{"id":250528,"date":"2010-11-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010"},"modified":"2014-06-07T11:12:57","modified_gmt":"2014-06-07T05:42:57","slug":"mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr Girish Arora vs Smt R Lakshmamma on 19 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mr Girish Arora vs Smt R Lakshmamma on 19 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 19*\" DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2o1o?I_%'a._V\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.I\\\u00a3. vENoGoRAI\u00a7A:Vrs'OJvvOA1;\"  \n\nWRIT PETITION NO.34496\/i2o1o'I'(<3 r'%2I.~,C'R'Q\\\u00a7 .   A I. ' 7\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nMr. Gir\u00e9sh Arora,\nSon of fate Nandlai Arora,_\nAged about 50 years, No~..._3f,'* _  V.\n'Sangeetha Towers', 80 feet.a_road.,"  _\nNear CMH Hospital, Indira.n.ag'ar,'._  \nBangalore -- 560 0.38-._  y  . \n\nH   _ _   ' _    PETITIONER\n(By M\/s. M.L7;.'Ra.cIhL:vI~;1a_th'&--\u00ab.Assgci_a'tes). '\n\nANO:  """ \n1. smt.'R.Lakshjm\u00e9tnmay}.7  A\n\nWife of late A.R.arna\u00a3ah\u00ab,--__gg"' "\nAged about 52' years. \n\n v  Sfri3'<.R:,\u00a3\u00a7Iag__arajLj';  ..... .. \u00ab\n\n' \u00abSon o'fjiate\u00ab.A.Ramaiah,\n'  Ag eAd"vabIoAutV 5-2 years.\n\n3..'  Kumar,\nSon of" late A.Ramaiah,\nAged about 50 years.\n\nA '~:%i.i Sr'i~\u00ab.R.Suresh,\n\n'~_'Sor'a of late A.Ramaiah,\n Aged about 46 years.\n\n\n\n2\n\nNos. 1. to 4 alt are residing at\nKariammana Agrahara,\nBangalore South Taiuk,\nBangalore.\n\n5. Smt. Kanthamma,\n\nWife of Sri Seetharamaiah,\nAged about 56 years,\nResiding at Indalavadi Pura,\nAnekai Taluk,\n\nBangalore.\n\n6. Smt. Chandramma,\n\nWife of Sri A.Marappa,\nAged about 54 years,  \nResiding at No.8, 2"" Cross, \n2"" Main road, Hosahally, \nVijayanagar,   _  \nBangalore -- 560 040.   *   \n\n  -      'RESPONDENTS\n\n(By Sri  C\n\nThis wr_it'petitE'o..n 'i\u00bbs,_fii.ed._.under Articles 226 and 227 of\nthe Constitution of In,'dia',"\u00ab-._p'raying to quash the impugned\norder dated'=.,20.10..20~10',...~'vide Annexure - A passed in\nO.S.No'.15022\/20,01, onthe file of the Addl. City Civil Judge,\n\n '~  Mayo Ha'|lv,....Banga|ore.\n\nI   coming on for preliminary hearing in '8'\n\ng'rou5'p th"i's."'c*..ay,.C'Vtv!=.'e Court made the following:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
 .. Petitioner has instituted the suit on 03.01.2001 for<\/p>\n
 ._trzeV’reECief of specific performance in respect of the plaint<\/p>\n
