{"id":250910,"date":"2011-09-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011"},"modified":"2014-02-08T07:34:28","modified_gmt":"2014-02-08T02:04:28","slug":"bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh vs Banshi Tanti & Ors on 22 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Patna High Court<\/div>\n
Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh vs Banshi Tanti & Ors on 22 September, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: Amaresh Kumar Lal<\/div>\n
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA\n\n                 Criminal Revision No.174 of 2002\n\n  (Against the order dated 29.11.2001 passed by the learned Sub-\n Divisional Magistrate, Majhaul in Case No.1623 (Misc.) of 1981)\n==================================================\n<\/pre>\n
1.    Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh (now dead), son of late Ramautar
\n      Prasad Singh\n<\/p>\n
      (a) Chandani Devi, wife of Late Bishwa Mohan Prasad.\n<\/p>\n
      (b) Manoj Kumar Singh.\n<\/p>\n
      (c) Saroj Kumar Singh.\n<\/p>\n
      (d) Pankaj Kumar Singh\n<\/p>\n
      (e) Bhoosan Kumar Singh\n<\/p>\n
      (f)   Roshan Kumar Singh.\n<\/p>\n
      (g) Kamini Sinha, wife of Sri Birendra Kumar Singh,
\n            resident of village-Sukki, Patepur, P.S.-Patepur, District-
\n            Muzaffarpur.\n<\/p>\n
      (h) Kumkum Devi, wife of Sri Arvind Singh, resident of
\n            village-Bathnaha, P.S.-Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.\n<\/p>\n
      (i)   Paso Devi, wife of Sri Shushil Kumar Singh, resident of
\n            village-Mozamma, P.S.-Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.\n<\/p>\n
      (j)   Poonam Sinha, wife of Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, resident
\n            of village- Phulwaria, P.S.-Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.\n<\/p>\n
      (k) Pinki Kumari, wife of Sri Ajit Kumar Singh, resident of
\n            village-Kafain, P.S.-Hathauri, Distt.-Muzaffarpur.\n<\/p>\n
      (l)   Rinki Kumari, wife of Sri Shashi Bhushan Singh, resident
\n            of village-Jasauli, P.S.-Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.
\n      (All sons and daughters of late Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh,
\n      resident of village-Nayanagar, P.S.-Hasanpur, District-
\n      Sitamarhi)<\/p>\n
                                                  …. ….   Petitioners
\n                               Versus\n<\/p>\n
1.    Banshi Tanti (since died), son of Bhattu Tanti.\n<\/p>\n
      (a) Ram Dulari Devi.\n<\/p>\n
      (b) Bikhari Das.\n<\/p>\n
      (c) Lal Dhari Das.\n<\/p>\n
      (d) Uma Devi.\n<\/p>\n
      (e) Kamini Devi.\n<\/p>\n
2.    Bhikhari Tanti\n<\/p>\n
3.    Lalo Tanti, both sons of Banshi Tanti.\n<\/p>\n
      (All residents of village-Purpathar, P.S.-Khodawandpur,
\n      District- Begusarai)
\n        Patna High Court CR. REV. No.174 of 2002 dt.22-09-2011                            2<\/p>\n
                                               …. …. 2nd Party-Opposite Parties
\n            ==================================================
\n                                         Appearance:\n<\/p>\n
            Advocate for the Petitioners    : Mr. Bhupendra Narain Sinha
\n                                           : Mr. Shailendra Kumar.\n<\/p>\n
            Advocate for the Opp. Parties : Mrs. Meera Kumari
\n                                           : Mr. B.N.Sinha ‘Suman’<\/p>\n
               CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL<\/p>\n
                                            ORAL JUDGMENT<\/p>\n
               (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL)<\/p>\n
Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.                The 1st party-petitioners have preferred this revision<\/p>\n
                             application against the order dated 29.11.2001 passed by<\/p>\n
                             the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Majhaul in Case<\/p>\n
                             No.1623 (Misc.) of 1981 by which the possession over the<\/p>\n
                             land in dispute has been declared under Section 145<\/a><\/p>\n
                             Cr.P.C. in favour of the 2nd party-opposite party.<\/p>\n
                                     The land in dispute is appertaining to Mauza-<\/p>\n
                             Purpathar in Tauzi No.1233, Khata No.38, Plot Nos.24,<\/p>\n
                             26, 33, 114, 115, 127 and 128 measuring 4 Bighas, 8<\/p>\n
                             Kathas and 8 Dhurs, but on the spot these lands are<\/p>\n
                             meansuring 4 Bighas 11 Kathas and 8 dhoors.<\/p>\n
                                     The facts rising to this application are that an<\/p>\n
                             application was filed by the petitioner (original) on<\/p>\n
                             10.09.1981 before the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
\n Patna High Court CR. REV. No.174 of 2002 dt.22-09-2011                              3<\/p>\n
                      Majhaul to initiate a proceeding under Section 144<\/a> Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n
                      On which, a report was called for from the concerned<\/p>\n
                      police station. After receipt of the report, the Sub-<\/p>\n
                      Divisional Magistrate initiated a proceeding under Section<\/p>\n
                      144<\/a> Cr.P.C. on 16.09.1981 and subsequently, it was<\/p>\n
                      converted into a proceeding under Section 145<\/a> Cr.P.C. on<\/p>\n
                      14.11.1981.\n<\/p>\n
                              The case of the 1st party petitioner is that the land in<\/p>\n
                      dispute alongwith other lands were sold in auction on rent<\/p>\n
                      suit and purchased by the then landlords Sri Jagarnath<\/p>\n
                      Prasad Singh and Sri Balbhadra Prasad Singh, resident of<\/p>\n
                      village-Nayanagar, vide Case No.93\/1910 and Case<\/p>\n
