{"id":251700,"date":"2002-08-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2002-07-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002"},"modified":"2018-07-10T22:52:10","modified_gmt":"2018-07-10T17:22:10","slug":"wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002","title":{"rendered":"Wheels World vs Pradeep Kumar Khurana on 1 August, 2002"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">National Consumer Disputes Redressal<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Wheels World vs Pradeep Kumar Khurana on 1 August, 2002<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: I (2008) CPJ 324 NC<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: D W Member, R Rao, B Taimni<\/div>\n<p id=\"p_1\">ORDER<\/p>\n<p>D.P. Wadhwa, J. (President)  <\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">1.<br \/>\nOpposite Party is the petitioner in the revision petition and appellant in<br \/>\nthe appeal. Revision petition arises out of the proceedings under <a href=\"\/doc\/1098723\/\" id=\"a_1\">Section 25<\/a> and <a href=\"\/doc\/1763766\/\" id=\"a_1\">27<\/a> of the Consumer Protection Act initiated by the respondent-complainant. These proceedings under <a href=\"\/doc\/1098723\/\" id=\"a_2\">Section 25<\/a> and <a href=\"\/doc\/1763766\/\" id=\"a_3\">27<\/a> were initiated as the petitioner failed to comply with the order dated 18.11.96 of the Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission whereby complaint of the petitioner was allowed. Respondent had complained about deficiency in service on the part of the petitioner in not repairing his new Montana Car and then not delivering the same for a period of 4 years. Respondent had purchased the Montana car on 22.3.98 from the petitioner. On 2.7.88 while the car was being taken for second free service its differential cage had broken and the car had to be towed to the workshop. While the petitioner contended that the differential cage had broken on account of accident, the respondent&#8217;s case was that it was on account of technical fault. Petitioner wanted the respondent to have insurance claim. But the surveyor appointed by the Insurance Company was of the view that it was not because of accident and differential cage had broken on account of manufacturing defect. However, petitioner raised a bill of Rs. 16,000\/- which the respondent refused to pay as according to him damage occurred during the warranty period.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">2.<br \/>\nOn 4.4.91 respondent filed complaint before the State Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">During the pendency of the complaint car was delivered to the respondent on 7.5.92<br \/>\nwithout charging any amount. Respondent alleged gross deficiency in service. He said he<br \/>\nwas a medical practitioner and suffered his profession on account of being deprived of the<br \/>\ncar for all this period. State Commission allowed the complaint and rejected various<br \/>\npreliminary objections raised by the petitioner-opposite party. State Commission ordered<br \/>\nthat petitioner shall pay Rs. 30,000\/- as compensation with interest @ 18% per annum<br \/>\nfrom 2.7.88 to 7.5.92. State Commission also directed further interest at this very rate<br \/>\non the amount of Rs. 82,000\/- being price of the car for the same period. A sum of<br \/>\nRs. 3,000\/- was awarded as costs.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">3.<br \/>\nPetitioner did not file any appeal against this order. When the revision<br \/>\npetition was taken up it was pointed out to the counsel for the petitioner that since the<br \/>\norder of the State Commission had become final it had to be complied. There upon this<br \/>\nappeal was filed on 2.4.2002. Along with this, an application for condonation of delay<br \/>\nwas also filed. It was submitted that copy of the order of the State Commission was not<br \/>\nreceived by the petitioner, therefore, it could not file appeal. However, record shows that<br \/>\nthe petitioner had been contesting the complaint and was aware of the order of the State<br \/>\nCommission. In any case it became aware of the order on 17.4.97 when the State<br \/>\nCommission passed order under <a href=\"\/doc\/1763766\/\" id=\"a_4\">Section 27<\/a> of the Act and against that order petitioner<br \/>\nfiled revision petition before this Commission on 28.4.97. Along with the grounds of<br \/>\nappeal, certified copy of the order dated 18.11.96 of the State Commission was filed<br \/>\nwhich shows that petitioner applied for copy of the order on 18.10.2001 and it was<br \/>\nready on 31.10.2001. However, delivery was taken on 21.11.2001. Index of the<br \/>\ngrounds of appeal shows that the appeal was prepared on 3.12.2001 and it came be to<br \/>\nfiled on 2.4.2002. It, therefore, surprise us as to how petitioner\/appellant could allege<br \/>\nthat it had no knowledge of the order of the State Commission on the complaint filed by<br \/>\nthe respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">4. We find no ground whatsoever to condone the delay in filing appeal. In<br \/>\nfact it appears that he petitioner has come up with a make up story of not having<br \/>\nreceived the copy of the order of the State Commission to get the delay condoned.<br \/>\nOtherwise, circumstances point to the fact that appellant was negligent in filing the appeal.<br \/>\nWe find no sufficient grounds made in the application for condonation of delay and it is<br \/>\ndismissed, so is the appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">5.<br \/>\nComing to the revision petition when the impugned order had become final<br \/>\nthere cannot be any question to challenge the same in proceedings under <a href=\"\/doc\/1763766\/\" id=\"a_5\">Section 27<\/a> of<br \/>\nthe Act. When the revision petition came up before us for the first time on 29.4.1997<br \/>\nwe ordered stay of imprisonment on depositing a sum of Rs. 50,000\/- within three weeks<br \/>\nfrom date of the order. This amount shall be payable to the respondent. The revision<br \/>\npetition is dismissed. We however, grant four weeks time to comply with the order<br \/>\ndated 18.11.96 of the State Commission. Respondent complainant shall be entitled to<br \/>\ncost both in revision and appeal which we assess at Rs. 2500\/-.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>National Consumer Disputes Redressal Wheels World vs Pradeep Kumar Khurana on 1 August, 2002 Equivalent citations: I (2008) CPJ 324 NC Bench: D W Member, R Rao, B Taimni ORDER D.P. Wadhwa, J. (President) 1. Opposite Party is the petitioner in the revision petition and appellant in the appeal. Revision petition arises out of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-251700","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Wheels World vs Pradeep Kumar Khurana on 1 August, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Wheels World vs Pradeep Kumar Khurana on 1 August, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2002-07-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-10T17:22:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Wheels World vs Pradeep Kumar Khurana on 1 August, 2002\",\"datePublished\":\"2002-07-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-10T17:22:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002\"},\"wordCount\":796,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002\",\"name\":\"Wheels World vs Pradeep Kumar Khurana on 1 August, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2002-07-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-10T17:22:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Wheels World vs Pradeep Kumar Khurana on 1 August, 2002\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Wheels World vs Pradeep Kumar Khurana on 1 August, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Wheels World vs Pradeep Kumar Khurana on 1 August, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2002-07-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-10T17:22:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Wheels World vs Pradeep Kumar Khurana on 1 August, 2002","datePublished":"2002-07-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-10T17:22:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002"},"wordCount":796,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002","name":"Wheels World vs Pradeep Kumar Khurana on 1 August, 2002 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2002-07-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-10T17:22:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wheels-world-vs-pradeep-kumar-khurana-on-1-august-2002#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Wheels World vs Pradeep Kumar Khurana on 1 August, 2002"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251700","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=251700"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251700\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=251700"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=251700"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=251700"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}