{"id":252043,"date":"2008-06-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008"},"modified":"2014-03-03T22:22:40","modified_gmt":"2014-03-03T16:52:40","slug":"mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mr Apurv Kumar Mishra vs National Law School Of India on 30 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mr Apurv Kumar Mishra vs National Law School Of India on 30 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
 E\n\nWP 8058\/06\n\n111 was more com': or rmmmmxa AT BANGALORE\" \nDA1'ED 11:13 THE 30114 my or JUNE, 20% 2' 'f ~ : \"[j  \nsarong T 4' V .'\nwas Hormm MRJU8TI\u00a2_E..3.\u00a7.PAj'ft\u00a3 \" ~ if     \" '*\n\n \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nMr. APURV KUMAR MISI-IRA,  *\ns\/0 SR1 ANANBEE NATH MISHRA,  '\nAGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, '  \nR\/AT NOB-\u00ab20,\n\nINCOME TAX COLONY, ..\nmama ROAD,   ..\now; usna KIRAN A\u00a7'ARTMENT,\nNEAR JASLOK I-Iospm.-1., . \u00ab 1  '-\nMUMBAI - 400 925';  ..  '   '    H\u00bb  PETITIQNER\n\n{BY sm M.ASHWAT:FIA:\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7RA\u00a5AN;\u00a7\"RE\u00a7DY,\u00a7ADV.}\nAND: '  V \"\n\n1. NAT:0r~zALLAw SCHOOL 022%.\u00bb? '\n11~zmA UNIVB'\u00a3RSi'I'Y, ._ A . \nNAGARA8HAV1,._ = = -\nBANGALORE -- 56C~Q7_'2, _\n\n'V \"  .REPRES3EN'I\"ED BY \n .R'EG:s'rRA.r<-mam CHANCELLOR.\n\n2. 'THE__COfWE,NO.R,\ncommon: LAW .ADMISS\u00a7ON\nTEST (C1_m7,20oa,\n\n3 NAT1o\u00a5.\u00a7mL LAW SCHOOL OF'\n\n"-INDIA UNIVERSITY,\n\n' ,,NAGA.RABHAw,\n= ::w\u00a7<3ALo\u00a7eE ~-- 560 072.  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
  \u00a39:\/s. HOLLA 85 HOLLA, ADVS.}<\/p>\n
THIS FETTTEON IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE<\/p>\n
‘  ‘ ~  (\u00a7ONS’I’ITU’I’ION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY R2<\/p>\n
DT. 5.6.2008 VEDE ANNEXU, AND ETC.\n<\/p>\n
\n
WP 8058 \/08
\n3<\/span><\/p>\n
in the newspaper is produced at Am1exure~E. Pursuant to the<\/p>\n
said paper advertisement, the pefaltioner agaplieci for <\/p>\n
showing his first preference for the 1″ ICSpOI1dCI1t’p\u00a7\u00a7i:iOQ$aI’V34\u00a7#$07.<\/p>\n
School of India University, Nagarabhavi,   <\/p>\n
has alse written letters addressedilhito   * <\/p>\n
National Law School of India U1;1iversify’–,  <\/p>\n
no.1} stating that although he Wstsjever   e\ufb01eceeded V’<\/p>\n
the age limit of 20 by  10″‘de.ys as on<\/p>\n
01.07.2003, he was mm 1.; 1;ai;ee:e  2003 under the<\/p>\n
l\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01matc    Cha\ufb02ce\ufb02or had
\naddmssed__M_aV   as per Annexuze-C,
\n    that the petitioner could not<\/p>\n
secure a sea’: j’13;et110″px%:ifio\u00a7:1.s–.eei:Jan2ix:ation held in the year 2007<\/p>\n
V and  for  academic year, hopefully a common<\/p>\n
   all the law schools would be held and the<\/p>\n
 his ambition at that time. Peti\ufb01oner<\/p>\n
V V’ fu1t11e:%_a,sg:?ex’t.Vs.:’~’tI:1at based on the guidance and assurance given<\/p>\n
” ” ‘T the a{1’tt\u00a7exities, he made critical career choices and decided<\/p>\n
\u00ab  i1e.it”t0  for engineering admiss\ufb01tm. and instead prepared<\/p>\n
  Vfqrlfaw admission.\n<\/p>\n
\n
WP 8058 :08
\n5<\/span><\/p>\n
that the respondents would consider the petitioner’s application<\/p>\n
for admission to Rajiv Gandhi National University” <\/p>\n
Patiala; and Chanakya Nationai Law Unive;fsi’t3?;<\/p>\n
Aggzieved by this communieatzien, the pzesent    <\/p>\n
\ufb01led .\n<\/p>\n
5. Learned Counsel for the petit:io1:terA  <\/p>\n
Redd]; submits that having aocepteei~.the <\/p>\n
by the petitioner wherein date’6t”‘t:i;t;ti’zz9fas c}te\u00e9\u00a3t*1y”V1V:nez1tio11ed