                      No.48\/1911. The auction sale was confirmed by the 1 st<\/p>\n
                      court of Munsif, Begusarai on 21.07.1911 and delivery of<\/p>\n
                      possession was affected over the lands in dispute and other<\/p>\n
                      lands on 16.11.1911. Both the auction purchasers<\/p>\n
                      partitioned their lands privately including the lands in<\/p>\n
                      dispute, which, were allotted to the share of Jagarnath<\/p>\n
                      Prasad Singh, who came in possession of the same. After<\/p>\n
                      the death of Jagarnath Pd. Singh, his only son Ramautar<\/p>\n
                      Singh inherited the disputed land and came in possession<\/p>\n
                      thereof. The said Ramautar Singh settled the disputed
\n Patna High Court CR. REV. No.174 of 2002 dt.22-09-2011                           4<\/p>\n
                      lands by virtue of Hukumnana dated 1st Asin, 1356 F.S. in<\/p>\n
                      favour of Smt. Chandani Devi, wife of the petitioner and<\/p>\n
                      since then she is coming in exclusive possession of the<\/p>\n
                      same. She was paying rent to the ex-landlords and after<\/p>\n
                      vesting of Zamindari her name was mutated in the revenue<\/p>\n
                      records of the Anchal and she is paying rent regularly and<\/p>\n
                      rent receipts in proof of the payment of rent were regularly<\/p>\n
                      issued in her favour.\n<\/p>\n
                              The case of the 2nd party-opposite party is that the<\/p>\n
                      lands, in question, were recorded in the name of their<\/p>\n
                      ancestors in the cadastral survey and after the death of the<\/p>\n
                      recorded tenants, they have inherited the lands being their<\/p>\n
                      heirs and claimed to be in possession thereof. They have<\/p>\n
                      further claimed that the recorded tenants have executed<\/p>\n
                      several mortgage deeds with respect to the lands in dispute<\/p>\n
                      in favour of the relatives of the petitioner as well as in<\/p>\n
                      favour of the then landlords. The Ex-landlord of the Tauzi<\/p>\n
                      had submitted the name of the recorded tenant in the<\/p>\n
                      Jamabandi return submitted at the time of vesting of<\/p>\n
                      Jamindari and later rent receipts were also issued vide<\/p>\n
                      Mutation Case No.3\/15 of 1980-81 (Annexure-B to the<\/p>\n
                      counter affidavit of the opposite party). Thus the opposite
\n Patna High Court CR. REV. No.174 of 2002 dt.22-09-2011                             5<\/p>\n
                      party claimed their possession over the disputed lands on<\/p>\n
                      the basis of redemption of mortgaged as well as on the<\/p>\n
                      basis of recent mutation order passed in their favour.<\/p>\n
                              Both the parties adduced their oral as well as<\/p>\n
                      documentary evidence in support of their respective claims<\/p>\n
                      before the learned Magistrate. The learned Magistrate has<\/p>\n
                      found and declared the possession of the 2nd party over the<\/p>\n
                      land in dispute vide order dated 22.04.1988 (Annexure-C<\/p>\n
                      to the counter affidavit of the opposite party). The<\/p>\n
                      petitioner challenged the aforesaid order dated 22.04.1988<\/p>\n
                      passed by the learned Executive Magistrate in Cr. Rev.<\/p>\n
                      No.243\/88,        which      was   dismissed   on   30.03.1994<\/p>\n
                      confirming the order of the learned Magistrate (Annexure-<\/p>\n
                      D to the counter affidavit of the opposite party).<\/p>\n
                      Thereafter, the petitioner challenged both the orders of<\/p>\n
                      learned Executive Magistrate as well as the learned<\/p>\n
                      Additional         Sessions        Judge-V,    Begusarai    in<\/p>\n
                      Cr.W.J.C.No.554\/94 before the Patna High Court, which<\/p>\n
                      was allowed vide order dated 4.07.1995 and the case was<\/p>\n
                      remanded to the learned Magistrate with direction that he<\/p>\n
                      will afford an opportunity to the parties to prove their<\/p>\n
                      documents and thereafter he will dispose of the proceeding
\n Patna High Court CR. REV. No.174 of 2002 dt.22-09-2011                              6<\/p>\n
                      in accordance with law (Annexure-E to the counter<\/p>\n
                      affidavit). The opposite party filed S.L.P. in the Hon’ble<\/p>\n
                      Supreme Court vide S.L.P. (Cr.) No.356\/96, which was<\/p>\n
                      later on dismissed (Annexure-G to the counter affidavit).<\/p>\n
                      In the meantime, the petitioner filed a petition in Misc.<\/p>\n
                      Case No.1523\/81 under Section 145<\/a> Cr.P.C. before the<\/p>\n
                      learned     S.D.M.,       Majhaul,   Begusarai.   The   learned<\/p>\n
                      Magistrate passed an order on 23.01.1996 against the<\/p>\n
                      opposite party and declared the possession of the petitioner<\/p>\n
                      (Annexure-H to the counter affidavit). The opposite party<\/p>\n
                      challenged the aforesaid order dated 23.01.1996 vide Cr.<\/p>\n
                      Rev. No.14\/97 before the learned Sessions Judge, which<\/p>\n
                      was heard and allowed vide order dated 30.07.1999 by the<\/p>\n
                      learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.VII, Begusarai<\/p>\n
