.fs"td'cQ.Sts. Sd\/_<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Gopalappa vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 11 August, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DAT ED THIS T HE 11′?” DAY OF AUGUST 2009 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A 3 BoPA:\u00a7N\u00a3\u00a7T:’V@ \u00e9 ‘ WRIT PE’I’I’E’ION NO. 15888\/;1{\u00a7\u20ac)’?”* {KLR BETWEEN: Z A’ 1 SR1 GOPALAPPA […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-249815","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Gopalappa vs The Deputy Commissioner ... on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Gopalappa vs The Deputy Commissioner ... on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-29T08:44:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Gopalappa vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 11 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-29T08:44:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":992,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Gopalappa vs The Deputy Commissioner ... on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-29T08:44:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Gopalappa vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 11 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Gopalappa vs The Deputy Commissioner ... on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Gopalappa vs The Deputy Commissioner ... on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-29T08:44:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Gopalappa vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 11 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-29T08:44:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009"},"wordCount":992,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009","name":"Sri Gopalappa vs The Deputy Commissioner ... on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-29T08:44:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalappa-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Gopalappa vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 11 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249815","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=249815"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249815\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=249815"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=249815"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=249815"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}