if schedule property pursuant to an agreement of sale dated<\/p>\n
‘it<\/p>\n
\/7.\n<\/p>\n
\n
3<\/span>
\n17.02.2000 and the demand made vide notice dated<\/p>\n
17.07.2000. The defendants have filed written statement<\/p>\n
and have contested the relief prayed in the suit. Petit’i’aner<\/p>\n
filed an interlocutory application on 05.10.2010  H<\/p>\n
6 Rule 17 CPC to permit him to incorporate tlii’-2: <\/p>\n
pleading in the plaint, to which th.=3″defend’~ants<\/p>\n
statement of objections on  COl’b’lV.’j:’glA\u00a7Ad”E’:vl’i’E”1\u00a7iV}’:.ifl”i\u00a32’V’<\/p>\n
rival contentions and the recorc1..,.:’\u00a2:’filnding the=a’pplV5’caVtlVon to
\nbe devoid of merit, the “t~:i_al court ‘V..hj4as”p_asse\u00abdV’sn..i’0{der of
\nrejection dated 20.10.20120.-i.’Fe’e’lvi*’ng  the plaintiff<\/p>\n
has filed this wrlit”p.etl.tior\u00a7:’_. 1. <\/p>\n
2. Learnledf~c:ou,niS’el”appearing for the petitioner<\/p>\n
contended uxthat, thei’.res.p’ondents have challenged the<\/p>\n
 proceedi\u00abn.g.s,\u00abiwhich fact was not brought to the<\/p>\n
V’*.notice\u00bb.of~._t:he:ftria~l. court and the same being a subsequent<\/p>\n
eventfthei petiti’oner was obliged to bring the same to the<\/p>\n
 Tnotice”o…f ithsevcourt in order to have a proper adjudication of<\/p>\n
  proceedings. Learned counsel contends that, without<\/p>\n
“\u00bb___'”tproper consideration, the learned \\l:al judge has<\/p>\n
\/7<\/p>\n
.1<\/p>\n
mechanically upheld the objections raised by the<\/p>\n
defendants. According to the learned counsei~,g:.””–.gthe<\/p>\n
impugned order being against the settled principl.es~<\/p>\n
governing the principles with regard to <\/p>\n
pleadings, interference in the matter is :’caiied~__fo’r.–  * V  V<\/p>\n
3. Sri A.G.Shivanna,”llearned counsell’la_pp.ea-~ri.ng for = L’<\/p>\n
the respondents, on the other ha.nVo”gvco’n.tend’e”d-thatf the trial
\nof the suit has commenced_,-ti1_at~.’t,h’e’re:_ due diligence
\non the part of  plaintiff’iri1:jf:lli,i”9:’.i’tije”-appillication after the
\nclosure of  ‘~.Sl4.l’-it.  otherwise, the
\nDiaintiff evidence and the
\nproposed_’arrierid:rne’n.tVi’s.’,’V_ne.t’:”teguired for adjudication of the<\/p>\n
rights of the”-parties-v._to’..th’e.’-‘suit property and hence, the trial<\/p>\n
“V..,coui:tj’3″is,\u00bb_\u00a7,lust_ifiedAA”i’rivi–.p.assing the impugned order. Learned<\/p>\n
ll’-i.co’unsel”vrnad’e:’s-Libmissions in support of the findings and<\/p>\n
‘.p_er:LJ\\s’ed the writ petition record.<\/p>\n
colnclulsion’ofj__the trial court in passing the impugned order.