                      and remanded the case before the learned S.D.M. for<\/p>\n
                      disposal in accordance with law. The learned S.D.M.,<\/p>\n
                      Majhaul passed the order on 29.01.2001 in favour of the<\/p>\n
                      opposite party, which has been challenged in this criminal<\/p>\n
                      revision.\n<\/p>\n
                              Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the<\/p>\n
                      learned counsel for the opposite party.<\/p>\n
                              The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
\n Patna High Court CR. REV. No.174 of 2002 dt.22-09-2011                          7<\/p>\n
                      the learned Magistrate has not considered the oral as well<\/p>\n
                      as documentary evidence properly. He has further<\/p>\n
                      submitted that in a proceeding under Section 145<\/a> Cr.P.C. a<\/p>\n
                      Magistrate has to peruse the documents and affidavits filed<\/p>\n
                      in the case. The word ‘perused’ of course means to<\/p>\n
                      examine critically.\n<\/p>\n
                               In support of his contention, he has relied upon a<\/p>\n
                      decision in the case of Bhola Kumar and Ors. Vs.<\/p>\n
                      Bhubneshwar Singh reported in 1968 BLJR 327.<\/p>\n
                              The learned counsel for the 2nd party-opposite party<\/p>\n
                      has submitted that it is apparent from the impugned order<\/p>\n
                      that the learned Magistrate has considered the evidence<\/p>\n
                      adduced on behalf of both the parties. The documents have<\/p>\n
                      also been exhibited and marked as Exhibits on behalf of<\/p>\n
                      both the parties. The 1st party-petitioners have produced<\/p>\n
                      nine witnesses and the 2nd party has adduced seven<\/p>\n
                      witnesses. The learned Magistrate has considered the oral<\/p>\n
                      as well as documentary evidence adduced on behalf of<\/p>\n
                      both the parties and has come to the conclusion that the<\/p>\n
                      second party opposite party are in possession of the land in<\/p>\n
                      dispute and their possession has been declared and it has<\/p>\n
                      also been made clear that the order will remain in force
\n        Patna High Court CR. REV. No.174 of 2002 dt.22-09-2011                          8<\/p>\n
                             until any order is passed by any competent court.<\/p>\n
                                     After hearing the learned counsel for both the<\/p>\n
                             parties and on perusal of the record, it appears that the<\/p>\n
                             contention of the learned counsel for the 2nd party opposite<\/p>\n
                             party is correct. The learned Magistrate has considered the<\/p>\n
                             oral as well as documentary evidence adduced on behalf of<\/p>\n
                             both the parties and has come to the conclusion that the<\/p>\n
                             second party opposite party is in possession of the land in<\/p>\n
                             dispute.\n<\/p>\n
                                     Considering the facts and circumstances stated<\/p>\n
                             above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the<\/p>\n
                             impugned order. This petition is dismissed.<\/p>\n
                                                      ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)
\nPatna High Court, Patna
\nDated the 22nd September, 2011
\nNAFR\/V.K. Pandey\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Patna High Court Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh vs Banshi Tanti & Ors on 22 September, 2011 Author: Amaresh Kumar Lal IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.174 of 2002 (Against the order dated 29.11.2001 passed by the learned Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Majhaul in Case No.1623 (Misc.) of 1981) ================================================== 1. Bishwa […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-250910","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBishwa Mohan Prasad Singh vs Banshi Tanti & Ors on 22 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh vs Banshi Tanti & Ors on 22 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-08T02:04:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh vs Banshi Tanti & Ors on 22 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-08T02:04:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1545,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh vs Banshi Tanti & Ors on 22 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-08T02:04:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh vs Banshi Tanti & Ors on 22 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh vs Banshi Tanti & Ors on 22 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh vs Banshi Tanti & Ors on 22 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-08T02:04:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh vs Banshi Tanti & Ors on 22 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-08T02:04:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011"},"wordCount":1545,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011","name":"Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh vs Banshi Tanti & Ors on 22 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-08T02:04:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bishwa-mohan-prasad-singh-vs-banshi-tanti-ors-on-22-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bishwa Mohan Prasad Singh vs Banshi Tanti & Ors on 22 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250910"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250910\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}