{"id":251066,"date":"2008-08-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008"},"modified":"2019-04-07T11:05:00","modified_gmt":"2019-04-07T05:35:00","slug":"chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"Chikka Lagumaiah vs The Dy Commr on 20 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Chikka Lagumaiah vs The Dy Commr on 20 August, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGPI COURT OF KARNATAKA, \n\nDATED THIS THE 20\"\u00bb: DAY OF Auauz\u00e9fi' 2ziQ\u00a2\u00a3    \n\nBEFORE'  \n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE  A \n\nWRIT PETITION No.263f4\u00bb1 OF 2004  J\nBETWEEN V' V' A' V'\n\nCHIKKA LAGUMAIAH ..   \nS\/O. LATE CHOQRI KEMP,AIVAH   % '\nAGED ABOUT59 argms %    % \nR\/AT aonnafsa-ME VILLAGE   \" \nKASABA HQBLL '9E?JAm:..mLLs_T-ALQK\nBANGALORE R_U;RAL\" r31S?R5Cr;i \n\n PETITION ER\n\n(BY M] s.(:'_\u00a7~\"2%  85 A\/S.)\n\nANEL : \"\n\n  1.  'fF\u00a7.E .\ufb01?\u00a7:P'UTY COMMISSIONER\n\n_  _ BANGALR-OE RURAL DISTRICT\n ._ %. BA\u00a7_\u00a3QALA')RE.\n\n2   COMMISSIONER\n~DQ'\u00a3)DABALLAPU RA SU B-{)IVISION\nBANGALORE.\n\n\"    NARAYANAPPA\n\nSINCE DECEASED REP.BY HIS LRS\n\nV'  33A MUNIYAMMA,\n\nAGED ABOUT 55 YEARS\nW\/O. LATE NARAYANAPPA\nR[A'I' DODDASANNE VILLAGE\n\nKASABA HOBLI \n\n\n\n3B\n\n3C\n\n3})\n\n3E\n\nDEVANAHALLI TALUK\nBANGALORE RURAL DIS'I'RIC.'l'.\nKRISHNA VENI\n\nAGED ABOUT 34 YEARS\n\n1:)\/0. LATE NARAYANAPPA\nw\/0. REDDY   \nR] AT THATHAHALLI WLILAGE\n\nSIDLAGHATTA TALUK, KG;.,AR\"DIs'TR1_\u00a7:i'r'\u00a7\n\nPADMAMMA, 32 YEARS 1 .\n\nD\/O. LATE NARAYANAPM; \n\nW\/C}. LAGUMAIAH \"  v_ j'  ..\nR\/AT MALLE5NAHALL;v.\u00a7:ILLA\u00a23E I  \"\nKASABA HQELI, *DEw.~NAHAi;L1 TALUK.\nBAN GA L.QI<\u00a3I_:; RU RAL' \u00a7)m'R1Cr. .\n\nANANBAMMA, :3Qf*YEAES.._ .\n\n33\/ 0; LAETE NARAm'reAPPA""\n\n'W\/0-- CH:%N\u00bbDRAPPA  \n\nR',(A'I'._ ANcHAT.'FAH_ALL,\u00a3- VILLAGE\nMALUR TA1.U'E<:,' KOLAR DISTRICT.\n\n   SIISHEELAMMA; 23 YEARS\n"  LATE" NARAYANAPPA\n\nW] 0. NARAYANA SWAMY\n\n' " "  RjAT"\u00abDC3DDASANNE VILLAGE\n\n' K.ASABA~ HOBLI, IDEVANAHALLI TALUK\n\n\ufb02 "  BAN\u20ac'_}--5i;0RE RURAL DISTRICT.\n\n.K':11vi. xNAGAVENI, 16 YEARS\n\n'13 go. LATE NARAYANAPPA\nMINOR, RERBY HER MOTHER a.-.\n\n NATURAL GUARDIAN LE. R3(A)\n\n3H\n\nR\/AT DODDASANNE VILLAGE\nKASABA HQBL1, DEVANAHALLI TALUK\nBANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.\n\nMANJUNATH, 20 YEARS\nS\/O. LATE NARAYANAPPA 3 K\n\n\n\nR] AT DODDASANNE VIELAGE\n* KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK\nBANGALORE RURAL DISFRICT.\n\n4 HOSAHUDYA MUNISHAMAPPA\ns\/0. PILLAPPA\n\nAGED ABOUT' 57 YEARS\n\n5 G R SATHENDRA\nS\/0. CHIKKARAMAEAHV \nAGED ABOUT 45 YEAREKL\u00bb \n\nN{).3 TO 5 ARE REs1DEN*:'s'gm?'~-\u00bb}._  \nDODDASANNE *v1I;:..AG\u00a2E, ;<A$A\u00a3m-HOBLI\nBEVANAHALLI TAL'Ui~'Z "       .\nBANGALORE RURAL DVIS'__I'F;VICT*.~  ' '\n\n6 THE S\u00a7?ECE\u00a33.LV,Lu%ND ACQU..1SiTI{:)N\nZomcgge, man B3539 %\n*.{NTERNA'1'}QN'AL' 'A; RPORT PROJECT\nKAS'I."URBA Roan, Tsmaas ~-- 560 001.\n -   .   RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
(BY SRLR DEVAf)}AS,V’.AGA FOR R1 -3)<\/p>\n
