{"id":250418,"date":"1999-10-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1999-10-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999"},"modified":"2015-06-13T18:28:41","modified_gmt":"2015-06-13T12:58:41","slug":"kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999","title":{"rendered":"Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust vs Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) on 12 October, 1999"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Supreme Court of India<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust vs Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) on 12 October, 1999<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S S Ahmad<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: S.Saghir Ahmad, R.P.Sethi<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">           PETITIONER:\nKALPAVRUKSHA CHARITABLE TRUST\n\n\tVs.\n\nRESPONDENT:\nTOSHNIWAL BROTHERS (BOMBAY)\n\nDATE OF JUDGMENT:\t12\/10\/1999\n\nBENCH:\nS.Saghir Ahmad, R.P.Sethi\n\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT:\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">      S.  SAGHIR AHMAD, J.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">      This  appeal  was\t disposed of by us by  our  judgment<br \/>\ndated 12th August, 1999.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">      Mr.   R.N.   Keswani,  appearing\ton  behalf  of\t the<br \/>\nappellant, has filed the instant Application stating that he<br \/>\nwas the only counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant on<br \/>\n12.8.1999,  but\t since he was busy in some other Court\twhen<br \/>\nthe  matter was taken up by us, he could not come and  argue<br \/>\nthe appeal.  He also stated that the counsel who was deputed<br \/>\nto  make a mention that he (Mr.\t R.N.  Keswani) was busy  in<br \/>\nsome other Court was not entitled to argue the appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">      The  appeal  was heard by us in detail  and  elaborate<br \/>\narguments  were\t made on behalf of the appellant  also,\t but<br \/>\nhaving\tregard\tto the fact that Mr.  Keswani was  the\tonly<br \/>\ncounsel\t in  the  appeal and he has stated  that  the  other<br \/>\ncounsel\t was not entitled to argue the appeal, we have heard<br \/>\nMr.  Keswani as also Mr.  S.P.Mithal.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">      The  main reliance on behalf of the appellant has been<br \/>\nplaced\ton  the decision of this Court in <a href=\"\/doc\/1433560\/\" id=\"a_1\">Laxmi\t Engineering<br \/>\nWorks  vs.  P.S.G.  Industrial Institute<\/a> (1995) 3 SCC 583 in<br \/>\nsupport\t of  the  contention  that   the  appellant  was   a<br \/>\n&#8220;consumer&#8221;  within the meaning of the definition set out  in<br \/>\nthe  <a href=\"\/doc\/1733066\/\" id=\"a_1\">Consumer  Protection  Act<\/a>, 1986.\tThe  definition\t was<br \/>\nconsidered by us and it was held that since the machinery in<br \/>\nquestion  was  installed  by the  appellant  for  commercial<br \/>\npurpose, it would not be a &#8220;consumer&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">      It  is contended by the counsel for the appellant that<br \/>\nthe  term  &#8220;commercial purpose&#8221; has been considered by\tthis<br \/>\nCourt in the case of Laxmi Engineering Works (supra) and the<br \/>\nobservation of National Commission that &#8220;commercial purpose&#8221;<br \/>\nwould  mean  &#8220;profit-making activity on a large\t scale&#8221;\t was<br \/>\napproved  and,\ttherefore,  the\t  activity  of\tthe  present<br \/>\nappellant   would  not\tbe  a  commercial  activity  as\t  no<br \/>\n&#8220;profit-making\ton  a large scale&#8221; is involved.\t We  do\t not<br \/>\nagree.\tThis Court in that decision had further held in para<br \/>\n21 as under :\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">      &#8220;21.  We must, therefore, hold that :\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">      (i)  The explanation added by the <a href=\"\/doc\/1819218\/\" id=\"a_2\">Consumer  Protection<br \/>\n(Amendment)  Act<\/a> 50 of 1993 (replacing Ordinance 24 of 1993)<br \/>\nwith  effect  from 18.6.1993 is clarificatory in nature\t and<br \/>\napplies to all pending proceedings.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">      (ii) Whether the purpose for which a person has bought<br \/>\ngoods  is  a &#8220;commercial purpose&#8221; within the meaning of\t the<br \/>\ndefinition  of expression &#8216;consumer&#8217; in <a href=\"\/doc\/334666\/\" id=\"a_3\">Section 2(d)<\/a> of\t the<br \/>\nAct  is always a question of fact to be decided in the facts<br \/>\nand circumstances of each case.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">      (iii)  A person who buys goods and uses them  himself,<br \/>\nexclusively  for  the purpose of earning his livelihood,  by<br \/>\nmeans  of  self-employment is within the definition  of\t the<br \/>\nexpression &#8216;consumer&#8217;.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">      Applying\tthose tests, the Court in the case of  Laxmi<br \/>\nEngineering  Works (supra) held that the appellant was not a<br \/>\n`consumer&#8217;  as the machinery in that case were not purchased<br \/>\nfor  self-employment,  but  were purchased  for\t &#8220;commercial<br \/>\npurposes.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">      It  is,  therefore,  clear  that\t in  spite  of\t the<br \/>\ncommercial  activity, whether a person would fall within the<br \/>\ndefinition  of &#8220;consumer&#8221; or not would be a question of fact<br \/>\nin  every case.\t The National Commission had already held on<br \/>\nthe  basis of the evidence on record that the appellant\t was<br \/>\nnot  a\t&#8220;consumer&#8221;  as\tthe   machinery\t was  installed\t for<br \/>\n&#8220;commercial  purpose&#8221;.\t We  have  been\t again\treferred  to<br \/>\nvarious\t  documents,  including\t  the  &#8220;Project\t  document&#8221;,<br \/>\nsubmitted  by the appellant itself to the Bank for a loan to<br \/>\nenable\tit  to\tpurchase the machinery in question,  but  we<br \/>\ncould not persuade ourselves to take a different view.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">      Learned counsel for the appellant then referred to the<br \/>\ncase  of  Addl.