\nas 21.05.1933 and having  the CLAT Test
\nconducted     Vprovisional admission
\nletter date\u00a3i”\u20ac)2e;\u00a7):\u20acv_.V2(‘\u00a7t}8′, “es netbjz\ufb02aen for the respondents to
\ncaucei   that his age exceeds the<\/p>\n
permissible  _tjIe–.  states that the Iespondents were<\/p>\n
   such stand and that the doctrine of<\/p>\n
.V’]egittinate’v.eex;\u00a7eeitat:ion applies to the facts of the case. He has<\/p>\n
next.   the petitioner has not suppressed his age,<\/p>\n
 . en the  try he had written letters explam 111′ g several<\/p>\n
 ‘ eeiz’e11’1n.stances and making 3. request to issue admission in<\/p>\n
  enable him to appear for the CLAT though he was not<\/p>\n
” the age limit of 20 years as on the cut-o\ufb01” date.<\/p>\n
 “Thezefore, he contends that for no fault on the pan of the<\/p>\n
WP 8058 \/08
\n6<\/span><\/p>\n
petitioner, the admission gven to him is cancelled. His next
\ncontention is that the fixation of lower age limit at 20 years is
\narbitrary, as there is no rational nexus with the object sought to<\/p>\n
be achieved. It is lastly contended that the age limit<\/p>\n
in the paper advertisement and also in the informs-iion  ‘
\nis without authority of law, as them ~is.__I;o  u l
\nwhich clothes the respondents with si’:ch\u00a7;{i*pow’lV er <\/p>\n
limit. In other words, he coiiieiacls  it;  Aii\u00e9ghvsence off<\/p>\n
statutory rule or regulation, the ..i_ixaiion.’of\u00ab   of 20<\/p>\n
years as    arlmissioiillllis illegal. He has
\nplaced     by this Court in the
\ncase of \ufb01fsllqry  -‘Ltd. Vs. state of Kamataka<\/p>\n
_ 5.  msponaa\ufb01tsl haize \ufb01led their statement of objections.<\/p>\n
 ‘v.TIfie3′.hsa*e  that as the petitioner was above the age of<\/p>\n
 Ox1u’.vI_l7.2008, he was not eligible for admission to<\/p>\n
  \ufb02ag 15*”‘\u00abres1;oix.:lc:it-University. It is further contended that right
\n Ville” 1987 upto 2007, the 1′” respondent-University<\/p>\n
  conducting the entrance test for admission to its
\n.   However after the establishxxient of law schools in<\/p>\n
   \u00e9li\ufb01ezent places in the countxy, which are run on the same lines<\/p>\n
Vs<\/p>\n
we sossxos
\n8<\/span><\/p>\n
admitted. Thus it is contended that as the petitioner would
\ncross the age of 20 years as on 01.0′?.2008, he was not eligible<\/p>\n
for admissixm to the 1″ respondent-University. I-Io\\x;’eiv:ez:_”dit is<\/p>\n
urged that the petitioner is eligiiole for admissiou’_to.’e1i\u00a7\u20ac:’  <\/p>\n
other Universities] Co\ufb02eges if he \ufb01zlengother ~. <\/p>\n
It is the further stand of the reepo;J.de1}t~LIm;yfeteit$?..that’due <\/p>\n
computer error, pe\ufb01tionefs name-was e”i3,o\ufb01;n i.;;1e3t1:ieAg1trvis;;ioi1a1″‘e.<\/p>\n
admission letters and hence be   ‘thelviiiatewiew.<\/p>\n
When the mistake:’w_’as inhotvir;-ed 3 xrdespondent, they
\ninformed the  w_a:~ij notie\ufb02ltdgible as he did not
\nful\ufb01ll theVvc:jtefiax”  ,\u00e9pIescn’bed. The demand<\/p>\n
dra\ufb02  pe\ufb01tionernfae also returned.\n<\/p>\n
7. Counselfor  Ie\ufb01ioiidents Sri Ho\ufb01a contends that the<\/p>\n
 ‘~”.2?%d   meeely an agency which conducts the<\/p>\n
.V’e:1″trei1.ee   the actual admission to each of the<\/p>\n
 would be made by the respective<\/p>\n
‘n.11iverei!:ie’s.:.iti xaccondance with their admission procedures and
\n  veeqt\ufb01rements. He further urges that the OLA’? was
\nV  as a consequence of the proceedings before the Apex
\nT  for mitigating the hardship, both physical and \ufb01nancial to<\/p>\n
‘4 3%: candidates due to multipie admission tests being conducted<\/p>\n
w? 8058 (08
\n9<\/span><\/p>\n
for di\ufb01ezent law schools in eii\ufb02erent places. He submits that
