{"id":250271,"date":"2007-10-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-10-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007"},"modified":"2015-09-27T21:34:55","modified_gmt":"2015-09-27T16:04:55","slug":"t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007","title":{"rendered":"T.C. Sasikumar vs The State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">T.C. Sasikumar vs The State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C) No. 4545 of 2007(N)\n\n\n1. T.C. SASIKUMAR,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE STATE OF KERALA,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DIRECTOR,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.V.BOSE\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI\n\n Dated :17\/10\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                        V. GIRI ,J.\n               -------------------------------\n               WP(C).NO.4545 of 2007\n              ---------------------------------\n     Dated this the 17th       day of October, 2007\n\n                        JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">        The     petitioner   is  working     as    a  Senior<\/p>\n<p>Superintendent in the Kerala State Water Transport<\/p>\n<p>Department. He aspires for promotion to the post of a<\/p>\n<p>Director. In the special rules for the Kerala State Water<\/p>\n<p>Transport Services (Administration Wing), the service<\/p>\n<p>shall consist of three categories.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">      Category-1 &#8211; Director<\/p>\n<p>      Category-2 &#8211; Personal Assistant to the Director<\/p>\n<p>      Category-3 &#8211; Works Manager<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">      2. Method of appointment to the post of Director is<\/p>\n<p>by promotion of qualified persons in the service or by<\/p>\n<p>transfer from any other service. The petitioner contends<\/p>\n<p>that though the Senior Superintendent as such is not<\/p>\n<p>included in the state service of Water Transport<\/p>\n<p>Department, the post of Senior Superintendent must be<\/p>\n<p>treated as included in the service and therefore he must<\/p>\n<p>be treated as eligible for being considered for promotion<\/p>\n<p>to the post of Director. Learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">W.P.(C)4545\/2007               -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      petitioner Mr.Bose contends that he was working as a<\/p>\n<p>      Junior Superintendent. Thereafter he was promoted as<\/p>\n<p>      Senior Superintendent as evidenced by Ext.P2 order. He<\/p>\n<p>      contends that the post of Senior Superintendent is not<\/p>\n<p>      included in the subordinate service and therefore it must<\/p>\n<p>      be treated as equivalent to the post of Personal<\/p>\n<p>      Assistant. He further contends that there is no person<\/p>\n<p>      working as a Personal Assistant in the Water Transport<\/p>\n<p>      Department, at present, that the petitioner is the senior<\/p>\n<p>      most Superintendent and therefore he is entitled to be<\/p>\n<p>      considered as included in Category &#8211; II of the service. He<\/p>\n<p>      further refers to Ext.P4 communication sent by the then<\/p>\n<p>      Secretary of the Transport Department, reporting that<\/p>\n<p>      the petitioner, who       is the senior most senior<\/p>\n<p>      Superintendent    working    in   the   Regional    Office<\/p>\n<p>      Changanacherry, is eligible for promotion to the post of<\/p>\n<p>      Director. By Ext.P5 judgment, this Court directed the<\/p>\n<p>      Government to consider the claim of the petitioner and<\/p>\n<p>      others for promotion to the post of Director within a<\/p>\n<p>      period of two months from the date of judgment dated<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">W.P.(C)4545\/2007                -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      7.3.2006. Apparently, even contempt proceedings had to<\/p>\n<p>      be initiated against the Government, when there was<\/p>\n<p>      delay in considering the claim of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>      Ultimately, the Government passed Ext.P7 order,<\/p>\n<p>      wherein it was found that the State Water Transport<\/p>\n<p>      Services (Admn. Wing) consists of the Director, Personal<\/p>\n<p>      Assistant to Director and Works Manager. Petitioner does<\/p>\n<p>      not belong to these categories and is therefore not in the<\/p>\n<p>      feeder category. It is, therefore, stated in Ext.P7 that<\/p>\n<p>      the petitioner is not eligible for promotion to the post of<\/p>\n<p>      Director.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">            3. Ext.P7 further proceeds to state that though the<\/p>\n<p>      special rules provide for appointment by transfer from<\/p>\n<p>      any other service, petitioner cannot be considered for<\/p>\n<p>      appointment by transfer as his `CR&#8217; for the year 2006<\/p>\n<p>      (Upto 19.9.2006) reveals that he is not suitable for<\/p>\n<p>      appointment to a responsible post. Subsequently, by<\/p>\n<p>      Ext.P12, Government issued a circular stating that they<\/p>\n<p>      are looking for competent officers for the post of<\/p>\n<p>      Director, State Water Transport Department, who are<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">W.P.(C)4545\/2007                -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      willing to be considered for appointment on a deputation<\/p>\n<p>      basis. Ext.P12 has been specifically challenged by the<\/p>\n<p>      petitioner in this writ petition. Petitioner has also sought<\/p>\n<p>      for a direction to the respondents not to implement<\/p>\n<p>      Ext.P12 so that the petitioner is to be appointed as a<\/p>\n<p>      Director.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">             4. The Writ petition was, originally, disposed of by<\/p>\n<p>      this Court by judgment dated 4.6.2007. It was ordered<\/p>\n<p>      by this Court that if there are eligible or suitable<\/p>\n<p>      candidates available for appointment by transfer, the<\/p>\n<p>      Government shall follow the said method, which is<\/p>\n<p>      permissible as per the special rules. It was further<\/p>\n<p>      observed that only in the absence of eligible or suitable<\/p>\n<p>      candidates for appointment by transfer, the post shall be<\/p>\n<p>      filled up by deputation as notified in Ext.P12. The Court<\/p>\n<p>      had also found that there is nothing illegal in Ext.P12.<\/p>\n<p>      State applied for a review of the said judgment and<\/p>\n<p>      review petition was allowed on 17.7.2007. This Court<\/p>\n<p>      referred to the counter affidavit filed in the writ petition,<\/p>\n<p>      wherein, it was specifically stated that the amendment<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">W.P.(C)4545\/2007               -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      to the special rules is under active consideration of the<\/p>\n<p>      State   Government     and    until   the    formalities for<\/p>\n<p>      amendment are complied with, as an interim measure,<\/p>\n<p>      it was decided to fill up the post on deputation. The<\/p>\n<p>      application for review was allowed. Earlier judgment was<\/p>\n<p>      recalled and the writ petition was restored to file.