{"id":251023,"date":"2010-09-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010"},"modified":"2016-01-25T18:21:10","modified_gmt":"2016-01-25T12:51:10","slug":"sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri P Sridhar Reddy S\/O Sri. Venku … vs The Commissioner on 13 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri P Sridhar Reddy S\/O Sri. Venku … vs The Commissioner on 13 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n
-1-\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 131'\" DAY OF SEPTEMBER,j2O 10\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUsTIcE RAM    _  \n\nWRIT PETITION No.3s47o of ;2\u00b00_o9 'Irina' '_ \n\nC[w. \n\nWRIT PETITION NOS.1'849-18.50 OF  iBI:f~A)II  ,\n\nMISC.W.No. I397\/2010 &'VMISC.W.-No.51 1.2\/2010\nIN w.P.No,3s4fm or 2909 (BDA).\/\n\nMISC.W. 1397\/20 10 A: 'M1scIE.I:*a\\Z;5  0 &\nW.P.NO.38470.0F 2009 1  '     1 'A '\n\n  A\nPSRIDHARAAREDDTWS A' \n\nS\/Q.,,VENKU_RED'DY\\ \nAGE 47 YEARS,\n\n \"  . R\/AT \/ 1,  BLOCK\n. jGANQENA\u00a7--1AL__L1, BANGALORE --- 32.  PETITIONER\n\n ~.(E\u00a7\u00a5R \u00absir'<i\u00ab'\u00a7"'_I#\u00bbI'1(}ID{jIA'i\\\/IED NASIRUDDIN, ADV]\n\nAND  ' - \n\n"  ~ COMMISSIONER D\n .BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY\n ._ BELLMQY ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST\nBANGALORE ---- 20. .. .RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
(BY SR1. A M VIJAY, ADV]<\/p>\n
MK<\/p>\n
MISC. W. 1397\/10 FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF
\nCPC FOR VACATING INTERIM ORDER 5: MISC.W. 5112\/I0
\nFILED UNDER ORDER 6 RULE 17 OF THE CPC”-.R\/W
\nARTICLE 226<\/a> & 227<\/a> OF’ THE CONSTITUTION OEfI.ND_IA
\nPRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE A.<~:~QUwIS_IT*I__ON<\/p>\n
PROCEEDINGS AND AWARD PASSEDj' BYV"_
\nRESPONDENT ON 21.12.1983 AT  8: <\/p>\n
PRODUCED BY THE RESPONDENT. 'AALON'GWITH.i'. ITS
\nOBJECTIC)NINW.P.38470\/09. *  I.    <\/p>\n
THIS PE'I'I'I'ION FILED UNDER-.. 1Vx'}"\\'1'IC'I,.'I\u00a53AT.\u00a72v2,6VV<'SI 2272*<\/p>\n
OF THE CONSTITUTION OFTNDIA PP{I'–\\fYI'1'JC% TO DIRECT
\nTI-IE RESPONDENT, ITS OFEICIALS._, OR ITS,_l-IENCHMEN
\nFROM IN ANY WAY 'INTERIi'ERIN'(?; WITH THE PEACEFUL
\nPOSSESSION AND EfI\\IJOYMf\u20ac\u00bbNv"i'  'THE SCHEDULE
\nPROPERTY OR, IN AT1fI:MPTING""~-.TO._':_.DEMOLISH THE<\/p>\n
STRUCTURES\u00bb,STA:N'DING_'THEREON; AND ETC.
\nW.P.NOs u1849w'l.S.5f)j;1\u00a5Q*~..: ' <\/p>\n
BE'IWEI<3N :"\n<\/p>\n
 T,  , I  .  IvIO}iAMMED”‘R1YAZUDDIN<\/p>\n
–. _ .8\/OI.,IvIOHAMMED ZIAUDDIN
\n AGE 46_YEARS
\n~ R\/AT NO. 5, 3RD MAIN RAOD
\nVASANTHNAGAR (EAST), BANGALORE.<\/p>\n
 2 ” NAVEED PASHA<\/p>\n
I S\/O. LATE MOHAMMED ISMAIL
\n AGE 39 YEARS
\nR\/AT NO. 647, 7TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS
\nHMT LAYOUT, R T NAGAR, BANGALORE.
