{"id":251912,"date":"2010-08-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010"},"modified":"2014-04-06T04:45:28","modified_gmt":"2014-04-05T23:15:28","slug":"the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"The Superintendent Of Post &#8230; vs P.M.Padmanabhan on 16 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Superintendent Of Post &#8230; vs P.M.Padmanabhan on 16 August, 2010<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 24393 of 2010(S)\n\n\n1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. POST MASTER GENERAL, NORTHERN REGION,\n3. DEPARTMENT PROMOTION COMMITTEES,\n4. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. P.M.PADMANABHAN, S\/O THE LATE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. N.K.BALACHANDRAN, POSTMAN,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.O.V.RADHAKRISHNAN (SR.)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :16\/08\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                  THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN\n                                         &amp;\n                    S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JJ.\n                      -------------------------------------------\n                    W.P(C).No.24393 OF 2010\n                      -------------------------------------------\n                Dated this the 16th day of August, 2010\n\n\n                              JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">\n<p id=\"p_2\">1.We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the<\/p>\n<p>  learned senior counsel appearing for the first respondent, who<\/p>\n<p>  was the applicant before the Tribunal in O.A.349\/09, from<\/p>\n<p>  which, this writ petition arises. We also record the appearance<\/p>\n<p>  of Adv.T.C.Govindaswamy on behalf of the second respondent.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">2.The writ petitioners (establishment) is aggrieved by order<\/p>\n<p>  dated 26.7.2010 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, which,<\/p>\n<p>  essentially, is an interim order directing the establishment to<\/p>\n<p>  pass    appropriate       orders         promoting            the applicant<\/p>\n<p>  (Padmanabhan), first respondent herein, with effect from 2005<\/p>\n<p>  and to report such matter to the Tribunal. Today, we are also<\/p>\n<p>  shown by the learned counsel appearing for Padmanabhan that<\/p>\n<p>WPC.24393\/10.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\"><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                                 2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>  the Tribunal had passed yet another order subsequently on<\/p>\n<p>  4.8.2010 essentially reiterating the earlier stand.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">3.Padmanabhan had agitated a claim that he is eligible for being<\/p>\n<p>  considered for promotion. That issue was subject matter of<\/p>\n<p>  O.A.704\/06, which was disposed of by the Tribunal.          The<\/p>\n<p>  establishment filed a review petition against that decision.<\/p>\n<p>  That was also decided against the establishment. The matter<\/p>\n<p>  came to this Court. The Division Bench affirmed the decision<\/p>\n<p>  of the Tribunal, thereby the establishment stood obliged to<\/p>\n<p>  consider the case of Padmanabhan for promotion. Ultimately,<\/p>\n<p>  Padmanabhan      moved     the   Tribunal   alleging  that  the<\/p>\n<p>  establishment has courted contempt by disobeying the<\/p>\n<p>  directions. The establishment filed a counter affidavit. On the<\/p>\n<p>  basis of those materials, the Tribunal disposed of the contempt<\/p>\n<p>  application holding that no contempt is made out.        It was<\/p>\n<p>  specifically within the knowledge of the Tribunal at that point<\/p>\n<p>  of time that N.K.Balachandran, second respondent herein, had<\/p>\n<p>  been appointed in preference to the applicant Padmanabhan.<\/p>\n<p>WPC.24393\/10.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\"><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_1\">                                 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">4.We are clear in our mind that the closure of the contempt<\/p>\n<p>  proceedings does not deprive Padmanabhan of his right to sue,<\/p>\n<p>  if any, as against the appointment of Balachandran. He filed<\/p>\n<p>  O.A.349\/09 from which this writ petition arises.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">5.It is submitted by the learned senior counsel appearing for<\/p>\n<p>  Padmanabhan       as   also  the   learned   counsel   for   the<\/p>\n<p>  establishment that the parties had placed before the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>  elaborate pleadings finalising their stand. It appears that the<\/p>\n<p>  establishment was sticking on to the statutory rules while the<\/p>\n<p>  applicant Padmanabhan tries to get the benefit of the earlier<\/p>\n<p>  judgment in O.A.704\/06. We are clear in our mind that in such<\/p>\n<p>  a situation, the issue before the tribunal was as to whether the<\/p>\n<p>  establishment was justified in preferring Balachandran over<\/p>\n<p>  Padmanabhan for being appointed as against the vacancy in<\/p>\n<p>  question. We are also told that the tribunal could have also<\/p>\n<p>  considered whether both Padmanabhan and Balachandran<\/p>\n<p>  could have been accommodated in the same category having<\/p>\n<p>WPC.24393\/10.