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">            5. Subsequently, about 14 persons were called for<\/p>\n<p>      interview for appointment by deputation. Petitioner also<\/p>\n<p>      participated in that interview. Selection process for<\/p>\n<p>      deputation has not been finalised so far. In the<\/p>\n<p>      additional counter affidavit filed by the Government,<\/p>\n<p>      reference is made to the fact that the amendment to the<\/p>\n<p>      special rules is pending approval with the Government<\/p>\n<p>      and that in the draft special rules, it is proposed that the<\/p>\n<p>      requisite qualification prescribed for promotion to the<\/p>\n<p>      post of Director is a Degree from the recognized<\/p>\n<p>      University with MBA and preference will be given to<\/p>\n<p>      those   who    have   Post   Graduation      and   Technical<\/p>\n<p>      qualification.  Therefore, since a fairly comprehensive<\/p>\n<p>      amendment to the special rules was contemplated,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_4\">W.P.(C)4545\/2007               -6-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      Government decided that pending amendment to the<\/p>\n<p>      special rules, they will fill up the post of Director on<\/p>\n<p>      deputation. As noted above, the Board interviewed 14<\/p>\n<p>      persons including the petitioner and the candidates were<\/p>\n<p>      assessed based on their provisional caliber, Management<\/p>\n<p>      ability, Corporate knowledge, Leadership and personality<\/p>\n<p>      and Communication ability. Five candidates were ranked<\/p>\n<p>      strictly based on merits. Select list has been circulated<\/p>\n<p>      for approval to the Minister for Transport and Chief<\/p>\n<p>      Minister. The decision, not to fill up the post of Director<\/p>\n<p>      on regular basis till the special rules are amended, was<\/p>\n<p>      taken at the highest level on 25.6.2006.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">             6. What has been, principally, challenged in the<\/p>\n<p>      writ petition is Ext.P12, by which, the Government<\/p>\n<p>      decided to call for applications from the interested<\/p>\n<p>      persons for appointment to the post of Director in the<\/p>\n<p>      State Water Transport Department on deputation. A<\/p>\n<p>      perusal of the additional counter affidavit filed by the<\/p>\n<p>      Government would show that a decision was taken by<\/p>\n<p>      the Government at the highest level not to fill up the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_5\">W.P.(C)4545\/2007                -7-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      post of Director on regular basis pending amendment to<\/p>\n<p>      the special rules. The Government has the power to do<\/p>\n<p>      so under Rule 9Bof Part II of KS&amp;SSR. It cannot be said<\/p>\n<p>      that there is anything illegal or arbitrary in the<\/p>\n<p>      Government deciding to do so. The power of the<\/p>\n<p>      Government to do so was considered and upheld by a<\/p>\n<p>      Bench of this court in Kerala State Housing Board v<\/p>\n<p>      Murali (1989 (2) KLT 28).\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">             7. For all these reasons, I do not find that there is<\/p>\n<p>      anything illegal in Ext.P12 and the decision taken by the<\/p>\n<p>      Government to fill up the post of Director, State Water<\/p>\n<p>      Transport   Department     on   deputation.    Ext.P12   is,<\/p>\n<p>      therefore, upheld.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">            8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that<\/p>\n<p>      the    selection    proceedings    undertaken     by    the<\/p>\n<p>      Government for appointing a person to the post of<\/p>\n<p>      Director on deputation is illegal and is liable to be<\/p>\n<p>      interfered with on several grounds. In my view, the<\/p>\n<p>      validity of the same is not the subject matter of the<\/p>\n<p>      present writ petition. Contention of the petitioner, who<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_6\">W.P.(C)4545\/2007                -8-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      had also participated in the selection process, is left<\/p>\n<p>      open with liberty to assail the same, if so advised, and if<\/p>\n<p>      permissible. Subject to the above observation, I find no<\/p>\n<p>      merit in the writ petition and the same is dismissed.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">                                          V. GIRI, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>      css\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court T.C. Sasikumar vs The State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C) No. 4545 of 2007(N) 1. T.C. SASIKUMAR, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DIRECTOR, For Petitioner :SRI.M.V.BOSE For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice V.GIRI [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-250271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>T.C. Sasikumar vs The State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"T.C. Sasikumar vs The State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-10-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-27T16:04:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"T.C. Sasikumar vs The State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-10-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-27T16:04:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1262,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\",\"name\":\"T.C. Sasikumar vs The State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-10-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-27T16:04:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"T.C. Sasikumar vs The State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"T.C. Sasikumar vs The State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"T.C. Sasikumar vs The State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-10-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-27T16:04:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"T.C. Sasikumar vs The State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007","datePublished":"2007-10-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-27T16:04:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007"},"wordCount":1262,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007","name":"T.C. Sasikumar vs The State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-10-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-27T16:04:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-c-sasikumar-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-17-october-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"T.C. Sasikumar vs The State Of Kerala on 17 October, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250271","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250271"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250271\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}