\n\ufb01xation of age limit of 20 yeazs is made by \ufb02aming regulations
\nin exercise of the power conferred under Section 13.: the<\/p>\n
National Law School sf india Act (Karnataka Act (g%2″‘– <\/p>\n
(‘Act’, for short). Learned Counsel has made  it   <\/p>\n
Ceurt the relevant regulations alongg,\\i?it}i1<   0-fr <\/p>\n
Academic Council, Executive CounciIiA\u00a73;1\u00a2i–_t}:ie  <\/p>\n
Based on the approval given  Ge1:er\u00a2s1.._  the"<\/p>\n
eligibility criteria for gdmissieniitoitile\u00bb.il';res\u00a7ie1ident~Universit\u00a7',
\nregulations     including the
\n\ufb01xation sf  submits that the
\ncontentiezis  stating that the age limit<\/p>\n
prescribed  liWitl:o1itiA's:itl:._srity of law, is baseless. He has<\/p>\n
V 33130 ccglitemdedi ti1atithei'1_setitioner having chosen to apply for<\/p>\n
    of the advertisement issued and the<\/p>\n
 'V wherein the age limit of 20 years was<\/p>\n
i  speci\ufb01cally' zne\ufb01tioned, cannot be permitted to challenge the<\/p>\n
i'  ef..thc elig\ufb01aility criteria regarding the age limit at this<\/p>\n
A  %,,'mg'e. Ef\ufb01e further submits that there cannot be any estoppel<\/p>\n
  'against the statute or a statutory rule made and the<\/p>\n
  iiespondents were well Within the right to cermct the mistake<\/p>\n
inadvertently committed in providing admission to the pe\ufb01tioner<\/p>\n
7% .\n<\/p>\n
\n
 -vcc’)nsi1i::\u00a3ati;:i’11 is,-\n<\/p>\n
W? 8058\/w
\n10<\/span><\/p>\n
in the 1″ rcspondent~University which was basically an ermr
\nthat has crept in due to inadvertence and due to computer
\nrelaxed errors. In support of his contentions, he has\ufb01pl\ufb01aocd<\/p>\n
reliance on the folbwing judgmcnts.\n<\/p>\n
xesammuxrs.\n<\/p>\n
cw s.L.sreuau:r & Ora. vs x.1I:m:m\u00a2’f_'” 9   ”   <\/p>\n
my mod Corporation of  *, and rAnr\u00a2_  Kean’ <\/p>\n
Yadav andanr. rqorua;-Hy:   531 —<\/p>\n
\n\n(in; Union qf '\ufb02aky.  my-\u00e9udm singh\nrqao:-mt in 2003.3;  '- :    _\n\n(9)   tI.P.Pub!\u00a3c Services\n\n ~    in 19945) sec 130.\n8. Having     for the paxtics and in\n<\/pre>\n
the light of tl:Vi\u00a2a..ainat\u00a2vi1\u00a3z;u1V9s._v\u00a23:1;.:_’i*ecord, the question that falis for<\/p>\n
~  _ 1-” rmpondent was justified in issuing<\/p>\n
A  ._  informing the petitioner that<\/p>\n
  eiigible to take adrnission in the 15′
\nr\u00e9Sp\u00ab5\u00a7:\u00a2l\u00e9nt~Uru’versity ?\n<\/p>\n
 \u00ab9I ~\u00bb .  petitioner had taken a contention ur\ufb01ng that the<\/p>\n
  of age limit of ‘.20 years as on 1″ July of the year of<\/p>\n
  __4’z\u00a7dInission (2008 in the instant case) wax} made without<\/p>\n
@<\/p>\n
WP 8058\/68
\n16<\/span><\/p>\n
Bangaiore, for the year 2008 and being thus guided and
\nassumd made a critical choice of his career and did not prepare
\nfor engineexing admission and prepared oniy for Law adn\ufb01sssion,<\/p>\n
no such assurance or pmmise is made by the ree\ufb01oniieixts<\/p>\n
tickling out that he would be admitted for the law   <\/p>\n
the yea; 2008. Reliance placed i.’!}”‘”‘i–hC  .iiOi”il.i’.\u00bbtli1e <\/p>\n
consolation letter by the Vice Chanceiioref <\/p>\n
University on 16.06.2007 vide  qaaiiet V L’<\/p>\n
as an assurance or promise  __’AI’hAeirefore the
\npe\ufb01tioner cannot plead estbgiml (>33.  also. The reliance<\/p>\n
placed on the judgment qf”r1iisjjr:\u00a2:u:’t__zegxai~i;\u00a2d'”i;1 Bella:-,y Steel<\/p>\n
and ways  reported in 12.12 zoos<\/p>\n
KAI? 2441   eat ‘the facts of the case.\n<\/p>\n
  _\u00bbFi1r  eforeiizaentimied reasons, the petition being devoicl<\/p>\n
i”Qf’n:1e1its   to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed.<\/p>\n