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\"><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_2\">                                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>  regard to the availability of vacancies, subject to the rules and<\/p>\n<p>  the decisions binding inter partis.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">\n<p id=\"p_11\">6.In the aforesaid context, we are clear that the impugned order<\/p>\n<p>  dated 26.7.2010 of the tribunal and the subsequent order<\/p>\n<p>  issued on 4.8.2010, on which day, we had admitted this writ<\/p>\n<p>  petition, would not stand in the way of the tribunal deciding<\/p>\n<p>  the matter finally on merits.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\">\n<p id=\"p_13\">7.For the aforesaid reasons, we set aside the impugned order<\/p>\n<p>  Ext.P7 dated 26.7.2010. As a consequence, the tribunal will<\/p>\n<p>  treat its order dated 4.8.2010 as one that does not stand. It<\/p>\n<p>  would accordingly proceed to hear parties and dispose of the<\/p>\n<p>  matter on merits finally, the fundamental issue being the inter-<\/p>\n<p>  se dispute between Padmanabhan and Balachandran to<\/p>\n<p>  preferential treatment for appointment against the post. We<\/p>\n<p>  clarify that this judgment does no,t in any manner, answer any<\/p>\n<p>  of the contentions on merits and all issues are left open for the<\/p>\n<p>  tribunal to decide. Having regard to the nature of the case,<\/p>\n<p>WPC.24393\/10.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\"><span class=\"hidden_text\" id=\"span_3\">                             5<\/span><\/p>\n<p> the tribunal will make an endeavour to dispose of the matter<\/p>\n<p> expeditiously.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\">\n<p id=\"p_16\">                                        Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_17\">                       THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,<br \/>\n                                       Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_18\">\n                                         Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_19\">                            S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN,<br \/>\n                                        Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_20\">kkb.19\/08.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court The Superintendent Of Post &#8230; vs P.M.Padmanabhan on 16 August, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 24393 of 2010(S) 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICES, &#8230; Petitioner 2. POST MASTER GENERAL, NORTHERN REGION, 3. DEPARTMENT PROMOTION COMMITTEES, 4. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, Vs 1. P.M.PADMANABHAN, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-251912","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Superintendent Of Post ... vs P.M.Padmanabhan on 16 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Superintendent Of Post ... vs P.M.Padmanabhan on 16 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-05T23:15:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Superintendent Of Post &#8230; vs P.M.Padmanabhan on 16 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-05T23:15:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":649,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010\",\"name\":\"The Superintendent Of Post ... vs P.M.Padmanabhan on 16 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-05T23:15:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Superintendent Of Post &#8230; vs P.M.Padmanabhan on 16 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Superintendent Of Post ... vs P.M.Padmanabhan on 16 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Superintendent Of Post ... vs P.M.Padmanabhan on 16 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-05T23:15:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Superintendent Of Post &#8230; vs P.M.Padmanabhan on 16 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-05T23:15:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010"},"wordCount":649,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010","name":"The Superintendent Of Post ... vs P.M.Padmanabhan on 16 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-05T23:15:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-superintendent-of-post-vs-p-m-padmanabhan-on-16-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Superintendent Of Post &#8230; vs P.M.Padmanabhan on 16 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251912","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=251912"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251912\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=251912"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=251912"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=251912"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}