{"id":250941,"date":"2009-01-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009"},"modified":"2015-09-29T16:12:10","modified_gmt":"2015-09-29T10:42:10","slug":"municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Municipal Council vs Ramesh Chand on 19 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Municipal Council vs Ramesh Chand on 19 January, 2009<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">R.S.A. No. 321 of 2009 (O&amp;M)\n                                                                     -1-\n\n       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                       CHANDIGARH\n\n\n                                        R.S.A. No. 321 of 2009 (O&amp;M)\n                                        Date of decision: 19.1.2009\n\n\nMunicipal Council, Yamuna Nagar and others\n                                                          ....Appellants\n\n\n                   Versus\n\n\nRamesh Chand\n                                                         ....Respondent\n\nCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA\n\nPresent: Mr. Sanjay S. Chauhan, Advocate,\n         for the appellants.\n\n                   *****\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">VINOD K. SHARMA, J (ORAL)<\/p>\n<p>         This regular second appeal is directed against the judgment<\/p>\n<p>and decree dated 10.4.2007 and 4.12.2008 passed by the learned<\/p>\n<p>Courts below vide which the suit filed by the plaintiff\/respondent for<\/p>\n<p>recovery of an amount stands decreed.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">         The plaintiff brought a suit for recovery of a sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,20,000\/- on the ground of supply of goods to the Municipal<\/p>\n<p>Committee against which payment was said to have not been made.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">         In support of this contention, the plaintiff produced on record<\/p>\n<p>the bills as well as details of the goods supplied to the Municipal<\/p>\n<p>Committee as also the total amount received.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">         The case of the plaintiff was that the total goods supplied<\/p>\n<p>were worth Rs.4,23,457.78 paise out of which a sum of Rs.3,07,651.48<\/p>\n<p>paise had been received, thus leaving a balance of Rs.1,15,806.30<\/p>\n<p>paise as on 31.3.1998.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">         The suit was contested wherein a plea was taken that the<br \/>\n R.S.A. No. 321 of 2009 (O&amp;M)<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                                                                         -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>stock as claimed was not supplied to the Municipal Committee as the<\/p>\n<p>same was not entered in the stock register of the appellant\/defendant.<\/p>\n<p>The plea of the suit being time barred was also taken.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">              The learned trial Court on appreciation of evidence held that<\/p>\n<p>the plaintiff was entitled to amount claimed along with interest @ 18%<\/p>\n<p>per annum.        Issue No. 3 regarding suit being time barred was not<\/p>\n<p>pressed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">              In the appeal, however, a stand was taken that the plea of the<\/p>\n<p>limitation was question of law and, therefore, the Court was bound to<\/p>\n<p>decide the question of limitation also.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">              The learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar,<\/p>\n<p>considered the evidence brought on record showing that the last<\/p>\n<p>payment was made on 3.4.1994, therefore, it was held that the suit<\/p>\n<p>having been filed within two years of said date was within the period of<\/p>\n<p>limitation.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">              The plea of the appellant\/defendant that the supplies were not<\/p>\n<p>made as per provisions of Section 50 of the Municipal Act has been<\/p>\n<p>rejected. Reasons given for rejecting this plea by the learned lower<\/p>\n<p>appellate Courts read as under: &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>              &#8220;Mere this fact that the provisions of Section 50 of the<br \/>\n              Municipal Act have not been followed is no ground to<br \/>\n              non suit the plaintiff because the appellants\/Municipal<br \/>\n              Council has received the electric goods from the<br \/>\n              plaintiff even though the contract for supply of the<br \/>\n              goods does not fulfil the requirement of Section 50 of<br \/>\n              the Municipal Act and is invalid on that account, but,<br \/>\n              as the goods have been voluntarily accepted by the<br \/>\n              appellants-Municipal Council, plainitff is entitled for<br \/>\n              the recovery of the value thereof as per <a href=\"\/doc\/340124\/\" id=\"a_1\">Section 65<\/a><br \/>\n              and <a href=\"\/doc\/1454268\/\" id=\"a_1\">70<\/a> of the Indian Contract Act. To support this<br \/>\n              view reference can be made to case State of West<br \/>\n              Bengal Vs. M\/s B.K. Mondal and Sons, A.I.R. 1962<br \/>\n              S.C. 779.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_9\">\n<p id=\"p_10\">              Then, there is a direct authority of our Hon&#8217;ble High<br \/>\n              Court titled as Deputy Chand Goyal Vs. Municipal<br \/>\n              Committee, Meham, 1993(2) R.R.R. 202. In that<br \/>\n R.S.A. No. 321 of 2009 (O&amp;M)<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                                                                       -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>         case plainitff was a contractor. He entered into a<br \/>\n         contract with the municipal committee for<br \/>\n         construction of some work. He completed the work<br \/>\n         as per the work order.          