 ._i?!”Owe\u00a7feijl the pzesent case, it has to be observed that<\/p>\n
  petitioiitieriwae umiecessarily put to hardship, agony and<\/p>\n
  disey\ufb01oinhnent due to the mistake committed by the 1″<\/p>\n
 ___”‘1.*e:s1i;)n.dent in giving him provisional admission and thezea\ufb02ex:<\/p>\n
‘V V  _ ii” him that he was not eligibie for being admitted to the<\/p>\n
15* respondent\u00bb-University. It is on account of this mistake on<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
KKV<\/p>\n
WP 8058\/05
\n17<\/span><\/p>\n
the part of the 1″ mspondem-institution that the petitioner had.
\nto appmach this Court. He has su\ufb01cmd fmancial loss in<\/p>\n
prosecuting this li\ufb01gation. It is 3130 surprising to 11otc.’s*L1i{‘\u00e91t\u00bb_ihVe<\/p>\n
respondents 1 85 2 could commit such glaring  V.
\nhave lead to such. consequences of Hg\u00a2:_1:zem_’i;iiig’ —-  ” ”
\naspirations in the young mind only “\u00a3():\ufb02r\u20acS’:ii}t <\/p>\n
disappointment later. in the:  Ii;   it <\/p>\n
appropriate to award a sum of Rs.  as  pafyabic by
\nthe 19* respondent to the   weeks fmm<\/p>\n
3d\/:3
\nIudg3<\/p>\n
today.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mr Apurv Kumar Mishra vs National Law School Of India on 30 June, 2008 Author: B.S.Patil E WP 8058\/06 111 was more com’: or rmmmmxa AT BANGALORE” DA1’ED 11:13 THE 30114 my or JUNE, 20% 2′ ‘f ~ : “[j sarong T 4′ V .’ was Hormm MRJU8TI\u00a2_E..3.\u00a7.PAj’ft\u00a3 ” ~ if ” […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-252043","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMr Apurv Kumar Mishra vs National Law School Of India on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr Apurv Kumar Mishra vs National Law School Of India on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-03-03T16:52:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr Apurv Kumar Mishra vs National Law School Of India on 30 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-03T16:52:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1470,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Mr Apurv Kumar Mishra vs National Law School Of India on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-03T16:52:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr Apurv Kumar Mishra vs National Law School Of India on 30 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr Apurv Kumar Mishra vs National Law School Of India on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr Apurv Kumar Mishra vs National Law School Of India on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-03-03T16:52:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr Apurv Kumar Mishra vs National Law School Of India on 30 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-03T16:52:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008"},"wordCount":1470,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008","name":"Mr Apurv Kumar Mishra vs National Law School Of India on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-03T16:52:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-apurv-kumar-mishra-vs-national-law-school-of-india-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr Apurv Kumar Mishra vs National Law School Of India on 30 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252043","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252043"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252043\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252043"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252043"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252043"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}