\n.. . PETITIONERS<\/p>\n
{BY SR1. A K SUBBAIAH & A S PONNAMMA, ADV)<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
AND:\n<\/p>\n
THE COMMISSIONER M
\nBANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUT_H.ORITY_” E
\nBELLARY ROAD, KUMARAPARK EST’ ‘ .. ”<\/p>\n
BANGALORE.   E.  ..1E\u00bbRESPON[i3EN%I’j ‘<\/p>\n
{BY SR1. V B SHIVA <\/p>\n
THESE PETmO_NS E1LEt)\u00bbv.:J1~:pER’ ARTICLE 226 81
\n227<\/a> OF THE CONSTITUTTONVA *’O.EfIND1A PRAYING TO
\nDIRECT TI-IE RESPONDENT ‘LSSTJE AEPRORRIATE WRIT OR
\nORDER OR D1REcT’1OVNV:’THE__ N TGRE_’;G1T PROHIBITION
\nREsTRAIN1NG.–.TEE Ij3ESP’Q1\\TD’EANT, “ITS” OFFICIALS AND
\nHENcHMAN3..FR-SM DEMOLISHING THE BUILDING OF THE
\nPETITONERS;HEREIN’~-.STANr51NG IN ASSESSMENT NO.6.
\nEHOO1?SANE’RA.;_,V1LLAGE’. ~– KASAISA I-IOBLI, BANGALORE
\nNORTH TALIJK; AND ETC’.\n<\/p>\n
THESE MISCf;W;s__}LNI3 PETITIONS COMING ON FQR
\nPRLHEARING IN ‘E5 GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE
\nTHE. FOLLOw1NG;–. * <\/p>\n
 _ . . . .\n<\/p>\n
  questions Of fact and that Of <\/p>\n
Sr-ise Vforivticfieeision making, with the consent of learned<\/p>\n
 _cOurz1sei for the parties, the petitions are clubbed<\/p>\n
O gttcgether, \ufb01naliy heard and are disposed Of by this<\/p>\n
—-Common Order.\n<\/p>\n
bk<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
2. It is not in dispute that land  <\/p>\n
guntas in Sy.No.6 of Boopasandra V111age,oL1t’oi”  <\/p>\n
the petitioner claim to purchased <\/p>\n
sites, was acquired alonggvzith 1ar_g”‘e- tracts.  <\/p>\n
the formation of Rajarnahaln\u00e9iii’ Stage,”-Cfoiiui:’}IImStage,
\nExtension layout,   Vi\ufb01eyelopment
\nAuthority, for, short…  preliminary
\nnoti\ufb01cation   Pfvinaiwjnoti\ufb01cation dated
\n  of possession was
\nno\ufb01fied   dated 3.1.1985 under<\/p>\n
Sectionxi1\u00a7d3d(2)   Land Acquisition Act<\/a>, 1894,<\/p>\n
   the”\u00ab1ay_out has been formed. According to<\/p>\n
    — BDA, the noti\ufb01ed kathedars did not<\/p>\n
 acquisition proceedings while one Raziya 5<\/p>\n
 Bee; ‘W’\/o. Abdul Jabbar Khan claiming to have; an<\/p>\n
  in the immovable property in question<\/p>\n
 ___5instituted O.S.No.3502\/89 for permanent injunction<\/p>\n
arraigning the respondent-BDA as party~defendant<\/p>\n
which when dismissed by judgment and decree dated<\/p>\n
5*<\/p>\n
-6-<\/span><\/p>\n
3. Aithough a faint effort was made by’ <\/p>\n
counsel for the petitioners that  <\/p>\n
permitted to challenge the noiti\ufb01cateionscp it<\/p>\n
lands in question, I am afraid neither suchajp conte_ij.1tion_–‘*.<\/p>\n
cannot be countenanced  in
