{"id":251394,"date":"2009-07-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009"},"modified":"2018-12-18T18:37:27","modified_gmt":"2018-12-18T13:07:27","slug":"pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Pottanki Damu vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Pottanki Damu vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRL.A.No. 2137 of 2008()\n\n\n1. POTTANKI DAMU, AGED 58 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN\n\n Dated :07\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                     M.N. KRISHNAN, J.\n                    ---------------------------\n                    CRL.A.NO.2137 OF 2008\n                    ------------------------------\n               Dated this the 7th day of July, 2009\n\n                           JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">     This is an appeal preferred against the conviction and<\/p>\n<p>sentence passed in S.C.No.57\/2007 of the Additional Sessions<\/p>\n<p>Judge (Adhoc-II), Thalassery. The accused was charge sheeted<\/p>\n<p>for an offence under Section 55(g) of the Abkari Act and was<\/p>\n<p>convicted there under and sentenced to undergo S.I. for one<\/p>\n<p>year and to pay a fine of Rs. One lakh and in default, to<\/p>\n<p>undergo S.I for six months. Set off was allowed under <a href=\"\/doc\/914361\/\" id=\"a_1\">Section<\/p>\n<p>428<\/a> of the Cr.P.C. It is against that decision, the accused has<\/p>\n<p>come up in appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">     2. The points that arise for determination in the appeal<\/p>\n<p>are (1) whether the conviction        under Section 55(g) of the<\/p>\n<p>Abkari Act is sustainable (2) In case of guilt, whether the<\/p>\n<p>punishment awarded is excessive.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">     3. It is the case of the prosecution that on 10.9.2005 at<\/p>\n<p>about 2 p.m, the accused was found in possession of 100 liters<\/p>\n<p>of wash kept in three plastic containers intended for distillation<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">CRL.A.NO.2137\/08                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of illicit arrack and therefore, he was apprehended, sample<\/p>\n<p>was taken, produced before the court, analysed and       found<\/p>\n<p>that it contained percentage of ethyl alcohol.      The person,<\/p>\n<p>who had detected the offence, is examined as PW3 in the case.<\/p>\n<p>It is stated by him that, he was informed that distillation of<\/p>\n<p>arrack was going on in the residential compound of the accused.<\/p>\n<p>They proceeded to the place and saw the accused stirring<\/p>\n<p>something in a nearby plantation and therefore they approached<\/p>\n<p>him. He was found in a sitting position and the officials were<\/p>\n<p>able to see the three plastic cans with its top portion cut off<\/p>\n<p>having earthed in three      nearby pits.    The accused was<\/p>\n<p>interrogated, sample was taken from the contraband wash and<\/p>\n<p>the balance was destroyed.     The sample was produced before<\/p>\n<p>the court on 12.9.2005 and sent for chemical       examination.<\/p>\n<p>The chemical analyst&#8217;s report would reveal that it contained<\/p>\n<p>11.68% by volume of ethyl alcohol.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">       4. Pw2     is  another police     constable,   who had<\/p>\n<p>accompanied PW3. He admitted the presence of the accused<\/p>\n<p>and that the accused was seen stirring something in a vessel<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">CRL.A.NO.2137\/08                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and that wash has been kept in three Cans in three pits. So,<\/p>\n<p>the evidence of Pws 2 and 3 would      reveal that the accused<\/p>\n<p>was found stirring a liquid  and that he was preserving three<\/p>\n<p>Cans of wash in plastic containers and that on detection<\/p>\n<p>sample was taken and sent      for examination and it had been<\/p>\n<p>revealed    that the sample    contained   percentage of     ethyl<\/p>\n<p>alcohol.   The court also had considered      the fact that there<\/p>\n<p>was no much delay in producing the wash before the court as<\/p>\n<p>well. The learned counsel would argue before me that though<\/p>\n<p>it is stated about three plastic Cans, it is not produced before<\/p>\n<p>the court.    The explanation   tendered   by the   officials is to<\/p>\n<p>the effect that it was got damaged on account of the lapse of<\/p>\n<p>time. It has to be stated that the evidence of Pws 2 and 3<\/p>\n<p>established the factum of wash being stirred by the accused.<\/p>\n<p>The sample was taken in a sealed bottle and it was sent for<\/p>\n<p>chemical analysis which revealed that the sample was intact and<\/p>\n<p>it contained the percentage of    volume of ethyl alcohol.     So,<\/p>\n<p>the evidence is quite convincing to hold that the accused was<\/p>\n<p>found in possession of wash for which he       did not have any<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">CRL.A.NO.2137\/08                  4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>proper explanation.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">       5. Therefore, the conviction under Section 55(g) of the<\/p>\n<p>Abkari Act    cannot be    found   fault with and therefore it is<\/p>\n<p>suspended.     So far as the sentence is concerned, the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel    would contend that he is aged more than 58       and<\/p>\n<p>he has a family to be looked after and he is in a very<\/p>\n<p>difficult situation and that is why he was only able to deposit<\/p>\n<p>a sum of Rs.2,000\/=, when this Court ordered to deposit 20%<\/p>\n<p>of the fine.     It has to be stated that he had only deposited<\/p>\n<p>Rs.2,000\/= and that, is undergoing          imprisonment   from<\/p>\n<p>11.3.2009 itself after getting surrendered himself before the<\/p>\n<p>court.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">         6. So, taking into consideration the totality of the<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, I feel, some leniency can be shown with respect<\/p>\n<p>to the sentence. The punishment for the offence under <a href=\"\/doc\/390591\/\" id=\"a_1\">Section<\/p>\n<p>55(g)<\/a> can be six months S.I with a fine of Rs. One lakh and<\/p>\n<p>in default, to undergo imprisonment for one more month.<\/p>\n<p>The penalty amount, which was already deposited by him by<\/p>\n<p>way of fine, shall be credited to the governmental account as<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">CRL.A.NO.2137\/08                 5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>receipt of fine of Rs.2,000\/=.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">      7. In the result,   the criminal appeal is disposed of   as<\/p>\n<p>follows:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">      (1). The finding of guilt under Section 55(g) of the Abkari<\/p>\n<p>Act is confirmed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">      (2) The sentence is modified and the accused is sentenced<\/p>\n<p>to undergo S.I for six months      and to pay a fine of Rs. One<\/p>\n<p>lakh and in default of which,        he shall     undergo further<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment for a period of one month.            The amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.2,000\/= already deposited by him shall be credited to the<\/p>\n<p>governmental account      as part of the fine and that fact also<\/p>\n<p>had been taken into consideration for reducing the default<\/p>\n<p>sentence.     If the accused is already in jail, he shall undergo<\/p>\n<p>the sentence otherwise, the lower court shall execute the<\/p>\n<p>sentence.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">                                      M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>cl<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_4\">CRL.A.NO.2137\/08    6<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_5\">CRL.A.NO.2137\/08    7<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Pottanki Damu vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRL.A.No. 2137 of 2008() 1. POTTANKI DAMU, AGED 58 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-251394","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Pottanki Damu vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pottanki Damu vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-18T13:07:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Pottanki Damu vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-18T13:07:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":891,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Pottanki Damu vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-18T13:07:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pottanki Damu vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pottanki Damu vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pottanki Damu vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-18T13:07:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Pottanki Damu vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-18T13:07:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009"},"wordCount":891,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009","name":"Pottanki Damu vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-18T13:07:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pottanki-damu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pottanki Damu vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251394","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=251394"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251394\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=251394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=251394"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=251394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}