{"id":251470,"date":"2008-07-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008"},"modified":"2019-02-25T23:16:27","modified_gmt":"2019-02-25T17:46:27","slug":"shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale vs Central Railway on 31 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale vs Central Railway on 31 July, 2008<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">                        Central Information Commission\n                                      *****\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">                                                             No.CIC\/OK\/A\/2008\/00115<\/p>\n<p>                                                                  Dated: 31 July 2008<\/p>\n<p>Name of the Appellant                :     Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale<br \/>\n                                           R\/o 20, Santaji Nagar, Behind Sudhir<br \/>\n                                           Colony, Akola, AT. PO. Tq. Distt. Akola<br \/>\n                                           Maharashtra, 444001<\/p>\n<p>Name of the Public Authority         :     Central Railway<\/p>\n<p>Background:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">      Shri S.D. Navthale of Akola filed an RTI-application with the Public<br \/>\nInformation Officer, Central Railway, Bhusawal, on 27 April 2007, wherein he sought<br \/>\na certificate confirming the status of reservation of waitlisted berths in 1040<br \/>\nMaharashtra Express for 26 October 2006, etc.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">2.    The PIO vide his letter dated 15 June 2007 replied to his RTI-application. Not<br \/>\nsatisfied with the reply of the PIO, the Appellant filed an appeal with the first<br \/>\nAppellate Authority on 8 July 2007 who vide his letter dated 13 July 2007 replied to<br \/>\nhis First Appeal.   Thereafter, the Appellant approached the Central Information<br \/>\nCommission with a Second Appeal on 12 December 2007.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">3.    The Bench of Dr. O.P. Kejariwal, Information Commissioner, heard the matter<br \/>\non 18 July 2008.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">4.    Shri R.D. Meena, ADRM &amp; Appellate Authority and Shri G. Yawalkar,<br \/>\nrepresented the Respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">5.    The Appellant, Shri S.D. Navthale, was present in person.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">6.    The Commission heard both the sides and noted that the Applicant had filed<br \/>\nan RTI-application of 27 April 2007 to which the reply was given on 10 May 2007.<br \/>\nHere the confusion arose because the Applicant had gone by the RTI-rules of the<br \/>\nState of Maharashtra, which allowed the RTI-fee to be paid through a Court fee<br \/>\nstamp of Rs.10\/-. However, when this application reached the PIO of the Central<br \/>\nRailway, he acted according to the RTI-Act as prevalent at the Centre and which<br \/>\nshould be considered as prevalent everywhere else. According to him, the court fee<br \/>\n was not acceptable and hence he asked the Appellant to pay Rs.14\/-, that is,<br \/>\nRs.10\/- towards the RTI-application and Rs.4\/- towards the cost of photocopies of<br \/>\nthe documents containing the information. This fee was paid by the Appellant and<br \/>\nthe information supplied.     By this time, however, six months had passed and,<br \/>\naccording to the Respondents, since they were required to retain this information<br \/>\nonly for six months as per the standing rules\/guidelines of their Department, they<br \/>\nhad destroyed this information.     After this period of six months, some skeleton<br \/>\ninformation regarding reservations and tickets were available in soft copy, a copy of<br \/>\nwhich also was supplied to the Applicant.         Obviously, this was taken by the<br \/>\nCommission as a satisfactory response. However, during the hearing, the Appellant<br \/>\ncame up with the fact that the information which was required by him related to<br \/>\nthe reservations of Railway tickets from Akola and, therefore, the RTI-application<br \/>\nshould have been received at Akola. However, as per the statements of both, the<br \/>\nAppellant as well as the Respondents, there is no Information Officer in over 100<br \/>\nStations between Akola and Bhusawal. The next PIO is available only at Bhusawal<br \/>\nwhich is the Divisional Headquarters. During the hearing, the Respondents stated<br \/>\nthat this was the usual practice of the Railways. Even if we consider this to be the<br \/>\nfact, the Department was required to guide an RTI-applicant at Akola as to where<br \/>\nthe application should have been filed.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">7.    While the Commission, therefore, accepts the submission of the Respondents<br \/>\nthat after six months much of the information asked for by the Appellant had been<br \/>\nweeded out because of the standing rules prevalent in the Department regarding<br \/>\nretention of records, it understands the harassment that the Applicant had to go<br \/>\nthrough in absence of a PIO stationed in the office of the public authority and not<br \/>\neven being told as to where he could file the RTI-application.           As such, the<br \/>\nCommission awards a compensation of Rs.5,000\/- to the Appellant for the mental<br \/>\nharassment that he has undergone. This may be paid to the Appellant by 29 August<br \/>\n2008. In addition, it directs the Respondents to take care of the appointment of<br \/>\nPIOs and Appellate Authorities as per the letter and spirit of the RTI-Act.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">8.    The Commission ordered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">                                                                                  Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">                                                                      (O.P. Kejariwal)<br \/>\n                                                            Information Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated true copy:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">(G. Subramanian)<br \/>\nAssistant Registrar<br \/>\n Cc:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>      1.   Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale, S\/o Shri Dagaduji Navthale, R\/o 20, Santaji<br \/>\n           Nagar, Behind Sudhir Colony, Akola, AT. PO. Tq. Distt. Akola, Maharashtra,<br \/>\n           444001<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_1\"><p>      2.   The Public Information Officer, Central Railway, Divisional Railway Manager&#8217;s<br \/>\n           Office, Commercial Branch, Bhusawal Division, Bhusawal-425201<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_2\"><p>      3.   The Appellate Authority, Central Railway, Divisional Railway Manager&#8217;s Office,<br \/>\n           Commercial Branch, Bhusawal Division, Bhusawal-425201<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_3\"><p>      4.   Officer Incharge, NIC<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote id=\"blockquote_4\"><p>      5.   Press E Group, CIC\n <\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale vs Central Railway on 31 July, 2008 Central Information Commission ***** No.CIC\/OK\/A\/2008\/00115 Dated: 31 July 2008 Name of the Appellant : Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale R\/o 20, Santaji Nagar, Behind Sudhir Colony, Akola, AT. PO. Tq. Distt. Akola Maharashtra, 444001 Name of the Public Authority : Central Railway [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-251470","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale vs Central Railway on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale vs Central Railway on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-25T17:46:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale vs Central Railway on 31 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-25T17:46:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":743,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale vs Central Railway on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-25T17:46:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale vs Central Railway on 31 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale vs Central Railway on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale vs Central Railway on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-25T17:46:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale vs Central Railway on 31 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-25T17:46:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008"},"wordCount":743,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008","name":"Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale vs Central Railway on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-25T17:46:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shriram-dagaduji-navthale-vs-central-railway-on-31-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Shriram Dagaduji Navthale vs Central Railway on 31 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251470","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=251470"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251470\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=251470"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=251470"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=251470"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}