{"id":250491,"date":"2010-11-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010"},"modified":"2015-10-25T03:44:47","modified_gmt":"2015-10-24T22:14:47","slug":"sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Suhail Ahmed S\/O Syed Khader vs Sri Mahaboob Pasha on 29 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Suhail Ahmed S\/O Syed Khader vs Sri Mahaboob Pasha on 29 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDated this the 29\" day of November, 2010\n\nBefore\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI    \n\nCriminal Appeal\nBetween:\n\nSri Sahaii Ahmed, 28 yrs\nS\/0 Syed Khader\n\nR\/a # 24, 4\"' Cross\nCuovindapura Main Road\nArabic Coilege Post\nBangalore\n\nAnd:\n\nSri Mahaboob\"Pasiia,  \" \nS\/o Abdu1_Wajeed, _Genei'al '1-\"ra\\'rels\n\n _R\/d # 8,..%.i>ari<ei Mutt B--t1ii1d_i_ng\n Tani; Bound 3.-Road Majestic)\n"gQpp_te _I\u00a7SRTC  Stand\n\nBangal.ore  " \n\n  (By SAri--..RasheedvC'}?ihan & Asstsx, Adv.)\n\n\n\n971" \/~ 2903 kg   ; 1\n\nRespondent\n\n_   A. , Appeal is filed under 3378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure\n\n .__p'rayiong to set aside the order of acquittal against the respondent and\nA.  __eQn"v_ict and sentence the accused with which he has been charged in CC\n\n  26930\/2004 on 16.8.2008 by the XXIV Addl. CMM, Bangalore.\n\n\n\nThe Appeal coming on for Hearing this day, Court delivered the\nfollowing:\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Appeal is by the complainant against the order of’acquittal”pas’s’ed’g<\/p>\n
by the XXIV Addl. CMM, Bangalore in CC\u00bb+26.9y30\/2004’on’; A    <\/p>\n
According to the complainant,_’accused’ had’ borroiiv:ed”‘a sum of’<\/p>\n
Rs.50,000\/~ on 30.11.2002 having agreed to repay the samebn 3.1.2003
\nand had also issued a cheque’dr.avJne._oii -Bank, Subhasnagar<\/p>\n
Branch, Bangalore. .On._pre;\u00a7ent:aticn,._the”cheque in\/as dishonoured for<\/p>\n
insufficient funds. ‘l*}te- ..con1p’l’a.in”a–nt, after issuance of legal notice, due<\/p>\n
to non payment,’ i”iledf’the’.comp.laint. Thereafter, the trial court After<\/p>\n
4… Vholdinginquiry, i’dis–miVss_ed the complaint holding that the complainant<\/p>\n
Vfailedwtog esftablish””th_e case against the accused beyond doubt relying<\/p>\n
  V upon Aimshiffia lanardihiaiia Bhat’s case (AIR 2008 scw 738).<\/p>\n
 per.S;li39 of the Negotiable instruments Act and also as per<\/p>\n
  ratio laid down in the case of Rangappa Vs Mohan – AIR 2010 SC<\/p>\n
._I8S5e}, the initial presumption is in favour of the complainant that the<\/p>\n
cheque was issued towards a legally enforceable debt and the negative
\nonus is on the accused to disprove. the same, not only hypifobiavble<\/p>\n
explanation but proof of explanation also has to be offered;<\/p>\n
The trial court although noted that btlth ittteilpartiegyare enga:_?gedpli.i1.VV<\/p>\n
business, only on the ground that transaction aboV’e.Rsx…2:O_,Oll{}\/-lhas to be V<\/p>\n
made only through cheque:;._has ;rni’sconstrue_d andlldisrnissed the
\ncomplaint. So far as the mandate that rraln:sac_ti_o’11naboyte Rs.2.0,000\/– has<\/p>\n
to be made only thret:gh”_’chec;;ues\u00a7 is…conce’rne–d,_itjis only for income tax<\/p>\n
purposes as such”, it ,canf1’ot–V.be  <\/p>\n
Accordingly,  alliowed. Impugned order is set aside.<\/p>\n
_..I.{eeping View thei1’atest___decision of the Apex Court noted above, the<\/p>\n
“t_r_ia\u00bb1;’court.._shal\u00abl.._dispose of the case in accordance with law,<\/p>\n
expedit.i’ously.’ Parties are directed to appear before the trial court on<\/p>\n
I5” Decetrgbl\u00e9x, 0. Send back the records.\n<\/p>\n
Sdf-*3;\n<\/p>\n
I\ufb01dcfe<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Suhail Ahmed S\/O Syed Khader vs Sri Mahaboob Pasha on 29 November, 2010 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated this the 29″ day of November, 2010 Before THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI Criminal Appeal Between: Sri Sahaii Ahmed, 28 yrs S\/0 Syed Khader R\/a # […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-250491","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Suhail Ahmed S\/O Syed Khader vs Sri Mahaboob Pasha on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Suhail Ahmed S\/O Syed Khader vs Sri Mahaboob Pasha on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-24T22:14:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Suhail Ahmed S\\\/O Syed Khader vs Sri Mahaboob Pasha on 29 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-24T22:14:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":364,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Suhail Ahmed S\\\/O Syed Khader vs Sri Mahaboob Pasha on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-24T22:14:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Suhail Ahmed S\\\/O Syed Khader vs Sri Mahaboob Pasha on 29 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Suhail Ahmed S\/O Syed Khader vs Sri Mahaboob Pasha on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Suhail Ahmed S\/O Syed Khader vs Sri Mahaboob Pasha on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-24T22:14:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Suhail Ahmed S\/O Syed Khader vs Sri Mahaboob Pasha on 29 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-24T22:14:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010"},"wordCount":364,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010","name":"Sri Suhail Ahmed S\/O Syed Khader vs Sri Mahaboob Pasha on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-24T22:14:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-suhail-ahmed-so-syed-khader-vs-sri-mahaboob-pasha-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Suhail Ahmed S\/O Syed Khader vs Sri Mahaboob Pasha on 29 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250491","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250491"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250491\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}