\n4~._”:. Keeping in view the rival contentions, I have<\/p>\n
\\\u00a7<\/p>\n
\/’<\/p>\n
.o<\/p>\n
5<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
5. The point for consideration is:\n<\/p>\n
Whether the trial court is justified in<\/p>\n
rejecting the LA for amendment of the_..__<\/p>\n
plain t?\n<\/p>\n
6. The triai judge, based on the ciainiiofv.pVi’aiihtitf’i ”<\/p>\n
and defendants, having found merit”‘in’th–‘e sVtaite’men.ti’.~oft it<\/p>\n
objections fiied by the defendantsl’:’.arid_l<\/p>\n
appiication by making the foilowing..pobseiveat\u00a7ohs::  <\/p>\n
“These questions being V.t11*e–..”p_facuts_ whiclmare to be
\nestablished by way’: ofAevid?e1iee’*.Vi3}f”it.if1e plaintiff who
\nalready led in sufficient ievidVe1:ice*'”onV ioehalf to prove<\/p>\n
those fact.s;~.,,_t’l\\he \u00a7prQ_po.seci,xartiendriient is not at all<\/p>\n
rerijtiiredri  rights of the parties
\ncoriclusiv elv ”  it  “‘su_it. Without the proposed
\namendrhent  that are raised in the suit
\ncan he eiieeti’vely adj tidicated on the available pleadings
\n..’:p_jand._rAV:evidencle,’~—-the’refore the application filed by the
\n _plainti1’f{seeking the amendment is devoid of merits,<\/p>\n
  rejected”.\n<\/p>\n
  Indispiitedly, trial of the suit is complete and<\/p>\n
it  suaitpt isat the state of hearing of arguments. The proviso<\/p>\n
..,l.’.ai5pended to Rule 17 of Order 6 CPC pursuant to the<\/p>\n
‘\ufb02lalmending Act 22 of 2002, iimits the p\ufb01ier of amendment to<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
‘.\n<\/p>\n
\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
a certain extent. The proviso lays down that, no application
\nfor amendment shall be allowed after the commencement of<\/p>\n
trial, unless the court comes to the conclusion that inspite of<\/p>\n
due diligence the party could not have raised <\/p>\n
before the commencement of trial. Whetherg’a’..:pairtv”_ it<\/p>\n
acted with due diligence or not <\/p>\n
and circumstances of each case.\n<\/p>\n
8. In the affidavit in visa,-mrti gfarithei<\/p>\n
application, the plaintiffhas stated”that,”tldefen’da’nt”‘VNo.1 has<\/p>\n
filed W.P.No.30983\/200.4% -i.”Vchfai’l’eng_.ln:g acquisition<\/p>\n
proceedirig’s~ s:\u00e9el<in'g'.V,'de–no'ti\ufb01~c'ation and the same is
\npending  to the plaintiff, the<\/p>\n
defendantsflfla'-re iappr_obati'n.g' and reprobating their actions.<\/p>\n
 hafsd\u00e9beegn stated'th_at\u00ab,' the subsequent event, which is of<\/p>\n
.Vp'aramo,u"n,t"importance, which could not be pleaded earlier<\/p>\n
as"he'*was' n':2_tV..aadvised to do so by his previous advocate<\/p>\n
Vt=~..___Ta_'nd it is deemed necessary and expedient to<\/p>\n
  ~if_nrforpo,rate the proposed pleading, which goes to the root of<\/p>\n
 ____"".his';claim in the plaint. \u00a7\\<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
r_l\\<\/p>\n
7<\/span><\/p>\n
9. Indisputedly, the said writ petition has been
\nfiled in the year 2004. The petitioner has filed an<\/p>\n
app\u00e9ication seeking impleading in the said writ petitiotnhand<\/p>\n
having been impleaded, is a party therein. <\/p>\n
not appear to be dependent upon the outcom_e'”o,f _ V’<\/p>\n
writ petition. If the suit property  <\/p>\n
challenge is negatived, the defendantsca.nnot,b.e.compe.|led’=,<\/p>\n
to perform the Contract enlterjed into\ufb01_V_e’ar!-ier\u00b0v_ to the
\nacquisition. The petitioner ha’vi’n_gc~:b_eco’rne aparty to the
\nsaid writ petition is bound by_th’e’fo:rde\u00abr:Vthat\u00bb__may be passed<\/p>\n
therein. The p~eti’t.i_o’nerighavi-n’g ~.t.Q.:V.fi<now of the said<\/p>\n
writ petition 'a.n"'-application seeking impleading<\/p>\n
therein andwas i'na.pV3eade'd\u00ab–._:"IInmediate steps have not been<\/p>\n
taken in the suit.,'A1fter' considerable amount of delay i.e.,<\/p>\n
 af'ter"theE"'cios'ure of trial of the suit, the present application<\/p>\n
was=!'_fi|,ed..f–._:'flies'same indicates that, there is lack of<\/p>\n
 _ bonai*i.des__~'ir".-the matter of filing the IA and even otherwise,<\/p>\n
 trial. "court has observed that, the facts which are to be<\/p>\n