\nthe light of the decision    Imnvsnuss LTD
\nvs. STATE  or  p OTHERSI
\ndisentitling   in question the<\/p>\n
acquis_i_tior1~   cou\u00e9rt of law.<\/p>\n
4. iA~Fut1c1 this Court in POORNAPRAJNA<\/p>\n
  H_o*Us1Es: tpmilnnzwoz COOPERATIVE SOCIETY  vs.<\/p>\n
   DODDA BAILAMMA & OTHERS<\/a>? hgiq<\/p>\n
 “28. Writ appeals 2090434\/93 arising
\nout of wit petition Nos.480 to 484\/93 have
\nbeen \ufb01led by the purchasers of the lands
\nafter the issuance of notification under<\/p>\n
Section 4(1)<\/a> of the Act. Now it is a well<\/p>\n
‘ (2003) 5 scc 365 M<\/p>\n
_-7..\n<\/p>\n
settled proposition of law that a perso;1*-Wl1o_:”‘.j’ <\/p>\n
purchases the land subsequent  {the <\/p>\n
issuance of the noti\ufb01cat.io’n–under _, .S”ectio11._f, <\/p>\n
4(1) of the Act, cannot be  to  <\/p>\n
owner. Such a pu:~’ch__aser7has no.”ri’ght_ to’;<\/p>\n
challenge the acquisitionl’it_self,”  he<\/p>\n
is entitled to claim  b3dr’VVi1’tue of<\/p>\n
sale made in    title and<\/p>\n
interest ;of__ his A   1 Reference may<\/p>\n
be Ina-deb t’l1e”Supreme Court<\/p>\n
in it  jji’i1’\u00a7’J’i._3ui;A  sR1. SHIVKUMAR
\nI’l’BHAF\u00a7t}Al?}}”‘&:”Ofi’i-IERS”{JT 1995 (6) so 274)
\n  *  ‘<\/p>\n
A T V   of the Government
\nind_i_c_ates that the person whose land
\nwas acquired means the owner as on<\/p>\n
 ‘-date. notification was notified for<\/p>\n
‘V dll’-ijacajuisition, and he alone will be
\nt ‘V entitled to allotment of alternative site.
\nA person who purchases land
\nsubsequent to the Notification may be
\nentitled to claim compensation by
\nvirtue of sale made in his favour,<\/p>\n
namely, the right title and interest the<\/p>\n
3 ELR 2.998 KAR E441 <\/p>\n
-8-<\/span><\/p>\n
predecessor had but, he cannot <\/p>\n
said to be the owner for a11otrn”ent..’  it <\/p>\n
since the right of ownership Wouid_beA_f<\/p>\n
determined with refere’nee’4to theedtate V  <\/p>\n
on which Notificationi’u\ufb01_der   <\/p>\n
4(1) was pubIished’.~..-WasVt}1e”V’.ijewVV <\/p>\n
of this Court in another oases ‘white<\/p>\n
considering: the   Judgment<\/p>\n
of the De1hi4Hi_gh”   these<\/p>\n
circtariistancet V’    it Ttllowed.<\/p>\n
   S h’e””considered<\/p>\n
dddd “‘tto:.:ivi}3’eTV’::ii\u00a7he ‘”_’as””on the date of<\/p>\n
_ ”  Section 4(1)<\/a><\/p>\n
 =  the Gazette. The<\/p>\n
direction given by the learned Single<\/p>\n
“eiudged  ‘accordingly quashed. The
\n :Wi}it.Petition stands dismissed.<\/p>\n
it “Reference can also be made to the<\/p>\n
subsequent Judgments of the Supreme
\nCourt in SMT. SNEH PRABI-IA vs. STATE OF
\nU.P. 8: ANOTHER (AIR 1996 SC 540}; U.P.