 v  _ (BY_1′:*:*,1:.>;\u00bb_1.._ PC DHA1w:~i PATHY, ADV FOR R4)
\n V Cay M $HW13L.PRAKASH,ADV FOR R4, R3A-E, (}&;.H)
\n {CA{1TSI3.\u00bb_’i’E’I’LEAMENDED AS PER ORDER D’I’D.4.7.2007)<\/p>\n
THiS:’WRI’I’ PETYFION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES<\/p>\n
  226 as 227 OF THE CONSTI’I’U’I’I()N OF INDLA PRAYING<\/p>\n
A  T\u20ac)__ QUASH ANNEXURE.A, PASSED BY R-2 DATED 31-<\/p>\n
 95-2002 AND ANNEXUREB mssan BY 12-1 DATED
\n“‘.11~08-2003, AND ETC.\n<\/p>\n
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL
\nHEARING, THIS DAY THE COURT’ MADE THE<\/p>\n
FOLLOWING:\n<\/p>\n
\n
OREZFER<\/p>\n
Four acres of land in Sy.No.28 of <\/p>\n
Village was granted on lease in favour of    <\/p>\n
Choori Kempaiah during  is x <\/p>\n
Special Dharkast order k1s:e.75\/M;45  ‘ D\u00a7;puty* ”<\/p>\n
Commissioner in terms   order
\nNo.R.6580\/93 -RM.es\u00e9;%.1- 1.’_VAt1:3g.fet1:\u00ab 494- 1942 “under the
\n“Grow more    cultivation<\/p>\n
   made absolute ciu1″iI1’ g
\nthe  ” of an upset price, laced<\/p>\n
with the  ‘co;f1di.tioIi”v_of’ ” Vnon~alieI1at’1e1:1. ‘I’hough it is<\/p>\n
 V’  ._ alie\u00e9eci-e~:h’a1; x1e’iVt}1e’r”the petitioner nor his mother being<\/p>\n
     of the deceased grantee, executed Sale<\/p>\n
  the ganted land in favour of<\/p>\n
   Resposririents 3 and 4, nevertheless, \ufb01led an application<\/p>\n
under Section 5 of The Kamataka Scheduled Castes<\/p>\n
 so  aind Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain<\/p>\n
Lands) Act, 1978, (for short ‘the Act’) to declare the<\/p>\n
transaction of sale as null and void, for resumption and<\/p>\n
UK<\/p>\n
to restore the land in their favour.  <\/p>\n
Commissioner, having held an enquiry,  ” \u00bb <\/p>\n
fmdings that the gent by way o\ufb01a   <\/p>\n
temporary eultivatiozti duri\u00a7}’g._the” A   . L’<\/p>\n
the “Grew more food Jscheieeft  the year
\n1962-63 in terms of “i\u20acL11e  ‘4 absolute in
\nfavour of the   of non-\n<\/p>\n
alienatiozt.       The Assistant
\nCemmi.ssie-tief,   the law laid down by
\nthe    in the case of CHIKKA<\/p>\n
KULLEGi)\u00a7fi)A,:V’  t e’E’A’rE or KARNATAKA mm<\/p>\n
   at1id~….app1yh1g the principles laid down<\/p>\n
 ‘  the claim of the petitioner on the<\/p>\n
  it was impermissible for the authority to<\/p>\n
   xestrrietion on the alienation of the property at<\/p>\n
A if “time of con\ufb01zmation of the grant, invoking Rule 43–J<\/p>\n
   \u00a2;r The Mysore Land Revenue (Amendment) Rules, 1960,<\/p>\n
for short Rules, by order dated 31435-2002<\/p>\n
3%<\/p>\n
‘IL.R.1997KAR.1753<\/p>\n
6 <\/span>
\nAnnexure” “. That order when carried in appea1:e\u00bbtoi.1\u00a7he<\/p>\n
Deputy Commissioner, stood af\ufb01rmed by  <\/p>\n
11-08-2003 A.I1I1\u20acXuI’\u20ac–“B”. Henoe, this writ  ii  ‘V<\/p>\n
2. The answer to the Toquesiion’-sis <\/p>\n
gnnted under Rule 43\u00abJ of R1.1le,s._<i;id :.i1ofg:oiiipowerVV<\/p>\n
the authorities to .  ineondition 'fregarding
\nalienation Without adVei'%:ing'.to {of the Act is no<\/p>\n
more res     'soffitlie autlrioritative<\/p>\n
pronc{nneement_'VV.oif {o'no~\u00abi..VvApe.KwV'Court in GUNTAIAH 3.
