{"id":252068,"date":"2011-09-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2"},"modified":"2016-09-26T08:19:32","modified_gmt":"2016-09-26T02:49:32","slug":"whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2","title":{"rendered":"Whether Reporters Of Local Papers &#8230; vs Mr Mukesh Patel For on 2 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Whether Reporters Of Local Papers &#8230; vs Mr Mukesh Patel For on 2 September, 2011<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S.K.Keshote,<\/div>\n<pre id=\"pre_1\">     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n\n\n\n     SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5395 of 1984\n\n\n\n\n     For Approval and Signature:\n\n\n     Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE\n     ============================================================\n<\/pre>\n<p id=\"p_1\">     1.      Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed<br \/>\n             to see the judgements?\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_1\">     2.      To be referred to the Reporter or not?\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_2\">     3.      Whether Their Lordships    wish to see the fair copy<br \/>\n             of the judgement?\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_3\">     4.      Whether this case involves a substantial question<br \/>\n             of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution<br \/>\n             of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_4\">     5.      Whether   it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_5\">     &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br \/>\n     AB TALAVIA &amp; ORS.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_6\">Versus<br \/>\n     DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL DEFENCE DEPARTMENT\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_7\">     &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br \/>\n     Appearance:\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_8\">          MR DM THAKKAR for Petitioners<br \/>\n          MR MUKESH PATEL for Respondents<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_9\">     &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_10\">     CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE<br \/>\n     Date of decision: 05\/05\/97<\/p>\n<p>C.A.V. JUDGEMENT\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_11\">     1.Heard learned counsel for the parties.        The<br \/>\n     counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner<br \/>\n     No.1 has already left the Government service, and as<br \/>\n     such, his name should be deleted, to which the counsel<br \/>\n     for the respondents has no objection. Order accordingly.<br \/>\n     The name of petitioner No.1 is deleted from this Special<br \/>\n     Civil Application.    The Special Civil Application is<br \/>\n     dismissed so far it relates to the petitioner No.1.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_12\"> 2.The petitioners, Probation Officers in the office<br \/>\nof the Director of Social Defence Department, Gujarat<br \/>\nState, Ahmedabad, filed this Special Civil Application<br \/>\nbefore this Court and challenge has been made to the<br \/>\norder of the respondent No.1 to terminate their services.<br \/>\nThe   petitioners    have challenged the order of the<br \/>\ntermination of their services on the ground that it is<br \/>\nillegal,    arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of<br \/>\nArticles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, and<br \/>\ncontrary to the administrative policy laid down by the<br \/>\nGovernment from time to time. Both the petitioners were<br \/>\nappointed as Probation Officer in the pay-scale of<br \/>\n425-700 under the order dated 12th May, 1977, and they<br \/>\nhave been appointed after selection and have been placed<br \/>\non probation.     As per the recruitment     rules,   the<br \/>\npetitioners    were required to pass the departmental<br \/>\nexamination and examination in Hindi and Gujarati.    The<br \/>\nother conditions have been fulfilled by the petitioners,<br \/>\nbut the condition of the passing of the departmental<br \/>\nexamination as required under the aforesaid rules was not<br \/>\nfulfilled.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_13\">3.Now it is not necessary to give out all the<br \/>\ndetailed facts of the case as it is not in dispute that<br \/>\nthe   petitioner   No.3   has   passed the departmental<br \/>\nexamination later on and his services were regularised.<br \/>\nSo far as the petitioner No.2 is concerned, he has been<br \/>\ngiven one more chance for passing of the departmental<br \/>\nexamination by the department, subject to the approval of<br \/>\nthe State Government.    It is not in dispute between the<br \/>\nparties that the petitioner No.2       has   passed   the<br \/>\nexamination, but his result was not declared as it was<br \/>\nsubject to the approval of the State Government, and the<br \/>\nlatter declined to approve the same. However, the record<br \/>\nof the examination of the petitioner No.2 has been called<br \/>\nand he passed the examination.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_14\">4.The learned counsel for the respondents contended<br \/>\nthat the chance has been given by the department subject<br \/>\nto the approval of the Government, and as such, when the<br \/>\napproval was not granted, the passing of the examination<br \/>\nby the petitioner No.2 is of no consequence and his<br \/>\ntermination order does not call for interference.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_15\">5.I do not find any       justification   in   this<br \/>\ncontention of the counsel for the respondents.        The<br \/>\npetitioner No.2 was appointed, as stated earlier, after<br \/>\nselection and it was a regular appointment. It is not<br \/>\nthe case of temporary appointment or adhoc appointment or<br \/>\na back-door entry. It is true that the appointment of<br \/>\n the   petitioner was subject to the passing of the<br \/>\ndepartmental examination, but when the petitioner No.2<br \/>\nhas already passed the examination, I fail to see any<br \/>\njustification in the action of the respondent-State not<br \/>\nto accord the sanction to the result of the examination.<br \/>\nMoreover, the services of the petitioners were terminated<br \/>\nunder the order dated 17th October, 1984 only on the<br \/>\nground of non-passing of the departmental examination,<br \/>\nthat is after seven      years,   their   services   were<br \/>\nterminated.   The order of termination has been stayed by<br \/>\nthis Court as it transpires from the order of this Court<br \/>\ndated 23rd October, 1984. So the petitioners are working<br \/>\nin the department since 1977 and more than 19 years have<br \/>\nalready passed. In view of this fact, now it will not be<br \/>\nin the interest of justice to ask the petitioner to go to<br \/>\nhome. The departmental examination has to be passed and<br \/>\nthat examination has been passed, may be on a grace<br \/>\nchance given to the petitioner No.2.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_16\">6.Taking into consideration the totality of the<br \/>\nfacts of this case, this writ petition deserves to be<br \/>\naccepted and the same succeeds. The orders annexure `G&#8217;<br \/>\ndated 17th October, 1984 at page Nos.31 and 33 relating<br \/>\nto the termination of the services of the petitioners<br \/>\nNo.2 and 3 are quashed and set aside. Rule is made<br \/>\nabsolute with no order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<p id=\"p_17\"> ***********<\/p>\n<p>zgs\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Whether Reporters Of Local Papers &#8230; vs Mr Mukesh Patel For on 2 September, 2011 Author: S.K.Keshote, IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5395 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon&#8217;ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-252068","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Mr Mukesh Patel For on 2 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Mr Mukesh Patel For on 2 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-26T02:49:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Whether Reporters Of Local Papers &#8230; vs Mr Mukesh Patel For on 2 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-26T02:49:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2\"},\"wordCount\":826,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2\",\"name\":\"Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Mr Mukesh Patel For on 2 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-26T02:49:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Whether Reporters Of Local Papers &#8230; vs Mr Mukesh Patel For on 2 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Mr Mukesh Patel For on 2 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Mr Mukesh Patel For on 2 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-26T02:49:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Whether Reporters Of Local Papers &#8230; vs Mr Mukesh Patel For on 2 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-26T02:49:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2"},"wordCount":826,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2","name":"Whether Reporters Of Local Papers ... vs Mr Mukesh Patel For on 2 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-26T02:49:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/whether-reporters-of-local-papers-vs-mr-mukesh-patel-for-on-2-september-2011-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Whether Reporters Of Local Papers &#8230; vs Mr Mukesh Patel For on 2 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252068","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252068"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252068\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252068"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252068"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252068"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}