Running payment of<br \/>\n         Rs.2500\/- was made by the defendant-Municipal<br \/>\n         Committee and he filed the suit for the recovery of<br \/>\n         the remaining amount. In the written statement it was<br \/>\n         pleaded that the agreement was not executed in<br \/>\n         accordance with Section 47 of the Punjab Municipal<br \/>\n         Act, 1911 (This Section 47 of the Punjab Municipal<br \/>\n         Act, 1911 is analogues to Section 50 of the Haryana<br \/>\n         Municipal Act, 1973). Taking note of the legal<br \/>\n         position Hon&#8217;ble High Court has laid down as under: &#8211;<br \/>\n         There is no denying the fact that no valid agreement<br \/>\n         has come into existence as contemplated by Section<br \/>\n         47 of the Punjab Municipal Act. Resolution of the<br \/>\n         Municipal Committee Exhibit P-13 authorising the<br \/>\n         President to invite for tenders and execution of the<br \/>\n         work as per work orders Exhibits P-3 to P-6 by the<br \/>\n         plainitff cannot constitute a valid contract, but all the<br \/>\n         same it cannot be lost sight of that the plaintiff<br \/>\n         executed the work in pursuance of the Resolution of<br \/>\n         the Municipal Committee Exhibit P13 and is entitled<br \/>\n         to compensation in terms of <a href=\"\/doc\/340124\/\" id=\"a_2\">Section 65<\/a> of the Indian<br \/>\n         Contract Act. <a href=\"\/doc\/340124\/\" id=\"a_3\">Section 65<\/a> of the Indian Contract Act<br \/>\n         reads as under: &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">         65. Obligation of person who has received advantage<br \/>\n         under void agreement or contract that becomes void.<br \/>\n         When an agreement is discovered to be void, or<br \/>\n         when a contract becomes void, any person who has<br \/>\n         received any advantage under such agreement or<br \/>\n         contract is bound to restore it or to make<br \/>\n         compensation for it, to the person from whom, he<br \/>\n         received it.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">         Thus when an agreement is discovered to be void or<br \/>\n         becomes a void any person who has taken<br \/>\n         advantage under such agreement or contract is<br \/>\n         bound to restore it or give compensation for the<br \/>\n         same. Similarly <a href=\"\/doc\/1454268\/\" id=\"a_4\">Section 70<\/a> of the Indian Contract Act<br \/>\n         envisages awarding of compensation to a person<br \/>\n         who has done anything for another and who did not<br \/>\n         intend to do so gratuitously.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">         It is pertinent to mention here that though in the bills, the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff had claimed that interest @ 18% would be charged on delayed<\/p>\n<p>payment and learned trial Court accepted the claim of interest.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">         The learned appellate Court taking into consideration, the<\/p>\n<p>present rate of interest reduced the interest to 12%.          the finding<\/p>\n<p>recorded on other issues was affirmed.<br \/>\n R.S.A. No. 321 of 2009 (O&amp;M)<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">                                                                       -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            The learned counsel for appellants contends that following<\/p>\n<p>substantial questions of law arise in present appeal: &#8211;<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>            &#8220;1.   Whether contract executed in violation of<br \/>\n                  Section 50 of the Haryana Municipal Act, could<br \/>\n                  be enforced?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_2\"><p>            2.    Whether learned Courts below erred in drawing<br \/>\n                  adverse inference, even though record i.e. stock<br \/>\n                  register was produced in Court?&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p id=\"p_15\">\n<p id=\"p_16\">            The first substantial question of law does not arise as the<\/p>\n<p>learned Courts below rightly rejected the plea and the findings recorded<\/p>\n<p>are as per settled law.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_17\">            The second question of law as framed does not arise as<\/p>\n<p>admittedly the stock register was not proved, thus could not be read in<\/p>\n<p>evidence.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_18\">            No merit.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_19\">            Dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_20\">                                                   (Vinod K. Sharma)<br \/>\n                                                        Judge<br \/>\nJanuary 19, 2009<br \/>\nR.S.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Municipal Council vs Ramesh Chand on 19 January, 2009 R.S.A. No. 321 of 2009 (O&amp;M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 321 of 2009 (O&amp;M) Date of decision: 19.1.2009 Municipal Council, Yamuna Nagar and others &#8230;.Appellants Versus Ramesh Chand &#8230;.Respondent CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-250941","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Municipal Council vs Ramesh Chand on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Municipal Council vs Ramesh Chand on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-29T10:42:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Municipal Council vs Ramesh Chand on 19 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-29T10:42:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1033,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Municipal Council vs Ramesh Chand on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-29T10:42:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Municipal Council vs Ramesh Chand on 19 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Municipal Council vs Ramesh Chand on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Municipal Council vs Ramesh Chand on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-29T10:42:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Municipal Council vs Ramesh Chand on 19 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-29T10:42:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009"},"wordCount":1033,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009","name":"Municipal Council vs Ramesh Chand on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-29T10:42:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/municipal-council-vs-ramesh-chand-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Municipal Council vs Ramesh Chand on 19 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250941"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250941\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}