\nornmxks "vs.    & o'rm3Rs2, Where their<\/p>\n
lordossiaips lrieleii tine oijhiion of the Full Bench as i11COI'I'6Ct<\/p>\n
 "    eonciiiions restricting alienation are given<\/p>\n
    of the Rules, which are applicable to<\/p>\n
Ri\ufb02e 4._3~'J making the grant absolute.<\/p>\n
"   3. In the admitted facts of the case, that the land<\/p>\n
it   seas conveyed to Respondents 3 and 4 during the mriod<\/p>\n
of non-alienation, being in breach of the terms of non-<\/p>\n
bk<\/p>\n
311,11 zoos KAR 4265 (SC)<\/p>\n
alienation eondition, as recorded by the <\/p>\n
Commissioner and the Deputy  <\/p>\n
concurrently and in the  of the"= 'V 'V<\/p>\n
C}u11taiah's case supra over\ufb01\ufb02irgge .. :t1ie.    V1;"3e11:.:},1<\/p>\n
opinion in Cmkkaku\ufb02egoti\u00e9afs ease tstzpiefgi;  HQ;*ders~. V "<\/p>\n
impugned are u11sust_ai11ab1e,_L: *<\/p>\n
4. In the result,   allowed. The<\/p>\n
orders    to a \ufb01nding<\/p>\n
that i\u00e9ulet:  empower the authorities to<\/p>\n
impose” 2; “rest;<'iC1':i.'Qn:_"' iiiiexzation while making the<\/p>\n
gra1jt~ eabsomteg    quashed. The petitioner's<\/p>\n
'V " re\ufb01resc:"?:3ts;tiQ11 is allowed. The sale transaction in<\/p>\n
  fsvg m~-T\u00a7:1\u00a3V'\\V_}\u00a7e's@ndents 3 and 4 are declared null and<\/p>\n
void, the Ez\u00e9iids in question are directed to be resumed to<\/p>\n
   the State and restored to the legal heirs of the g'ax1tees.<\/p>\n
    Sd\/…\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Chikka Lagumaiah vs The Dy Commr on 20 August, 2008 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy IN THE HIGPI COURT OF KARNATAKA, DATED THIS THE 20″\u00bb: DAY OF Auauz\u00e9fi’ 2ziQ\u00a2\u00a3 BEFORE’ THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A WRIT PETITION No.263f4\u00bb1 OF 2004 J BETWEEN V’ V’ A’ V’ CHIKKA LAGUMAIAH .. S\/O. LATE CHOQRI KEMP,AIVAH […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-251066","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nChikka Lagumaiah vs The Dy Commr on 20 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chikka Lagumaiah vs The Dy Commr on 20 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-07T05:35:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chikka Lagumaiah vs The Dy Commr on 20 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-07T05:35:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":698,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008\",\"name\":\"Chikka Lagumaiah vs The Dy Commr on 20 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-07T05:35:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chikka Lagumaiah vs The Dy Commr on 20 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chikka Lagumaiah vs The Dy Commr on 20 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chikka Lagumaiah vs The Dy Commr on 20 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-07T05:35:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chikka Lagumaiah vs The Dy Commr on 20 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-07T05:35:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008"},"wordCount":698,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008","name":"Chikka Lagumaiah vs The Dy Commr on 20 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-07T05:35:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikka-lagumaiah-vs-the-dy-commr-on-20-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chikka Lagumaiah vs The Dy Commr on 20 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251066","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=251066"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251066\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=251066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=251066"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=251066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}