\nJAL NIGAM, LUCKNOW THROUGH ITS
\nCHAIRMAN AND ANOTHER vs. M\/S. KALRA<\/p>\n
UR<\/p>\n
-9-<\/span><\/p>\n
PROPERTIES (P) LTD., LUCKl<\/a>\\?OW;~””;~’\\;[\\lf_)_J:’I’
\nOTHERS (AIR 1996 SC 1170) aiIH1d~.,:$\\;]’AY t<\/p>\n
KRXSI-IAN SHINGHAL vs.:-‘U’NI\u00abON~’_:OF’:iIi\\I’DlA.’_i’.  it<\/p>\n
AND OTHERS (AIR 1996:”1SCf_’_’2L5’7’7}=i_ ‘-15}:
\naforesaid judgments’ -..__t_he S_uprerr:e:’
\nreiterated the View
\nBhargava” casg Supraiargdg  p held that the
\npurchaser subs’et;uent_Vtoitheilissuance of the
\nnoti\ufb01cations uiiiderif\ufb01ection   6 has no
\nright      acquisition
\nDro1\u00a7\u00a7e5ii1;1\u00e9S’i”’ ‘  a  <\/p>\n
  exfeielgsettied proposition of law that a<\/p>\n
person  the land subsequent to the<\/p>\n
  is:s’}:1ance,vp_of notification under sub–section (1) of Section<\/p>\n
V of”-cannot be said to be the owner and such a<\/p>\n
 Fcannot have the right to challenge the<\/p>\n
 acquivsiition itself although he is entitled to claim<\/p>\n
 vcofnpensation by virtue of the sale made in his favour<\/p>\n
__\u00a7i.e. of right, title and interest of his predecessor.<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
.10<\/p>\n
In the circumstances, writ petitions :are_wi__fict’\u00a7;cut<\/p>\n
merit and are accordingly rejected.<\/p>\n
In View of the disposal ofithg.  ‘:petitioia.sL:_’i{ssei’f,<\/p>\n
MiSC.W.1397\/2010 &\u00ab’ \u00bbi__M1sc,W.511.27\/gfcvio <\/p>\n
dismissed as having become__i’mriecessa:yi_.’ I if;<\/p>\n
KS <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri P Sridhar Reddy S\/O Sri. Venku … vs The Commissioner on 13 September, 2010 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 131′” DAY OF SEPTEMBER,j2O 10 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUsTIcE RAM _ WRIT PETITION No.3s47o of ;2\u00b00_o9 ‘Irina’ ‘_ C[w. WRIT PETITION NOS.1’849-18.50 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-251023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri P Sridhar Reddy S\/O Sri. Venku ... vs The Commissioner on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri P Sridhar Reddy S\/O Sri. Venku ... vs The Commissioner on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-25T12:51:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri P Sridhar Reddy S\\\/O Sri. Venku … vs The Commissioner on 13 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-25T12:51:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1148,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri P Sridhar Reddy S\\\/O Sri. Venku ... vs The Commissioner on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-25T12:51:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri P Sridhar Reddy S\\\/O Sri. Venku … vs The Commissioner on 13 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri P Sridhar Reddy S\/O Sri. Venku ... vs The Commissioner on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri P Sridhar Reddy S\/O Sri. Venku ... vs The Commissioner on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-25T12:51:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri P Sridhar Reddy S\/O Sri. Venku … vs The Commissioner on 13 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-25T12:51:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010"},"wordCount":1148,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010","name":"Sri P Sridhar Reddy S\/O Sri. Venku ... vs The Commissioner on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-25T12:51:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-p-sridhar-reddy-so-sri-venku-vs-the-commissioner-on-13-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri P Sridhar Reddy S\/O Sri. Venku … vs The Commissioner on 13 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251023","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=251023"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251023\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=251023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=251023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=251023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}