 ..esAtabiished by way of evidence by the plaintiff, the plaintiff<\/p>\n
if ':'_4"vha–s: placed evidence and the proposed amendment is not at<\/p>\n
\\ci
\n\/'.\n<\/p>\n
\n
8<\/span><\/p>\n
all required for adjudication of the rights of the parties
\nconclusively in the suit. It has further opined that, without<\/p>\n
the proposed amendment, the questions that are raised in<\/p>\n
the suit can be effectiveiy adjudicated on the…._avVaila’i;\u00bb|:eiV.<\/p>\n
pleadings. If, that be so, the trial courtis”-j:usti_i’i.eld’%<\/p>\n
passing the impugned order, rejectirv1Jg’AA’th’e’LAT -S is<\/p>\n
10. The suit is one for; speci\ufb01clperform–‘an.c’e”ofjtlhiell\ufb02<\/p>\n
contract in terms of the agreemventidated”3.7.”G2-;2Cl{)0iV The
\nsuit has been instituted ‘ono3′;’o’i’v,2oo:i;’-irriai of the suit is
\ncomplete. In view of the by the trial<\/p>\n
court noticed-rstijpra\u00e9V’:tfl:1’at,”‘-i.t”is un’n’e’ce:ssary for the plaintiff to
\nseek incor_por_atio_n  amendment in the plaint, I<\/p>\n
do not’findxla.ny”   interference in the impugned<\/p>\n
~”‘~orderi._”:’~:. ,_Ti1ere i’s\u00ab….,oeither procedural impropriety nor<\/p>\n
‘Vir’ra~tio*nal”ivty’lonithe part of the trial court in passing the<\/p>\n
  ‘t_he_sa’me shall stand dismissed. E<\/p>\n
impugned ordjeri’<\/p>\n
Forvlthe foregoing reasons, the writ petition fails and<\/p>\n
\/I?\n<\/p>\n
\n
9<\/span>
\nHowever, it is made clear that the observations and
\nfindings recorded herein, being limited for consideration of
\nthe challenge put to the impugned order rejecting the IA for
\namendment of the plaint, the trial court is directed to decide
\nthe suit on its merit uninfluenced by the observationsl\ufb01ade<\/p>\n
herein.\n<\/p>\n
Contentions of both parties Wi1lh_ regard’ or <\/p>\n
otherwise of the suit is kept open ‘for <\/p>\n
trial court.\n<\/p>\n
Ks;i\/- _– .<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mr Girish Arora vs Smt R Lakshmamma on 19 November, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 19*” DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2o1o?I_%’a._V BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.I\\\u00a3. vENoGoRAI\u00a7A:Vrs’OJvvOA1;” WRIT PETITION NO.34496\/i2o1o’I'(<3 r'%2I.~,C'R'Q\\\u00a7 . A I. ' 7 BETWEEN: Mr. Gir\u00e9sh Arora, Son of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-250528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMr Girish Arora vs Smt R Lakshmamma on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr Girish Arora vs Smt R Lakshmamma on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-07T05:42:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr Girish Arora vs Smt R Lakshmamma on 19 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-07T05:42:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1309,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr Girish Arora vs Smt R Lakshmamma on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-07T05:42:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr Girish Arora vs Smt R Lakshmamma on 19 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr Girish Arora vs Smt R Lakshmamma on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr Girish Arora vs Smt R Lakshmamma on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-07T05:42:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr Girish Arora vs Smt R Lakshmamma on 19 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-07T05:42:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010"},"wordCount":1309,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010","name":"Mr Girish Arora vs Smt R Lakshmamma on 19 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-07T05:42:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-girish-arora-vs-smt-r-lakshmamma-on-19-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr Girish Arora vs Smt R Lakshmamma on 19 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250528"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250528\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}