\t  <a href=\"\/doc\/1859206\/\" id=\"a_4\">Commissioner of Income  Tax,\tGujarat\t vs.<br \/>\nSurat  Art  Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association<\/a> (1980)\t 121<br \/>\nITR  1\twherein\t the activity of a  charitable\tinstitution,<br \/>\nthough\tcommercial  in nature, was held to be a part of\t the<br \/>\ncharitable  activity.\tThis  decision\tdoes  not  help\t the<br \/>\nappellant as it was a decision rendered under the <a href=\"\/doc\/789969\/\" id=\"a_5\">Income Tax<br \/>\nAct<\/a>  and the question which we are considering here had\t not<br \/>\narisen in that case.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">      Learned counsel for the appellant then referred to the<br \/>\ndecision  of  this Court in <a href=\"\/doc\/1253587\/\" id=\"a_6\">Commissioner of Income Tax,\t New<br \/>\nDelhi  vs.   Federation\t of Indian Chambers  of\t Commerce  &amp;<br \/>\nIndustries,  New Delhi<\/a>, 1981 (3) SCR 489, and contended that<br \/>\nif  the\t dominant  object  of the trust\t or  institution  is<br \/>\ncharitable,  the  activity  carried on by it  would  not  be<br \/>\ntreated\t as an activity for profit.  It is contended on\t the<br \/>\nbasis  of the above decision that the activities carried  on<br \/>\nby the appellant were not profit- oriented nor was there any<br \/>\nintention  or  object to carry on those activities  to\tearn<br \/>\nprofit.\t  This\tagain  was the decision rendered  under\t the<br \/>\n<a href=\"\/doc\/789969\/\" id=\"a_7\">Income\tTax  Act<\/a>  and is not on the point  involved  in\t the<br \/>\npresent\t case whether the appellant was a &#8220;consumer&#8221;  within<br \/>\nthe meaning of the <a href=\"\/doc\/1733066\/\" id=\"a_8\">Consumer Protection Act<\/a>, 1986.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">      In  the  instant\tcase, what is to  be  considered  is<br \/>\nwhether the appellant was a &#8220;consumer&#8221; within the meaning of<br \/>\nthe  <a href=\"\/doc\/1733066\/\" id=\"a_9\">Consumer Protection Act<\/a>, 1986, and whether the goods in<br \/>\nquestion  were\tobtained  by him for &#8220;re-sale&#8221;\tor  for\t any<br \/>\n&#8220;commercial  purpose&#8221;.\tIt is the case of the appellant that<br \/>\nevery  patient\twho is referred to the Diagnostic Centre  of<br \/>\nthe  appellant\tand who takes advantage of the CT Scan\tetc.<br \/>\nhas  to pay for it and the service rendered by the appellant<br \/>\nis not free.  It is also the case of the appellant that only<br \/>\nten  per  cent\tof the patients are provided  free  service.<br \/>\nThat  being so, the &#8220;goods&#8221; (machinery) which were  obtained<br \/>\nby the appellant were being used for &#8220;commercial purpose&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\">      No  other point was pressed before us.  We, therefore,<br \/>\nmaintain  our  judgment dated 12th August, 1999\t even  after<br \/>\nhaving heard Mr.  Keswani who insisted for a hearing through<br \/>\nthis  Application.   The  Application shall  be\t treated  as<br \/>\ndisposed of.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of India Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust vs Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) on 12 October, 1999 Author: S S Ahmad Bench: S.Saghir Ahmad, R.P.Sethi PETITIONER: KALPAVRUKSHA CHARITABLE TRUST Vs. RESPONDENT: TOSHNIWAL BROTHERS (BOMBAY) DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12\/10\/1999 BENCH: S.Saghir Ahmad, R.P.Sethi JUDGMENT: S. SAGHIR AHMAD, J. This appeal was disposed of by us by our judgment [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-250418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supreme-court-of-india"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust vs Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) on 12 October, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust vs Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) on 12 October, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1999-10-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-13T12:58:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust vs Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) on 12 October, 1999\",\"datePublished\":\"1999-10-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-13T12:58:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999\"},\"wordCount\":988,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court of India\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999\",\"name\":\"Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust vs Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) on 12 October, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1999-10-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-13T12:58:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust vs Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) on 12 October, 1999\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust vs Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) on 12 October, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust vs Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) on 12 October, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1999-10-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-13T12:58:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust vs Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) on 12 October, 1999","datePublished":"1999-10-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-13T12:58:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999"},"wordCount":988,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Supreme Court of India"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999","name":"Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust vs Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) on 12 October, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1999-10-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-13T12:58:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalpavruksha-charitable-trust-vs-toshniwal-brothers-bombay-on-12-october-1999#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kalpavruksha Charitable Trust vs Toshniwal Brothers (Bombay) on 12 October, 1999"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250418"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250418\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}